Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sandra Day O'Connor Justifies Prayer Limits
worldnetdaily.com ^ | March 20, 2008 | staff

Posted on 03/21/2008 10:10:08 AM PDT by kellynla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Doe Eyes

America is Not a Muslim country, it’s a Judeo-Christian country and public prayers shoud be either Jewish or Christian. If the Islamo-Fascists have their way and turn America into an Islamic Republic, then prayers to Mohammed or Allah will be ok.


21 posted on 03/21/2008 11:06:04 AM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

“Who cares what O’Connor says?”

The problem is that O’Conner is on an appeals court panel.


22 posted on 03/21/2008 11:06:53 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Then what’s the use of praying? Only God, through Jesus and in His Name, answers or hears those prayers anyway. How dumb are folks anyway?


23 posted on 03/21/2008 11:06:54 AM PDT by Marysecretary (.GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

See we are Americans and God owes us a listen whether we reject His only begotten Son who sacrificed Himself for our transgressions or not. It’s in the Bill of Rights, isn’t it? I mean, God has read our Bill of Rights, hasn’t he? /sarcasm


24 posted on 03/21/2008 11:14:50 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Whenever I see the name “Sandra Day O’Connor”, I still think of Ronald Reagan. But I usually don’t read past where it says “Sandra Day O’Connor”. Reagan should have apologized for that nomination but never did.


25 posted on 03/21/2008 11:19:23 AM PDT by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I'm sure he intended to do a good thing. Unfortunately, intent doesn't guarantee success.
26 posted on 03/21/2008 11:23:49 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear

To be fair, O’Connor wasn’t nearly as liberal in her early years. She started off as a moderate/conservative, then became a moderate after Reagan and then during the last few years of her term became a moderate/liberal.

By the way, McCain said he would appoint justices like “O’Connor.”


27 posted on 03/21/2008 11:27:56 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

It’s also reasonable that W. handed her her walking papers when she tried to renig on her resignation. She was shown the door none too soon.


28 posted on 03/21/2008 11:31:25 AM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Since Supreme Court related, is it too late for W. to get another justice even if one leaves soon? Would the dims hold up a nomination at this early date? Could they?


29 posted on 03/21/2008 11:33:18 AM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Why, why, of course! We’re the chosen people, right?


30 posted on 03/21/2008 11:46:22 AM PDT by Marysecretary (.GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Reagan should have apologized for that nomination but never did.

That's not the only thing Reagan should have apologized for.

31 posted on 03/21/2008 12:19:47 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" -- Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

...former member of the U.S. Supreme Court

Thank Jesus for that.

32 posted on 03/21/2008 12:22:14 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Thank you, Sandra, for retiring.

But the present situation is very scary. We are almost certain to get three more loons on the court, no matter which of those three crumbs is elected. Alito and Roberts will be in the minority for decades, unless we get some sort of miracle.


33 posted on 03/21/2008 12:23:57 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"John Whitehead, the founder and chief of the Rutherford Institute, told WND it's an issue of freedom of speech and freedom of religion,"

It's also a separation of powers issue. How can any Court tell a legislature how it will conduct its debate. The establishment clause says "Congress shall PASS NO LAW.......". Thus, at best the judiciary can adjudicate the constitutionally of a law passed by the legislature. Nowhere does a any judge have any right to tell the legislature how to conduct its debate. If the majority of the legislators feel a prayer to Jesus assists in legislative deliberations they have that power. The remedy for any offended is the ballot box.

34 posted on 03/21/2008 12:30:06 PM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues

The answers to your questions are YES and YES.


35 posted on 03/21/2008 2:52:05 PM PDT by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

I could care less ~ and the point you are trying to make is?


36 posted on 03/21/2008 4:07:18 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Gee, that’s too bad. I was hoping she was totally irrelevant at this point.


37 posted on 03/22/2008 8:38:53 AM PDT by khnyny (Hillary is the national equivalent of Tracy Flick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson