Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

{ John Paul Stevens } Supreme Court Justice says horse died more humanely than death row prisoners
AP via KnoxNews ^ | 5/10/8

Posted on 05/10/2008 9:07:01 AM PDT by SmithL

CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. (AP) - Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens says the euthanized Kentucky Derby horse Eight Belles probably died more humanely than death row prisoners do.

Stevens drew a round of applause for his comments Friday night in Chattanooga at the 68th conference of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The comments were reported in the Chattanooga Times Free Press.

According to the newspaper, in brief remarks Stevens told the audience he checked into the procedure used to kill Eight Belles and was surprised to learn it is against the law in Kentucky to kill animals using one of the drugs in a three-drug lethal injection cocktail that many states, including Kentucky, use to execute prisoners.

The speech comes on the heels of a Supreme Court ruling that shot down a challenge to the three-drug lethal injection protocol by two Kentucky inmates. Stevens voted with the majority on the question of lethal injections but said for the first time that he now believes the death penalty is unconstitutional.

The conference drew almost 50 federal judges and more than 800 attorneys who practice in the 6th Circuit, which has jurisdiction in Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio and Michigan.

Stevens presides over the appeals court his position on the Supreme Court.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deathpenalty; eightbelles; stevens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last
Boo Hoo! The horse had a productive life and didn't kill anyone.
1 posted on 05/10/2008 9:07:01 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Stevens needs to resign or be impeached.


2 posted on 05/10/2008 9:08:56 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

She probably killed less people too! Damn sore loser keep you mouth shut!


3 posted on 05/10/2008 9:10:05 AM PDT by keving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I have absolutely no problem running a serial killer to his death...


4 posted on 05/10/2008 9:10:48 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The horse also died more humanely than the preborn babies who are aborted every day. And with more dignity.


5 posted on 05/10/2008 9:12:04 AM PDT by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Stevens is keeping his mind together just a little bit better than Jimmuh Kkkatuh, but not by much.

He should be outta' there!

6 posted on 05/10/2008 9:12:43 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I think Justice Stevens has something here. Run death row inmates until their legs break, then kill them.


7 posted on 05/10/2008 9:13:54 AM PDT by upsdriver (My kingdom for an acceptable presidential candidate!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If that is the case, we should probably kill the murderers the same way they killed the horse.


8 posted on 05/10/2008 9:14:50 AM PDT by rlmorel (Clinging bitterly to Guns and God in Massachusetts...:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I am ashamed to admit that I got a little excited when I glanced at the headline contianing “John Paul Stevens”, “Supreme Court Justice” and “Died”

Anyone else experience this twinge of pre-mature glee?


9 posted on 05/10/2008 9:15:40 AM PDT by Notwithstanding ("You are either with America in our time of need or you are not" - Hillary from Senate well 9/12/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

No there’s a great idea!!! GIDDY-UP!!


10 posted on 05/10/2008 9:15:48 AM PDT by Fighter@heart (Anti-troll mechanism is on & scanning all posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Then use the horse-killer on the prisoner.


11 posted on 05/10/2008 9:15:52 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: murron

MEGA DITTOES BUMP


12 posted on 05/10/2008 9:16:25 AM PDT by Notwithstanding ("You are either with America in our time of need or you are not" - Hillary from Senate well 9/12/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
As a veterinarian, I agree with Stevens. The use of succinylcholine in the human euthanasia procedure is cruel and inhumane. The person is paralyzed and cannot breathe yet is conscious. I think it would be more humane if they would euthanize the criminals with the same drugs we use on animals. The use of succinylcholine for euthanasia was prohibited by the veterinary profession almost thirty years ago. Stevens knows his drugs and procedures.
13 posted on 05/10/2008 9:16:34 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Well put. Concision and wit. Cheers!


14 posted on 05/10/2008 9:17:20 AM PDT by Notwithstanding ("You are either with America in our time of need or you are not" - Hillary from Senate well 9/12/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Subhumans do not deserve the humane treatment that’s properly reserved for decent, loving animals whose time has sadly come through no guilt of their own.


15 posted on 05/10/2008 9:17:29 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Let’s just go back to strapping prisoners to the front of a cannon.


16 posted on 05/10/2008 9:17:57 AM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Did these 3000 die more humanely, Mr. Defender-of-Terrorists-and-Murderers?


17 posted on 05/10/2008 9:18:08 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

How does this compare to say partial birth abortion or the snuffing of a baby that manages to survive an abortion?


18 posted on 05/10/2008 9:18:47 AM PDT by weegee (Osama Obama claims to have visited 57 states now. Can you say Potatoe Head?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westlander

I prefer public hangings, as in the movie, HANG ‘EM HIGH.


19 posted on 05/10/2008 9:20:28 AM PDT by upsdriver (My kingdom for an acceptable presidential candidate!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Or when they inject them with poison in the latter stages of the pregnancy by the use of a super-long hypodermic needle?


20 posted on 05/10/2008 9:21:24 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fighter@heart

"Giddy up!!!"

21 posted on 05/10/2008 9:21:28 AM PDT by weegee (Osama Obama claims to have visited 57 states now. Can you say Potatoe Head?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Wow. I did not know we broke the legs of death row inmates before we execute them - thats kool.
22 posted on 05/10/2008 9:21:56 AM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

I have no problem using more humane lethel injections. Just as long as they are used.


23 posted on 05/10/2008 9:22:19 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

The horse also died more humanely than the murder victims of death row inmates.


24 posted on 05/10/2008 9:22:43 AM PDT by weegee (Osama Obama claims to have visited 57 states now. Can you say Potatoe Head?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

and piss on their victims too!! don’t forget!!!!


25 posted on 05/10/2008 9:28:46 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

John Paul Stevens? I loved his bass playing with Zep, when did he become a vegetarian?


26 posted on 05/10/2008 9:34:31 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

He’s right. We should break these guys’ legs before we give them the needle.


27 posted on 05/10/2008 9:34:42 AM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

As it should be...


28 posted on 05/10/2008 9:38:02 AM PDT by NordP ((Rev Wright ) - Hey, Obama... Looks like YOUR "turrr-key" has come hoooome to ROOOOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Hopefully someone or group will publish a book with these horrors and DVDs as well along with “THE PATH TO 911” to remind all of the horrors the DEMORATS WANT TO COVER UP AND IGNORE! MAY AMERICA BE SAVED FROM THE DEMORATS!


29 posted on 05/10/2008 9:40:39 AM PDT by True Republican Patriot (God Bless America and The Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

FWIW,

I’ve always wondered why they don’t use the same drugs on inmates as they do on dogs and cats.

Having worked as a Vet assistant during high school and having to have several animals put down over the years, I’ve seen how the animals just get sleepy, fall asleep and never wake up.

The drugs just gradually supress their body functions until they stop breathing. But by then they’re unconcious.

So why don’t they do executions this way?


30 posted on 05/10/2008 9:41:26 AM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

...or die. That’s what most people do when they’re 89.


31 posted on 05/10/2008 9:42:26 AM PDT by proudpapa (McCain-Pawlenty '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

<< As a veterinarian, I agree with Stevens. The use of succinylcholine in the human euthanasia procedure is cruel and inhumane. The person is paralyzed and cannot breathe yet is conscious. I think it would be more humane if they would euthanize the criminals with the same drugs we use on animals. The use of succinylcholine for euthanasia was prohibited by the veterinary profession almost thirty years ago. Stevens knows his drugs and procedures. >>

Why should murderers be put to death more humanely than their victims? These ba$tard$ should suffer even more than what their victims went through!


32 posted on 05/10/2008 9:50:28 AM PDT by Never2baCrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Oh...that’s rich! I LOVE IT....put it on national TV too!


33 posted on 05/10/2008 9:51:02 AM PDT by NordP ((Rev Wright ) - Hey, Obama... Looks like YOUR "turrr-key" has come hoooome to ROOOOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
To say NOTHING about how their victims died.

.

And DO NOT give me that two wrongs don't make a right, crap, either!"

34 posted on 05/10/2008 9:52:21 AM PDT by NordP ((Rev Wright ) - Hey, Obama... Looks like YOUR "turrr-key" has come hoooome to ROOOOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Never2baCrat
Personally, I'm for a program that gives death row inmates the job of killing other death row inmates EXACTLY how their victims were killed.

It's a win...win!

35 posted on 05/10/2008 9:54:10 AM PDT by NordP ((Rev Wright ) - Hey, Obama... Looks like YOUR "turrr-key" has come hoooome to ROOOOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

Another great point!


36 posted on 05/10/2008 9:55:48 AM PDT by NordP ((Rev Wright ) - Hey, Obama... Looks like YOUR "turrr-key" has come hoooome to ROOOOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Inhumane does not equal cruel or unusual. Besides, why do murderers need to die humanely? We need to go back to hangings and shootings as a means of execution. Less than 10% of murderers are executed - that needs to be reversed. AND - executions need to be televised, or at least made available for viewing online.

I'll tell you what's really inhumane - imprisonment as a means of punishment. No! Put them in slave labor camps instead. If they stole money, make them pay it back plus a lot extra.

37 posted on 05/10/2008 9:59:13 AM PDT by tlj18 (Governor Sarah Palin for Vice President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Stevens is an excellent example of the chaos that ensues when smart people with no ethics resort to "any argument in a storm." Stevens, as do many liberals, opposes the death penalty. They want it banned as "cruel and unusual punishment" under the Constitution. Unfortunately for them, they lost that argument, and there's little chance of the death penalty itself being overturned. So they now concentrate on whether or not the individual feels pain during the fifteen or so minutes it takes to die.

Obviously, the psychological stress is going to be far worse than any physical pain. In terms of physical pain, the death penalty is no more painful than being put to sleep for surgery. However, despite the fact that the argument is totally bogus, it's maintained some traction in court. The people making the argument know it's bogus, but they'll keep using it as long as they can to delay executions and try to overturn the death penalty.

38 posted on 05/10/2008 10:01:10 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

That would be my preference as well. Nothing says you effed
up better than the 13 step walk.


39 posted on 05/10/2008 10:02:16 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
I guess I'm pretty cruel and inhumane too, As a paramedic for 30+ years I've used succinylcholine in hundreds of rapid sequence intubations I've done on human beings. Of course it's in conjunction with sedative agents as well. (Just like executions from what I understand)

NOT impressed with Stevens.

40 posted on 05/10/2008 10:03:17 AM PDT by Species8472 (Time to drill in ANWR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
The use of succinylcholine in the human euthanasia procedure is cruel and inhumane. The person is paralyzed and cannot breathe yet is conscious. I think it would be more humane if they would euthanize the criminals with the same drugs we use on animals. The use of succinylcholine for euthanasia was prohibited by the veterinary profession almost thirty years ago.

IIRC; the euthanasia execution procedure includes 3 drugs. The first is a heavy sedative. If you've been under general anesthetic you've experienced the criminal's "Trauma".

A few years ago a man on death row chose the electric chair. Immediately before his "appointment" he tried to get his execution stayed due to the method being "cruel."

He had been sentenced to death for raping a woman and torturing her to death. During his crime he repeatedly shocked the woman with electricity...

Pardon me if I don't get caught up in the hype.

41 posted on 05/10/2008 10:07:11 AM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens

This is why we all have to bite the bullet and reluctantly cast our vote for McLame.

42 posted on 05/10/2008 10:08:23 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland
This is why we all have to bite the bullet and reluctantly cast our vote for McLame.

Any chance he might pull a "Sandra Day" on us?

43 posted on 05/10/2008 10:09:57 AM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
If the death penalty is unconstitutional, why does the Constitution specify it for certain crimes?

Why are judges, especially Federal Appellates and Supremes, so illiterate that they do not understand the difference between "and" and "or", as in "...cruel and unusual punishment..."?

Until they stuck their straws in the septic tank and stirred before drinking, the death penalty was not unusual. It is 'profiting from their own crime' to first ban it, then claim it is 'unusual'; therefore, 'cruel' should not be coming into play at all.

44 posted on 05/10/2008 10:12:25 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

His comment is a great illustration of the left’s selective and skewed moral perspective.


45 posted on 05/10/2008 10:16:30 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

FIRST break both ankles of the condemned, THEN give them the injections?

I am fine with that.


46 posted on 05/10/2008 10:16:46 AM PDT by Eddie01 (one more for the road is actually a really bad idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
So lets start shooting convicted murders...quicker and much less fuss. Not to mention cheaper. Guilty = BANG!!!!

Bed wetters amd hand wringers...UP YOURS !!!

47 posted on 05/10/2008 10:22:47 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
The person is paralyzed and cannot breathe yet is conscious.

Yeah, so? The VICTIM was probably also paralyzed...with fear; unable to breathe, but conscious. Oh, that's right; that is just the victim.

That's why we call it the CRIMINAL justice system; victims do not have rights, nor count.

If the criminal suffers a short bit, too damned bad. The Constitution specifies "cruel AND unusual", no matter how hard 'they' try to turn that "AND" into an "OR". The more they suffer, and the quicker they die, the better. Just put them out of our misery as expeditiously as possible...it makes it just that much sooner that they can cry on God's shoulder, before being kicked into The Pit.

ITMT, please continue to euthanize innocent, suffering animals as humanely as possible.

48 posted on 05/10/2008 10:22:54 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rahbert
This would be fun to watch-
49 posted on 05/10/2008 10:29:06 AM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent

I second your question about why executions aren’t done like we put down our beloved animals. Do you think it’s because the government (i.e., a bunch of people who couldn’t get work in the private sector who are best at shuffling paper) decided what drugs to use?

It really doesn’t make any sense.


50 posted on 05/10/2008 10:37:25 AM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson