Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parade Shills for PBS to Get $400 Million in Federal Funding
businessandmedia.org ^ | May 12, 2008 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 05/12/2008 9:26:23 AM PDT by Rufus2007

The headline for the poll may as well have read “Vote Yes to Save PBS,” but the editors at Parade magazine didn’t go quite that far.

A poll on Parade’s Web site posted on May 4 ask respondents how Congress should vote on supporting PBS with $400 million in funding, or as they put it – “whether to continue supporting Big Bird – or give him the ax.” And on top of that, NPR affiliates have joined in a campaign to skew the poll’s results.

“In the next few months, Congress will decide whether to continue supporting Big Bird – or give him the ax. Public broadcasting gets around $400 million annually from the U.S. government, which covers about 15% of local station budgets. (Most shows are funded primarily by producers, viewer donations, private foundations and corporations.) Now the Bush Administration has proposed cutting funding by half,” Lyric Wallwork Winik and Mark Naymik wrote for Parade on May 4.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessandmedia.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: npr; parade; pbs; taxes
Parade, PBS and NPR are engaging in activism to skew public opinion about taxpayer-funded public broadcast.

Thanks a lot. I really like subsidizing the Jim Lehrer Newshour.

1 posted on 05/12/2008 9:26:25 AM PDT by Rufus2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
Thanks a lot. I really like subsidizing the Jim Lehrer Newshour.

Newshour has it's own sponsors. The federal subsidy instead pays for the excessive executive salaries at the various stations, and guarantees the generous retirement and benefits packages for the rest of the employees.

2 posted on 05/12/2008 9:32:56 AM PDT by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
“whether to continue supporting Big Bird – or give him the ax.” ?


3 posted on 05/12/2008 9:33:09 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

The Profile on GHWB is a pretty good watch as well.


4 posted on 05/12/2008 9:33:36 AM PDT by Philly Nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

PBS...The time for its demise is long overdue.


5 posted on 05/12/2008 9:34:36 AM PDT by getarope (I don't like McCain, but I'll pick him over Shrillary or Osama Obama ANYTIME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

I thought the liberals were all set against ‘corporations’.
The ‘Corporation for Public Broadcasting’ is one of those corporation that doesn’t meet ‘free enterprise’ standards since it’s federally subsidized.


6 posted on 05/12/2008 9:35:40 AM PDT by griswold3 (Al queda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

How is it the government’s job to subsidize anything but national defense? And with public monies no less!

David Crockett would be appalled.

Ruefully


7 posted on 05/12/2008 9:38:23 AM PDT by petro45acp (NO good endeavor survives an excess of "adult supervision" (read bureaucracy)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
PBS produces a number of popular shows that I have little doubt could continue to be supported by private donations.

There is absolutely no need for public funding.

8 posted on 05/12/2008 9:41:05 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

Why don’t they get a kickback from the CTW advertisement known as Seasame Street?


9 posted on 05/12/2008 9:43:44 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

The Republicans couldn’t/wouldn’t cut PBS when they controlled all the levers of power, now they control only the White House. It’s silly to think that they will do anything but “compromise” to a large increase for PBS.


10 posted on 05/12/2008 9:46:33 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
"whether to continue supporting Big Bird – or give him the ax.”


11 posted on 05/12/2008 9:56:52 AM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Why don’t they get a kickback from the CTW advertisement known as Seasame Street?

Photobucket

12 posted on 05/12/2008 10:02:55 AM PDT by digger48 (http://prorev.com/legacy.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RJL

I can hear the cries now as in the past if the R’s don’t give the D’s the entire amount they want.
“The Republicans ‘cut’ the budget!!”
A decrease in the increase is not a CUT!


13 posted on 05/12/2008 10:03:16 AM PDT by griswold3 (Al queda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

These PBS people are all hucksters...I won’t give
them a dime until they get rid of their left wing
nutcase...u-all know who I mean...another thing,
they have a fundraiser every month it seems...I
asked for an Annual Report once to see their income
and expenses..they ignored the requestr...if we all
called in when they have the phones going..ask them
for a copy of the Report....LOL....JK


14 posted on 05/12/2008 10:17:47 AM PDT by sanjacjake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Chop! Chop! Chop!


15 posted on 05/12/2008 10:38:51 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("All gave some, and some gave all!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

I say cut the budget entirely. If nobody else will do those sort of shows there’s a reason.

It’s bad enough we are subjected/inundated/immersed in Socialist/Leftist crap on Network Television should we hit the ‘ON’ button of the remote, but why should we support hard core Leftism on PBS with our tax dollars.

The lies never end on PBS. They spend more time trying to milk donations with programming only seen at the time they are lying to us about what they will show us for our dollars in donations.

A couple of the primarily PBS programs are now being shown on Network Television, and can understand why as they are actually interesting.

Actually (disclaimer here) I don’t watch television, my wife does while I’m glued to this computer screen. Unfortunately she talks about what I don’t watch.


16 posted on 05/12/2008 10:55:56 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

Over the last four years....off most local stations in America....they’ve cut opera, jazz, and classical off the public radio stations...going more to a news format. Everyone I know of...has commented on this. On a typical weekend...if you get six hours of opera, jazz or classic music...you are lucky. I see no reason to fund a news network...when I have two or three already at my disposal. I’d rather see PBS broken up into fifty entities....given to each state to hand out to one state college...and just let them contribute a piece to the pie.


17 posted on 05/12/2008 11:07:11 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
I see no reason to fund a news network...when I have two or three already at my disposal. I’d rather see PBS broken up into fifty entities....given to each state to hand out to one state college...and just let them contribute a piece to the pie.

I'd rather the government just quit funding them. The government shouldn't dole out the stations to state entities such as state colleges. They should simply get out of the entertainment and news business.

18 posted on 05/12/2008 11:49:27 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

The Feds pass out money. People lobby to get it. Nothing new there.


19 posted on 05/12/2008 11:53:41 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

This is one waste of our tax money that should be put on the ballot so WE can eliminate the “Public Liberal Network”


20 posted on 05/12/2008 12:00:58 PM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

21 posted on 05/12/2008 3:53:34 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson