(AP Photo )
Posted on 02/24/2008 11:46:20 PM PST by familyop
(AP Photo )
Former President Proves Liability as Well as Asset in Hillary Clinton's Campaign
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has been trying to chip away at Sen. Hillary Clinton's lead in Ohio primary polls by attacking the North American Free Trade Agreement, one of former President Clinton's major legacies — which unions in Ohio say has cost them jobs.
"She has essentially presented herself as co-president during the Clinton years," Obama told supporters in Loraine, Ohio. "The notion that you can selectively pick what you take credit for and then run away from what isn't politically convenient doesn't make sense."
Obama honed his attack on NAFTA in Ohio, where union households comprise a quarter of Democratic voters. Since the end of 2000, non-farm employment in Ohio fell by 209,400 jobs, according to the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition — the worst showing since the Great Depression.
President Clinton was supposed to be Hillary's not-so-secret weapon, but Obama has belittled his legacy — and the former president has done so, as well, in his own way, seeming to marginalize Obama as "the black candidate" last month in South Carolina. Since that January primary, Clinton, D-N.Y., has badly lost the black vote to Obama in every primary or caucus.
Although her husband's relationship with the African-American community was one of his historic strengths, Saturday night in New Orleans, Hillary Clinton apologized for the remarks.
"If anyone was offended by anything that was said, whether it was meant or not, whether it was misinterpreted or not, then, obviously, I regret that," she told the annual State of the Black Union conference hosted by PBS's Tavis Smiley.
Sen. Clinton took a lighter tone in Rhode Island Sunday afternoon, mocking Obama's oratory.
"Now, I could stand up here and say let's just get everybody together, let's get unified, the sky will open, the light will come down, celestial choirs will be singing," she said. "And everyone will know that we should do the right thing and the world will be perfect."
But if Clinton has not been able to put Obama on the defensive, Republicans are hoping to do so, questioning his patriotism, making hay out of his not putting his hand over his heart last summer during the national anthem and his removal of his American flag lapel pin.
Last week his wife Michelle told a Milwaukee rally, "for the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change."
Obama brushed aside the attempts to question his patriotism. "The way I respond to it is with the truth – that I owe everything I am to this country," he said.
Obama said he would push back against questions of his patriotism by saying Republicans are the ones who presided over a war which our troops did not get the body armor they needed fast enough.
"We'll see what the American people think is the true definition of patriotism," Obama said.
Sunlen Miller, Greg McCown, Eloise Harper and Gina Sunseri contributed to this report.
Wha? I think Barracks is plagiarizing Free Republic now. Well, if anything could be a consensus opinion here. Just sayin'
Let’s ban cars. They put the horse and buggy industry out of business and we need to bring those jobs back!!!
...there's more major negatives, but I wouldn't classify them as "legacies"...a mere attempt to reclassify history. This ranks somewhere in between the few jobs people got by becoming Monica Lewinsky lookalikes and the future carpet replacement that went on after they ransacked the White House
“”If anyone was offended by anything that was said, whether it was meant or not, whether it was misinterpreted or not, then, obviously, I regret that,” she told the annual State of the Black Union conference hosted by PBS’s Tavis Smiley.”
well I am not actually surprised, but it is rather odd to see such a convoluted statement to say that bill clinton screwed up.
I think clinton gets a lot of credit for nafta as well as signing on to a lot of contract with america. That’s why the economy was so good in the 90’s. Hillary can’t just say she’s a clinton and deliver the same economy if she’s against the very ideas that made it possible.
on nafta....the piaps was for it before she was against it....sounds familiar....kind of catchy...more lib/dems should use that tag line ~ look what it did for j f’n kerry!!!!
The bigger issue is that the one time “consensus” that Free Trade was universally good has been lost, when a Clinton cannot take any credit, only blame, the idea has lost it’s cache’ with voters.
Why the PIAPS wears a pant suit ...
Not so.
The dems have not abandoned their support for free trade or NAFTA.
They are complaining that Bill Clinton, to include his wife, did a bad job when he negotiated the parallel agreement that contained the labor and environmental protections. Those protections turned out to be toothless and Chapter 11 has benefited investors and business to the detriment of labor and environment. The criticisms of Bill are misplaced because it was the democratic controlled congress that approved both NAFTA and the parallel agreement.
Blaming Hillary is also misplaced because she began calling for the renegotiation of NAFTA to include the labor and enviro protections long before the presidential campaign began. In fact, it all began in 2001 with Grider's article in the Nation on Invalidating the 20th Century. Hillary has been claiming since then that Reagan, Bush, the VRWC, and the Federalist Society were trying to use NAFTA, CAFTA, and FTAA to roll back the New Deal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.