Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mothers of Sect Children Forced to Leave
Google News ^ | 14 April 2008 | By JENNIFER DOBNER and MICHAEL GRACZYK

Posted on 04/14/2008 8:17:56 PM PDT by BlackVeil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-140 next last
To: keats5

“at first blush, to take the men off the ranch and leave the women and children”

It seems to me that the women are complicit in the crimes of the men. They were providing the children for sex with the men.


61 posted on 04/15/2008 6:52:03 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Former President Jimmy Carter has a 13-year-old daughter, BTW.

What?

That's news to me, and I can't stand the has-been, worst-president-ever Jimmah.

Do you have a source?

62 posted on 04/15/2008 6:53:30 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Notice how the prosecutor is not having any Nifong style press conferences?

I think the lawyer in charge knows they are in trouble. (or at least have a problem)


63 posted on 04/15/2008 7:00:07 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
But also, it has been reported that there are multiple Dale Barlows, Dale Jeffs Barlow, etc. If you look at the public notice of the guardianship issues there are 419 children, and approximately 20 surmanes (or combinations of the same surmane).

My two cents...the FDLS pervs are pretty savvy at playing both welfare fraud, but also obfiscating state inquiries into their 'cult' by making personal id's hard to obtain. I reference that by the fact that the name used by the 16 year old girl (who made the original call) at the hospital (where she was treated for the injuries from a beating) was also 'used' by multiples girls of that age during the questioning by the TX authorities. The kids have been 'schooled' since birth to distrust all outsiders and to lie about something as simple as their name...

64 posted on 04/15/2008 7:00:53 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (PaMom--a broken glass DINO til 4/23/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil

Wow. Interesting link you posted. I’m going to set forth the listed children from that like here:

2779 IN THE INTEREST OF BABY GIRL JESSOP #26600675, A CHILD
2780 IN THE INTEREST OF VILATE NIELSEN, A CHILD
2781 IN THE INTEREST OF ESTER NIELSON, A CHILD
2782 IN THE INTEREST OF MARILYN ROBACK, A CHILD
2783 IN THE INTEREST OF SUSIE ANN JEFFS, A CHILD
2784 IN THE INTEREST OF SHANALYN JEFFS, A CHILD
2785 IN THE INTEREST OF SETH JEFFS, A CHILD
2786 IN THE INTEREST OF JOSIAH BARLOW JEFFS, A CHILD
2787 IN THE INTEREST OF STEED JEFFS, A CHILD
2788 IN THE INTEREST OF LEAH JESSOP JEFFS, A CHILD
2789 IN THE INTEREST OF MARILEE JEFFS, A CHILD
2790 IN THE INTEREST OF KAYLEE JEFFS, A CHILD
2791 IN THE INTEREST OF RICHARD JEFFS, A CHILD
2792 IN THE INTEREST OF JOSEPH SMITH JEFFS, A CHILD
2793 IN THE INTEREST OF JAMES RULON JEFFS, A CHILD
2794 IN THE INTEREST OF HANNAH JEFFS, A CHILD
2795 IN THE INTEREST OF ALLEN JEFFS, A CHILD
2796 IN THE INTEREST OF SAMANTHA EMAK, A CHILD
2797 IN THE INTEREST OF ETZEL #26609430, A CHILD
2798 IN THE INTEREST OF FREDDIE #26609430, A CHILD
2799 IN THE INTEREST OF ABRAHAM #26609359, A CHILD
2800 IN THE INTEREST OF AMBER #26609387, A CHILD
2801 IN THE INTEREST OF ANN #26609432, A CHILD
2802 IN THE INTEREST OF DANIELLE BARLOW, A CHILD
2803 IN THE INTEREST OF EZRA BARLOW, A CHILD
2804 IN THE INTEREST OF RENON BARLOW, A CHILD
2805 IN THE INTEREST OF STEVEN BARLOW, A CHILD
2806 IN THE INTEREST OF BEN #26690422, A CHILD
2807 IN THE INTEREST OF BRENDA #26690422, A CHILD
2808 IN THE INTEREST OF ABRAM BARLOW, A CHILD
2809 IN THE INTEREST OF AMON BARLOW, A CHILD
2810 IN THE INTEREST OF AUTUMN BARLOW, A CHILD
2811 IN THE INTEREST OF IDA #26609422, A CHILD
2812 IN THE INTEREST OF NAOMI (LAST NAME UNKNOWN) #26609432, A CHILD
2813 IN THE INTEREST OF NAOMI #26609436, A CHILD
2814 IN THE INTEREST OF NETTIE #26609402, A CHILD
2815 IN THE INTEREST OF JAMES #26609371, A CHILD
2816 IN THE INTEREST OF ABRAHAM LEROY JESSUP, A/K/A ABRAHAM LeROY JESSOP,
A/K/A ABRAHAM LEROY JESSUP, A/K/A ABRAHAM LeROY JESSUP, A CHILD
2817 IN THE INTEREST OF ANDREW JESSOP, A CHILD
2818 IN THE INTEREST OF BENJAMIN JESSOP, A CHILD
2819 IN THE INTEREST OF BETHANY JESSOP, A CHILD
2820 IN THE INTEREST OF CHARITY JESSOP, A CHILD
2821 IN THE INTEREST OF DAVID LEROY JESSOP, A/K/A DAVID LeROY
JESSOP, A/K/A DAVID LEROY JESSUP, A/K/A DAVID LeROY JESSOP, A CHILD
2822 IN THE INTEREST OF JAMES JESSOP, A CHILD
2823 IN THE INTEREST OF ALLEN DUTSON, A CHILD
2824 IN THE INTEREST OF MORONI DUTSON, A CHILD
2825 IN THE INTEREST OF NANCY DUTSON, A CHILD
2826 IN THE INTEREST OF REBECCA DUTSON, A CHILD
2827 IN THE INTEREST OF SHAUNA DUTSON, A CHILD
2828 IN THE INTEREST OF BRIGHAM EMACK, A CHILD
2829 IN THE INTEREST OF WADE LYNDSAY, A CHILD
2830 IN THE INTEREST OF ROULENE DUTSON, A CHILD
2831 IN THE INTEREST OF MALE CHILD (NAME UNKNOWN), A CHILD
2832 IN THE INTEREST OF ZAYNE LYNDSAY, A CHILD
2833 IN THE INTEREST OF MARYANN (LAST NAME UNKNOWN) #26609422, A CHILD
2834 IN THE INTEREST OF MARYANN(LAST NAME UNKNOWN) #26609432, A CHILD
2835 IN THE INTEREST OF MATY (LAST NAME UNKNOWN), A CHILD
2836 IN THE INTEREST OF NAOMI ROBACK, A CHILD
2837 IN THE INTEREST OF RULON ROBACK, A CHILD
2838 IN THE INTEREST OF RULEN #26609402, A CHILD
2839 IN THE INTEREST OF RULON #26609387 (LAST NAME UKNOWN) A CHILD
2840 IN THE INTEREST OF RULON #26609395, A CHILD
2841 IN THE INTEREST OF RULON #26609432 (LAST NAME UNKNOWN) A CHILD
2842 IN THE INTEREST OF RULON #26609435, A CHILD
2843 IN THE INTEREST OF JOESON JESSOP, A CHILD
2844 IN THE INTEREST OF JOSEPH JESSOP, A CHILD
2845 IN THE INTEREST OF LEROY SUNDERLAND JESSOP, A/K/A LeROY SUNDERLAND
JESSOP, A/K/A LEROY SUNDERLAND JESSUP, A/K/A LeROY SUNDERLAND JESSUP, A CHILD
2846 IN THE INTEREST OF LYLE LEROY JESSOP, A/K/A LYLE LeROY JESSOP,
A/K/A LYLE LEROY JESSUP, A/K/A LYLE LeROY JESSUP, A CHILD
2847 IN THE INTEREST OF MARIA JESSOP, A/K/A MARIA JESSUP, A CHILD
2848 IN THE INTEREST OF MELANIE JESSOP, A/K/A MELANIE JESSUP, A CHILD
2849 IN THE INTEREST OF MELISSA JESSOP, A CHILD
2850 IN THE INTEREST OF REBECCA JESSOP, A CHILD
2851 IN THE INTEREST OF SARA #26609406, A CHILD
2852 IN THE INTEREST OF SETH (LAST NAME UNKNOWN) #26609403, A CHILD
2853 IN THE INTEREST OF SHAWN #26609430, A CHILD
2854 IN THE INTEREST OF ANGELA STEED, A CHILD
2855 IN THE INTEREST OF HARMONY STEED, A CHILD
2856 IN THE INTEREST OF JOSIE STEED, A CHILD
2857 IN THE INTEREST OF SARAH JESSOP BARLOW, A/K/A SARAH BARLOW, A CHILD
2858 IN THE INTEREST OF ESTHER NIELSEN, A/K/A ESTHER NEILSEN, A CHILD
2859 IN THE INTEREST OF KAYLEE STEED, A CHILD
2860 IN THE INTEREST OF ESTHER NIELSON, A CHILD
2861 IN THE INTEREST OF KENDRA STEED, A CHILD
2862 IN THE INTEREST OF LEANNA STEED, A CHILD
2863 IN THE INTEREST OF CURTIS LYNDSAY, A CHILD
2864 IN THE INTEREST OF DANIEL LYNDSAY, A CHILD
2865 IN THE INTEREST OF WENDELL JESSOP, A CHILD
2866 IN THE INTEREST OF WILLIAM LEROY JESSOP, A/K/A WILLIAM LeROY JESSOP,
A/K/A WILLIAM LEROY JESSUP, A/K/A WILLIAM LeROY JESSUP, A CHILD
2867 IN THE INTEREST OF YVONNE JESSOP, A CHILD
2868 IN THE INTEREST OF ZIANA JESSOP, A CHILD
2869 IN THE INTEREST OF AVALON JOHNSON, A CHILD
2870 IN THE INTEREST OF SERMELIA JOHNSON, A CHILD
2871 IN THE INTEREST OF SUZANNE JOHNSON, A CHILD
2972 IN THE INTEREST OF VILATE JOHNSON, A CHILD
2873 IN THE INTEREST OF JOSHUA #26609395, A CHILD
2874 IN THE INTEREST OF LORETTA (LAST NAME UNKNOWN) #26609432, A CHILD
2875 IN THE INTEREST OF LESLIE STEED, A CHILD
2876 IN THE INTEREST OF LEVI STEED, A CHILD
2877 IN THE INTEREST OF LISA STEED, A CHILD
2878 IN THE INTEREST OF LUCINDA STEED, A CHILD
2879 IN THE INTEREST OF LUKE STEED, A CHILD
2880 IN THE INTEREST OF MARTHA STEED, A CHILD
2881 IN THE INTEREST OF MARY STEED, A CHILD
2882 IN THE INTEREST OF MATY STEED, A CHILD
2883 IN THE INTEREST OF MORMON #26609402, A CHILD
2884 IN THE INTEREST OF MILLENNIA #26609395, A CHILD
2885 IN THE INTEREST OF SYLVIA STEED, A CHILD
2886 IN THE INTEREST OF RULEN STEED, A CHILD
2887 IN THE INTEREST OF SARAH STEED, A CHILD
2888 IN THE INTEREST OF SHEM STEED, A CHILD
2889 IN THE INTEREST OF TROY STEED, A CHILD
2890 IN THE INTEREST OF WOODY (LAST NAME UNKNOWN) #26609405, A CHILD
2891 IN THE INTEREST OF WENDELL #26609406, A CHILD
2892 IN THE INTEREST OF WARREN #26609395, A CHILD
2893 IN THE INTEREST OF UNKNOWN BABY BOY #26609354, A CHILD
2894 IN THE INTEREST OF SUNSHINE #26609383, A CHILD
2895 IN THE INTEREST OF ZANE STEED, A CHILD
2896 IN THE INTEREST OF RACHEL STEED, A CHILD
2897 IN THE INTEREST OF OLIVE STEED, A CHILD
2898 IN THE INTEREST OF NAOMI STEED, A CHILD
2899 IN THE INTEREST OF MONICA STEED, A CHILD
2900 IN THE INTEREST OF MIRANDA STEED, A CHILD
2901 IN THE INTEREST OF HYRUM SMITH JEFFS, A CHILD
2902 IN THE INTEREST OF 330 CHILDREN FROM THE YFZ RANCH
2903 IN THE INTEREST OF 16 CHILDREN FROM THE YFZ RANCH


65 posted on 04/15/2008 7:01:59 AM PDT by keats5 (tolerance of intolerant people is cultural suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

True. I agree.


66 posted on 04/15/2008 7:02:32 AM PDT by keats5 (tolerance of intolerant people is cultural suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: berdie
"This post is very different from your first post, or maybe I’m tired. What does this have to do with the Muslim community?"

The issue of polygamy and welfare fraud in the Muslim community. Same type of thing going on there.

67 posted on 04/15/2008 7:11:24 AM PDT by awaken2spirit (When one fornicates with ignorance, the result of that union is chaos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

Perhaps. But they were targeting one specific man, who hasn’t left Arizona in at least five years. Also, notice that all the of the lurid allegations have come from an anonymous telephone call, from a girl that no one is sure even exists. With the details she supposedly gave, that are online in the probable cause statement, she should have been easy to identify, regardless of the name she gave. She would be pregnant, have evidence of a recent beating, and there would be some evidence that she had been treated at a hospital.

Also, they have had 416 children and some number of women in custody now for how long? But no lurid details emerging from a real, live person?


68 posted on 04/15/2008 8:10:54 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
So, you really believe that if the authorities know who and where this girl is they are going to broadcast the information so that she will be a target for retaliation?

I believe that if the authorities think they have a shadow of a smidgen of success, they hold a press conference

69 posted on 04/15/2008 8:14:55 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (So you want to be President - it's like reality TV, only real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
But no lurid details emerging from a real, live person?

Pregnant girls ages 13 and 14 - that's pretty lurid.

70 posted on 04/15/2008 8:30:34 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

And how many of them have been confirmed.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t agree with these polygamists. But, if they would limit themselves to girls above the age of consent, and not commit welfare fraud — and I’m not sure the FLDS engage in welfare fraud — I think they should be left alone. If they are not marrying underage girls and not commiting welfare fraud, they are not hurting anybody.

And, in a country where 25 percent of the teenage girls on the outside have venereal diseases, it’s hard to get as worked up even over underage marriages as it used to be.


71 posted on 04/15/2008 8:38:54 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom
He was respectful but you could tell he was skeptical. He asked her if she was aware of what actually happened to the Jews after she made her outrageous claim that they were being treated like the Jews in Germany.

She said yes, she knew her history and she has a college degree. You could tell he was not impressed with that answer.

Cooper and 360 have been on this case for several years, starting with the Warren Jeffs trial.

There was a reporter in Colorado City who said how he was chased out of town today by thugs.

Even the local police in that area are polygamists. Cooper said it is hard to imagine things like that happening in America today.

Anderson gives this story the exposure it deserves.

72 posted on 04/15/2008 8:40:20 AM PDT by JRochelle (Q. Where are all the polygamist men?.A. Hiding behind the skirts of their many wives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Oh please. Your spin for polygamists is ridiculous.

The warrant was issued last week, before the Rangers met with the Dale Barlow in AZ.


73 posted on 04/15/2008 8:43:39 AM PDT by JRochelle (Q. Where are all the polygamist men?.A. Hiding behind the skirts of their many wives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jubal Harshaw

According to the CDC, 11.7% of teens were pregnant in the general population in the U.S. while 3.7% of teens 13-17 were pregnant.

With a reported 15-20 teens pregnant out of the 416 forcibly removed from their homes in Texas the pregnancy rate for these girls could be stated as 3.6-4.8 percent, roughly the same as the nation as a whole.

Why doesn’t the state take away all the children?


74 posted on 04/15/2008 8:45:47 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
" But, if they would limit themselves to girls above the age of consent, and not commit welfare fraud — and I’m not sure the FLDS engage in welfare fraud — I think they should be left alone."

In the interest of full disclosure, you are LDS, are you not?

75 posted on 04/15/2008 8:49:05 AM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

If these same actions were taken by an individual they would be seen as kidnapping.

If crimes have been committed, reserve punishment until conviction.


76 posted on 04/15/2008 8:50:58 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

Of course. So what?


77 posted on 04/15/2008 8:53:01 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

The warrant may have been issued before they talked with Barlow, but it was executed afterward, according to Barlow’s lawyer in Arizona.


78 posted on 04/15/2008 8:54:13 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Jubal Harshaw
This entire thing is going to be tossed on the basis of a defective Search Warrant.

And the citizens of the State of Texas will pay heavily for the incompetence.

The really sad thing is that the abusers will most likely get off scot-free.

L

79 posted on 04/15/2008 8:58:29 AM PDT by Lurker (Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
According to the CDC, 11.7% of teens were pregnant in the general population in the U.S. while 3.7% of teens 13-17 were pregnant.

With a reported 15-20 teens pregnant out of the 416 forcibly removed from their homes in Texas the pregnancy rate for these girls could be stated as 3.6-4.8 percent, roughly the same as the nation as a whole.

All 416 teens were not girls, and all were not between the ages of 13-17. I wonder what the percentage of girls between 13-17 residing at the compound were pregnant.

Based upon statistics, if one half of all children were female we are down to 208. if we divide 208 by 17 (for each year under age 18) we would have approximately 12 of each age. If you then times 12 by 5, you get the approximate number of female children ages 13-17, or about 60 girls. If 15 to 20 of them are pregnant, we have a pregnancy rate of 25 to 33% which is 10 TIMES the rate of pregnancy nation wide.

Your comparison is faulty.

80 posted on 04/15/2008 8:59:09 AM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson