Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Bob Barr candidacy
Michelle Malkin ^ | 5/12/08 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 05/12/2008 10:54:49 AM PDT by Dawnsblood

Many readers have e-mailed asking what I think of former Ga. Rep. Bob Barr’s presidential candidacy (he’s making an official announcement for the Libertarian Party nomination at 11am this morning).

Two words: Not much.

On immigration, he’s virtually indistinguishable from all the other remaining presidential candidates.

On homeland security, he’s joined with what Heather Mac Donald calls the “privocrats” in whipping up unfounded hysteria about intelligence-gathering efforts in a post-9/11 world.

On Iraq, he’s what Allahpundit calls the “poor man’s Ron Paul.”

And doesn’t the ACLU, for which Barr consults, already have enough candidates in the race?

(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 2008; bobbarr; election; libertarian; malkin; president; thirdparty
Many links at the site...
1 posted on 05/12/2008 10:54:49 AM PDT by Dawnsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Skimming from the dimocrats or from the GOP?


2 posted on 05/12/2008 11:03:09 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Another disappointing conservative.


3 posted on 05/12/2008 11:05:37 AM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

I suppose some big government conservatives might be “disappointed” by a conservative who actually favors small government and civil liberties across the board.


4 posted on 05/12/2008 11:09:12 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

I think Bob Barr got a little taste of power during the Clinton impeachment and he kind of snapped and started suffering delusions of grandeur. If he was still a Republican Congressman fighting the good fight in the long war then I would still like him. Now that he has decided he is too important to play on a team I have little use for the man. He had opportunities others dream of to make a difference but that wasn’t enough for Bob Barr.


5 posted on 05/12/2008 11:18:10 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Hmmm? Ross Perot reincarnate?


6 posted on 05/12/2008 11:18:36 AM PDT by kcm.org (Now unto Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Wasn’t he the guy involved in a boob-licking episode?


7 posted on 05/12/2008 11:25:32 AM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

bookmark


8 posted on 05/12/2008 11:26:18 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (What if Tony Almeida is the 12th Cylon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood
Good luck Bob.

To discourage this sort of idiocy the election commission should require a $50 million deposit from each candidate refundable only if they receive 20% or more of the popular vote.

9 posted on 05/12/2008 11:26:51 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

GOD BLESS YOU MICHELLE~!!!!!!!!!!!


10 posted on 05/12/2008 11:27:06 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

are you kidding me?

and exactly how is THAT a conservative idea?


11 posted on 05/12/2008 11:28:14 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

If anyone has Bob Barr’s ear, please let him know that there are several things a third party candidate has to do to be successful.

1) If you run for yourself and your platform, you will lose, for even if you win, you would have no supporters in government. For this reason, your most important platform to run with is getting other members of your party elected. Your greatest victory will be in getting members of your party on ballots all over the country.

2) The way to get your parties candidates elected is for them all to be on the same sheet of music. That is, by far the most successful national campaign in living memory was done with the Contract With America. In this way, your parties message gets out to every American. In your case, every American will know your party platform, because it is simple and clear. It is truly issue driven.

3) What you have on your Contract With America is also easy to figure out. List all your campaign platform items in a long list, then poll Americans as to what their top 10 favorite items are. You don’t have to compromise your beliefs even a tiny bit, you just emphasize those, that the public want and you want, as your platform.

4) Your promise to the public is, if elected, to give them what you and *they* want as well. And you stay on message. Of course the other parties and the press will want to talk about other things, but you don’t. You harp on those 10, simple, easy to understand platform items. The public will love that.

5) You will still probably not win in this election, but the next election, and the election after that, you will get more and more national elected officials. It will build momentum, until your party can give your the bottom up support you need to gain the presidency.


12 posted on 05/12/2008 11:29:12 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcm.org

He doesn’t have Perot’s money, he won’t get anywhere near his number of votes and he might not even get the nomination.


13 posted on 05/12/2008 11:31:43 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Barr will do about as well as every other candidate the Libertarians have fielded for President - he’ll wind up with between 0.25-0.50% of the vote and have made absolutely no perceptable impact on the race.


14 posted on 05/12/2008 11:32:48 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Here they come boys! As thick as grass, and as black as thunder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood
da rulz
15 posted on 05/12/2008 11:33:51 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

50 million deposit and 20% of the popular vote? Perot didn’t even get 20 in his first run. With a rule like that we are most certain doomed to have two party rule forever.


16 posted on 05/12/2008 11:35:12 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead
he might not even get the nomination.

I will be very surprised if the Libertarians nominate him . They know they will not win , this time anyway , and have no reason to nominate anyone who is not a true believer in their platform .

17 posted on 05/12/2008 11:36:47 AM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead
The purpose of this run, if it gets beyond trial balloon stage, will be to steal votes from Sen McCain, so that Mrs. Clinton can return to the White House.

History repeats itself with different players...

18 posted on 05/12/2008 11:40:28 AM PDT by kcm.org (Now unto Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Exactly, Barr isn’t necessarily the most likable guy either. I must also say if find it quite amusing that Gravel and Barr are jumping in late trying to get the parties nomination, sucking the air out of the campaign of Wayne Allyn Root and others who have been trying to get it for some time. Further more is even more funny that party would rather have Ron Paul as their nominee over all the other people running anyway and is trying to draft him.


19 posted on 05/12/2008 11:46:07 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Nader is going to be mad. Some of his votes just got cancelled out.


20 posted on 05/12/2008 11:47:53 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (If you don't vote, you don't matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc
I will be very surprised if the Libertarians nominate him . They know they will not win , this time anyway , and have no reason to nominate anyone who is not a true believer in their platform .

Well they know none of their candidates will win. It has been that way for a long time. But I do agree on them not wanting to nominate a non-believer of their platform as their guy.

21 posted on 05/12/2008 11:48:16 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

is this the same guy that ate cheese from Borat?


22 posted on 05/12/2008 11:48:47 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (Conservatives are to McCain what Charlie Brown is to Lucy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcm.org

Ok but Barr isn’t going to steal many votes. The guy just isn’t very likable. Ron Paul on the other hand could do some damage to McCain’s numbers.


23 posted on 05/12/2008 11:49:57 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead
Ok but votes aren't counted anyway/

remember the snafu in 1998 elections when a striking ABC worker released the next days election to Matt Drudge which Drudge had online in the early morning on election day and we waited all day for the votes to be "counted," instead of the "exit polls" predicting the winners?

24 posted on 05/12/2008 11:55:28 AM PDT by kcm.org
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kcm.org

It doesn’t matter if we count votes, exit polls or tiddlywinks. Bob Barr is a non factor.


25 posted on 05/12/2008 11:58:54 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Many “small government” Reagan conservatives are disappointed by Bob Barr, myself included.


26 posted on 05/12/2008 12:48:22 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
In a debate last week at Oxford University, Mr. Barr argued that in some ways the end of freedom predicted in George Orwell’s “1984" has arrived....
“not in the form of a brutal dictatorship but in the guise of modern governments using the tools of digital technology and the fear of terrorism to take away what vestiges of privacy remain to our citizens.”

I don't think I'll be voting for Barr...

27 posted on 05/12/2008 1:09:15 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood
On homeland security, he’s joined with what Heather Mac Donald calls the “privocrats” in whipping up unfounded hysteria about intelligence-gathering efforts in a post-9/11 world.

"Privocrat"? Another stupid new coinage that we don't need.

Argue a national security question on its merits and you may win.

Make a fool out of yourself by thinking up a word to demonize your opponents and you've lost.

28 posted on 05/12/2008 1:18:59 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

GREAT: Then I might as well be living in the SOVIET UNION! GRRR


29 posted on 05/12/2008 1:43:38 PM PDT by JSDude1 (It;s only a protest vote if your political worldview is Republican 1st, conservative 2nd-pissant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Clearly, he is acting out some serious grudge against republicans.


30 posted on 05/12/2008 2:53:18 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Too bad Michelle wasn’t born a US citizen.


31 posted on 05/13/2008 5:09:34 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Ditto.


32 posted on 05/13/2008 6:59:36 AM PDT by Deo et Patria ("Don't taze me, bro!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson