Skip to comments.
About Those Texas Caucus "Results" ...
Talking Points Memo ^
| March 5, 2008
| Eric Kleefeld
Posted on 03/05/2008 3:58:42 PM PST by Dog Gone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Obama apparently won more delegates in Texas than Hillary did, but she's the "winner."
Go figure.
1
posted on
03/05/2008 3:58:43 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
Obama wins Texas.
I waited an hour and a half in line to vote and counted 19 out of 20 people voting in Democratic Primary.
2
posted on
03/05/2008 4:02:25 PM PST
by
trumandogz
("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
To: Dog Gone
I think something similar happened in Nevada.
I can’t understand how a state can have both caucuses and a primary. Meh.
3
posted on
03/05/2008 4:03:27 PM PST
by
pogo101
To: Dog Gone
A lot of readers have wondered why the Texas caucuses have been so slow to report to the media. Because Hillary's people are trying to 1)figure out how to fix them, or, failing that 2)minimize their impact on the "Comeback Kid" narrative.
4
posted on
03/05/2008 4:06:49 PM PST
by
steve-b
(Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. --RAH)
To: Dog Gone
Texas’ system is really messed up. She won the primary which had the most delegates, yet since they give the loser almost as many delegates, he is able to beat her in the caucus with far fewer delegates.
Just messed up.
To: rwfromkansas
Don’t blame it on Texas. These are the rules that the Texas Democrat Party set up for itself.
The Republicans don’t do it that way.
6
posted on
03/05/2008 4:18:44 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: trumandogz
I waited an hour and a half in line to vote and counted 19 out of 20 people voting in Democratic Primary. In my case it was more like 2 out of 50 or 60, maybe more, voting in the Republican primary. I just couldn't hold my nose hard enough to vote for B. Hussein to "Stop Hillary" or for the Harridan to "Stop Barak" and was one of those two.
The good news, no waiting, the other Republican was almost finished getting her ballot when I walked up.
7
posted on
03/05/2008 4:19:53 PM PST
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: rwfromkansas
Caucus delegates....another screwed up system brought to America courtesy of the Dummy ‘Rat party of idiots. Why? because ‘yes they can’ and ‘yes they will’.
8
posted on
03/05/2008 4:19:57 PM PST
by
tflabo
(Truth or tyranny)
To: Dog Gone
Obama would get 37 delegates to Hillary's 30 delegates, netting Obama a +3 delegate advantage for the combined Texas prima-caucus.
Hahaahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!
9
posted on
03/05/2008 4:21:22 PM PST
by
The_Republican
(You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
To: Dog Gone
This was predicted some time ago given the fact that the delegates are chosen by state senate district and weighted favoring the heavily black urban areas. So the reality is that Obama won Texas in much the same way that George Bush beat Gore in 2000 despite losing the popular vote.
10
posted on
03/05/2008 4:25:18 PM PST
by
kabar
Wow! Who knew Hildabeast had so many fans!!! Rushbots! LOL!
11
posted on
03/05/2008 4:25:21 PM PST
by
The_Republican
(You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
To: rwfromkansas
Those are the rules. George Bush beat Al Gore despite losing the popular vote.
12
posted on
03/05/2008 4:26:48 PM PST
by
kabar
To: Dog Gone
In the world of democRATS that how it works. It's not who crosses the finish line first, has the most points at the end of the game, scored the most runs.
It's who ever screams the loudest "I won!"
13
posted on
03/05/2008 4:30:33 PM PST
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(Hillary Clinton - It's OBAMAS Party and She'll Cry if She Wants to?)
To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
That’s just it. Texas will award more delegates to Obama, but Hillary gets credit for winning when she actually lost.
The mainstream media will never announce this.
14
posted on
03/05/2008 4:38:30 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
True; it is the Texas Dem party. The Texas GOP actually does it correctly.
I do like Texas....go down to Abilene sometimes to see my wife’s family, and Texas is great.
To: Dog Gone
16
posted on
03/05/2008 4:46:26 PM PST
by
newfreep
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: rwfromkansas
Not 1% of America understands that Hillary actually lost Texas. At least the Freepers who read this thread now do.
17
posted on
03/05/2008 4:47:25 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
I enjoyed listening to the Dems at work today, talking about what a fiasco the caucuses were. One lady talked about how how one of the leaders at hers would scratch off the name and choice of folks who supported the other side as soon as they left, but left all her folks on. And that was one of the milder stories.
19
posted on
03/05/2008 5:43:20 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: Dog Gone
I figured Obama would do much better in the caucus. +3 for Obama is a much better result for Mrs. Clinton than I would have expected.
20
posted on
03/06/2008 2:14:40 AM PST
by
gridlock
(They don't call us "The Stupid Party" for nuthin'!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson