Posted on 05/02/2008 1:01:13 PM PDT by neverdem
McClatchy Newspapers
State legislators are stepping into the arena of reproductive law again in a bid to regulate the use of birth control - on deer.
The House passed a bill Wednesday that makes it illegal to use fertility control agents or chemical substances on deer and other wildlife without a permit from the S.C. Department of Natural Resources. Violators could face a fine of up to $2,500 and two years in prison. The bill must pass the Senate and be signed by governor to become law.
Permits would be eligible for scientific research or for wildlife management as approved by the department, the bill states.
Charles Ruth, a department wildlife biologist who supervises deer and turkey projects statewide, said the bill is intended to reinforce a practice already in place but not codified in law. It would also keep wildlife contraceptives from being used "willy-nilly."
Contraceptives that target mammals like deer are particularly worrisome.
"People are mammals. There are possibilities of nontarget effects," Ruth said. "What we're trying to [ensure] is in the event some of these substances are put on the market that they are used appropriately and by responsible and trained individuals."
Deer contraceptives are in use with the blessing of the Department of Natural Resources on Fripp Island as part of a five-year study.
Donations from Fripp Island property owners partially pay for the $170,000 study, which serves as an alternative to the professional culling several gated communities in southern Beaufort County use to thin deer populations, also a process that requires permits from the Department of Natural Resources.
Other than Fripp Island, the only permit the department issued for deer contraceptives went to Sea Pines on Hilton Head Island, though the nonlethal effort to reduce deer population in the community fizzled with a failed lawsuit. A community management company wanted to kill about 200 deer in the late-1990s, which a community group objected to and contested in court.
The department issued about 14 permits for deer culling in the past decade, Ruth said, almost all to gated communities in southern Beaufort County. In those instances, deer were baited to carefully selected open spaces, where a sharpshooter waited.
Allen Rutberg, an assistant professor at the Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University who is involved in the Fripp Island study, has been following the bill. He said it is reasonable, though he took issue with an amendment the House committee added Tuesday.
"Preference must be given to hunting as the primary method of controlling wildlife before a fertility control agent or a chemical substance is utilized," the amendment states.
"I think that localities should be able to choose whatever means is most appropriate for them, rather than state law pushing them to do whatever may not be suitable," Rutberg said.
For example, Fripp Island's limited open space and somewhat dense housing would not be appropriate for hunting with firearms for safety reasons, he said. Bow hunting would be too cumbersome to significantly reduce the deer population and, in his opinion, inhumane.
In his study, female deer on Fripp Island are tranquilized with blow darts powered by compressed gas, then tagged and injected with chemical contraceptives.
The Fripp Island study primarily is funded by the Humane Society of the United States. Rutberg estimated the deer population at 400 when the study began in 2004. Recent counts aren't available, but the deer population has fallen to a level homeowners are generally more comfortable with, said Kate Hines, general manager of the Fripp Island Property Owners Association.
© 2008 MyrtleBeachOnline.com
Birth control pills for deer come in all calibers.
Jeez, shoot the damn deer and give the meat to the needy. Freakin’ bureaucrats.
...but condoms are still OK?
I’m sure there’s some law against feeding game to the “needy”.
Besides, they probably wouldn’t eat it.
As one person said, she got tired of driving her 10yr old car to the food bank to donate and watching people in 1 yr old cars picking up.
“As one person said, she got tired of driving her 10yr old car to the food bank to donate and watching people in 1 yr old cars picking up.”
LOL! That would get at me as well.
I would think you could give meat to anyone you chose. I’ve been given game many times. I’ve never killed a deer and I eat it pretty much every winter.
Jeez, shoot the damn deer and give the meat to the needy. Freakin’ bureaucrats.
Idiots. People can’t afford food in certain areas of the country. Libs: People hungry = deer birth control and more food stamps. Conservatives: People hungry = kill a damn deer and feed your family.
While it may be true that you are sure ... it is untrue that there is a law against feeding the needy with game. Hunters for the Hungry and Hunter Helping the Hungry are but two of the organizations that accept and distribute hundreds of thousands of pounds of game meat every year. Hunters feed a bunch of folks other than their families.
That’s good.
I just erred on the side of “if it makes sense, some lib will pass a law against it”.
Amen. Why spend huge amounts of money to control wildlife populations when hunters will pay for the privilege to hunt.
"Bow hunting would be too cumbersome to significantly reduce the deer population and, in his opinion, inhumane."
While bow hunting would not be the most efficient method to decrease population, it is not in any way inhumane unless you have a really bad bowhunter that wounds and does not recover the game. A razor sharp broadhead, properly placed, is extremely effective and not inhumane in the least.
What’s wrong with shooting them? There’s talk of food shortages and we have a food supply that is producing wonderfully... and the bureaucrats want to poison it with birth controlling chemicals?
What is wrong with venison?
The poor don’t want to eat anything unless it comes from Popeye’s, Burger King or Mickey D’s. Venison is nice and lean so it lacks the larda$$ potential of fast food and the intoxicant of malt liquor.
Here in CA, if you have nuisance deer, you can get depredation tags from Fish and game, any deer taken must be turned in, and they end up going to shelters, kitchens for the poor and whatnot.
illegal to use fertility control agents or chemical substances on deer
...but condoms are still OK?
Ok, I want to see someone install said condom on a deer.
I nominate the dickhead who pushed this legislation thru.
It would also keep wildlife contraceptives from being used “willy-nilly.”
that line just cracks me up! LOL
US Navy research lab under microscope in Indonesia
Broncos quarterback Cutler diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
Excellent.......LOL !
I’d hate to be the one to break it to the deer.
What about the Catholic deer?
But what about the deer’s right to choose? Aren’t we taking away their fundamental reproductive rights? Where are the deer feminists on this?
...but condoms are still OK?
Only if you put them on ‘em.
Works in my neck of the woods.
Concerning laws against feeding game meat to the needy, the Bambi-worshippers in some states have persuaded local health departments to ban game meat donations because it’s unregulated, uninspected, unethical, uncontrolled, etc.
In that case, laws banning local tightenings of state law should be brought to bear.
South Carolina Ping
Add me to the list. / Remove me from the list.
“Other than Fripp Island, the only permit the department issued for deer contraceptives went to Sea Pines on Hilton Head Island,”
Not surprising since as this is a liberal Yankee conclave. These people are anti-hunting, including bow-hunting, resulting in highway 278 being deer central after dark.
Other than the areas mentioned the hunters shoot them as fast as they can aim. I believe Hampton, County has the longest deer season in the country.
Just when you thought that ethanol would be the last stupid thing that your tax dollars would be wasted on...
I had not heard that. What states are doing this?
Actually, IIRC, the PETA types go to the soup kitchens and warn them that they will be sued if a patron becomes sick after they had accepted game meat.
(Worthless PETA b@stards!)
the venison & pork given to the truly needy (and there ARE a lot of TRULY needy in our area.)is well-received & a HELP to numerous families.
last year, in our county alone, over 10,ooo pounds of meat was donated to the hungry.
free dixie,sw
PETA harasses everyone ... that is their goal. But that is vastly different from state government requiring local health departments to ban donations of game meat, as you originally stated.
My family doesn't belong to one of those groups, but we have provided meat to many a family in our area and they are always very pleased.
free dixie,sw
free dixie,sw
OK, I’m not aware that any state has actually banned the donation of game meat, but I have heard it proposed in our state assembly (SC), by the usual suspects.
It represents just another backdoor approach to changing the culture and banning hunting altogether.
Several deer processing operations here in North Alabama will process for free any deer donated to charity.
free dixie,sw
The operant phrase being “TRULY needy.” I’ll never forget being denied food stamps in Graduate School because I, “would be able to make lots of money someday,” and 3 days later standing behind a well-dressed family buying steak, lobster, frozen desserts and canned foie gras but paying with food stamps. I was buying potted meat and saltines.
fwiw, i was so poor in college (my dad had just died & left us with >100K dollars of medical bills = insurance company refused to pay!!!)that we HUNTED so that we COULD have something to EAT!
free dixie,sw
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.