Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gates: Iran boosts support for militias
AP on Yahoo ^ | 4/11/08 | Lolita C. Baldor - ap

Posted on 04/11/2008 3:30:59 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - Iranian support for militias in Iraq has grown, top U.S. defense leaders said Friday, asserting that recent battles in Basra gave the Iraqis an eye-opening view of Iran's increased negative role there.

More broadly, the outlook for more progress toward stabilizing Iraq and reducing the U.S. troop presence is clouded by several other potential pitfalls in coming months, including the prospect of increased violence with the approach of provincial Iraqi elections this fall, Gen. David Petraeus said in an interview at the Pentagon with a group of reporters.

Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, also cited the return of refugees and the release of security detainees as potential sources of instability to be considered as he determines when, and at what pace, U.S. troop withdrawals should resume after July. He reiterated that while he hopes further withdrawals are possible he will be careful not to reduce so quickly as to jeopardize the security gains of the past several months.

In separate remarks, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the U.S. will be as aggressive as possible to counter the increase in Iranian support for militias, adding that the Iraqis "are in a position themselves to bring some pressures to bear on Iran."

Speaking after a series of hearings on Capitol Hill mapping out progress in Iraq, Gates also acknowledged that future troop withdrawals will go more slowly than he had initially hoped last year.

"I think that the process has gone a little slower," Gates told a Pentagon news conference Friday. He said that plans — endorsed by President Bush on Thursday — to halt troop withdrawals at least until mid-September would make it a "real challenge" to pull out five additional brigades by the end of the year.

Last year Gates said he was holding out hope that the U.S. presence in Iraq could drop to about 10 brigades — or roughly 100,000 troops — by the end of this year. On Thursday, he told senators he had abandoned that hope.

Iran's role has been one of the complicating factors.

"I think that there is some sense of an increased level of supply of (Iranian) weapons and support to these groups," said Gates, referring to what the military has termed "special groups" of Shiite militants. "But whether it's a dramatic increase over recent weeks, I just don't know."

Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said recent clashes between Iraqi security forces and Shiite militias in Basra highlighted the increase in Iranian support.

"I think the Iraqi government now has a clearer view of the malign impact of Iran's activities inside Iraq," said Gates. "I think they have had what I would call a growing understanding of that negative Iranian role. But I think what they encountered in Basra was a real eye-opener for them."

In his interview, Petraeus would not discuss Iran on the record.

Late last year, military commanders suggested Iran may be slowing the flow of illegal weapons across the border into Iraq. And Tehran recently helped broker a truce between the Iraqi government and radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, whose Mahdi Army is battling U.S. and Iraqi troops in Baghdad.

On Friday, Gates and Mullen discounted that suspected decrease in weapons flow.

In related comments, Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador in Iraq, said Friday that the Bush administration wants to test whether Iran is really interested in talking to the United States about Iraq.

Crocker said that even though Iran has backed out of recent appointments to meet with him for such discussions, he's ready and waiting for the meeting. He said the administration thinks it's worthwhile to make the case to Iran that it should butt out of Iraq's internal affairs.

Gates, meanwhile, said Friday that he doubts Muqtada al-Sadr would be subject to arrest by U.S. forces. Al-Sadr is believed to be in Iran while elements of his militia in the Sadr City section of the capital fight Iraqi government troops supported by the U.S. military.

Asked if an arrest was possible, Gates said: "I would be surprised along those lines — a move to arrest him. He is a significant political figure. We want him to work within the political process. He has a large following. It is important that he become a part of the process, if he is not already."

Gates said anyone who is prepared to "work within the political process in Iraq, and peacefully, are not enemies of the United States."

Petraeus told reporters that al-Sadr's organization has to be reckoned with.

"It is a movement that must be addressed and, to varying degrees, accommodated," Petraeus said. He added that he hopes al-Sadr will maintain the cease-fire he declared last August.

"We are concerned about the maintenance of the cease-fire," Petraeus said. "It has been one of the three or four most important factors in reducing the level of violence" since late summer.

A senior aide to al-Sadr was assassinated Friday in the holy city of Najaf, officials said. Authorities immediately announced a citywide curfew and security forces were seen deploying on the streets. The killing threatened to raise tensions amid a violent standoff between al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia and the U.S.-backed Iraqi government.

Mullen, appearing alongside Gates at the news conference, said he regards al-Sadr as "somewhat of an enigma."

"So, I think Sadr clearly is a very important and key player in all this," Mullen added. "Exactly where he's headed and what impact he'll have long term, it's, I think, is out there still to be determined."

While Gates said troop withdrawals will go more slowly than he initially wanted, he reiterated that he is "confident that we will have a lower number of troops" in Iraq next year.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; iraq; militias; robertgates; sadr; support
How many more hundreds, thousands or millions have to die before we crunch the cockroaches that hide behind a 'Religion of Peace'?

What is the 'tripwire' that will set in motion the demise of a regime bent on the spread of death and destruction in the name of defending its little corner of the world?

1 posted on 04/11/2008 3:31:07 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Defense Department: http://www.defenselink.mil


2 posted on 04/11/2008 3:31:25 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Iran belongs at the tip of our spear, impaled right through the heart


3 posted on 04/11/2008 3:33:02 PM PDT by infantrywhooah (Hold your nose and vote in November. Even McCain is better than the alternatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Since Iran declared war on us back in the Jimmy Carter days why have we allowed them to survive this long. Take them out NOW!

They along with their principal supporter, devil and general in Iraq al-Sadr have murdered thousands of Iraqi and Americans. Why are they allowed to survive? If we are going to win this war they must be destroyed just as we did the Nazi and the Japanese.

4 posted on 04/11/2008 3:45:22 PM PDT by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the Royal 100 Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infantrywhooah

But wait! Obama wants to sit and talk, he’s sure that he will be able make friends!


5 posted on 04/11/2008 3:52:51 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (I'd rather be hunting with dick than driving with Ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

One can immediately tell this is an A. P. story by looking at the first line and seeing the verb “asserting” (our field commander and Defense Secretary are “asserting” that Iran is increasing supplies to its militia).

The Bush Administration, in the A. P. lexicon, is always “asserting” rather than “stating.”

Another A. P. favorite is “Bush ARGUED today that that things are improving in Iraq.” Bush may have made a major policy speech, but to the A. P. he “argued” (argued with whom, one may ask...the A.P.?).

The A. P.’s liberal bias is a definite factor in the increasingly abysmal condition of newspaper circulation and hence ad revenue.


6 posted on 04/11/2008 9:12:51 PM PDT by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson