Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas LDS deal with confusion
Deseret News ^ | 04/21/2008 | Ben Winslow

Posted on 04/21/2008 7:29:14 AM PDT by JRochelle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-352 next last
To: Old Mountain man
You've posted this, word-for-word, multiple times on multiple threads.

Sheer repetition will not sway skeptics.

21 posted on 04/21/2008 8:00:37 AM PDT by Malacoda (A day without a pi$$ed-off muslim is like a day without sunshine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

Delphi, the people who are hopping on to this FLDS mess and using it to smear the Mormon church are the same people who hijacked every Mitt Romney thread to smear the Mormon church.

It takes a particularly vile person to attack another’s religion the way these people do. And there is a nest of such vile people on FR, unfortunately. That’s why I quit donating.

You can’t reason with them. If you try in good faith to explain things, they ignore your valid points, twist what you said, and end up arguing with straw men.

Pearls/swine.


22 posted on 04/21/2008 8:01:24 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Malacoda

I am merely correcting what I can charitably call “mis-statements” rather than the blatant lies they really are.


23 posted on 04/21/2008 8:02:03 AM PDT by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen
Maybe the statement should read “there is no significant connection.” I will the say the same thing re connection between mainline Protestant churches and David Koresh and Jim Jones. I do not judge Protestants by the actions of Paul Crouch or cults such as Children of God even though many, many parallels can be drawn.

That's an interesting point. However you leave out one very important distinction.
The heresies preached by Jim Jones, David Koresh, and even Paul Crouch are perversions of Christian doctrine. They are supposedly "new" ideas that the church somehow missed in the past.
The whacked out beliefs of the FLDS sects are in fact restorations of "divine" revelation and doctrine preached by the very founders of the LDS church. To say that Joseph Smith and Brigham Young did not preach these abominations is simply not true.
24 posted on 04/21/2008 8:02:19 AM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jwatz49
Not only did he practice polygamy, he also married and diddled women who already had husbands.
25 posted on 04/21/2008 8:02:21 AM PDT by JRochelle (Keep sweet means shut up and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

50 plus wives? That is a definite lie of commission.


26 posted on 04/21/2008 8:03:12 AM PDT by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
The fLDS are Mormons: lock, stock and barrel all the way.

Funny, I work with a couple, and they hate being called Mormons, in fact they minimize the LDS part and just call themselves fundamentalists.
27 posted on 04/21/2008 8:04:06 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; All
There are millions of mormons who believe EVERYTHING bad about non-mormon faiths, and proselytize by preaching that only mormons have the "true gospel" and that's what they're going to do. Sounds like schadenfreude to me.

Your comment also prompted me to think: Do mainstream Mormons proselytize the fLDS? If not, why not? Do the mainstream Mormons send missionaries to fundamentalist Mormons in Hildale, UT & Colorado City AZ & Bountiful BC & certain parts of Juarez, Mexico? If not, that would seem to confirm the duplicity of Salt Lake's LDS HQ: Here they say fLDS is another "faith" yet for some reason this is the only "faith" not to receive standard house-to-house visitations from Mormon missionaries!

28 posted on 04/21/2008 8:05:10 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marbren
Which group would Joseph Smith belong to.

Good point.

29 posted on 04/21/2008 8:05:14 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jwatz49
Joseph Smith did not practice Polygamy; so, you figure it out!

Ok then...we won't call him a Polygamist. Let's just call him an adulter and child abuser then. How's that?
Or would you rather keep your blinders on? Either way is fine with me.
30 posted on 04/21/2008 8:05:47 AM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

I notice you posted the exact thing to another thread. It’s difficult to tell if this is satire or not.


31 posted on 04/21/2008 8:06:15 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jwatz49
Joseph Smith did not practice Polygamy; so, you figure it out!

Um, as a Mormon, let me say, yes he did, and what are you smoking?
32 posted on 04/21/2008 8:06:33 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Unfortunately you are repeating slanderous lies.

“What a thing it is for a man to be accused of committing adultery, and having seven wives,
when I can only find one”—Joseph Smith (LDS History of the Church 6:411).

If you want to attack Brigham in this manner; I have no reply.


33 posted on 04/21/2008 8:07:40 AM PDT by jwatz49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser; jwatz49
Um, as a Mormon, let me say, yes he did, and what are you smoking?

From the tenor of jwatz' posts, I deduce he is probably too young to drink, new to the FR mormon threads, and very possibly either a new convert or investigator.

In other words, someone you could mentor.

34 posted on 04/21/2008 8:10:04 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
You guys bringing up Fred Phelps is so funny. I could not care less about that.

It's an apt comparison, they are embarrassing and break the law, these guys in Texas are embarrassing and break the law.
35 posted on 04/21/2008 8:10:43 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
"Bigot"

A person of strong conviction or prejudice, especially in matters of race, religion or politics, who is intolerant of those who differ with him.

"Bigotry"

The attitude, state of mind, or behavior characteristic of a bigot; intolerance.

36 posted on 04/21/2008 8:10:48 AM PDT by davisfh ( Islam is a serious mental illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jwatz49
Joseph Smith did not practice Polygamy; so, you figure it out!

Oh really, he didn't??

<

Marriage(s)
Spouse:  Catherine WALKER (AFN: 1CB1-M7) Family
Marriage: 
Spouse:  Sarah SCOTT (AFN: 1Z2L-ST) Family
Marriage: 
Spouse:  Sarah STILES (AFN: 8R67-VW) Family
Marriage: 
Spouse:  Desdemona Wadsworth FULLMER (AFN: 2S9J-LX) Family
Marriage:  1842
Nauvoo, Hancock, Il
Spouse:  Sarah LAWRENCE (AFN: 8R65-X0) Family
Marriage:  Abt 11 1843 May
Spouse:  Mary Elizabeth ROLLINS (AFN: 17RW-FT) Family
Marriage:  17 Jan 1842
Nauvoo, Hancock, Il
Spouse:  Emma HALE (AFN: 91T1-HN) Family
Marriage:  18 Jan 1827
South Bainbridge, Chenango, Ny
Spouse:  Amanda Melissa BARNES (AFN: 1S4B-X9) Family
Marriage:  Sealed 19 1852 Jan
Salt Lake City, Ut
Spouse:  Sylvia Porter SESSIONS (AFN: 1H4D-3M) Family
Marriage:  26 Jan 1846
Spouse:  Zina Diantha HUNTINGTON (AFN: 8R65-S9) Family
Marriage:  27 Oct 1841
Nauvoo, Hancock, Il
Spouse:  Mary HOUSTON (AFN: 2HDJ-8W) Family
Marriage:  3 Feb 1846
Spouse:  Nancy Mariah WINCHESTER (AFN: 34HH-3H) Family
Marriage:  3 Feb 1846
Spouse:  Helen Mar KIMBALL (AFN: 1FZD-48) Family
Marriage:  May 1843
Smith's Store, Nauvoo, Hancock, Il
Spouse:  Lucy WALKER (AFN: 3FNF-72) Family
Marriage:  1 May 1843
Smith's Store, Nauvoo, Hancock, Il
Spouse:  Rhoda RICHARDS (AFN: 1F72-5R) Family
Marriage:  12 Jun 1843
Nauvoo, Illinois
Spouse:  Eliza Roxey SNOW (AFN: 272Q-KP) Family
Marriage:  29 Jun 1842
Smith's Store, Nauvoo, Hancock, Il
Spouse:  Sarah Ann WHITNEY (AFN: 3LTZ-0W) Family
Marriage:  27 Jul 1842
Nauvoo, Hnck, Il
Spouse:  Martha MCBRIDE (AFN: 1JJW-V0) Family
Marriage:  Aug 1842
Smith's Store, Nauvoo, Hancock, Il
Spouse:  Malissa LOTT (AFN: 1CZR-T8) Family
Marriage:  20 Sep 1843
Nauvoo, Illinois
Spouse:  Fanny YOUNG (AFN: 1BK5-VM) Family
Marriage:  2 Nov 1843
Spouse:  Prescendia Lathrop HUNTINGTON (AFN: 1RBQ-97) Family
Marriage:  11 Dec 1841
Smith's Store, Nauvoo, Hancock, Il
Spouse:  Sophronia Gray FROST (AFN: 2HZ7-PN) Family
Marriage: 
Spouse:  Melissa SNOW (AFN: 272Q-N7) Family
Marriage: 
Spouse:  Cordelia Calista MORLEY (AFN: 1CP9-HR) Family
Marriage: 

37 posted on 04/21/2008 8:10:48 AM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

For people who have no connection and disapprove of their practices, there are sure a lot of mormons defending this cult.


38 posted on 04/21/2008 8:10:48 AM PDT by Politicalmom (The children were taken because they were either being raised to be raped, or raised to be a rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
Pearls/swine.

Lipstick/pig

Photobucket

39 posted on 04/21/2008 8:13:22 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jwatz49
Joseph Smith did not practice Polygamy

Actually Joseph Smith and Brigham Young did in fact practice polygamy. There shouldn't be any question there because it just is fact.

Now what that polygamy entailed is up for debate on both sides.

40 posted on 04/21/2008 8:13:32 AM PDT by Domandred (McCain's 'R' is a typo that has never been corrected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-352 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson