Posted on 05/11/2008 11:07:02 PM PDT by kathsua
It appears that Barack Obama has survived a tough couple of weeks. In the words of some, he's shown that "he can take a punch."
But, frankly, I think Senator Obama is still getting kid gloves treatment from a press corps that tilts left.
Despite the hounding about his "bitterness" remarks, and the ongoing story of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, there's been hardly 10 seconds of attention about his incredible statement that he wouldn't want his daughters "punished with a baby" if they "make a mistake."
This in a discussion about HIV/AIDS in which he said that contraception should be included alongside of abstinence in sex education.
Regarding his two young daughters, Obama said, "I am going to teach them first about values and morals."
First? What are values and morals if there is a second? Faith, of course, includes forgiveness. But values and morals are absolutes. There is a world of difference between forgiveness and teaching alternative paths.
There have been questions, appropriate questions, about how Barack Obama could have been sitting in the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's church for 20 years and suddenly, today, realize he does not agree with him. How so?
We have a good possible answer here. Religion for Senator Obama is not something too serious. It may satisfy some social needs and provide intellectual and emotional salve. But it doesn't translate into behavioral absolutes.
The arena for addressing life's dilemmas for Obama is politics not religion. So, in this sense, Pastor Wright had it right. His former congregant is first and foremost a politician.
In answering a question about abortion while campaigning in Iowa last year, the always deliberative Obama said: "I think the American people struggle with two principles: There's the principle that the fetus is not just an appendage, it's potential life ... They also believe that women should have some control over their bodies ..."
The fetus is "potential life?"
Shortly after the Supreme Court's decision last year upholding the constitutionality of the ban on partial birth abortions, Obama spoke at a Planned Parenthood conference in Washington, D.C. Condemning the court's decision, he said that it was part of "a concerted effort to steadily roll back" legal abortions.
Criticizing Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion in the case, Obama said, "Justice Kennedy knows many things, but my understanding is that he does not know how to be a doctor."
Of course, Kennedy's job is not to be a doctor, but to be a judge. And in doing so, he included in his opinion testimony of a nurse who participated in a partial birth abortion procedure:
"The baby's little fingers were clasping and unclasping, and his little feet were kicking. Then the doctor stuck the scissors in the back of his head, and the baby's arms jerked out ...The doctor opened up the scissors, stuck a high powered suction tube into the opening, and sucked the baby's brains out ... Now the baby went completely limp. He threw the baby in a pan, along with the placenta, and the instruments he had just used."
Thus the end of what, for Obama, was "potential life."
Nat Hentoff, no conservative, but a libertarian who writes for the "Village Voice,'' calls Obama the "infanticide candidate."
In a recent column, Hentoff noted that, while in the Illinois State Senate, Obama voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. This Act addressed cases where, during an abortion procedure, the live infant was actually born. The Act would have banned killing the living child.
Responding to John McCain's remarks delivered the other day at Wake Forest University about law and judges, Obama contrasted McCain's pledge of "judicial constraint" with his own concept of legal activism.
Obama said he'd seek out judges "who are sympathetic to those who are on the outside, those who are vulnerable, those who are powerless."
Aside from this bizarre idea about the role of law, what irony there is in hearing this from a man with zero empathy for our most vulnerable -- the helpless infant in the womb.
For the 90 percent of blacks who are casting votes for Obama, know that almost 50 million children have been aborted since Roe V. Wade in 1973, a third of which were black babies. Is this really the man whom our community needs?
Is Obama really even black? His mom was white, so that makes him just as much white as black.
Replace Obama’s name with any other Dem candidate and this whole article still applies to them.
Kerry, Gor, Klinton, every one of them.
He disowned his white part a long time ago. He's stated in his books his disdain for whites. No joke. No exaggeration.
They wouldn’t vote for the man they really need.
I’ve heard it said that even a 7% black ancestry defines a person as being black.
This appears to be of importance to the race pimps
than to reality.
Much advantage to being part of an oppressed minority
in our segmented political system. Only whites need to
be color blind; or else be deemed racist.
If its not genetically identical to every other organ in her body, its not part of her body. Sorry to be harsh but its just scientific fact.
Her strategy to clinch the nomination in the early states had no effective campaign operation to deliver what it took to win. And when this failed, the needed long range strategy was nonexistent.
The largest flaw in her campaign execution was she failed to effectively campaign in the caucus states.
Because the Clinton team presented Obama an easy advantage, Obama will have huge problems when McCain starts his engines.
This is both in the eye of the beholder and in the mind of the person of mixed ancestry.
Sally Hemmings, Thomas Jefferson's slave, was an Octoroon (one eighth black). There was no such thing as a 1/16-aroon, so the children of a white person and an Octoroon were considered white. After the US stopped the importation of slaves from abroad, there were slave-owners who feared the loss of slaves over time due to mixed breeding. Hence the notion of “even one drop of black blood” making a mixed-race person black. Both of those concepts are archaic, now. Barack Obama does not present himself as a Mulatto (the original term for half-black/half-white), he presents himself as black, with virulent, black-racist attitudes, even though his mother is white and he was raised by his white grandparents. What he has become is what he has chosen to become based on the values he has chosen to internalize.
A lot of people think that the hideous venom spewed by Rev Wright is marginal. But it is the same hatred and nonsense preached in black churches around the country, and even by black teachers to black pupils in public schools. And it is the tip of the iceberg. It is no different than the kind of stuff with which the Palestinians brainwash their children against the Jews.
Star Parker knows her stuff bump!
he’s black and a lib/dem....the black voters need to know nothing else to pull the lever!!!
He must hate his white mama even though she raised him like an educated white boy. He sure is acting "black" now.
That sounds like something the Klan came up with. LOL! That would mean a person could be 93% white and still be considered 100% black. Absurd!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.