This is my church, the one I never quit.
Rev. Pfleger - close friend of Obama and an Obama spiritual advisor since 2004 - brought up white supremacy from the pulpit in his rant against Hillary.
Louis Farrakhan was given a lifetime achievement award from TUCC, and he is a notorious racist.
Rev. James Meeks - close friend of Obama and an Obama spiritual advisor - in a YouTube video entitled "Another one of Obama's Friends - Chicago Reverend Meeks" insulted the white mayor and white governor, calling them slave owners.
Michelle Obama, if she did indeed say whitey... her words would go right along with what has been said at TUCC, who has been awarded by TUCC, and from Obama's friends and advisors.
What say you?
Look, folks, this is real simple: if this wasn't damaging, the Obama campaign would have gotten this out weeks ago. There is something big in this, I'm betting.
|
Of course in the same rumored tape, Michelle starts off with “the White Man has let us down.” Therefore, regardless of whether she’s saying “Whitey” or “why’d he” she’s making a racist statement.
Why keep harping on this when important news is being suppressed? Suzi Quattro is 58.
This spin is getting more and more ludicrous: “There is no tape! Michelle never said anything like that! Such a tape doesn’t exist! But if it does exist, what she really said was...”
Let this whole “Whitey/Michelle” matter drop. There is nothing to it.
If the offending word does indeed appear in the questions as written in the article, why would an educated woman suddenly slip into street talk? I would have to hear it in context to make my own judgement on it. The question would be, what makes more sense in the context of the discussion?
Why’d she say whitey? We know why...
If only she were on tape saying “niggardly.” Then she’d be finished! Wouldn’t she?
If only she were on tape saying “niggardly.” Then she’d be finished! Wouldn’t she?
Even if it is a “Matter Of Enunciation” it shows that Mrs O talks like a ghetto ignoramus. Better she be thought a racists than an Ebonics talking idiot. Nothing says “Im and ghetto/low class illiterate” more than repeated use of double negatives.
If her speech is phrased as a question, then she did in fact say “why’d he”. If it’s phrased as a statement, then she said “whitey”. Pretty simple, really.
Focus? Bofus?
Man, don’t you know she was just speaking Ebonics.
I mean’t to give you an example.
For instance. If you hear a black man say “Ho d do bro” it means that he is probably asking you to hold the elevator for him.
What’s up with why’d he?
Yeah, that almost makes sense.
No tickey, no shirty.
when the actual tape comes out and is posted, then I’ll decide. beyond that. it’ll hypothetical BS. And BS does not get bridges built
PING - Obama’s racist pastor friends
They would rather excuse her as an inarticulate woman, although she was educated in some of this country's finest schools, rather than what she is. She was plenty articulate when she expressed her opinion about this country.
"For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country … not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change,” she said. “I have been desperate to see our country moving in that direction and just not feeling so alone in my frustration and disappointment.”
Obama's Preacher/Wife Problems Mean Nothing to Hussein ObamaMessiaHamas's Fanatical Cult and to Hussein ObamaMessiaHamas. The core/base of their pseudo religion is hating America and Whitey!
As someone posted on another website:
IF this tape exists — and it probably doesn’t — it is likely that it will be clear whether Michelle Obama said “Whitey” or “Why’d he” by considering the next word.
If the next word is “DID” or another word in the past tense, then she was saying “Whitey DID that,” not “Why’d he DID that.”
But if the next word is “DO” or another word in the present tense, then she was saying “Why’d he DO that?”
You can do the same analysis with most other verbs suggested by Obama supporters:
“Why’d he leave” v. “Whitey left”
AND (less clearly)
“Why’d he attack” v. “Whitey attacked”
There shouldn’t be any ambiguity.