Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate change by Jupiter -- (global warming deniers)Part XXXVIII
National Post ^ | November 10, 2007 | Lawrence Solomon

Posted on 05/09/2008 2:53:59 PM PDT by Delacon

The alignment of the planets, and especially that of Jupiter and Saturn, control the climate on Earth.

So explained Rhodes Fairbridge of Columbia University, a giant in science over much of the last century whose accomplishments are perhaps unsurpassed for their breadth, depth, and volume. This one man authored or co-authored 100 scientific books and more than 1,000 scientific papers, he edited the Benchmarks in Geology series (more than 90 volumes in print) and was general editor of the Encyclopaedias of the Earth Sciences. He edited eight major encyclopedias of specialized scientific papers in the atmospheric sciences and astrogeology; geomorphology; geochemistry and the earth sciences; geology, sedimentology, paleontology, oceanography and, not least, climatology.

Changes in sunspots and other solar activity, scientists have realized for more than two centuries, correlate closely with the climate of Earth, explaining the ice ages and periods of great warming. But what, Dr. Fairbridge wondered, causes these changes in our sun?

The answer, he discovered with the help of NASA and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, lies largely in the solar system's centre of gravity. At times, the sun is at the solar system's centre of gravity. Most often, this is not the case-- the orbit of the planets will align planets to one side or another of the sun. Jupiter, the planet with by far the largest mass, most influences the solar system's centre of gravity. When Uranus, Neptune and especially Saturn -- the next largest planet -- join Jupiter on one side of the solar system, the solar system's centre of gravity shifts well beyond the sun.

The sun's own orbit, he found, has eight characteristic patterns, all determined by Jupiter's position relative to Saturn, with the other planets playing much lesser roles. Some of these eight have orderly orbits, smooth and near-circular. During such orbits, solar activity is high and Earth heats up. Some of the eight orbits are chaotic, taking a loop-the-loop path. These orbits correspond to quiet times for the sun, and cool periods on Earth. Every 179 years or so, the sun embarks on a new cycle of orbits. One of the cooler periods in recent centuries was the Little Ice Age of the 17th century, when the Thames River in London froze over each winter. The next cool period, if the pattern holds, began in 1996, with the effects to be felt starting in 2010. Some predict three decades of severe cold.

Temperatures on Earth are but one consequence of these periodic and predictable celestial movements. Others, Dr. Fairbridge has shown, are seen everywhere on Earth: in the various and differing periodicities in rocks, glaciers, sand dunes and the circulation of the ocean; geomagnetic records; the records of the isotopes of carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen in tree rings, ice cores, air and water. They are the periodicities of climate change.

Dr. Fairbridge's best-known periodicity, which he developed in the 1950s, hypothesized that sea levels had been rising for the last 16,000 years, during which there were periodic oscillations of rise and fall. The Fairbridge curve describing this period -- so named in derision because it offended the conventional wisdom - is now widely accepted. It demonstrates that, even within the past 1,000 years, sea levels have several times changed by up to two metres, and suddenly -- each of these large changes occurred in fewer than 40 years.

Dr. Fairbridge's broader climate change claims -- that celestial changes control Earth's temperatures -- remain controversial, but less so than they were decades ago, when his was a relatively lone voice. Solar scientists with increasing regularity are publishing data establishing celestial origins to climate change on Earth. Dr. Fairbridge saw his Fairbridgecurve theories vindicated, but he won't his celestial claims. This most remarkable individual died a year ago this week, at age 92. - Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe and the Urban Renaissance Institute. www.urban-renaissance.org

---

CV OF A DENIER

Rhodes Fairbridge, an early expert on climate change, was a professor of geology at Columbia. He received an undergraduate degree from Queen's University in Ontario and a master's degree from the University of Oxford. He was awarded a doctorate of science by the University of Western Australia in 1944 at the age of 30, bypassing the usual PhD prerequisite. During the Second World War, Dr. Fairbridge also served with the Royal Australian Air Force in U.S. General Douglas MacArthur's headquarters as deputy director of intelligence.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alarmists; climatechange; globalwarming; skeptics
Back on 3/24 I rediscovered(hat tip Freeper Libwhacker)  a very overlooked series of articles written by Lawrence Solomon of the National Post that sought to show how there was no "consensus" on global warming. Mr. Solomon didn't have to dig up illuminati believing bloggers, corporate shills or political pundits to do it. He just found some of the most respected scientists in their respective fields of study. At the time, I could find 27 articles in the series. I since found there are 38 so far.  I will be posting the remaining 11 articles over the next few weeks. Mr. Solomon has just written a book based on the series called The Deniers: The World-Renowned Scientists Who Stood Up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution, and Fraud**and those who are too fearful to do so. Freepmail me with a request to join my "the deniers"/global warming ping list if you'd like. Here is the series:

The Post's series on scientists who buck the conventional wisdom on climate science. Here is the series so far:

Statistics needed -- The Deniers Part I
Warming is real -- and has benefits -- The Deniers Part II
The hurricane expert who stood up to UN junk science -- The Deniers Part III
Polar scientists on thin ice -- The Deniers Part IV
The original denier: into the cold -- The Deniers Part V
The sun moves climate change -- The Deniers Part VI
Will the sun cool us? -- The Deniers Part VII
The limits of predictability -- The Deniers Part VIII
Look to Mars for the truth on global warming -- The Deniers Part IX
Limited role for C02 -- the Deniers Part X


End the chill -- The Deniers Part XI

Clouded research -- The Deniers Part XII
Allegre's second thoughts -- The Deniers XIII
The heat's in the sun -- The Deniers XIV
Unsettled Science -- The Deniers XV
Bitten by the IPCC -- The Deniers XVI
Little ice age is still within us -- The Deniers XVII
Fighting climate 'fluff' -- The Deniers XVIII
 
Science, not politics -- The Deniers XIX
Gore's guru disagreed -- The Deniers XX

The ice-core man -- The Deniers XXI

Some restraint in Rome -- The Deniers XXII
Discounting logic -- The Deniers XXIII
Dire forecasts aren't new -- The Deniers XXIV
They call this a consensus? -- Part XXV
NASA chief Michael Griffin silenced - Part XXVI
Forget warming - beware the new ice age -- Part XXVII
Open mind sees climate clearly -- Part XXVIII
Models trump measurements -- Part XXIX
What global warming, Australian skeptic asks -- Part XXX

In the eye of the storm of global warming -- Part XXXI
From chaos, coherence -- Part XXXII
The aerosol man -- Part XXXIII
The Hot Trend is cool yachts -- Part XXXIV
You still need your parka in Antarctica -- Part XXXV

IPCC too blinkered and corrupt to save -- Part XXXVI
Why melting of ice sheets 'is impossible' -- Part XXXVII
Climate change by Jupiter -- Part XXXVIII

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/pages/climate-change-the-deniers.aspx

 

In case you missed it up the thread, from Steelyourfaith...                                                               

1 posted on 05/09/2008 2:54:00 PM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; ...

Here’s the last article from The Deniers series....so far. I think Mr. Solomon will go on to write more articles for the series(after he rests up from the book he just published). If he doesn’t, many others will. Refuting global warming alarmist theories is a growth industry right now. I want to thank everyone for joining my ping list to confront global warming alarmism with special mention to steelyourfaith, xcamel, and Tolerance Sucks Rocks. I’d also like to thank everyone who posted on these many thread...deniers, alarmists, and everyone else in between. I learned a lot.


2 posted on 05/09/2008 2:55:21 PM PDT by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon; All
Sunspot cycles, galactic cosmic rays and "global warming"

If you look at the chart below, you will see that sunspot activity (during solar maxes--the individual peaks) has been relatively high since about 1900 and almost non-existent for the period between about 1625 and 1750. This period is known as the Maunder (sunspot) Minimum or "Little Ice Age".

From BBC News [yr: 2004]:
A new [2004] analysis shows that the Sun is more active now than it has been at anytime in the previous 1,000 years. Scientists based at the Institute for Astronomy in Zurich used ice cores from Greenland to construct a picture of our star's activity in the past. They say that over the last century the number of sunspots rose at the same time that the Earth's climate became steadily warmer.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3869753.stm

It's really hard to imagine how this little ball of fire could have any impact on our climate at all.

But the main arguments being made for a solar-climate connection is not so much to do with the heat of the Sun but rather with its magnetic cycles. When the Sun is more magnetically active (typically around the peak of the 11 year sunspot cycle --we are a few yrs away at the moment), the Sun's magnetic field is better able to deflect away incoming galactic cosmic rays (highly energetic charged particles coming from outside the solar system). The GCRs are thought to help in the formation of low-level cumulus clouds -the type of clouds that BLOCK sunlight and help cool the Earth. So when the Sun's MF is acting up (not like now), less GCRs reach the Earth's atmosphere, less low level sunlight-blocking clouds form, and more sunlight gets through to warm the Earth's surface...naturally. Clouds are basically made up of tiny water droplets. When dust particles in the atmosphere become ionized by incoming GCRs they become very 'attractive' to water molecules, in a purely chemical sense of the word.-Eye On The Left

____________________________________________________

2008: "The Center for Sun-Climate Research at the DNSC investigates the connection between variations in the intensity of cosmic rays and climatic changes on Earth. This field of research has been given the name 'cosmoclimatology'"..."Cosmic ray intensities – and therefore cloudiness – keep changing because the Sun's magnetic field varies in its ability to repel cosmic rays coming from the Galaxy, before they can reach the Earth." :
http://www.spacecenter.dk/research/sun-climate

3 posted on 05/09/2008 3:00:35 PM PDT by Eye On The Left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
When the moon is in the Seventh House
And Jupiter aligns with Mars
Then peace will guide the planets
And love will steer the stars

4 posted on 05/09/2008 3:05:28 PM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Thanx for posting this great series, Delacon! I just got my copy of The Deniers this week.

BTW, the graphic has been updated, eliminating expired air dates:  

Reminder
This Sunday on C-Span 2:

 


5 posted on 05/09/2008 3:12:43 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

And today’s spaceweather.com picture shows — NO SUNSPOTS. Had one start a couple days ago, but it went POOF, gone.

Combined with the effects of that Chilean volcano, we might be looking at some VERY cold years VERY soon.

But don’t get your hopes up. Remember, the movie “The Day After Tomorrow” was premised on global warming causing global cooling. The econuts will ignore the facts and just blame cooling on CO2, capitalism, etc. And their solution will be the same as it always is: More taxes, more government, more socialism...


6 posted on 05/09/2008 3:14:25 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

I will read this with a cup of coffee tomorrow morning. Who knows really, could be something to it. It’s much more thought provoking than the supposed (CO2 is the greenhouse gas from the planet Krypton) theory.


7 posted on 05/09/2008 3:23:11 PM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magellan
"When the moon is in the Seventh House And Jupiter aligns with Mars Then peace will guide the planets And love will steer the stars"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncscQ6z2ylQ&feature=related

8 posted on 05/09/2008 3:40:47 PM PDT by Eye On The Left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Delacon; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

The Great Global Warming Swindle Video - back on the net!! (click here)

Ping me if you find one I've missed.


Another installment
9 posted on 05/09/2008 4:00:10 PM PDT by xcamel (Forget the past and you're doomed to repeat it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R

“I will read this with a cup of coffee tomorrow morning. Who knows really, could be something to it. It’s much more thought provoking than the supposed (CO2 is the greenhouse gas from the planet Krypton) theory.”

Hey, don’t let the title fool ya. The bottomline is that climate change has almost nothing to do with us humans but that climate change still happens. We still have to understand how it works. We are past due for an ice age. Thems are the facts. I’ll still have my many cups of coffee tomorrow and not worry though. :)


10 posted on 05/09/2008 7:27:34 PM PDT by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Hey, don’t let the title fool ya. The bottomline is that climate change has almost nothing to do with us humans but that climate change still happens. We still have to understand how it works. We are past due for an ice age. Thems are the facts. I’ll still have my many cups of coffee tomorrow and not worry though. :)

Getting colder is what I'd worry about much more than warming. It seems to me there'd be more serious consequences. And with a lagging sunspot cycle, a cool phase PDO, unprecedented sea ice in the southern hemisphere, and a Chilean volcano spewing tons of particulates that could go on for months, perhaps it's starting now. (cue the doom music)
11 posted on 05/10/2008 4:34:51 AM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Delacon; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

12 posted on 05/10/2008 6:54:41 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (To the liberal, there's no sacrifice too big for somebody else to make. --FReeper popdonnelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

I had never heard of this hypothesis until this article. That really surprises me.

I have long considered looking into the possibility that Jupiter and Saturn, especially, affected the Sun and thereby our climate somehow. I’m glad to see that this has already been postulated, and is probably under continuous investigation. Of course, the IPCC policymakers won’t give it any credence, but somehow that doesn’t concern me any longer.


13 posted on 05/12/2008 4:10:54 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson