Posted on 05/12/2008 8:03:12 AM PDT by SmithL
To his devotees, state Sen. Tom McClintock is a righteous defender of the Constitution and an unrepentant fighter for reining in government spending.
To his detractors, the conservative populist and revered orator is a lone wolf who refuses to bend even when his closest colleagues are preaching compromise.
"Lincoln said, 'I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true,' " said McClintock, a 22-year state lawmaker. "I have stayed true to my convictions."
McClintock, the Thousand Oaks lawmaker now running for Congress in Northern California's 4th District, is a man as consistent in his principles as he is complex in his politics and approach to governance.
During 14 years in the state Assembly and nearly eight in the Senate, McClintock's principles of limited government have led him to pass few pieces of legislation – even for a member of the minority party.
Yet he is famous for helping lead the charge to roll back the motor vehicle registration fee – or "car tax." He is hailed by deficit hawks for voting "no" on nearly every state budget and lauded by free-market advocates for resisting bills that intrude on the sanctity of private business.
Perhaps, above all, he is a fiscal doomsayer who lately has been proved correct.
Only a year ago, McClintock helped inflame renegade Republicans who held up the state budget for weeks. He sounded alarms that fellow Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger was papering over a crisis of deficit spending.
Schwarzenegger is now warning that next year's state deficit could reach $20 billion. And one of McClintock's Democratic adversaries in the Senate, Mike Machado of Linden, said recently that McClintock "is the one who brought to everybody's attention the pending crisis we are facing today."
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
- April 2008 State Sen. Tom McClintock debates former Rep. Doug Ose, left, at the Sunset Center in Rocklin last month in their campaign for the 4th Congressional District seat. Some observers admire his devotion to curbing government spending, but others say he is unwilling to compromise and is not a team player.
Sac-o-Bee continues campaigning against McClintock.
CA GOP could use a few more Republicans.
McCain would do well to pick the likes of McClintock as a running mate. It would heal a rift with conservatives, it would give him a financial expert (an area that Mccain has admitted to being weak in) and it would give McCain a shot at winning California.
Of course I’m dreaming. McCain will pick a RINO and will lose the election because he’ll refuse to offend Obama, the race card dealer.
From 2006: “Vote for Arnold, he’s a republican; besides, McClintock can’t win.”
Winning the election tends to be an individual accomplishment. Of course the rest of the 'team' will show up right away with their own ideas.
He has my vote and support! He will be my congressman!
Tom McClintock is THE MAN. It was these very weak-kneed Republicans and wishy-washy conservative talk radio hosts (like John and Ken) that gave CA the current abomination-in-chief, otherwise known as the A-r-r-n-o-l-l-d!
The kilt! Tom, Wear the kilt!
Compromise... team player...
If those aren’t the hallmarks of the Republican party these days. It’s stands for nothing, and will team up with just about anyone, except Conservatives.
Nobody would ever run on that. A candidate might end up doing that if he wins a seat, but to campaign on compromise and team playing is just saying there are too many seats in the legislature.
I agree.
Yep, this article is a hit piece. “Compromise” is why CA is in the mess it’s in now.
After vowing to never vote for McCain, I WOULD do so if he chose McClintock.
Getting Tom into the national spotlight would be worth it.
We’re still waiting for “Blowing up boxes in Sacramento.”
Lt. Governor McClintock would have had a nice ring to it in 2006, but that didn’t happen either.
“After vowing to never vote for McCain, I WOULD do so if he chose McClintock.”
I’m with you on that one.
PING to today’s SacBee hitpiece.
McClintock Ping List.
Please freepmail me if you want on or off this list
For reasons that were never really hashed out, such as... they were acting like party animals, agents of the political machine that pulls strings. Disloyal to their fellow conservatives, and definitely part of the problem. They were never made to admit it or pay a price for it, save for the price we're all paying.
Whatever happened to those FReepers? They're still here.
This is an obvious hit piece from the Sac Bolshevik. I didn’t even bother counting the number of loaded words.
BTTT
I asked Peter how he liked being seated in a booth populated with the proverbial "Scribes & Pharisees." Whenever he would interview me, he'd mention how we were both "taking the measure of the man." (as if he somehow knew how to measure men)
I think Peter thinks of himself as some kind of philosopher, rather than a mere reporter. But he's still far better than the BEE's rabidly militant "EnvironMental" reporter. He keeps thinking he's gonna git another Pulitzer Prize like the two dummies that wrote "Sierra In Peril" in the early '90's and actually did win such a phony prize.
One of those two wrote "Living Off The Fat Of The Land" in the early '00's which was very critical of the EnvironMental Vowell Movement which created a lively thread here on FR!!!
Isn't that the truth!
I hope that anyone that wants to get conservatives back in Washington, to counter the McCains of the party, start with supporting Tom McClintock.
I'm in San Diego now but I lived in Roseville for 20 years so I'm sending McClintock money. He's my grassroots! (I already have Brian Bilbray and I'll probably send Duncan D. Hunter money as well)
He has my vote and support as well. He will be my congressman too.
Some of us admitted we were wrong and did penance.
I read this piece and have to disagree with you. I don’t think it was a “hit piece” at all.
It came off fairly balanced, and even complimentary in some ways.
Hecht called him a “fiscal doomsayer”... vs. a “tell it like it is truth-teller.” He said that “McClintock helped inflame renegade Republicans” to hold up the budget—instead of pointing out that those were not “renegades” but legislators that were not willing to defraud the public by ignoring the fiscal crisis a few feet in front of their noses, the same crisis that is hitting headlines today. Hecht reaches out to gadfly Tony Quinn to find a Republican to mock fiscal responsibility as “purist” “ideology.” He goes on to point out that he votes against “fuel-conservation and clean-air bills” implying that he is against the environment instead of acknowledging (or even mentioning) that many of those bills had nothing to do with conserving fuel or making the air clean. He says he has an “intolerance for wasteful spending” as if that is a bad thing!
The whole tone of the article struck me as an attempt to slime him and paint him as an extremist when those things he advocates are almost impossible to refute.
Thanks for your kind response.
You made many good points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.