Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interview with Willy Wimmer (German View of the US in the Balkans)
JOURNAL FOR GERMAN AND INTERNATIONAL POLICY ^ | September , 2001 | Willy Wilmer

Posted on 03/12/2008 12:03:09 AM PDT by Bokababe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
This was originally published in the JOURNAL FOR GERMAN AND INTERNATIONAL POLICY in German in September, 2001, but was completely overlooked because of 9/11. It is, however, an interesting viewpoint from a German perspective on our Balkan intervention. According to him, the Germans started this and we just picked up where they left off, championing same relationships the Germans had in the Balkans during WWI & WWII -- only we forgot that the Germans were our enemies during both of those wars so that their selection of Balkan "friends" were not going to be good ones! Also, a German criticizing "American arrogance" is a little disquieting, given their WWII position.
1 posted on 03/12/2008 12:03:16 AM PDT by Bokababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kronos77

Please ping the list, I cannot access my copy of list right now.


2 posted on 03/12/2008 12:08:27 AM PDT by Bokababe ( http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe
The Germans did not “select friends.”

They sided with fascist forces in the Western provinces of the old Austro-Hungarian Empire.

Catholics,Orthodox and Muslims.

Natural allies of any Western country would be the Catholics.

Of course current Foreign policy does some incredibly stupid things.

3 posted on 03/12/2008 12:20:15 AM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

“Arrogant American?” That term again....hmmm, from a kraut who 2 generations ago invaded European countries because they were deemed inferior to their race...

I would prefer to be an arrogant American instead of a pu**y Euroweenie who sticks his head in the sand when threatened.


4 posted on 03/12/2008 12:33:07 AM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

Bump! Some good points.


5 posted on 03/12/2008 12:36:27 AM PDT by F-117A (Mr. Bush, have someone read UN Resolution 1244 to you!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

Amusing article. The revisionary version of the Balkans project is that it’s American Imperialism at work, the result of Republicans like Bob Dole in Roman senatorial togas listening to God whisper in their ear. Elite European Christophobia and anti-Americanism on display. Two for the price of one.

Kosovo of course is now under the jurisdiction of the EU, not the US Congress. Their currency is the EURO, not the Dollar. I forget the title used but the proconsul is an EU official.

Our intervention in the Balkans was Tony Blair’s project. He almost literally had to drag Bill Clinton along. Had there been no benefit to Bill Clinton of a low-risk foreign distraction I am skeptical Tony would have prevailed.

Under the facade of fighting “ethnic cleansing” we rid the region of a Russian ally and toe-hold. The resurgence of Putin/neo-Stalinism shows this was pushing the Russians further back was a good strategic idea. The author is in that respect correct about securing the lines of communication, but it was a joint US/EU strategy and more to the European benefit then of the US.


6 posted on 03/12/2008 1:47:37 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Our intervention in the Balkans was Tony Blair’s project.

Sorry but this is wrong.

Maddy Albright made quite an efford to find anyone in europe to help her plans to counter milosevic with a war.

England and France decided to take a waiting position - Russia wanted to be of help, but saw no possiblitly without loosing it face then to take a counter position - but promised to not interfere severly.

Germany alone - on the way to find a new self definition after the fall of the iron curtain - joined her in her effords - forcing the others to jump in.

the War on the balkans was inniciated by the USA.


7 posted on 03/12/2008 2:20:15 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
Maddy Albright made quite an efford to find anyone in europe to help her plans to counter milosevic with a war.

Remember that this was written in 2001 and addresses US policies begun under the first Bush. That policy survives 8 years of Clinton and 8 years of the second Bush. Why that is is something I can't deduce.

...the War on the balkans was inniciated by the USA.

'Prosecuted' would be better than 'initiated.' The European troops were there but not doing much. The slaughters were proceeding and the US grew impatient with the inaction of the Euro nations.

8 posted on 03/12/2008 4:28:40 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

btt


9 posted on 03/12/2008 4:31:29 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

Our involvement in the Balkans - of all places - seems to be tracable to some fondness of Bob Dole for the Albanians plus Madeleine Albright’s pique against the Serbs, tracable to Heaven only knows what cause. So now, out of habit or inertia we are busy promoting the creation of another independent Moslem state in Europe. Sometimes I think we are simply out of our minds.


10 posted on 03/12/2008 6:31:07 AM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Well at first maddy was quite impatient with her own congress - that also wanted less action then her.

The military strength or weakness is not a thing freepers think much about - it’s dutyful US here and lazy EU there.

Surprisingly the world isn’t that simple - although I have to grant you that the actions against Milosevic would never have happened if the US didn’t grab the lead - it’s also tru that the US are actively taking the role to be a world super power with the attitude to allow no european super power next to it. (That’s what condi only recently said)

So there you are - you won the price. Now live with it.


11 posted on 03/12/2008 6:47:15 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
So there you are - you won the price. Now live with it.

I've not well explained myself. I don't see there being a prize, I don't see any particular winners in this affair and I have never understood our (US) policy.

I don't like referring to a movie for a serious matter but I thought No Man's Land. to be quite good. As an American, I particularly liked that the movie covered the period before the US took the lead. IIRC, the only mention of the US was the British commander telling a French officer that the Americans were becoming impatient.

12 posted on 03/12/2008 7:12:18 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: joan; Smartass; zagor-te-nej; Lion in Winter; Honorary Serb; jb6; Incorrigible; DTA; ma bell; ...

13 posted on 03/12/2008 9:38:52 AM PDT by kronos77 (Kosovo is Serbian Jerusalem. No Serbia without Kosovo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe
It helps to know this was written seven years ago - some of the expressed phobias make more sense in that light. The translator's (?) shifts between 'us' and 'them' is a tad cumbersome, and the article points to Germany, then the US, then the UK as the instigators at different times within the same piece.

Apparently, it isn't just FR that gets disjointed over just what the hell happened, who did it, and why it got done to the Balkans.

FRY/Kosovo and the Mexican/American border strike me as opposing poles of stupid American diplomatic tricks. The aggressive and the submissive means of attacking friends and enabling enemies.

The balkans previewed, in reverse images, the substitution of news reporting for serious intelligence that dogs us in the middle east today.

14 posted on 03/12/2008 9:40:04 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez
"The Germans did not “select friends. They sided with fascist forces in the Western provinces of the old Austro-Hungarian Empire.”

Yes, and with Germany's WWII fascist Balkan allies -- but for the life of us, we couldn't figure out why the US would chose to side with those Balkan ethnic groups who had been US enemies, against those who had been American allies. But, according to this, the US didn't do the choosing -- Germany did -- which makes some sense of this lunacy.

15 posted on 03/12/2008 10:44:40 AM PDT by Bokababe ( http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

I’ll bet this schlemiel thinks America invented Auschwicz and Treblinka, too.


16 posted on 03/12/2008 10:58:24 AM PDT by PeterFinn (I am not voting for McCain. No way, no how.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

http://media.pcog.org/en/Literature/R527_EN.pdf


17 posted on 03/12/2008 11:00:37 AM PDT by gitmogrunt (Interesting read.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
"Kosovo of course is now under the jurisdiction of the EU, not the US Congress. Their currency is the EURO, not the Dollar. I forget the title used but the proconsul is an EU official."

Yes, however, Camp Bondsteel -- which is a permanent US Base -- went up in a heartbeat after NATO entered Kosovo. There is even talk of it replacing Aviano. Doesn't matter if the currency is the Euro or the Dollar -- we are not there for the sake of the local economy. We are there for strategic military purposes. We bombed a country that didn't attack us, seized the assets, sold off what we wanted, and gave the land to another people, keeping the air base for ourselves. In short, we "conquered Kosovo" and stole it from Serbia. The rest is just window dressing. And this is not the American way!

"Under the facade of fighting “ethnic cleansing” we rid the region of a Russian ally and toe-hold. The resurgence of Putin/neo-Stalinism shows this was pushing the Russians further back was a good strategic idea."

Quite the opposite -- Serbia is not "Russia"-- and Europeans know this even if Americans don't. We turned Serbia into "a Russian ally" when we didn't have to, Serbs would have preferred to turn West and not East, but we gave them no choice when we backed them into a corner and Russia came to their rescue. I hate that this is the case, but Russia is on the legal and moral high ground in all of this and we are legally & morally in a pit, causing much resentment toward us in Europe.

Unlike Americans, Europeans don't hate Russians for being Russians, they hated the Soviet Union for being brutes. Now we are the brutes, breaking every international law and steamrolling a small country to get what we want. This is not going to go smoothly and I fear that we have lost far more than we have gained by this.

18 posted on 03/12/2008 11:20:00 AM PDT by Bokababe ( http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
You don't know what you're talking about.

Germany and GB were the primary political instruments behind the war. NATO was simply the executioner.

It was when you had 250,000 refugees sitting in camps all through Germany when “your” government began knocking on NATOs and others door because the so-called peace keepers under UN authority before that were failing.

YU was still on the map when Genscher declared proudly that Germany would recognize Croatia as a sovereign state.........

Russia didn't want to be of “help,” they sided with the Serbs whom they had been arming and had ties to historically and even present day. The Russians did everything they could to stop any intervention since ultimately intervention meant that Serbia would be pressured. In fact the infamous Pristina airfield incident where it almost came to blows between US/Russian troops was more or less Russia throwing 200 men at at airfield and seizing it so they could maintain a back-door line of logistical communication outside the oversight of others.

You're completely clueless.

19 posted on 03/14/2008 10:21:58 AM PDT by Red6 (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red6

Yawn...

anti-german rant without appropriate source no.5021 brought to you by bile mouth 6.


20 posted on 03/17/2008 6:47:11 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson