Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fed rules give conservative radio all the local voices (And they want your input!)
Sacramento Bee ^ | 05-11-08 | Sue Wilson

Posted on 05/11/2008 9:51:35 PM PDT by Texas Eagle

Do you think talk radio in its current format is fair and good for our democracy?

Please e-mail your answers to forum@sacbee.com and include your name and where you live. Please limit your responses to 300 words, and we'll consider them for next Sunday's Forum

There's a mournful hush in Sacramento these days, the empty sound of an entire political viewpoint quieted.

More than 32,000 weekly listeners who once tuned to KSAC (1240 AM) to hear partisan Democrats beat up on President George W. Bush, now hear only Christian hip-hop.

But there are six other commercial radio stations licensed in the Sacramento area programming the Christian message. In the political realm, three local radio stations program 264 hours of partisan Republican radio talkers beating up on Democrats every week.

Now, zero stations program any Democratic view whatsoever: 264-0. This follows the national trend revealed in the 2007 Free Press and Center for American Progress study, "The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio." Nationally, 90 percent of commercial talk radio is conservative; only 10 percent is liberal.

This study does not include Public Radio, which by statute is required to provide differing points of view. One is as likely to hear a Republican's views as a Democrat's. And NPR hosts don't beat up on anybody.

It is time for all of us to take their lead, to remember that we the people own these frequencies, and to compel our representatives to put the public back into the public airwaves.

About the writer: Sue Wilson, a former reporter and host for Capital Public Radio, is an Emmy award-winning television and radio journalist based in Sacramento. She is producing and directing a film about media policy and reform titled "Broadcast Blues," You can reach her at suewilsonreports@gmail.com.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: conservatism; fairnessdoctrine; radio; talk
Fun! Fun! Fun! The SacBee wants to publish your comments in next Sunday's edition. Commence commenting.

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/927485.html

1 posted on 05/11/2008 9:51:35 PM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

They won’t want my comments on Liberals.


2 posted on 05/11/2008 9:55:55 PM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
They won’t want my comments on Liberals.

Heh, heh. But they asked for them.

3 posted on 05/11/2008 9:58:35 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (Could pacifists exist if there weren't people brave enough to go to war for their right to exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

They never understand why liberal talk radio doesn’t work do they?


4 posted on 05/11/2008 9:58:36 PM PDT by ripcasc (There is a lot at stake in this election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Do you think talk radio in its current format is fair and good for our democracy?

The free market has spoken. If there were a concerted effort to block them via a monopoly then that would be different. Lib talk doesn't work the way these guys do it. It might have an audience if done in a way that was informative and gave new insights, but it doesn't. Just bashing. That gets old fast.

5 posted on 05/11/2008 10:00:11 PM PDT by MovementConservative (John Roberts and Sam Alito.... Thank you GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle; All
Now, zero stations program any Democratic view whatsoever: 264-0. This follows the national trend revealed in the 2007 Free Press and Center for American Progress study, "The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio." Nationally, 90 percent of commercial talk radio is conservative; only 10 percent is liberal.

Well, geee whiz.....
Poor liberals......

Cry Me a River
Click the Pic

Cry me a river.......

6 posted on 05/11/2008 10:00:30 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
"Public Radio, which by statute is required to provide differing points of view."

SNORT!

7 posted on 05/11/2008 10:01:12 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
This study does not include Public Radio, which by statute is required to provide differing points of view. One is as likely to hear a Republican's views as a Democrat's. And NPR hosts don't beat up on anybody.

I don't think I've ever heard a Republican on NPR.

8 posted on 05/11/2008 10:01:49 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Catch the Korean Wave, one Bae Yong Joon film at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ripcasc
They never understand why liberal talk radio doesn’t work do they?

I think the Liberal version of "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em", is "If you can't get 'em to listen to you, force 'em."

9 posted on 05/11/2008 10:02:15 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (Could pacifists exist if there weren't people brave enough to go to war for their right to exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ripcasc
Sad that the concwept of free market is lost on the presumably educated people at the Sac Bee.

They claim these stations had listeners but no advertisers? NONSENSE!

Businesses are in business to make money. They care not a whit about the content so long as advertising brings customers.

10 posted on 05/11/2008 10:04:33 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Liberal radio doesn’t work because liberals don’t want to spend an hour discussing a subject six ways from sunday. They just want to be told what to think and the latest slogans. That takes only a few minutes. Filling the other 58 minutes with different versions of Bush is a poopy head just doesn’t hold the listeners attention.


11 posted on 05/11/2008 10:05:41 PM PDT by bad company (How much easier is self-sacrifice than self-realization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Two points (at least) need to be made.
1) The market place should decide what programming a station carries.
2) I wonder how the Bee would like to be told what flavor the articles they print should be.


12 posted on 05/11/2008 10:11:27 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Man, that's stupid ... even by congressional standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Businesses are in business to make money. They care not a whit about the content so long as advertising brings customers.

Here's my favorite part:

One thing is certain: It is time to act. Progressive talk radio has been taken off the air in Boston; Fresno; San Diego; Madison, Wis.; Eugene, Ore.; Austin, Texas; New Haven, Conn.; Columbus, Ohio and other markets all across the country since the 2006 election, often replaced with formats that get lower ratings.

Yeah, Sue, they're called "Informercials"! And the radio station actually makes money on them. Even with fewer listeners.

13 posted on 05/11/2008 10:11:37 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (Could pacifists exist if there weren't people brave enough to go to war for their right to exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ripcasc
They never understand why liberal talk radio doesn’t work do they?

It's very simple, all liberals are a-holes, what sane person wants to listen to an a-hole.

14 posted on 05/11/2008 10:14:52 PM PDT by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Read the comments, they’re priceless (sounds like FR).


15 posted on 05/11/2008 10:15:49 PM PDT by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one is striking at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

OMG, where to start. Is this for real??? I take it this is about the proposed (and dangerous) “Fairness Doctrine”, the intent of which is.....to silence Conservative talk radio. To all the libs who whine about the “unbalance” of conservative vs. liberal Talk Radio shows -— ALL media, including TR, is ruled and dictated, quite simply, by RATINGS - and thus far at least, liberal TR has failed abysmally to get the high ratings that conservative TR does. (Al Franken/Air America imploded fairly quickly, for one.) WHY? Because liberals consistently prove to be angry, one-dimensional and irrational in the light of day and, despite their protestations, conservative media is calmer, balanced, and logical.

Hellooooooo.........


16 posted on 05/11/2008 10:17:52 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

My comment to the Sac Bee: It’s blatantly obvious that the free market isn’t interested in the screeching angry hyperbole that passed as legitimate progressive talk radio. If Air America and these other liberal talk radio programs were actually interesting, entertaining and informative, they would have gathered a loyal audience in a state as liberal as California. What does it tell you when liberals don’t want to listen to liberal talk radio?! It was crap and it deserved to die.


17 posted on 05/11/2008 10:20:28 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Catch the Korean Wave, one Bae Yong Joon film at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Maybe they can get Bernie Ward to do live remotes from prison...between rapes...


18 posted on 05/11/2008 10:21:57 PM PDT by Crim (Dont frak with the Zeitgeist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

They still don’t want ‘em.


19 posted on 05/11/2008 10:21:59 PM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ripcasc

“And NPR hosts don’t beat up on anybody.”

Just had to say one more thing on this subject - both NPR AND PBS do indeed beat up on (conservative) people all the time, just more subtly, “softer” and gentler. I’m steadily working on a dear friend of mine who says he’s “apolitical” (read leaning to liberal). I’m getting him to see the contrast between MSNBC (Matthews, Olbermann) and FNC/Glenn Beck in terms of which always presents both arguments and has guests in equal numbers (or any!) from both sides. He’s beginning to see the light :-)))


20 posted on 05/11/2008 10:25:23 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

“I think the Liberal version of “If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em”, is “If you can’t get ‘em to listen to you, force ‘em.”

And how ironic that the ACLU/civil libertarians are proposing to restrict the 1st amendment via government regulation, to suit their own purpose and “level the playing field”. What a surprise.....not.


21 posted on 05/11/2008 10:30:55 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
“This study does not include Public Radio, which by statute is required to provide differing points of view. One is as likely to hear a Republican's views as a Democrat's. And NPR hosts don't beat up on anybody”

Chortle. The Lib Pressholes already get taxpayer subsidized radio and TV.

“Right wing” radio had to make it on it's own in a commercial setting. If nobody listened, it would be off the air.

22 posted on 05/11/2008 10:31:16 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

David Rodham Gergen?
Kevin Rodham Phillips?


23 posted on 05/11/2008 10:34:21 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

I dood it! I hope I showed suitable restraint.


24 posted on 05/11/2008 10:38:47 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Do you think talk radio in its current format is fair and good for our democracy?

The real question should be "do you think that the far-left print and television media in its current form is fair and good for our democracy?" I realize that the left wants to silence anyone that doesn't agree with their dogma, but the first amendment applies to all, not just liberals.

Oh, and by the way, it's a Republic, not a democracy.

25 posted on 05/12/2008 2:25:26 AM PDT by meyer (Still conservative, no longer Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Oh, and by the way, it's a Republic, not a democracy.

And the word fair appears nowhere in the Constitution.

26 posted on 05/12/2008 3:28:45 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
This study does not include Public Radio, which by statute is required to provide differing points of view. One is as likely to hear a Republican's views as a Democrat's. And NPR hosts don't beat up on anybody.

HAHAHA stop you're killing me.

27 posted on 05/12/2008 3:40:38 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter

humor ping


28 posted on 05/12/2008 5:22:53 AM PDT by IncPen (The liberal's reward is self-disgust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: metesky
And the word fair appears nowhere in the Constitution.

Neither does the word, "democracy."

29 posted on 05/12/2008 5:31:13 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Do you think talk radio in its current format is fair and good for our democracy?

Yes, it's fair, because it reflects the fact that a majority of radio listeners don't want liberal talk radio, as has been aptly demonstrated every time the listeners have been given a choice.

And yes it's good for our "democracy" because without talk radio there would be NO way for conservatives to be fairly represented in the broadcast dialog.

30 posted on 05/12/2008 5:55:30 AM PDT by Maceman (If you're not getting a tax cut, you're getting a pay cut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

You’re right. The comments tell the tale. Commentary from the right is concise and thoughtful and from the left is insulting and dismissive.

Makes that whole cognitive dissonance thing a bit harder fro them, doncha think?!


31 posted on 05/12/2008 6:21:10 AM PDT by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Even if these morons were able to force through the stupid “Fairness Nonsence” Rush would go satellite and everyone would go with him.
Their desire to take it away is impossible to achieve at this point. They will never have the Big 3 network Cronkite lie machine they once had. Boo-Hoo!


32 posted on 05/12/2008 6:58:27 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Rush gives the Liberal viewpoint every day.


33 posted on 05/12/2008 7:35:50 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (OVERPRODUCTION......... one of the top five worries for American farmers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

If the Democrats take over the congress and the presidency, the “Fairness Doctrine” will be a given. For more on this law go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine


34 posted on 05/12/2008 10:52:41 AM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson