Posted on 05/13/2008 5:04:35 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick
NEW YORK: News that scientists have for the first time genetically altered a human embryo is drawing fire from some watchdog groups that say it’s a step toward creating "designer babies". But an author of the study says the work was focused on stem cells. He notes that the researchers used an abnormal embryo that could never have developed into a baby anyway.
"None of us wants to make designer babies," said Zev Rosenwaks, director of Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center.
The idea of designer babies is that someday, scientists may insert particular genes into embryos to produce babies with desired traits like intelligence or athletic ability. Some people find that notion repugnant, saying it turns children into designed objects, and would create an unequal society where some people are genetically enriched while others would be considered inferior. The study appears to be the first report of genetically modifying a human embryo. It was presented last fall at a meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, but didn’t draw widespread public attention then.
The result was reported over the weekend by The Sunday Times of London, which said British authorities highlighted the work in a recent report. Rosenwaks and colleagues did the work with an embryo that had extra chromosomes, making it nonviable. Following a standard procedure used in animals, they inserted a gene that acts as a marker that can be easily followed over time. The embryo cells took up the gene, he said.
The goal was to see if a gene introduced into an abnormal embryo could be traced in stem cells that are harvested from the embryo, he said. Such work could help shed light on why abnormal embryos fail to develop, he said. No stem cells were recovered from the human embryo, said Rosenwaks.
Don’t pick on these guys.....all they want is to make a Master Race. Didn’t I hear that in Europe someplace?
The pride of man...This is Genesis Chapter 1. Naught but disaster can result when man tries to assume the role of God.
The point of this is to develop a technique to insert genes that are missing and needed. There are a lot of fatal and severely debilitating diseases caused by the lack of a single correct copy of a gene that codes for a critically important protein or enzyme. In most cases the critical molecule can’t be administered as a maintenance medication because it’s something that has to be produced inside cells on an immediate-need basis. If this technique can produce a healthy baby, where nature would have produced one that was profoundly retarded and died within its first year, why isn’t that just good medicine?
What they are talking about is far superior to aborting babies until the desired result takes place.
I think removing a defective gene from the gene pool is fine.
It is only a short step to gene therapy for adults.
What happens to drug companies when one gene therapy treatment elminates the need for lifetime maintenance drugs?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.