Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New source for biofuels discovered
www.physorg.com ^ | 04/23/2008 | Source: University of Texas at Austin

Posted on 04/23/2008 10:27:47 AM PDT by Red Badger

Left: Two rod-shaped, wild type cyanobacteria. Note the conspicuous absence of any cellulose or sugars on the surface of these cells. Right: A genetically altered cyanobacterium that produced highly visible cellulose (marked by cellulase coupled with an electron dense gold marker). Credit: Brown and Nobles, the University of Texas at Austin

A newly created microbe produces cellulose that can be turned into ethanol and other biofuels, report scientists from The University of Texas at Austin who say the microbe could provide a significant portion of the nation’s transportation fuel if production can be scaled up.

Along with cellulose, the cyanobacteria developed by Professor R. Malcolm Brown Jr. and Dr. David Nobles Jr. secrete glucose and sucrose. These simple sugars are the major sources used to produce ethanol.

“The cyanobacterium is potentially a very inexpensive source for sugars to use for ethanol and designer fuels,” says Nobles, a research associate in the Section of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics.

Brown and Nobles say their cyanobacteria can be grown in production facilities on non-agricultural lands using salty water unsuitable for human consumption or crops.

Other key findings include:

-- The new cyanobacteria use sunlight as an energy source to produce and excrete sugars and cellulose

-- Glucose, cellulose and sucrose can be continually harvested without harming or destroying the cyanobacteria (harvesting cellulose and sugars from true algae or crops, like corn and sugarcane, requires killing the organisms and using enzymes and mechanical methods to extract the sugars)

-- Cyanobacteria that can fix atmospheric nitrogen can be grown without petroleum-based fertilizer input

They recently published their research in the journal Cellulose.

Nobles made the new cyanobacteria (also known as blue-green algae) by giving them a set of cellulose-making genes from a non-photosynthetic “vinegar” bacterium, Acetobacter xylinum, well known as a prolific cellulose producer.

The new cyanobacteria produce a relatively pure, gel-like form of cellulose that can be broken down easily into glucose.

“The problem with cellulose harvested from plants is that it’s difficult to break down because it’s highly crystalline and mixed with lignins [for structure] and other compounds,” Nobles says.

He was surprised to discover that the cyanobacteria also secrete large amounts of glucose or sucrose, sugars that can be directly harvested from the organisms.

“The huge expense in making cellulosic ethanol and biofuels is in using enzymes and mechanical methods to break cellulose down,” says Nobles. “Using the cyanobacteria escapes these expensive processes.”

Sources being used or considered for ethanol production in the United States include switchgrass and wood (cellulose), corn (glucose) and sugarcane (sucrose). True algae are also being developed for biodiesel production.

Brown sees a major benefit in using cyanobacteria to produce ethanol is a reduction in the amount of arable land turned over to fuel production and decreased pressure on forests.

“The pressure is on all these corn farmers to produce corn for non-food sources,” says Brown, the Johnson & Johnson Centennial Chair in Plant Cell Biology. “That same demand, for sucrose, is now being put on Brazil to open up more of the Amazon rainforest to produce more sugarcane for our growing energy needs. We don’t want to do that. You’ll never get the forests back.”

Brown and Nobles calculate that the approximate area needed to produce ethanol with corn to fuel all U.S. transportation needs is around 820,000 square miles, an area almost the size of the entire Midwest.

They hypothesize they could produce an equal amount of ethanol using an area half that size with the cyanobacteria based on current levels of productivity in the lab, but they caution that there is a lot of work ahead before cyanobacteria can provide such fuel in the field. Work with laboratory scale photobioreactors has shown the potential for a 17-fold increase in productivity. If this can be achieved in the field and on a large scale, only 3.5 percent of the area growing corn could be used for cyanobacterial biofuels.

Cyanobacteria are just one of many potential solutions for renewable energy, says Brown.

“There will be many avenues to become completely energy independent, and we want to be part of the overall effort,” Brown says. “Petroleum is a precious commodity. We should be using it to make useful products, not just burning it and turning it into carbon dioxide.”

Brown and Nobles are now researching the best methods to scale up efficient and cost-effective production of cyanobacteria. Two patent applications, 20080085520 and 20080085536, were recently published in the United States Patent and Trade Office.

Source: University of Texas at Austin


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: biotech; energy; fuel; gas; oil

Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.....

If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL ”KnOcK” LIST just FReepmail me.....

This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....

1 posted on 04/23/2008 10:27:48 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; sausageseller; ...

BIG TEXAS KnOcK!...........


2 posted on 04/23/2008 10:28:24 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

We can make fuel from bio-engineered germs?


3 posted on 04/23/2008 10:30:23 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
New source for biofuels discovered

Soylent Cyan!

4 posted on 04/23/2008 10:33:50 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

the yield from this source must be very poor...


5 posted on 04/23/2008 10:34:53 AM PDT by rightwinggoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Real Scientists Solve the Fake Crisis of Global Warming (and make fuel incredibly cheap, clean and US made).


6 posted on 04/23/2008 10:37:16 AM PDT by bpjam (Drill For Oil or Lose Your Job!! Vote Nov 3, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Brown and Nobles say their cyanobacteria can be grown in production facilities on non-agricultural lands using salty water unsuitable for human consumption or crops.

So if this bacteria is released into the oceans will they become a gel-like form of cellulose also?

7 posted on 04/23/2008 10:39:21 AM PDT by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Does the article say what these little suckers eat to get the carbon to make the sugars and cellulose?


8 posted on 04/23/2008 10:39:59 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
So, what more news do we have on the reports about a bug modified from those in the stomachs of ruminants, which bug makes hydrocarbon chains. If that really works, making alcohols is a waste of time.
9 posted on 04/23/2008 10:44:10 AM PDT by Supercharged Merlin (The way to take money out of politics is to take the politics out of money !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Note the conspicuous absence of any cellulose or sugars on the surface of these cells.

Oh yeah. I noticed that straight away. Can't fool me.

10 posted on 04/23/2008 10:44:29 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (The secret of Life is letting go. The secret of Love is letting it show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bpjam

Works for me! Hand me a petri dish...


11 posted on 04/23/2008 10:48:02 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Supercharged Merlin

Alcohol (methyl or ethyl) is a necessary ingredient in the making of bio-diesel......


12 posted on 04/23/2008 10:50:03 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Soylent unleaded. Turn those dead relatives into fuel.


13 posted on 04/23/2008 10:50:19 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Yes. Another “germ” makes oil directly as a waste product.........


14 posted on 04/23/2008 10:50:58 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault
Does the article say what these little suckers eat to get the carbon to make the sugars and cellulose?

Doesn't say in the article - I assumed carbon dioxide dissolved in the water.
15 posted on 04/23/2008 10:51:23 AM PDT by chrisser (The Two Americas: Those that want to be coddled, Those that want to be left the hell alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They probably knew about this since the germs ate the oil spill at the Valdiz...


16 posted on 04/23/2008 10:51:49 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There are quite a few of these “alternative” fuel sources coming out that cost a gazillion dollars to produce.


17 posted on 04/23/2008 10:52:29 AM PDT by Rennes Templar ( Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

Being a blue-green algae, and therefore a plant, it uses the same sources as other photosynthesis plants do, CO2......


18 posted on 04/23/2008 10:54:30 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

There are quite a few of these “alternative” fuel sources coming out that cost a gazillion TAXPAYER dollars to produce........there, fixed it....


19 posted on 04/23/2008 10:55:36 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/253742/turning_dead_relatives_into_diamonds.html


20 posted on 04/23/2008 10:56:53 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Truth is stranger than fiction...again.


21 posted on 04/23/2008 10:58:46 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Being a blue-green algae, and therefore a plant, it uses the same sources as other photosynthesis plants do, CO2......

So, CO2 would be a GOOD thing here, right?

22 posted on 04/23/2008 11:01:18 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (It's a fine line between Guardian Angel and Stalker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Lots of potential solutions that always seem to be 10+ years out. We needed a solution not just yesterday, but decades ago.


23 posted on 04/23/2008 11:08:01 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (When hopelessness replaces hope, it opens the door to evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

But will it fly one of these?

http://grab.orsm.net//update20080417/personal_helicopter.wmv


24 posted on 04/23/2008 11:11:19 AM PDT by fishhound (Boycott the Olympics in China.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer_Tropsch

We’ve had one that works and has worked for nearly a century. A tried and proven technology, Fischer-Tropsch..............


25 posted on 04/23/2008 11:12:18 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

Yes, unless you want to kill every plant on the earth.......


26 posted on 04/23/2008 11:13:00 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fishhound

That guy is insane.......


27 posted on 04/23/2008 11:15:49 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Supercharged Merlin
Actually I think that the bacteria produce methane which can be easily converted to longer chain Hydrocarbons. This is hardly news, since Sewer Plants have burned off-gas for centuries. And who has not seen some clown do the tight blujean zippo lighter trick. I agree, why would anyone want to make EtOH? Even this is not a slam dunk, as as far as I know no one is doing it now.
barbra ann
28 posted on 04/23/2008 11:21:54 AM PDT by barb-tex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I don’t understand the role of alcohol in Bio diesel. Can you write the equation for me? Fats and oils are poly alcohols aren’t they?
barbra ann


29 posted on 04/23/2008 11:30:33 AM PDT by barb-tex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: barb-tex

Make your own biodiesel
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_make.html#biod


30 posted on 04/23/2008 11:58:30 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“if production can be scaled up...”

All you need for significant production is a vat approximately two miles in diameter by ten miles high.


31 posted on 04/23/2008 12:04:16 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
It should be noted how little play this will get in the MSM, A story about a different genetically engineered bacterium that directly produced diesel and kerosene also received little fanfare.

Since both stories herald a potential solution that addresses the two main public worries in the MSM (the supply of hydrocarbons from which to refine fuels and the level of CO2), since when is a possible solution to both problems not cause for great celebration? Answer: when the MSM’s worries are not really about supply and CO2.

Why does the MSM and the Left continually fret on these issues? They really seek to suppress our prosperity by suppressing our energy use. Clearly, they cannot be honest with the rest of us about this just as they cannot be honest with themselves. We are seeing self-loathing projected onto the public expression of hatred for our society.

Of course, the way to recover from self-loathing is for the loather to stop doing the things they loathe. Boy, do these people need help and a moral compass.

We had better learn to disregard everything the Left says or we will be in even more trouble than ever.

32 posted on 04/23/2008 12:12:19 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

==> “So if this bacteria is released into the oceans will they become a gel-like form of cellulose also?” <==

Yes - that way you will be able to walk to Europe for your next vacation, and not pollute the environment by burning all that jet fuel.


33 posted on 04/23/2008 12:12:57 PM PDT by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
...a vat approximately two miles in diameter by ten miles high.

Or a whole bunch of littler ones.......

34 posted on 04/23/2008 12:16:37 PM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Somewhere, an environmentalist is shivering. Frankenfoods or ending big oil - horrible decision to have to make.


35 posted on 04/23/2008 12:24:51 PM PDT by tbw2 ("Sirat: Through the Fires of Hell" by Tamara Wilhite - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

Is it still okay to buy rice, or are we going to have to make do with Top Ramen...?


36 posted on 04/23/2008 12:32:10 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Why hoard flour? Buy baking mix in bulk. A lot less work, and I’ll still use it. Broccoli cheddar rice mixes and couscous mixes, too, are getting added to my list. If rice shoots up in price, so will the mixes. And people aren’t buying the slightly more expensive stuff (pre-prepared/pre-mixed) nearly as much as they are “must get rice / flour / corn”.


37 posted on 04/23/2008 12:36:39 PM PDT by tbw2 ("Sirat: Through the Fires of Hell" by Tamara Wilhite - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: barb-tex

http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_make.html#biodnew


38 posted on 04/23/2008 1:19:24 PM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault
Does the article say what these little suckers eat

Lets hope it's liberal greenies!

39 posted on 04/23/2008 2:23:02 PM PDT by Don Carlos (No 8 Do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

bump


40 posted on 04/23/2008 2:27:30 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

PING for algoil/cyano-bacteria-fuel.


41 posted on 04/23/2008 2:43:27 PM PDT by WOSG (Gameplan: Obama beats Hillary, McCain beats Obama, conservatives beat RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Great way to commute though.

Do you know if the use of electricity to titrate glycerol from biodiesel applies to the raw vegetable oil or only as a last stagte to biodiesel? I saw some youtube of it and it was quick to produce glycerol between a positive and negeative posts and leave nice clear bisodeisel.


42 posted on 04/23/2008 8:24:24 PM PDT by fishhound (Boycott the Olympics in China.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fishhound
Do you know if the use of electricity to titrate glycerol from biodiesel applies to the raw vegetable oil or only as a last stagte to biodiesel?

That's a new one on me! Got the link?.......

43 posted on 04/24/2008 5:06:07 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
That is a problem with any biological process capital ,Sloow, which means higher capital cost. The reason it cost more to make Light Beer is the fermentation period is 5 days instead of the 3 days for real Beer. Although the raw material cost is lower, the capital cost balances it out.
barbra ann
44 posted on 04/24/2008 7:53:38 AM PDT by barb-tex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Supercharged Merlin; Froufrou

Here’s an post about the ‘oil bug’:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2003052/posts


45 posted on 04/24/2008 8:00:59 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I found them...
Electrostatic separation of glycerol from raw biodiesel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9ll_ojIP2c

Electrostatic glycerol separation - WVO feedstock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9ll_ojIP2c

High Speed, Glycerol Separation using High Voltage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdDvAMojZ90


46 posted on 04/24/2008 9:09:48 PM PDT by fishhound (Boycott the Olympics in China.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; Mother Abigail; EBH; vetvetdoug; Smokin' Joe; Global2010; Battle Axe

BUMP & A MICRO PING


47 posted on 04/24/2008 10:30:33 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Brown and Nobles calculate that the approximate area needed to produce ethanol with corn to fuel all U.S. transportation needs is around 820,000 square miles, an area almost the size of the entire Midwest.

They hypothesize they could produce an equal amount of ethanol using an area half that size ....

Only 410,000 square miles, only half the size of the 'midwest'. And you'll be able to smell it in Boston...the world's biggest slime pit.

And where are we going to grow food?

48 posted on 04/24/2008 10:51:58 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

Expert predicts ‘hydrogen economy’ will create millions of jobs
PersonnelToday,com(UK) | April 11, 2008
Posted on 04/14/2008 1:19:41 AM PDT by Dane
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2001187/posts

If you want the US to be out of the grip of OPEC, raise your hand(vanity)
April 14, 2008 | Me, Myself, & I
Posted on 04/14/2008 7:32:18 PM PDT by Dane
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2001655/posts


49 posted on 04/25/2008 12:10:18 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic
Lots of potential solutions that always seem to be 10+ years out. We needed a solution not just yesterday, but decades ago.

Then I guess you'd better get working on that time machine...

In reality, the earth still has lots of oil, and our shortages are self imposed by people worried about over hyped "environmental" concerns that are based on a lot of fear and a little unproven science.

50 posted on 04/25/2008 7:04:34 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson