Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hart says it’s GOP that may rupture
Journalstar.com ^ | 5-10-2008 | Don Walton

Posted on 05/11/2008 5:29:14 AM PDT by stan_sipple

This year’s long and contentious Democratic presidential battle will end with Barack Obama and a healed party, former Colorado Sen. Gary Hart said Saturday night.

In fact, he suggested, it actually may be the Republican Party that splinters before the November election.

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain “seems to have a free ride” for now, Hart said in a Lincoln interview.

“But there’s a real struggle for the soul of the Republican Party under way.”

That clash pits a party tied to the religious right, personal social issues, neoconservative foreign policy and libertarian taxpayers against a traditional GOP that embraced balanced budgets, caution in foreign policy and a philosophy of keeping government out of private lives, Hart said.

“Sooner or later, the very, very deep division in the Republican Party is going to come out.”

And, the result, he said, may be “a lot of Republicans staying home” in November or choosing the independent course of abandoning their nominee.

Hart, who sought the Democratic presidential nomination in 1984 and 1988, was featured speaker at the Nebraska Democratic Party’s annual Morrison-Exon dinner.

A crowd of 450 contributors attended the event held three days before Democrats choose their 2008 Senate nominee.

Scott Kleeb, the party’s 2006 congressional nominee in the 3rd District, and Tony Raimondo, chairman of Behlen Manufacturing Co., are locked in what is viewed as an unpredictable struggle.

“I don’t have a clue who will win,” State Chairman Steve Achelpohl of Omaha said prior to the dinner.

“I think it’s anybody’s guess what might happen.”

Sen. Ben Nelson said “it’s always hard to know” when the campaign largely has been waged through 30-second TV ads.

The winner has a decent shot at defeating Mike Johanns, the prohibitive favorite in the Republican primary election, Nelson said.

“Johanns’ support is a lot softer in many places than people may be aware,” the senator said.

“The key will be to demonstrate a bipartisan message and commitment,” he said, along with “an independent-minded approach.”

Both Kleeb and Raimondo claim momentum is on their side.

“Over 2,500 people are now involved in our campaign,” Kleeb said. “We’re going to do well.”

Raimondo said he sees evidence of “very positive progress, with more and more people coming aboard.”

Hart said he believes Obama’s nomination would be good for the party and the country.

“What Hillary Clinton offers is a return to the ’90s, while Obama would take us into the 21st century,” he said.

It’s largely a generational contest, Hart said, with few major policy differences at stake.

“I believe we do need a generational change with a fresh new leader with new supporters offering revolutionary change.”

The election of Obama would “send a powerful signal around the world,” Hart said.

“Election of a mixed-race, young leader who is a product of internationalism would resonate in Latin America, Africa, Asia and elsewhere, particularly among young people.”

A general election showdown with McCain would be “a dramatic generational contest,” Hart said.

“I hope to be 74 too someday, but I do not believe I should be president then.”

Both McCain and Hart will turn 72 later this year. McCain would be 74 in the middle of his term.

What Obama and Democrats need to recognize, Hart said, is that this election actually could be decided during the summer months leading to the national nominating conventions rather than this autumn.

Once the GOP convention has ended in September, only eight weeks will remain before the election, he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: 2008; democrats; garyhart; mccain; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2008 5:29:14 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

How’s that Monkey Business holding up? Dont you love Democrats who tell us that the GOP should be like it was in the old days when the Demoncrats could run them.


2 posted on 05/11/2008 5:30:49 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

And everyone knows that Gary Hart is an expert in presidential politics... what would he be expected to say? Certainly not the truth, he’s a Democrat.


3 posted on 05/11/2008 5:32:22 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

Both parties are in real trouble. I’m afraid there’s an excellent chance that both parties will re-assemble themselves and take positions further to the Left.


4 posted on 05/11/2008 5:33:45 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Et si omnes ego non)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

Considering how Hart’s own run for the nomination went, they should have his picture in the dictionary under “DOH!”


5 posted on 05/11/2008 5:35:22 AM PDT by Maceman (If you're not getting a tax cut, you're getting a pay cut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Russ

If 72 is too old for President, why not for Congressmen?


6 posted on 05/11/2008 5:35:48 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Both parties are in real trouble. I’m afraid there’s an excellent chance that both parties will re-assemble themselves and take positions further to the Left.

How do you get any further to the left than mccain.

7 posted on 05/11/2008 5:37:16 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
Dont you love Democrats who tell us that the GOP should be like it was in the old days when the Demoncrats could run them.

Sorry. When did that exactly change? McCains head is still buried firmly up Ted Kennedy's ars!

8 posted on 05/11/2008 5:41:02 AM PDT by Bommer (There's an (R) next to his name! I must trash my principles & beliefs and vote for the (R)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

Just think. If Hart had been a decade later and sailed under the MSM radar screen like almost all RAT Party MSM favorites, he could have been Bubba Clinton. Same mantra.


9 posted on 05/11/2008 5:42:53 AM PDT by rod1 (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

I know this for a fact: I was one of those who put Bill Clinton in office TWICE by voting for Ross Perot. I will never do that again! I learned my lesson. I will vote “lesser of of two evils” even if I have to hold my nose doing it.


10 posted on 05/11/2008 5:46:39 AM PDT by svxdave (Life is too short to wear a fake Rolex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

Can we get the whole list of arrogant DEM has-beens quoted today—just as a reminder what “stellar” leaders have been they are. How about Dukakis, Mondale, Mcgovern, Kerry, Ferraro, Gore, Carter, Stevenson from the grave (Ok, the last one is a little tough but I know he voted last election).


11 posted on 05/11/2008 5:47:11 AM PDT by rod1 (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat; Lancey Howard

>>>How do you get any further to the left than mccain.

Idiotic and very tiresome meme.

Lancey Howard posted the American Conservative Union ratings for 2007. Quoting his post:

McCain: 80 (This is up from his 65 in 2006, and close to his lifetime rating of 82.)

Kyl: 100

Feinstein: 0 (Check out California’s reps - - in that state, with few exceptions, a House representative is basically either a zero rat or a one-hundred Republican. It’s the same with Colorado. Weird...)

Shays (R): 20

Castle (R): 20

Isakson: 96 (This Georgia senator has been a pleasant surprise.)

Durbin: 0

Obama: 7

Jindal: 88 (2007 was Jindal’s last year as a House rep.)

Snowe: 28

Collins: 36

Kennedy: 0

Kerry: 4

Coleman: 64

Hagel: 79

Reid: 0

Clinton: 0

Dole: 92

Voinovich: 48 (Pathetic - - way down even from his low lifetime rating of 71.)

Inhofe: 100

Coburn: 100

Smith (Oregon): 48 (Again, pathetic, and way down from a low lifetime rating of 72.)

Specter: 40

Lindsey Graham: 88 (Not too bad...)

DeMint: 100

Warner: 60

Barrasso: 100

So to summarize

Obama 7

Clinton: 0

McCain: 80

http://www.acuratings.org/2007all.htm


12 posted on 05/11/2008 5:57:54 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

The GOP has been fracturing for a long time with its incremental march towards socialism.


13 posted on 05/11/2008 5:59:31 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
Dont you love Democrats who tell us that the GOP should be like it was in the old days when the Demoncrats could run them.

Yeah, Gary Hart really didn't need to say this, since republicans are doing the heavy lifting for dems anyway.

14 posted on 05/11/2008 6:06:59 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The GOP death march to the gravesite is underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
“I believe we do need a generational change with a fresh new leader with new supporters offering revolutionary change.” “Election of a mixed-race, young leader who is a product of internationalism would resonate in Latin America, Africa, Asia and elsewhere, particularly among young people.”

There we have it, straight from a Demonrat horse's err...mouth. Obama is a revolutionary [i.e. a Marxist who will overthrow all our traditions]. He will bring America into line with all those wonderful Third World socialist regimes.

15 posted on 05/11/2008 6:17:24 AM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

16 posted on 05/11/2008 6:21:55 AM PDT by Bratch (“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” --- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
What possible use is any opinion on any political subject from Gary Hartpence?

This guy makes Dukakis look like a political genius.

I always expected him to wind up as a game show contestant on some obscure program.

17 posted on 05/11/2008 6:24:46 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Idiotic and very tiresome meme.

Yes, and the very tiresome idiotic reply I expected. Go vote for some amnesty program and help support his good friend Ted.

18 posted on 05/11/2008 6:26:15 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

“How do you get any further left then McCain”?

Have you not seen nor read any of Obamao’s policy proposals? From Abortion to the Second Amendment to Taxes, To losing in Iraq to pretty much any mildly conservative position, Obama is to the left of even Hillary.


19 posted on 05/11/2008 6:26:17 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: padre35
Clue, I did not post about Obamma.
20 posted on 05/11/2008 6:27:15 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
That clash pits a party tied to the religious right, personal social issues, neoconservative foreign policy and libertarian taxpayers against a traditional GOP that embraced balanced budgets, caution in foreign policy and a philosophy of keeping government out of private lives, Hart said.

I think he put "libertarian taxpayers" on the wrong side of the "against" - we're the ones who want the Goldwater-style, pre-social spending GOP back, remember?

21 posted on 05/11/2008 6:27:41 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word." -- Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

You asked a question, you got an answer that was accurate, and concise, and spot on, if you do not want such a response, do not post a question.


22 posted on 05/11/2008 6:30:48 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: padre35
No problem , I'm sure we can straighten it all out with a couple of gas tax holidays. Now lets get back to building more toll roads.
23 posted on 05/11/2008 6:34:07 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Either way, small potatoes compared to higher tax rates on income, and on investment income, Obamao wants not the GWB tax cuts not only to sunset, he also wants to raise Cap Gains tax rates from 15% to 28% or higher on investment earnings.


24 posted on 05/11/2008 6:37:29 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: padre35

Obama is a pure socialist. His first job, that has been described as community organizer was for the Gemaliel foundation. What he actually did was train community activists in the Saul Alinsky organizing methods. The Black Liberation theology that is taught at Wright’s Church is Marxist, also, and is based on the same Alinsky principles. According to Obama’s half sister, Obama fist became interested in socialism back at Occidental College, where his socialist contacts recommended that he could be more successful in his poloitical career if he transferred to Columbia.


25 posted on 05/11/2008 6:39:45 AM PDT by Eva (CHANGE- the post modern euphemism for Marxist revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Exactly, Obamao is a pure socialist demogouge, for all of McCain’s flaws, Obamao makes McCain look like Barry Goldwater by way of comparison.

When those folks in a Houston Obamao office put up the Che’ Flag, they were quite accurate in their assesment of Obamao.


26 posted on 05/11/2008 6:44:11 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

The two, Libertarian Taxpayers, and Balanced Budgets are not mutually exclusive at all, it is known as “Reducing Govt Spending” even Klinton grasped that workable plan with the help of a Republican Congress.

I’m afraid this campaign is going to be a very negative/counter driven one, it won’t be about what McCain is offering, it will be driven by what Obamao is proposing in the way of those issues, for example Evangelicals may not be wild about McCain, but Obamao’s embrace of Gay Marriage as a Civil Right will (or could) turn them out to vote against Obamao by voting for McCain...


27 posted on 05/11/2008 6:48:25 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

>> I’m afraid there’s an excellent chance that both parties will re-assemble themselves and take positions further to the Left.

It’s already happening.

>> Both parties are in real trouble.

No, “Left == GOOD” as far as Government (i.e. Parties) are concerned. It’s US — the “citizen class” — who are in real trouble, FRiend!


28 posted on 05/11/2008 6:52:22 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (La Raza hates white folks. And John McCain loves La Raza!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
Guys, he makes excellent points.
Credit your adversaries their strengths and never underestimate them.

This viewpoint is not at all unfounded:

“But there’s a real struggle for the soul of the Republican Party under way.”
That clash pits a party tied to the religious right, personal social issues, neoconservative foreign policy and libertarian taxpayers against a traditional GOP that embraced balanced budgets, caution in foreign policy and a philosophy of keeping government out of private lives, Hart said

Who here would disagree with that analysis??

29 posted on 05/11/2008 6:56:35 AM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

>>>help support his good friend Ted.

Interesting. I post based on actual policy the objective evaluations and comparisons from a respected conservative source and the answer of first resort is grade-schoolyard ad hominems. McCain while he hasn’t got a perfect score has a high conservative rating while both the democrat candidates score in the single digits. Therefore to claim he is no different then either of them is either deranged or dishonest.

I really don’t think McCain has much to fear from the crackpot fringes, left or right. Which reminds me, did you know Cindy Sheehan has endorsed Ron Paul for president?


30 posted on 05/11/2008 6:57:52 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: padre35
I personally hope they raise short term capital gains by 50%. The stock market and futures market were suppose to be investment ventures, not a crap shoot in las Vegas.
31 posted on 05/11/2008 6:58:09 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tlb
I passed a crack pot fat girl on the interstate the other day pulling a trailer with Ron’s sign on it. Are you any relations to her??
32 posted on 05/11/2008 7:05:40 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

He’s kind of wrong. What the Repubs have is a RINO problem. A “Maverick” problem. And they went and nominated one of ‘em and expect the base to vote for that which they hate.


33 posted on 05/11/2008 7:16:38 AM PDT by Grunthor (McCain voters believe that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

Operation Monkey Business.


34 posted on 05/11/2008 7:18:06 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

“Democrats who tell us that the GOP should be like it was in the old days when the Demoncrats could run them.”

How is that any different from Juanito and his aisle crossing? He’s cross the aisle so much that he’s practically BECOME the enemy in every way except that shiny big “R” after his name.


35 posted on 05/11/2008 7:18:19 AM PDT by Grunthor (McCain voters believe that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

“How do you get any further to the left than mccain.”

Change the “R” to a “D”.


36 posted on 05/11/2008 7:19:18 AM PDT by Grunthor (McCain voters believe that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

I’ve heard many a “moderate Republican” on non-political oriented talk shows saying for some time that the party is moving away from the “religious right” if people will just be patient.

I’ve read FR since 98, even though I didn’t post for years, and one thing always struck me. Freepers often forget that the conservative base is not the only powerful force in the Republican Party, as much as we’d like it to be.

I believe sincerely it is a race to see which of the two parties will rupture due to the drastic differences in priorities between the major factions. The Dems are more obvious right now because the Feminist vs. African American faction differences are so in your face. But the posts on this very forum show divisions are equally strong on the right. We just don’t have such obvious faces to associate with the divisions.


37 posted on 05/11/2008 7:24:01 AM PDT by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
““Sooner or later, the very, very deep division in the Republican Party is going to come out.” “

Ummm, where the heck have you been? It's already occurred.

38 posted on 05/11/2008 7:39:01 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (A Lesser Evil Is Still Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“Both parties are in real trouble.”

I do believe that one is correct. However, I think both parties are starting to undergo a “transformation”. The democrats to the extreme left and the pubies, just imploding, leaving it up to us to “reform”.

Both parties have become very very similar, you really can’t tell them apart. And that is dangerous for our country.


39 posted on 05/11/2008 7:42:38 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (A Lesser Evil Is Still Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rod1

Clinton had enough political sense to keep Dhimmah Carter up in the rafters of the Dem 1996 convention.


40 posted on 05/11/2008 7:43:22 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

MonkeyBusiness Hart did a good job mixing up the GOP “factions” as if all the ones he dislikes end up on the same side


41 posted on 05/11/2008 7:45:08 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

Someone speculated that, while unlikely, that for purely health reasons, John McCain might drop dead before the convention. Not to impugn McCain, but to speculate: then what would happen?

Unlike the usual candidate selection process, which is dominated by big money and the “country club” RINO set, most of the convention delegates are conservatives. Since there are no superdelegates, they could force a vote that would make a real conservative the Republican candidate.

Much to the horror of both big money and the country club Republicans.

And while they might refuse to vote for a conservative for President, preferring a liberal Democrat with more of their values, they are too small a faction to matter. Especially because a true conservative would woo lots of Reagan Democrats.

Granted, the RINOs would try every trick in the book to steal the convention, much like they did in Nevada, at the national level it is unlikely they could pull it off.


42 posted on 05/11/2008 7:50:27 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Change the “R” to a “D”.

The record shows that mccain more than once was willing to do that.

43 posted on 05/11/2008 7:58:38 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
“Someone speculated that, while unlikely, that for purely health reasons, John McCain might drop dead before the convention. Not to impugn McCain, but to speculate: then what would happen?”

I'm NOT accusing you of wishing such a thing, however, that is not something I would “speculate” out loud. It just feels dirty.

44 posted on 05/11/2008 8:00:39 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (A Lesser Evil Is Still Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Interesting stuff, good post.


45 posted on 05/11/2008 8:03:09 AM PDT by Grunthor (McCain voters believe that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
Image hosted by Photobucket.com right, what ever you say monkeyboy...
46 posted on 05/11/2008 8:04:54 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
I think he put "libertarian taxpayers" on the wrong side of the "against" - we're the ones who want the Goldwater-style, pre-social spending GOP back, remember?

Sadly, that was not a mistake; the author is pushing the liberal idea that the only way to balance the budget is to raise taxes.

47 posted on 05/11/2008 8:14:10 AM PDT by lgwdnbdgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple

He should have told us earlier. We could have taken a pass and saved the money


48 posted on 05/11/2008 8:17:58 AM PDT by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
That clash pits a party tied to the religious right, personal social issues, neoconservative foreign policy and libertarian taxpayers against a traditional GOP that embraced balanced budgets, caution in foreign policy and a philosophy of keeping government out of private lives, Hart said.

I don't care what anybody thinks of Hart. He totally nails it here.

49 posted on 05/11/2008 8:26:08 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Bipartisanship: Two wolves and the American people deciding what's for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svxdave


50 posted on 05/11/2008 8:31:11 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson