Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William Tell
The ownership of private property, is a fundamental right in the Constitution and has equal footing with speech, press, and the 2nd amendment. And as for your assertion about parking, you are failing to recognize that like sidewalks, parking is access and as such is a public area.

In Colorado, we assert the castle doctrine where a property owner has the right to defend their property and as such, have the right to say who can come on their property and restrict their activities once they are on the private property.

18 posted on 03/02/2008 3:38:02 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol
taxcontrol said: "And as for your assertion about parking, you are failing to recognize that like sidewalks, parking is access and as such is a public area."

Since you can't seem to see the difference between "private property" and the human-created benefits, including the limited financial liability, that comes from the artificial distinction that constitutes a "corporation", then we aren't going to agree.

Without the benefits to the non-owners, there would be no justification to permitting the limited liability of incorporation and such laws would not exist.

I, for one, support changing corporate laws so that corporations are prohibited from denying me the right to keep and bear arms at work that I presently enjoy at home.

There is no constitutional right to form corporations and enjoy limited financial liability. It's not a natural right and my right to defend myself from harm is.

19 posted on 03/02/2008 3:59:09 PM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson