Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The spanking they deserve: NRCC gets an earful (Conservatives BLAST McCain, RINOs, etc.!)
Michelle Malkin.com ^ | 05/16/2008 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 05/16/2008 9:24:13 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

All week long, you and I have been blasting the bereft Beltway GOP leadership for their empty sloganeering and Obama-esque change obsession.

Now, the NRCC is hearing it directly on its website. Reader Fritz e-mails that the comments section in the NRCC blog post by chairman Tom Cole is sizzling hot with aggravated grass-roots conservative feedback.

Go check it out. A sample:

This is not the message I am looking to support. The message of the Replican Part should be fundumentally different than the Democrats. We don’t need to “fix” the government. We need the Federal Government to do wnat it is supposed to - protect our freedom. It should not try to be eveyones “Daddy” Healthcare is not the Federal Governments responsibility. If my new my situation, you might take these comments more seriously. I am not some rich guy who wants to pay less taxes and who can afford to pay for the high prices of healthcare. I just know that government, in general, is inefficiant and wasteful and would like to see less governement programs instead of more.

Posted: Steve Bryant on May 16, 2008 at 12:59 PM

Republicians think the way to Win is to Out “Liberal” the Liberals! McCain will be defeated by his views and disregard of Values. Obama will win. If we put up with Jimmy Carter for 4 years….Let Obama and the Dem’s take all the Credit for DESTRUCTION that will follow.I will either not vote or vote for Ron Paul. NO McCain.

Posted: Greatdanes on May 16, 2008 at 1:07 PM

PLEASE….you are kidding??!! John McCain is the republican candidate for President. So, which LIBERAL should I vote for. Let’s see OBAMA(Marxist), CLINTON(Marxist), MCCAIN(Open border/amnesty liberal). I have changed my party affiliation to independent. I will not vote for anyone who says one thing during the primary and when they think they have the nomination locked up, tell how they truly feel. John McCain “DIDN’T GET IT” after-all.

So if the RNCC is going to support this liberal RINO, then you and are at odds from here on out. No more money, no more support.

Posted: Terry on May 16, 2008 at 1:08 PM

No conservative American gets up in the morning looking for a government handout. They go to work and support their families. I have 2 questions for you. When everyone is collecting who will be paying? Why are we not using the resources for energy here in America that God gave us? STOP BEING RINOS. Either LEAD,FOLLOW, OR GET OUT OF THE WAY.

Posted: Maureen McInerney on May 16, 2008 at 1:15 PM

All you guys have shown us is how to loose. The Republicans had the Congress and the Presidency and you debated flag burning! Where is our energy policy? Why are we burning our food supplies? Where is the debate on “global warming”? I can’t support you, you all need to go.

Posted: 19852 on May 16, 2008 at 1:16 PM

It’s rather evident, the Real Republicans are telling you the GOP, the RINO’s are in charge, they are no better than the libs and their values are not those of conservatives. We want the Republican platform adhered to and the speeches to reflect our values as Republicans, not fence sitting RINO ways.

Real Republicans do not have barb wire rash.

Posted: ONTIME on May 16, 2008 at 1:17 PM

Your message sounds like more big government. I am conservative and want a conservative message. I want to support conservative candidates. The three congressional seats that the democrats just won were won by democrats that had a conservative message. Republicans have lost their way. The party has gone back to the good old boy party of elite country club moderates. That is not the way to win elections or raise money. I will certainly read your e-mails but will not support any candidate that does not espouse a conservtive agenda. I hope the party will adopt that philosophy and then carry through.

Posted: Lynda Shackelford on May 16, 2008 at 1:22 PM

…I’ve got a Republican Solution for you: Tighten the belt or lose the pants. And here’s a Positive Agenda Item for you: I Positively DO NOT need a Nanny and am tired of you thinking that I do.

Here’s a thought: Why don’t you figure out what you stand for? You’re starting to sound like you’re falling for anything. I won’t be following you there.

Posted: Colleen on May 16, 2008 at 1:31 PM

…I’m sorry, but there is no way I can/will contribute until I hear the Republican party taking on the fight against the global warming HOAX, drilling in ANWAR, and absolutely protecting our borders against illeagal immigrants. As an example of what I would like to hear, every Republican senator should have jumped on Dick Durbin’s comment “we can’t drill for lower prices” after the amendment to drill in Anwar was defeated. In the circumstances we find ourselves, that is one of the most stupid comments I have ever heard from any politician. To the best of my knowledge, the laws of supply and demand have not been overturned by the liberal judges…yet.

Just one example of many that could turn the party around.

Posted: Rod on May 16, 2008 at 1:42 PM

I’m a middle-class conservative business owner who is still outraged that the GOP leadership in this country decided to make medications part of the entitlements available for all medicare recipients.

I’ve reached that golden age when I am eligible for medicare myself. A lot of us can and should pay for our own prescriptions. For those that are unable to pay, there is a place for this largesse.

Since the government got in the business, the price of my meds has increased 30% across the board. I live on the Canadian border and have friends and family on both sides of the border. Heaven protect us from the kind of “free” healthcare they must endure.

When has the government ever done anything as cheaply and efficiently as the free market?

I come from 3 generations of straight ticket Democrats. Jimmy Carter was the last time I voted for a democratic candidate.

I doubt I’ll be able to stomach voting for McCain unless he gives me some solid reasons why I should. His “reaching across the aisle” only demonstrates a big lack of judgment.

Celeste Colson May 16,2008 12:51 CDT

Posted: Celeste Colson on May 16, 2008 at 1:45 PM

So let me get this straight - I have a choice between McCain or Hillary or Obama? Did I just say I have a choice? I think I just had a 52 yr-old brain cramp. I do not vote for RINOs. None of these 3 are qualified to run this country. If the Repubs are not different than the Demoncrats then what is the use? We speak with our votes - we vote for someone else. Vote for a spoiler? No, we vote our conscience. If the MSM or the NRCC want to consider them a spoiler - so be it. Get a clue already!. Abandoning conservatism means no money, no support, no vote from me.

Posted: PEPPER on May 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM

***

The LOTUS blog is selling a fitting t-shirt for the times.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; conservativebase; conservatives; elections; fundraising; gop; gopimplosion; mccain; michellemalkin; nrcc; payback; rinohunting; rnc; ronpaul; thebaseisangry; tomcole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-202 next last
FIVE HUNDRED PLUS postings from conservatives today alone, giving McCain and the NRCC RINOs a blistering earful! See for yourselves, by all means! ;)
1 posted on 05/16/2008 9:29:02 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz; calcowgirl; Calpernia; indylindy; pissant; SoConPubbie; ElkGroveDan; AnimalLover; AuntB; ...

Ping! ;)


2 posted on 05/16/2008 9:30:48 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I am a local-level GOP officer, and the party will more than likely not be getting my vote for president this fall.


3 posted on 05/16/2008 9:35:07 PM PDT by Tex Pete (Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I wonder why the Republican party is doing this?


4 posted on 05/16/2008 9:35:20 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

You have to wonder if these fools simply print off these emails and head to the nearest pub and laugh their butts off at these “bitter, God, Gun and law abiding Americans”.


5 posted on 05/16/2008 9:36:38 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
I wonder why the Republican party is doing this?

To which "this" are you referring, pray: allowing conservative voters to righteously lambaste them online, or committing electoral suicide...? ;)

6 posted on 05/16/2008 9:37:32 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

GOOD stuff there......I wonder if it’ll have any effect?

Sadly, this is WAY too late in the game.


7 posted on 05/16/2008 9:44:11 PM PDT by Brad's Gramma (Vote for my German Shepherds!!!! They're smarter than what's running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tex Pete
I am a local-level GOP officer, and the party will more than likely not be getting my vote for president this fall.

I was one 'til 2006. One of the reasons I resigned is because I would be obligated under our bylaws to support the R nominee and I was concerned it would be McCain.

If your bylaws require you to support the R nominees, then I would respectfully suggest the correct course of action is to submit your resignation. But your bylaws may be different than ours.

8 posted on 05/16/2008 9:44:50 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
This is MUST SEE.

The outpouring of Conservative anger (near 500 comments as I write this) to Tom Cole's letter at NRCC.org is beyond description.

9 posted on 05/16/2008 9:45:02 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
PLEASE….you are kidding??!! John McCain is the republican candidate for President. So, which LIBERAL should I vote for. Let’s see OBAMA(Marxist), CLINTON(Marxist), MCCAIN(Open border/amnesty liberal). I have changed my party affiliation to independent. I will not vote for anyone who says one thing during the primary and when they think they have the nomination locked up, tell how they truly feel. John McCain “DIDN’T GET IT” after-all.

I did not write that but it sure sounds like me!!!! And I agree 100%!!!!

10 posted on 05/16/2008 9:48:15 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I especially like this one:

The Republican Party was birthed when the Whigs, a party of elites and privilege, decided that they did not care what their base thought, and just followed the money.

The Whigs disappeared in history like frost on a sunny day, and now it is the Republicans turn.

The Republican leadership does not care what the base thinks and wants to follow the money.

I am convinced that my Party is too far gone to save, and that the soul of this Party,(a commitment to nationalism, lawfulness, the Constitution, and personal liberty) has been replaced by love of big government and trans-national globalism.

I will vote for individual conservatives, if they are Republican, but the Party will get no money, no support for McCain, and no loyalty as long as they follow this course.

I will vote for Bob Barr, if I can, and pray that the election machines will actually tally my vote.

I will pray that the next conservative Party to rise in the ashes of the Republican Party will learn from our mistakes.

Posted: Jonathan Brooks on May 16, 2008 at 3:40 PM

11 posted on 05/16/2008 9:54:03 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

They don’t care what we - conservative think. And that’s the problem, isn’t it?

Fro the first time in my voting life, I am seriously considering a protest vote - like a Duncan Hunter or JC Watts write-in. All three of the current candidate bozos make me ill.


12 posted on 05/16/2008 9:58:47 PM PDT by Noumenon (The only thing that prevents liberals from loading us all into cattle cars is the power to do it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
This one has a great idea:

Now that we know we're not alone. We might want to stop sitting in front of the computer screen and march on DC. A conservative alliance that shows we exist. We'd be cool about, all we need to do is show up quietly, hold up signs and get there attention. It wouldn't be a big rah rah yell fest, more like the schoolyard scene in Hitchcock's "The Birds"

Posted: Kyle on May 16, 2008 at 8:52 PM

The eerie silence in the scene from 'The Birds' as more and more conservatvies show up and stand silently, but increasingly more tense and menacing, sounds perfect.
13 posted on 05/16/2008 10:01:20 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Wow! That is some outrage... and some humor thrown in.
The GOP's new base: Illegal Aliens and Polar Bears. Better hope they turn out in droves this year.

Posted: on May 16, 2008 at 8:01 PM


14 posted on 05/16/2008 10:03:18 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Hilarious. I’d join in if I thought they’d give a damn. Unless you have a hundred grand in bundled cash, they just don’t care. Why should they? They really believe you have nowhere else to go.


15 posted on 05/16/2008 10:05:33 PM PDT by zeugma (Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

>Illegal Aliens and Polar Bears. Better hope they turn out in droves this year.

They had better hope that they throw in some hard cash, as well...


16 posted on 05/16/2008 10:11:03 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Why hasn't there been a second Contract With America? It worked in 94. It would probably work again. It's so simple. Maybe it could make a pledge to drill for oil in the US and Gulf and build more refineries, eliminate earmarks, secure the border, go after gangs that terrorize our cities, etc.

This one makes a good point. The Rs have gone so far left, they don't even remember what the Contract was about.
17 posted on 05/16/2008 10:11:20 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

I really liked the email that contained the phrase “tighten the belt or lose the pants.”

Ain’t it the truth.


18 posted on 05/16/2008 10:12:49 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
The true definition of "insanity" is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. The accompanying illustration in the encyclopedia shows someone voting for a Republican in the hopes that they will actually stand up for conservative principles some day...

Posted: Ted from Hayward on May 16, 2008 at 11:04 PM

I'm saving this one for the next time someone posts that we NEED to vote for McCain and then MAKE him act conservatively...
19 posted on 05/16/2008 10:14:29 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
I really liked the email that contained the phrase “tighten the belt or lose the pants.”

LOL! I liked that one as well. So far, I've only seen one pro-RNC/pro-McCain post and one ambivalent post. All the others could've been written by Freepers! (not the McCainiacs, I mean)
20 posted on 05/16/2008 10:15:49 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
The Republican Party of the 21st Century is less of a movement with a coherent political philosophy than it is a highly dysfunctional advertising agency, one that has yet to figure out the concepts of "product differentiation" and "customer base". If Coca-Cola used the same approach as the GOP, their ads would convey a message along the lines of "Coke is just like Pepsi, but not as refreshing, so buy Coke instead". How much longer do we need to put up with such incompetence from the Clueless Party?

Posted: Carl NOT Karl on May 16, 2008 at 11:25 PM

Here's another great one, austinaero.
21 posted on 05/16/2008 10:18:01 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

I like McCain’s personal story of his military service. I try not to judge him on other personal stuff, but, his politics make me very nervous. I will vote for him in November because I believe anyone is better than what the Dems will offer. However, I say that with some hesitation as well. I am glad McCain has a temper, I think it’s great. It may keep people on their toes and it shows he’s a real guy. There could be a drawback to it too.

I am really more concerned with what’s going to happen in the House and Senate because that’s where the nuts and bolts of the country grind together. Crazy times.


22 posted on 05/16/2008 10:20:08 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

Remember what Bismarck said!

“The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions ... but by iron and blood.”


23 posted on 05/16/2008 10:20:14 PM PDT by roses of sharon ( (Who will be McCain's maverick?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

“Here’s another great one, austinaero.”

Yep. There are many intelligent emails in that mix. Some of these people are really clever, lol.


24 posted on 05/16/2008 10:21:48 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
would love to contribute my hard earned money to the GOP for the fall election. Unfortunately, I do not have any to spare. My income and benefits have been depressed, and I am subsidizing large corporations by providing medical care and social services to their illegal employees and bilingual education to the illegals children. Did I mention that I had to pay $8000.00 above what my insurance paid when a drunk unlicensed and uninsured illegal totaled my new vehicle? Sorry, money is tight right now.

Posted: JR on May 17, 2008 at 12:10 AM

I especially love the sarcastic ones....
25 posted on 05/16/2008 10:23:36 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
The presidential elections of 2008 are beginning to look more and more like the old Monty Python skit about Parliamentary elections in Britain from the 1970's. We no longer have a "Sensible Party" and a "Silly Party" - we only have the "Silly Party" and a "Very Silly Party". At this rate we will have British prices for petrol (appx $6/gallon) in a short time as well. :O(

I love Monty Python. I never thought they'd be imitating real life here in the U.S., though.
26 posted on 05/16/2008 10:26:39 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

All I got was a black screen at the NRCC Blog link. I’ll try again in the AM. I read a lot of sensical commentary in the examples. Hope to read more at the link.


27 posted on 05/16/2008 10:29:30 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Also on the MM site, a list of suggested slogans for the GOP. OMG, they are hilarious!
Sadly, most of them are true.
Here’s one -
“G = Gutlessness
O = On
P = Parade”
or
“Blowback”
or
“We’re Screwed ‘08”


28 posted on 05/16/2008 10:32:55 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
“The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions ... but by iron and blood.”

I guess we're at the point. We'll either go under passively or will have to grab our torches and attack the monsters.
29 posted on 05/16/2008 10:33:09 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Standing in a circular firing squad is what Republicans excel at.

We really do need a third party to address the death of the GOP and fill in the breach.

Not this year, but we got 4 more to go after this.

Re -election will commence January 21/09.

The RINOS need to go, the message should be vote out the incumbents.

It would really have a chance if half the voters weren’t sucking off the Gov’t teat , in one way or another.

Whot the hell isn’t involved in a “Program/Supplement”
in this country.

That must be “The Rich”!

Those who earn enough to survive....don’t forget to hate everyone else who has more..
SanFranNan will come smack you with her pinky whip!

/Rant off


30 posted on 05/16/2008 10:34:35 PM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
I certainly respect your right to vote for whomever you wish. I do see a few positives in having him in office, but since I'm in Mexifornia, every time I even consider it - I remember he voted for SB2611 and co-sponsored McCain-Kennedy. If it weren't for those, I've might be able to stomach it.

My concern about McCain's temper is that he typically uses it against conservatives. IF he were to unleash it against the left, I too think that would be great. But, he's too busy 'reaching out' to them.

I agree 100% about the House and Senate. The worst part about McCain being the nominee, IMO, isn't the presidential election, but at how he will keep home so many who would otherwise vote for conservative reps! This will get ugly...
31 posted on 05/16/2008 10:38:09 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Interesting, but I have to wonder considering the rejection of conservative values at almost all levels, will this really have any effect.

Or will they dismiss the “disgruntled rumbling” of the unwashed rabble and continue steering full speed ahead into the rocks?

Only time will tell.


32 posted on 05/16/2008 10:41:30 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg ("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
Or will they dismiss the “disgruntled rumbling” of the unwashed rabble and continue steering full speed ahead into the rocks?

That's my guess. And then they'll feign surprise when the election is even worse than 2006.
33 posted on 05/16/2008 10:44:02 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

That makes two of us if I want to be honest about it.

I have less than zero faith in the gop to get it right anytime in the coming century.


34 posted on 05/16/2008 10:47:47 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg ("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
All you guys have shown us is how to loose.

LMAO! Now THERE's a comment that obviously came from a freeper. The pretend-moron misspelling of "lose" was the giveaway. Har!

35 posted on 05/16/2008 10:48:27 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I’m not bothering to even respond to them anymore. Falcon is my home from now on.


36 posted on 05/16/2008 10:51:46 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tex Pete
I am a local-level GOP officer, and the party will more than likely not be getting my vote for president this fall.

I too am a county GOP officer, when my term is up, I'm done, I've wasted enough time trying to change the stupid party. McCain is my Senator, I've been voting against him for years.

37 posted on 05/16/2008 11:20:52 PM PDT by c-b 1 (Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

It’s a BS comment that is ignorant of history of political parties. if you make-beleive your history, you can make-believe your future.


38 posted on 05/16/2008 11:22:31 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

The Democrat majority in Congress needs and deserves to be dumped, spanked, harmed, crushed and removed.

Attacking GOP minority leaders is diversion from the essential task of saving the country from the depredations of the Democrat majority.


39 posted on 05/16/2008 11:27:23 PM PDT by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

I notice that you are talking about 2 of the 7 statements made by the poster. I guess you agree with the rest, just not their interpretation of the Whig party’s demise? /s


40 posted on 05/16/2008 11:27:40 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Attacking GOP minority leaders is diversion from the essential task of saving the country from the depredations of the Democrat majority.

Do you work for the NRCC? You seem to have the same mind-set they have and are also ignoring the well-written opinions (over 500 of them, I'm told) of conservative posters. You are the one with the diversionary tactics, trying to bring the issue back to 'us' vs 'them', when there is no such thing. It is all 'them', leaving conservatives with nobody to vote for.
41 posted on 05/16/2008 11:31:15 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
There's a word for political parties which -- when increasingly confronted by anger and rejection on the part of the electorate -- routinely blame said voters for "not getting it," rather than re-examiming their own product for warts and flaws.

That word is "losers."

42 posted on 05/16/2008 11:31:18 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

I will not hestitate at all.

I will vote for McCain readily knowing I have reservations and disagreements on a few issues and common ground on many key issues - Iraq, taxes, spending, judges, pork, litigation.

Those whining about mcCain are narcissists. They have their own image, ego, and issues are not voting/thinking based on the simple patriotic question “Who is best for the *country*, McCain or Obama?”

We have plenty of time to clean out the RINO cr*p in the GOP stables, so long as the *country* remains intact. We cannot assure that will be the case with President Obama, he is that bad that the country as a whole will never be the same. Even his slogans are recycled communist themes!! ... With a Democrat Congress likely, we cannot afford a Democrat free-ride.


43 posted on 05/16/2008 11:33:44 PM PDT by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

The Whig party was fractured based on the slavery issue, leading to its demise. The Republican party is fractured based on numerous issues, among them illegal immigration, size and scope of government, spending, and free speech. It deserves the same fate if it can’t readjust itself back to its conservative platform.


44 posted on 05/16/2008 11:33:58 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: acapesket

“The RINOS need to go, the message should be vote out the incumbents”

The Democrats are a majority in both houses, so the anti-incumbent message needs to be a message that removes that Democrat majority from power.


45 posted on 05/16/2008 11:35:03 PM PDT by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
That word is "losers."

That's what they were in 2006 and 2008 will be no exception. I am amazed at the blinders they are wearing.
46 posted on 05/16/2008 11:35:44 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Bookmark to email link to County GOP chairman in AM

I told him Thurs night we were in serious trouble this year.


47 posted on 05/16/2008 11:37:46 PM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall
That's what they were in 2006 and 2008 will be no exception.

They'd genuinely rather lose, than "give in" to the conservative voting base within their own party. Sad, but true.

48 posted on 05/16/2008 11:38:08 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Those whining about mcCain are narcissists. They have their own image, ego, and issues are not voting/thinking based on the simple patriotic question “Who is best for the *country*, McCain or Obama?”

Yes, insulting people always gets them to want to evaluate your side. The 'simple patriotic' part is too, too simple. The lesser of evils is still evil. And based on the past, evil only begets even more evil. (Bush first, then an even worse McCain. Is Kennedy (R) next?)

We have plenty of time to clean out the RINO cr*p in the GOP stables, so long as the *country* remains intact.

See the previous paragraph. We are knee-deep in RINO crap and it's getting worse with each election - NOT better.
49 posted on 05/16/2008 11:40:42 PM PDT by CottonBall (It's time to light the torches and convene on Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

“Do you work for the NRCC?”

Do you work for Soros, Obama, and the Democrats? All you do is bash Republicans and take glee and their current doldrums. that’s not a conservative position, that’s just kneejerk anti-GOP.

” You seem to have the same mind-set”
My mindset is to be proactive and do the right thing for my values and my country.

Here’s what the GOP should do, and btw it is what many GOP Reps are supporting:
Stuff like this that was posted on the blog:

1) Drilling for domestic oil i.e. ANWR, Bakken Formation (ND), and off shore.
2) Support nuclear power plant, fast track utilities plans to build nuclear plants.
3) Forget about ethanol
4) Pass legislation to stop the boutique gas formulations.
5) Protect our 2nd ammendment rights for all firearms. Even the lowly 6-shooter is a semi-auto.
6) We don’t need a nanny. Government is meant to protect our freedoms. Not restrict them. McCain is wrong on campaign finance reform.
7) Protect our borders. Stop illegal immigration NOW. Reform legal immigration, friends who have immigrated have to hire high powered lawyers... This should not be necessary.
8) Pass legislation to build a natural gas pipeline from the north slope to the US or to Canada.

9) Forget about cap-and-trade on carbon. It is a hoax get over it.

10) DEMAND A VOTE ON MAKING BUSH TAX CUTS PERMANENT. FIGHT THE DEMOCRATS ON TAXES 24/7.

11) FIGHT THE DEMOCRAT MAJORITY 24/7 ON GWOT.

12) FIGHT THE DEMOCRAT MAJORITY 24/7 ON THEIR OVER-SPENDING AND LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IN GOVT.

13) FIGHT THE DEM MAJORITY ON TORT REFORM

14) END USELESS BOONDOGGLES AND ZERO OUT EARMARKS AND PORK.

And put it all together in
A CONSERVATIVE GOP AGENDA FOR THE NEXT CONGRESS

“they have and are also ignoring the well-written opinions (over 500 of them, I’m told) of conservative posters.”
BULL. These views are WELL represented in the MANY conservative Congressmen and activists who work DAILY with Rep Cole and others.

You are the us vs them, I am saying *WE* conservatives have to stick together and support conservative candidates for Congress ... there are HUNDREDS OF THEM.


50 posted on 05/16/2008 11:42:02 PM PDT by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson