Skip to comments.
Superdelegates predict quick primary end
Politico ^
| 6/2/08
| AMIE PARNES & CHARLES MAHTESIAN
Posted on 06/02/2008 8:50:45 PM PDT by Dawnsblood
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Tea in the Harbor
The prospect of nominating Obama seems to evoke a neurotic reaction from the superdelegates.Indeed... Which begs the question, why?
the infowarrior
To: Dawnsblood
It looks like Hillary is going to be President, thanks to Rush Limbaugh.
22
posted on
06/03/2008 3:35:16 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(We have people in power with desire for evil.)
To: Carry_Okie
It looks like Hillary is going to be President, thanks to Rush Limbaugh. So, the Repblican candidate would have no responsibility?
Candidates, not talk show hosts, lose elections.
23
posted on
06/03/2008 3:48:21 AM PDT
by
CharacterCounts
(When you discover rats in your house, you only have two options - fumigate or tolerate.)
To: Carry_Okie
I think you may be right, unfortunately.
My opinion from the git-go was that Operation Chaos would let the PIAPS win the nomination. When you let an enemy survive after having them whipped, you are asking for trouble.
Rush has made a large error and will suffer huge consequences, I’m afraid.
24
posted on
06/03/2008 3:48:30 AM PDT
by
2nd Bn, 11th Mar
(The "P" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
To: LiberConservative
Even if the Hildabeast concedes Wednesday it ain’t gonna be over. Bank on it.
Rubbish.
25
posted on
06/03/2008 3:50:42 AM PDT
by
shaft29
(Just your typical black woman.)
To: Prole
26
posted on
06/03/2008 3:51:17 AM PDT
by
shaft29
(Just your typical black woman.)
To: CharacterCounts
If you will recall, it was Hillary's early crossovers to the Republican race that brought McCain out of the pack, thus ridding the RINOs of the conservatives. That was what gave the Obamanation his early mo. It has very nearly cost her the nomination but you have to give her credit for chutzpah.
Voting for a weak opponent is a morally despicable practice, one that may well cost us dearly.
27
posted on
06/03/2008 4:04:21 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(We have people in power with desire for evil.)
To: Dawnsblood
The Nominatrix thought it would be over in February! Hubris will get you every time, Hilly.
28
posted on
06/03/2008 5:43:32 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: infowarrior
>The prospect of nominating Obama seems to evoke a
>neurotic reaction from the superdelegates.
>>Indeed... Which begs the question, why?
I can venture a guess. Because he has the most liberal voting record in the Senate. Because he's already received the Kerry, Dukakis and McGovern endorsements. Because his ability to think on his feet is startlingly bad. Because the contrast between a veteran of six years in the Hanoi Hilton and a frail, chain-smoking objector who thinks Arabic is the principal language spoken in Afghanistan is too much for independent voters. And yet...he has one striking point in his favor, from their point of view: he's not Hillary.
29
posted on
06/03/2008 12:10:33 PM PDT
by
Tea in the Harbor
(Diplomacy is the art of fishing tranquilly in troubled waters.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson