Is HIV/AIDS a big lie? (Part 2)

Modern Conservative ^ | May 23, 2008 | Clark Baker

[thinkingIsPresuppositional]

Is HIV/AIDS a big lie? (Part 2)

Part 1 here.

Note: Is HIV/AIDS as its commonly held to be, or is there some conspiracy? I don't know. (There certainly are some strong opinions about it over at Free Republic.) As I stated in Part 1, I am willing to allow the question to be asked and debated herein. This debate does not necessarily represent views held by the staff of Modern Conservative, but for right now, the battle continues between Baker and his correspondent...

*******

LOL...Miss Farber, this is what you call "evidence"??? Two lame testimonials, one from an unidentified individual and another guy with an undefined test kit that he seemed unable to properly use?

That's pathetic even for you. So what about David Pasquarelli? You don't think that he got all those opportunistic infections because he did a hit of pot once or something?

Yet you'll go on not only no evidence but information that refutes Duesberg's homophobic hypothesis of "drugs cause AIDS"? If drugs caused AIDS, I'd know a LOT more straight people with PCP, CMV retinitis, etc.

Try some actually (sic) data, as below. But maybe it's simply impossible for you to comprehend.

--Carter

**
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Apr 1;94(1-3):165-71. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

Recreational drug use and T lymphocyte subpopulations in HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected men. Chao C, Jacobson LP, Tashkin D, Martínez-Maza O, Roth MD, Margolick JB, Chmiel JS, Rinaldo C, Zhang ZF, Detels R.

Department of Epidemiology and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA...

[Resolute Conservative]

A 99% preventable disease that morphed into a social policy that has robbed the American public.

[aft_lizard]

This crap topic back? Your original post was bunk as it tried to propose that the HIV virus did not exist at all. I think you are a troll trying to make freepers look bad.