Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Driver of car that killed officer over speed limit(officer jumped in front of speeding cars)
Baltimore Sun ^ | March 7, 2008 | Tyeesha Dixon | Sun reporter

Posted on 03/07/2008 6:55:54 AM PST by sickoflibs

The driver of the car that struck and killed a police officer on a Howard County highway last year was traveling 16 mph over the speed limit at the time of the accident and swerved at the last moment.

Police Chief William J. McMahon said Grissom was traveling 71 mph in the 2007 Nissan Sentra that hit Cpl. Scott Wheeler that June afternoon. The speed limit at the site of the accident - Route 32 near Interstate 95 - is 55 mph.

In a written statement, Wheeler's widow, Tracy, said: "We are disappointed that the grand jury chose not to indict the driver who struck Scott on manslaughter charges. While we knew this was possible, it is difficult to accept. But with the support of our extended family in the Police Department, we will do our best to move forward."

Wheeler was a six-year veteran of the department and the first Howard County officer to die in the line of duty in almost 50 years. He was part of a three-officer "stop team" that used a long-range laser to catch speeders, stepping out into the road to direct them to the shoulder.

Other police agencies in Maryland, including the state police, also stopped using the "step-out" method on high-speed roadways.

Although the department will cease the method for safety reasons, McMahon said he knows it works. The number of speeding citations written on the roadways where the method was used has decreased 40 percent to 50 percent since it was suspended

(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: fines; police; speeding; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last
Well normally I support police but these officers put their lives at risk by jumping out in front of speeding cars to collect multiple speeding fines(the process of pulling over speeders with cars is much more costly) . Now Maryland and Howard county will use roving speed-radar-cameras to send out/collect fines. But that only works on roads with limits 35 mph and under. It is insane to jump in front of a car doing 70 in a 55 mph road (65 is average speed on this road, not 55.)

Maryland gives drivers licenses to illegals along with tax-payer benefits and them pumps us for more and more money.

1 posted on 03/07/2008 6:55:54 AM PST by sickoflibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
He was part of a three-officer "stop team" that used a long-range laser to catch speeders, stepping out into the road to direct them to the shoulder.

Sorry, but that's just idiotic. Just about Darwin Award-type behavior. It sounds like the grand jury made the right decision. 71 MPH in a 55 zone is pretty fast, but I don't think it rises to the level of reckless. Reckless is jumping out in front of a car on the highway.

2 posted on 03/07/2008 6:59:21 AM PST by thecabal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

“It is insane to jump in front of a car doing 70 in a 55 mph road (65 is average speed on this road, not 55.)”

Though that doesn’t excuse a driver from responsibility, it is a very dangerous practice by the troopers. I live outside of Ocean City and travel Rt 50 quite a bit. As you can imagine, in the summer the troopers are quite busy pulling people over. The danger comes in when they step out in the middle of a busy road and point to a driver to pull over...problem is there are usually at least 2 cars he/she might be point out so there’s confusion. Lot of braking, near misses, possible rear end collisions...it’s just not a safe way to operate.


3 posted on 03/07/2008 7:00:25 AM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
71 in a 55 isn't outrageous.

The 55 was probably deliberately set low to encourage speeding and increase traffic ticket revenue.

4 posted on 03/07/2008 7:03:05 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

If I remember correctly, a car going 60 mph travels 88 feet per second. A car going 71 probably goes around a hundred feet per second. That doesn’t leave much room for error......


5 posted on 03/07/2008 7:04:17 AM PST by Judith Anne (I have no idea what to put here. Not a clue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

It is insane to jump in front of a car doing 70 in a 55 mph road (65 is average speed on this road, not 55.)

*******

Yes, the step-out method assumes that the driver can stop before he hits the officer!!! Which means that the driver is not driving too fast!!!

The 3-man teams always deployed on a long straight stretch of not heavily travelled roadway, where they knew that drivers would be taking advantage of -— a long straight stretch of not heavily travelled roadway!

I am sorry that this officer died, but apparently, traffic enforcement decision makers could not fortell that this was bound to happen.


6 posted on 03/07/2008 7:04:33 AM PST by maica (Romney '08 + McCain, because it is essential to stop socialism at the voting booth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Suicidally stupid behavior, all in the name of revenue enhancement.


7 posted on 03/07/2008 7:05:57 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
People do not really pay that much attention to objects in the road, relegating that task most of the time to a few unconscious brain cells. It's extremely dangerous to count on drivers to stop. A long time ago I was moving a truckload of furniture in an open bed truck on a 30mph road and a wooden chair fell out. I quickly went back to get it out of the road but it was smashed to splinters by a mom in a mini-van in about 30 seconds.
8 posted on 03/07/2008 7:06:33 AM PST by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ourusa

ping


9 posted on 03/07/2008 7:06:40 AM PST by bmwcyle (I am the watchman on the tower sounding the alarm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I was pulled over in this very fashion several years ago on Route 17 in NY. I was the first of about a dozen cars pulled over at the same time, and it was very startling to suddenly see a human standing in the middle of the highway. I remember thinking at the time how easliy I could have run him over!

On the up side, I was greeted by the officer with a “We got the wrong red 4-door. Have a good day, ma’am.” Whew!


10 posted on 03/07/2008 7:10:28 AM PST by beyondashadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Dear E. Pluribus Unum,

“The 55 was probably deliberately set low to encourage speeding and increase traffic ticket revenue.”

Yup. This chunk or road drives easily at 65+ mph. I've driven through there many times.


sitetest

11 posted on 03/07/2008 7:10:46 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss; RockinRight; RJS1950; hellinahandcart; Lil'freeper; big'ol_freeper; tgslTakoma; ...

Maryland insanity ping!


12 posted on 03/07/2008 7:12:43 AM PST by sickoflibs (Are libs really as dumb as they act??(maybe they just assume we are that dumb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
This is a case of police making roadways more dangerous for everyone. I am surprised they haven't caused multi car crashes using this idiotic technique. Whoever thought of this in the first place ought to be the one charged with manslaughter. He/she/it is obviously brain dead.
13 posted on 03/07/2008 7:13:13 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

The friday before Memorial Day last year I ended up getting off early. Cruising down a four-lane interstate that was crowded, but flowing nicely and safely at 5-10 over the speed limit.

Motorcycle cop is hiding behind a bridge support with a laser.

As he starts pulling towards the road, of course panic sets in. Brake lights everywhere, traffic suddenly bunched together as everyone’s safety margins are suddenly squeezed by the traffic in front slowing down while traffic in back hasn’t seen the cop or brake lights yet.

His buddy is a couple thousand feet up the road with a vehicle pulled over on the narrow median between a concrete berm and the passing lane - also on a motorcyle with their tiny little flashing light. There’s hardly room to walk around the car he has pulled over.

In Ohio, you have to either slow down radically or pull out of the lane next to the officer who has pulled over a vehicle.

So now that four lanes of chaotic traffic caused by officer #1 has to squeeze into three lanes because of officer #2. More brake lights, sudden lane changes, traffic is now a gigantic gridlocked mess with no margin for safety. A perfectly safe driving environment on a sunny dry day is turned into a potential catastrophe waiting to happen so two “unsafe” motorists could be detained and ticketed.

What was more dangerous - the two motorists speeding along with the other couple hundred, or interestate traffic suddenly being packed into a spooked closely packed herd?

I’d say the latter, but I guess that’s why I’m not a police officer.


14 posted on 03/07/2008 7:13:40 AM PST by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
He was part of a three-officer "stop team" that used a long-range laser to catch speeders, stepping out into the road to direct them to the shoulder.

The police dept. supervisor responsible for this idiotic policy needs to own-up to responsibility for the officer's death.

15 posted on 03/07/2008 7:15:19 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Larry Lucido
This is SOP for many depts. It may have worked years ago, but now there are too many cars, going too fast, and too many distractions. The risk is too great, IMO.

Look for the procedures to change.

16 posted on 03/07/2008 7:16:27 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I was going through an urban school zone (four east bound lanes separated in pairs by a large planting strip with trees), in the lanes farthest from the school a couple years ago. I am normally really good at keeping it at 20 in a school zone but somehow it didn’t connect in my brain that it was a school zone.

I was not alone because they were pulling over cars as fast as they could get a radar reading. There were two “spotters” on foot hiding behind the trees and a bunch of cops in the parking lot a half a block away giving tickets based on the speed written on a yellow sticky they stuck to the top of your car by the spotter.

The normal limit is 30 and I was doing about 40. A cop literally jumped out from behind a tree right in front of me. It almost caused an accident. Both my wife’s and my initial impression was that it was a car-jacker with a gun (wearing all black with a radar gun) and I almost ran him down. But then I almost hit another car swerving to avoid him.

Meanwhile, the cop that gave me the ticket in the parking lot was a friend. I got a ticket for 25 in a school zone.

Funny thing is, I had actually mentioned to my wife as we entered the school zone (high school) that there were a lot of kids horsing around very close to the road and a missed step could get one of them killed. It didn’t even click that it was a school zone.

Doh!


17 posted on 03/07/2008 7:16:33 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecabal

>>71 MPH in a 55 zone is pretty fast, but I don’t think it rises to the level of reckless.<<

Honestly, it isn’t that fast. Heck, on my way to work today the FLOW of traffic on my main route was just under 60. The speed limit is 30. It felt perfectly safe.

We’ve all been on roads that have unreasonably low speed limits. Meanwhile, I just got back from Kentucky where I was on a road with a 50mph limit and it felt dangerous doing 5o around some of the corners.


18 posted on 03/07/2008 7:19:48 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

Oh man. Don’t get me started!


19 posted on 03/07/2008 7:20:58 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I dunno. These sort of things rarely have simple solutions.

While tragic, this was a tragic accident, plain and simple. I have to agree with the jury on this one. It is pretty clear that the driver did not go out of his way to harm this officer. Manslaughter charges are way out of line in this case.

I am sorry for the loss, though.


20 posted on 03/07/2008 7:23:11 AM PST by Mr. Quarterpanel (I am not an actor, but I play one on TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

>>Though that doesn’t excuse a driver from responsibility<<

It does in my book.

I hit a pedestrian about two years ago. For all I know he is a quadraplegic. I have never had a single pang of guilt. It was entirely his fault. I didn’t even have time to hit the brakes. It was exactly like hitting a squirrel that came out of nowhere.

When someone jumps out in front of a moving car, they take their own life in their hands. They, and they alone are the responsible party.


21 posted on 03/07/2008 7:23:12 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Kash Register Kops


22 posted on 03/07/2008 7:25:25 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Vaclav Klaus on global warming skeptics: "a whip of political correctness strangles their voice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

If the Florida highway patrol started jumping out in front of cars on I-75 here, the blue hairs who drive on our roads would be mowing them down daily. In fact they passed a State law here that you have to move to the outside lane when passing a FHP car parked by the side of the road or you can be ticketed with a large fine.


23 posted on 03/07/2008 7:25:39 AM PST by KDD (Freedom begins between the ears. -- Edward Abbey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: maica

And to take it a step further. If I had been the one to hit the officer, I would put ALL responsibility on the officer - even if I were “speeding”. Illegal and unsafe are two different things. I am old enough to remember driving on roads where the speed limit was dropped from 70 to 55, and it wasn’t for safety - but 70 did become “illegal”. And the laws are designed for the fresh off the boat DWA, or “blue hair looking through the steering wheel” anyway.


24 posted on 03/07/2008 7:27:18 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

((( I live outside of Ocean City and travel Rt 50 quite a bit. )))

Howdy neighbor. I’m in Centreville, MD (drive to DC every day on 50)


25 posted on 03/07/2008 7:27:55 AM PST by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KDD

Up in Seattle, the drivers got together and drove 55 across the lanes and the backup was so big that they had to stop enforcement.
MD has had the traps in the same places on 50 for at least 50 years..no surprises there.


26 posted on 03/07/2008 7:29:16 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

>>It may have worked years ago, but now there are too many cars, going too fast, and too many distractions.<<

Yup. That is why I am a more nervous bicycle commuter. I’m concerned I could be hit by a kid text-messaging his friends.

It’s always 2:15 a.m. on the roads these days.


27 posted on 03/07/2008 7:29:54 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo

“Howdy neighbor. I’m in Centreville, MD (drive to DC every day on 50)”

Howdy! Ugh, I feel for you. I drive from Ocean Pines to Salisbury every day....it’s an effort to stay awake. ;)


28 posted on 03/07/2008 7:32:54 AM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

>>Kash Register Kops<<

Expect to see a LOT more of this as cash strapped municipalities deal with reduced tax revenue. It is already happening in the Seattle suburbs where I have lived since the mid-1960’s. Spring is always bad, but this year it is ridiculous. Even during rush hour (which is normally pretty much taboo) there are radar traps all over the place!


29 posted on 03/07/2008 7:33:23 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
Up in Seattle, the drivers got together and drove 55 across the lanes and the backup was so big that they had to stop enforcement.

That raises an interesting point. If everybody obeyed every traffic law, no more tickets and no more revenue. What would they do then? Make the laws even stricter?

30 posted on 03/07/2008 7:34:08 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Vaclav Klaus on global warming skeptics: "a whip of political correctness strangles their voice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KDD

“State law here that you have to move to the outside lane when passing a FHP car parked by the side of the road...”

I noticed on my drive from Kentucky to Chicago last week that a lot of people were doing that. It is not a “Washington state” thing to do and I didn’t get it. Now I do.


31 posted on 03/07/2008 7:35:03 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

Indeed, if the whole rationale for ticketing the drivers is to make the roads safe, the officers in your scenario were making things far more dangerous than a flow of traffic operating smoothly albeit faster than the posted limit.


32 posted on 03/07/2008 7:35:48 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

They do this in Mass, too. I was speeding on 95 and I noticed an officer on the side of the road and slowed down in time but he stepped out after I passed to direct the car behind me to the side.
It seems awfully dangerous and they should not put their officers in such a precarious position just for catching speeders.


33 posted on 03/07/2008 7:37:43 AM PST by Lx ((Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

>>Indeed, if the whole rationale for ticketing the drivers is to make the roads safe, the officers in your scenario were making things far more dangerous than a flow of traffic operating smoothly albeit faster than the posted limit.<<

Think how great camera speed enforcement will be (or better yet, OBD III speed and seat-belt enforcement). No backups, just a ticket in the mail. And with OBD III even if the flow is 11 mph over, they can send EVERY SINGLE CAR IN THE FLOW a ticket!

That’ll slow the b@ast@rds down!

/s


34 posted on 03/07/2008 7:38:58 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I wonder who thought this was a good idea? How many people would jump out in the road in the path of a car going 70 mph? If my employer told me to do that, I’d be looking for another job.


35 posted on 03/07/2008 7:39:21 AM PST by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecabal
Sorry, but that's just idiotic. Just about Darwin Award-type behavior. It sounds like the grand jury made the right decision. 71 MPH in a 55 zone is pretty fast, but I don't think it rises to the level of reckless. Reckless is jumping out in front of a car on the highway.

True, anyone that does that is a Darwin candidate. Besides if the driver is an illegal they tell them to have a nice day.

36 posted on 03/07/2008 7:40:01 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

And they can debit your bank account before you even get home.


37 posted on 03/07/2008 7:40:50 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Vaclav Klaus on global warming skeptics: "a whip of political correctness strangles their voice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Cops stand along and step inside the left lane (HOV) on I-66 in decent weather to stop HOV violators. Usually happens just after the Beltway and Nutley St. If they aren’t there, I can get to rt 28 in 17-22 minutes from the Beltway. Otherwise, it’s usually a mess. Bad enough when there are accidents but the cops just make things worse standing in the median or left lane.


38 posted on 03/07/2008 7:41:34 AM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I have been hearing for months that there was going to be a multi-state ticket blitz starting on March 1, 2008, and that the police were going to try to get traffic flowing more or less at the posted speed limit.

I drive the Garden State Parkway every day, and have for 20 years. The only time my speedo reads 55 mph is at the instantaneous moment that I am accelerating or decelerating through that speed. Every single car on the road, without exception, is busting the limit by 10 mph, at least, and this is a big 5-lane in each direction highway.

If they are going to get that traffic stream down to the double-nickel, they are going to have to write a heck of a lot of tickets.


39 posted on 03/07/2008 7:47:35 AM PST by gridlock (They don't call us "The Stupid Party" for nuthin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecabal
Just about Darwin Award-type behavior. It sounds like the grand jury made the right decision. 71 MPH in a 55 zone is pretty fast, but I don't think it rises to the level of reckless. Reckless is jumping out in front of a car on the highway.

Agreed. If you're going to play chicken with an automobile, you ought to at least be in one yourself.

40 posted on 03/07/2008 7:48:28 AM PST by Sloth (Senator He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, D - Illinois)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Can you imagine an enforcement system so efficient that every time you went even five over you would get sent a $10 ticket.

Two things would happen:

1. I’d go broke in six months.
2. Half of the cause of that would be the bills from my shrink for treating my neurosis from feeling I am always being followed by a motorcycle cop - just WAITING for me to do something wrong and write a ticket.


41 posted on 03/07/2008 7:50:36 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

I dont know if you live in MD but now that Democrats took over the governorship by lying abour electricity rates they are speeding into this new revenue method.


42 posted on 03/07/2008 7:51:17 AM PST by sickoflibs (Are libs really as dumb as they act??(maybe they just assume we are that dumb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Two or three times a year, I drive from PA to West Virginia and spend some time on I-68 near Cumberland. At least times in the last couple of years, there have been these type of “jump out in the road” traffic stops. However, as I go past them, they usually have 3 to 5 cars pulled over with all the occupants out of the vehicles and trunks or lift-backs open. I have only ever seen this in Maryland. Are they searching all these cars/people?
43 posted on 03/07/2008 7:53:32 AM PST by trenton1776 (The Great Conservative Revolt of '08 is Underway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Dumb method to pull drivers over. About a couple of years ago, I got caught in an airplane trap in Missouri. For how much over ? 10 over the limit (80/70). At least when I got stopped, it was a “chase car” and not some officer coming out into the road while I am cooking at 80 mph.


44 posted on 03/07/2008 7:56:02 AM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I’m in a Seattle suburb.

On a side note, one guy in my neighborhood drives a green subaru with a vanity plate. It says “FREEPER”. I would like to stop him some time and find out who he is.


45 posted on 03/07/2008 7:57:58 AM PST by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

They know it works because the number of citations has decreased? It sounds like a stupid idea to step out in traffic, the kind of thing they teach 5 year olds not to do. Why not just pull up behind speeders with flashing red and blue lights and pull them over?


46 posted on 03/07/2008 7:58:33 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

the so called step out method sounds like a good way to get run over. I can’t imagine anyone would consider tis a good procedure


47 posted on 03/07/2008 8:04:30 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat; gathersnomoss; RockinRight; RJS1950; hellinahandcart; Lil'freeper; big'ol_freeper; ...

RE : “ the backup was so big that they had to stop enforcement.”

It doesnt work here in MD. Our ex-democrat Howard county executive Jim Robey promoted massive overdevelopment turning the county main roads into parking lots. He even made a comment that widening those roads wont help because more drivers will just appear to fill the new lanes. Now he is in the MD state Senate is pushing for speeding cameras on side roads. Why? He forced the traffic onto those roads but packing the main roads, now he can take more revenue to spend from the problem HE caused. But Maryland voters never get it. They love seeing taxes go up and government run their lives. No cause and effect here.


48 posted on 03/07/2008 8:06:46 AM PST by sickoflibs (Are libs really as dumb as they act??(maybe they just assume we are that dumb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
This officer was struck less than a mile from where 32 and I95 intersect. I95 is 65MPH so most people come off and continue at the same speed.
These guys take huge risks for little benefit other than career advancement. The wife should be suing the police for encouraging this idiotic practice. It certainly does not meet OSHA standards, I have seen them out there flagging people down without so much as a safety vest.
Truly sad, tragic and pointless death.
49 posted on 03/07/2008 8:10:52 AM PST by Boiler Plate ("Why be difficult, when with just a little more work, you can be impossible" Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: trenton1776
I have only ever seen this in Maryland. Are they searching all these cars/people?

Drugs/Guns/Money.

If you are a small municipality, you can do all right writing tickets, but the big money is in seizures.

50 posted on 03/07/2008 8:11:28 AM PST by gridlock (They don't call us "The Stupid Party" for nuthin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson