.
To: forkinsocket
Wow. Nice Straw Man in the second paragraph.
To: forkinsocket; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
The only dissenter was the irascible libertarian Ron Paul.
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed freepmail me or post a message here.
5 posted on
05/13/2008 2:06:40 PM PDT by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: forkinsocket
Last week, with little attention or fanfare, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 414 to 1 to outlaw genetic discrimination. The only dissenter was the irascible libertarian Ron Paul.Beyond the hideous and nightmarish extensions of where this kind of logic could lead us that I'm sure others will point out, I'll only ask exactly the question Paul would ask (and probably did), since he will likely wind up being a centerpiece of the discussion:
Where is this power granted to the federal government in the Constitution?
6 posted on
05/13/2008 2:21:13 PM PDT by
pupdog
To: forkinsocket
To: forkinsocket
" .. and this new weapon in the arsenal of .. "Let's see nowwwww ....
Not everyone gets a complete physical, nor enters therapy, nor submits an app. for conceal carry ... you know ... and your info disappears? ...
But almost everyone gets/has a job ........ !
And of course .... no, no no ... you may not data base that information Mr/Ms employer ... it's against the law.
9 posted on
05/13/2008 3:05:03 PM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: forkinsocket
Genetic discrimination, eh"
Well, take your pick:


20 posted on
05/14/2008 7:18:22 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: forkinsocket
“One purpose of the bill is to encourage genetic testing”
This would be enough for me to oppose this bill too.
26 posted on
05/14/2008 8:57:09 PM PDT by
SecAmndmt
(Arm yourselves!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson