Posted on 05/18/2008 1:59:04 PM PDT by wingsof liberty
Edited on 05/18/2008 2:14:02 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
While celebrating Israels 60th birthday, Bush said anyone who would negotiate with terrorists was naive & foolish. While not mentioned by name, these comments could have been directed against Jimmy Carter, who recently met with Hamas' leadsership. Despite this, Obama (and the majority of the Democratic party) immediately lashed out at his comments as "outrageous & offensive." This reaction clearly illustrated whos side the rats are on. What I dont understand is how "one sided" these reactions always are. Obama & Clinton slam Bush directly on an almost daily basis. Yet when Bush makes even a veiled reference, all hell brakes loose!! Does anyone else see this as somewhat lopsided??
Truth always hurts more than lies, plus truth to a Democrat is like bright sunlight to a vampire.
>>Isreals 60th birthday.
>>leadsership.
>>whos side the rats are on.
>>I dont understand.
>>all hell brakes loose!
Help me. Help me. I’ve fallen into typo-land and I can’t get up.
They are scared stiff of being criticized like this, because they know they are very vulnerable. They are therefore trying to discourage our side from making that criticism.
The other factor is that they think that Kerry got zapped because he didn’t respond, not the real reason: that the criticism was true.
Their, that's weigh bettor.
>>Bush is president while Obama and Hillary are swine. The rules are different.
Agreed. But these asses could be defeated (or at least given a good thrashing) with jawbones. It seems, alas, that our ‘Pubbie friends have none.
weigh s/b whey, dumbass.
hole_n_one, you are too clever by a kwantum amount!
Glad you fixed them brakes.
AAAAH! Get your fellings hurt? did ya? TO BAD!
A short video every American should view.
http://www.frugalsites.net/911/attack/
As someone noted in an earlier thread:
When you throw a rock at a pack of dogs, the one that yelps the loudest is the one that got hit ..."
I'm sorry, what was the question? I got to brakes and stopped reading.
:)
To answer your question, yes it is lopsided. It is typical liberal media bias.
Thanks for the link, and apologies to all for the typos. What steams me is how quickly some Americans either forget 9/11 or claim it was a Governement conspiracy. Anytime 9/11 is mentioned, the rats cry “You are spreading fear & intimidation!!” WHAT?!? More then 3,000 people were slaughtered on 9/11 - why is it fear and intimidation to never forget, or work to make certain it doesnt happen again?
For a comparison, every day 3000 babies are killed in abortion clinics. You bring that up to a liberal and they have basically the same reaction. Truth is, 3000 dead Americans does’t bother them. Criticizing them does bother them. They have very thin skin but no soul.
If that includes video of the twin towers, I’m not watching it. It pains me to see that footage.
Ideological leftists raise "issues" that are not issues. Issues are weapons.
Furthermore the issue is, as I like to say it recalling the 1960s, "Bring it all down, man." Though this is more anarchy than communist, for example.
Your garden variety nut liberals are totally crazed by feelings but manage to copy the same techniques. Thus "all hell brakes loose" regularly. (Followed by quickly moving on to another "issue.")
Name-calling is leftists/liberals preferred issue "debating" technique left over from the 20th century; e.g. screaming "Racist!" "Denier!" is a 21st century enhancement. Not bad.
Attempts at parody is about the only thing I have to avoid saying things, that at a minimum, would get me kicked of FR.
Make fun of the poor bastards.
3 words, Bush/Rice/Palis... Blackbird.
You spelled taht’s wrong. dumy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.