Posted on 02/21/2008 12:44:30 PM PST by NormsRevenge
SYDNEY (AFP) - The economic rise of China and India means climate change is occurring faster than previously thought, making efforts to fix the problem more urgent, an official Australian report found Thursday.
The government-commissioned report called for stronger international commitment to addressing climate change, saying current efforts "still fall far short of getting deep cuts in global emissions underway."
It warned Australia, already hot and dry, was more vulnerable to climate change than any other developed country and needed to lead efforts to reduce the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.
The government brushed aside the report's call for more ambitious climate change targets, though Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said Australia no longer had the policy of "denial" adopted by his predecessor John Howard.
Rudd commissioned the report, written by economics professor Ross Garnaut, before his centre-left government was elected last November.
Since then, he has made action on climate change the centrepiece of his government's environmental policy, signing the Kyoto Protocol as his first act in office after Howard refused for a decade.
In his interim findings, Garnaut said rapid industrialisation in China and India meant climate change was happening faster than expected and the solution lay in finding clean methods of achieving global economic expansion.
"Due to a sustained period of high economic growth led by China and India, the world is moving towards high risks of dangerous climate change more rapidly than has been generally understood," he said.
"Faster emissions growth makes mitigation more urgent and more costly," he said. "The challenge is to end the linkage between economic growth and emissions of greenhouse gases."
Garnaut said the Rudd government needed to go beyond its existing commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 60 percent by 2050, although he did not nominate an alternative figure.
He also said Australia should set an interim target for 2020, saying a lead had been provided by the European Union, which last month pledged to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 20 percent by 2020, compared to 1990 levels.
Garnaut said while all climate change models contained uncertainties, the seriousness of the outcomes they projected meant strong action was warranted, even if it came at an economic cost.
"Prudent risk management would suggest that it is worth the sacrifice of a significant amount of current income to avoid a small chance of a catastrophic outcome," he said.
Rudd told parliament just before the report's release that Australia was determined to become a leader in the campaign for climate change, although he made no fresh commitments on the issue.
"The government accepts that the scientific evidence is in that climate change is real, it is happening and no longer can this nation afford to be in any state of denial," he said.
The report released Thursday was an interim version and the final draft due later this year had been expected to form the basis of Rudd's climate policy.
However, Climate Change Minister Penny Wong said the government would also use other models when formulating what she said would be a "responsible" policy, insisting the 2050 target had not changed.
Professor Barry Brook, director of the Research Institute for Climate Change and Sustainability, said the report showed that swift action was critical.
"It's a clarion call for Australia to act -- in all of our interests," he said.
There it is...the beginning of the end of the global warming ruse - it has backfired.
How long before we get a ‘consensus’ among every scientist who has ever lived that it’s only capitalist C02 that causes global warming? And this is not sarcasm; Orwell’s prophecy has come true. People are capable of believing absolutely anything.
We are there already. The Kyoto Treaty exempts China.
And India.
Oh my goodness sake...What is this? A global warming article from the MSM that admits China and India are part of the problem? Amazing. Not quite as amazing a Rudd thinking Australia should do something about global warming...but pretty amazing, none the less.
One more time. What temperature is the earth supposed to be? How do we know that the recent climate is the correct one? Maybe it’s trying to correct itself, and we’re screwing up by trying to stop that process.
This article is an almost an admission that all of the measures we can take to "cut greenhouse gas emissions" will make us feel better about ourselves but do absolutely nothing to ameliorate global warming.
“Prudent risk management would suggest that it is worth the sacrifice of a significant amount of current income to avoid a small chance of a catastrophic outcome,” he said.
NO — It is NOT worth the sacrifice of even an INSIGNIFICANT amount of current income to avoid ZERO chance of a catastrophic outcome.
There. I feel better now.
The ‘climate change’ about which we may need to be concerned is ‘global cooling’, since there have been no sunspots recorded since about the middle of January. Fewer sunspots = more cooling. Has nothing to do with CO2, or anything else we humans are doing.
India with 3 times the population of the USA emits less than 20% as much Greenhouse gas. So in terms of per capita emission, we have a long way to go compared to both China and the USA for ANYBODY to be critical of our emission.
Having said that, I don’t have data to compare the 3 countries on emission vs absolute GDP size, which I think should also be a parameter. If the USA and China can produce more at lesser energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission rate, then I believe India should try to improve its efficiency by production.
However, I don’t think India will listen to MSM or anyone preaching to us to consume less and maintain our lower living standards so that the rest of the world can continue with their lavish ways.
I'd argue more, but I have to go scrape the climate change off my car windows.
I guess we all should stop breathing.
I just mentioned this to my semi-enviro whacked friend the other day - all those coal plants in China that have come on line in the last several years are a huge part of the problem. Even he agreed, having been there last year.
Of course, the only reason to boycott the Olympics is Darfur... /sarc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.