Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain
Town Hall ^ | 2-14-08 | Michael Reagan

Posted on 02/14/2008 2:14:33 PM PST by smoothsailing

Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain

By Michael Reagan

Thursday, February 14, 2008

In 1976 the Ford vs. Reagan campaign for the Republican presidential nomination got so heated it looked as if my father and Jerry Ford would never again talk to one another.

When it was over and Ford had won, what did Ronald Reagan do? He simply went all-out to help Ford win his re-election, as did I and as did my sister Maureen. My dad simply followed his rule of backing the Republican candidate no matter who he was.

Assuming that John McCain will be the Republican nominee, you can bet my father would be itching to get out on the campaign trail working to elect him even if he disagreed with him on a number of issues.

Unlike my father, a lot of conservatives stayed home in 1976, and we got four years of Jimmy Carter, whose main legacy was to drive the Shah of Iran from power and create the Islamic Republic of Iran with a bunch of wild-eyed mullahs running the show. He also gave us 20 percent inflation and long, long lines at the gas pumps. And don't forget 440 days of Americans held hostage by the mullahs.

By staying home those conservatives made possible the future election of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

We are still suffering from the legacy of James Earl Carter, thanks to the conservatives who refused to follow Ronald Reagan's example and instead sulked at home while the nation was being handed over to the worst president in American history.

We were still in the middle of the Cold War in those days, and by staying home conservatives risked losing that war by allowing an incompetent leader to become commander in chief.

Four years later Ronald Reagan took over, the hostages were immediately released, and he went on to win the Cold War. Now we have another world-wide war going on with a hidden enemy sworn to kill us all, and the policy of the Democrats running for the presidency is to throw up their hands and withdraw from the battlefield, leaving it to the enemy -- and our fate in the hands of Osama bin Laden.

Is that what the let's-stay-home-on-election-day conservatives want? Do they want the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama, as their president? Do they want the pseudo-Marist Barack Obama -- who reportedly has a photo of the murderous Castroite thug Che Guevara hanging in his Houston, Texas campaign headquarters -- hanging that photo in the Oval Office?

Do they want Hillary Clinton, the duplicitous former first lady, back in the White House enjoying all those furnishings she and her husband tried to swipe from the mansion?

Do they want a Democrat spending even more money that the government doesn't have on scores of programs right out of Karl Marx's playbook?

That's exactly what they'll get if they sit out the election and stay home on Election Day. That's called biting off your nose to spite your face. Or even more to the point, political suicide.

Let me say this. There has been plenty of battling in the primaries, and I've been in the middle of the battle, but until now haven't committed myself to any candidate, waiting until we had a nominee.

That's over.

If John McCain is the nominee of the party, this Reagan will happily campaign with him. The alternative is unthinkable to anyone who loves this nation.

...................................................

Michael Reagan, the eldest son of Ronald Reagan, is heard daily by over 5 million listeners via his nationally syndicated talk radio program, “The Michael Reagan Show.”

Copyright © 2006 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008endorsements; mccain; mcmexico; michaelreagan; ronaldreagan; suicidevoters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-245 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2008 2:14:34 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Doubt it other than the invocation of the 11th Commandment.
2 posted on 02/14/2008 2:17:00 PM PST by TCats (The Clintons Are Not Just Wrong - They Are Certifiable AND Dangerous! See my Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

well that’s one conservative vote in his corner.


3 posted on 02/14/2008 2:17:28 PM PST by street_lawyer (Truth is a defense and the best offense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

ROFLOL, just another vote insane or I’ll talk bad about your momma.


4 posted on 02/14/2008 2:18:30 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Well, I know me, and I’m no Ronald Reagan.


5 posted on 02/14/2008 2:19:04 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bceKsy4wXiM
Reagan Tribute


6 posted on 02/14/2008 2:19:23 PM PST by ari-freedom (True conservatives don't help Democrats win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

My tagline...


7 posted on 02/14/2008 2:19:24 PM PST by toddlintown (Ronald Reagan would vote for McCain, just like he sucked it up and supported Gerry Ford.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Come on folks, let’s rip the great Ronald Reagan’s son for being a RINO and a sell out. Rip his deceased father for backing Ford after he lost while you are at it.

You know you want to.....

Hunter? Gone
Fred? Gone
Romney? Gone

Hillary/Obama or McCain?

What would RR do?


8 posted on 02/14/2008 2:19:40 PM PST by misterrob (There is no such thing as a RINO.....CINO on the other hand has meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

LOL. The GOP establishment types are scared to death that rank and file conservatives won’t support McCain. Their fears are well-founded. I won’t be voting for McCain under any circumstance.


9 posted on 02/14/2008 2:19:41 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
John McCain would have sticked Ronald Reagan in the back too, if he had been President this past eight years. We have a liberal-moderate in conservative clothing who will surely bite us.
10 posted on 02/14/2008 2:20:20 PM PST by Sybeck1 (It's truly bad when your Savior in November is Judas Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Have fun with Juan, Mike. Keep your back facing away from him at all times, though.


11 posted on 02/14/2008 2:20:22 PM PST by TADSLOS (Be a 3.6 percenter- Write in Duncan Hunter for POTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

He was strong armed into bringing Bush on the ticket in ‘80, and tacidly supported him twice for POTUS. I think Reagan would give a Buchanan-style endorsement, but he wouldn’t sell his soul for the Benedict Arnold of the Reagan Revolution.


12 posted on 02/14/2008 2:21:56 PM PST by Rob112586 ("...a decrease in the quantity of legislation generally means an increase in the quality of life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The HUGE, HUGE difference today versus 1976 is that Obama or the Evil Witch would do far more damage than Peanut Head did, AND, that there is no Ronald Reagan magicaly popping up in 2012. If he’s not here today, he won’t be there in 2012. Reagan spent 20+ years setting up for the 1980 election.


13 posted on 02/14/2008 2:21:59 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I agree with Michael. I am no fan of MaCain’s when it comes to alot of his policys, But I will be voting for him in November. He is better then Hillary or Obama when at least it comes to National Defense.


14 posted on 02/14/2008 2:22:08 PM PST by FloridianBushFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: street_lawyer

Funny thing is that the RINO backers didn’t seem to care when Michael Reagan called Duncan Hunter the best man for the job. In the end it doesn’t really matter because RR didn’t spend his political career insulting us. That left Reagan with one thing McCain will never have....a chance of winning.


15 posted on 02/14/2008 2:22:12 PM PST by cripplecreek (Just call me M.O.M. (Maverick Opposed to McCain.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

This is an understandable position, and many conservatives have said vote for the GOP candidate, regardless - e.g., Reagan and, more recently, Fred Thompson.

The problem with this approach is that this loyalty is abused by triangulators like Karl Rove who force RINOs onto the party as “electiable” Republicans — lurching the entire party to the left.

While a reasonable path in Reagan’s day, I struggle with whether I will take that path any longer.


16 posted on 02/14/2008 2:22:20 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
"We are still suffering from the legacy of James Earl Carter, thanks to the conservatives who refused to follow Ronald Reagan's example and instead sulked at home while the nation was being handed over to the worst president in American history."

The worst president in American history is going to be elected in 2008.

Hopefully, it will not be a Republican. That would be a real difficult clean up for conservatives.

17 posted on 02/14/2008 2:22:51 PM PST by Radix (I do not want to press one for English.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
To think that the candidate who challenged a sitting GOP president would follow lock-step behind John McCain (of all people) is nutty.

Keep carrying the conservative cudgel, Gov. Huckabee!

18 posted on 02/14/2008 2:23:20 PM PST by unspun (Mike Huckabee: Government's job is "protect us, not have to provide for us." Duncan Hunter knows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus; EveningStar; All

Is me or what but does what would President Reagan sound like South Park joke of what would Brian Botaneo would do you know the ice skater


19 posted on 02/14/2008 2:23:23 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

Forget it - the Huck, Fred, and Hunter people on this site are so far around the bend that they can see the loonies on DU from the back. And it ain’t pretty.


20 posted on 02/14/2008 2:24:24 PM PST by Technocrat (McCain-Romney 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rob112586

Reagan was man enough to admit that he had lost and then worked to support his party while adding some conservative ideals to the platform.

Reagan would not allow a democrat in the mold of Hillary or Obama to take the WH.


21 posted on 02/14/2008 2:24:25 PM PST by misterrob (There is no such thing as a RINO.....CINO on the other hand has meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
I think it’s safe to say he wouldn’t have voted for him in an early primary.
22 posted on 02/14/2008 2:24:37 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (Your call may be monitored for quality-assurance purposes. ©®™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
It's very likely Ronald Reagan never would have been elected if Gerald Ford had earned a first elected term. Age was being used against Reagan at the time, and he would have had bruising primary battle against a possible 2nd termer in Gerald Ford.

And that's just the pragmatic electioneering angle.

Gerald Ford may have been a boob, and a bit of a Bob Michel bi-partisan hack, but he wasn't a traitor to basic American liberties--the way John McCain is. Reagan cared more about liberty than he did about party, and that's why he would have taken the longer term option.
23 posted on 02/14/2008 2:24:48 PM PST by farmer18th (Conservatives who vote McCain are like abused dogs who keep licking their master's hand...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown
That could have been the title of Michael's OP/ED!
24 posted on 02/14/2008 2:24:53 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Now we have another world-wide war going on with a hidden enemy sworn to kill us all, and the policy of the Democrats running for the presidency is to throw up their hands and withdraw from the battlefield, leaving it to the enemy -- and our fate in the hands of Osama bin Laden.
That's right.
25 posted on 02/14/2008 2:24:56 PM PST by samtheman (McCain: Not as good as a real Republican, not as bad as a real Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Michael Reagan-— quit calling my house and refusing to speak to me.


26 posted on 02/14/2008 2:25:11 PM PST by exhaustedmomma (Calm down: VOTE AGAINST MCCAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

When McCain was a POW, he heard that Reagan vigorously supported the cause of the POW being held. He was deeply grateful for that support. McCain may have many faults, but I seriously doubt that he would betray RWR.


27 posted on 02/14/2008 2:25:15 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

what kind of garbage is this?


28 posted on 02/14/2008 2:25:24 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Come on folks, let’s rip the great Ronald Reagan’s son for being a RINO and a sell out. Rip his deceased father for backing Ford after he lost while you are at it.

Perahps it would be good for you to note that the party came together under Dole, and it didn't help him a damn bit with the base.

And Dole was a conservative rock star compared to McCain.

29 posted on 02/14/2008 2:25:46 PM PST by roamer_1 (Conservative always, Republican no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TCats
Michael Reagan is right.

But at least Gerald Ford dropped Rockerfeller from the ticket and gave us Bob Dole. He also was polite enough to offer the spot to Reagan first. That made it a close election.

Why do I still get the idea than any McCain outreach to conservatives will be to slap them down?

30 posted on 02/14/2008 2:25:47 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Funny thing is that the RINO backers didn’t seem to care when Michael Reagan called Duncan Hunter the best man for the job. In the end it doesn’t really matter because RR didn’t spend his political career insulting us. That left Reagan with one thing McCain will never have....a chance of winning.

Excellent point.

31 posted on 02/14/2008 2:25:57 PM PST by TADSLOS (Be a 3.6 percenter- Write in Duncan Hunter for POTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TCats
Doubt it other than the invocation of the 11th Commandment.

So you know Reagan better than his son? I grew up watching Reagan as governor of California, and he was the first presidential candidate I ever had the chance to vote for in 1980. As much as I dislike McCain, I have to agree that Reagan would vigorously support the eventual Republican nominee under any circumstances, especially when faced with the alternative of Obama or Hillary.

I doubt I will be able to force myself to give money or time to elect McCain unless he does a whole lot better job of reaching out to conservatives. But if he is the nominee, as seems a certainty, I will not speak against him, will at least support him verbally to the extent I can without compromising my principles, and will not stay home in November. I do remember the Carter years, and with the economy in its current state, electing Barak or Hillary could bring them back with a vengeance. It is not worth it. I will pray that McCain will be better than I expect, and support conservative candidates wherever I can.

32 posted on 02/14/2008 2:26:22 PM PST by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain

Into what?

33 posted on 02/14/2008 2:27:10 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

So how would RR have seen or heard McCain
s mavericking the President during wartime, for the last years?


34 posted on 02/14/2008 2:27:51 PM PST by roses of sharon (Who will be McCain's maverick?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

He betrayed W.


35 posted on 02/14/2008 2:28:12 PM PST by Sybeck1 (It's truly bad when your Savior in November is Judas Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Technocrat

One more graduate of the McQueeg school of winning friends and influencing though insults and intimidation.


36 posted on 02/14/2008 2:28:24 PM PST by cripplecreek (Just call me M.O.M. (Maverick Opposed to McCain.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th

Reagan loved this country. So, I believe that Reagan would have preferred having Ford elected in 1976, even if that meant that he would never be President.


37 posted on 02/14/2008 2:28:34 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; All

They should just rename these articles, “Destroying Ronald Reagan for John McCain, Version 1, 2, 3... ...22,327.

I’m not voting for McCain. Tell me you’re going to dig Ronald Reagan up and re-bury him in Watts, and I’m still not voting for John McCain.

Republican Party, if you wanted my vote this year, there were two thing you could have done.

1. You could have told the guy in 1600 Pennsylvanie Boulvevard to rule from the right.

2. You could have set up the early primaries where conservatives weren’t subject to open voting, so that none of them could get elected.

Now, it is simply too late.

You’re going down in November. Get used to it.

Figure out what you’re going to do to get a conservative elected in 2012, because that’s what we’re working on, and it doesn’t involve you.

You’ve had your chance over the last twenty years and you’ve more or less taken a whiz on conservatives.

Surprise, surpise, what did you think that was going to gain you in the end?

Talk about a bunch of ignorant clowns...


38 posted on 02/14/2008 2:28:37 PM PST by DoughtyOne (We've got Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dumb & Tweedle Dumber left. Name them in order. I dare ya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
I'd just as soon rip RWR as I would use his memory to brow-beat others out of their vote in November.

It's his son's prerogative, but I have too much respect for the man.

39 posted on 02/14/2008 2:28:45 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Ronald Reagan was just a much, much better man than I.

I cannot support McCain because I don’t McCain gives a rat turd about the health of the GOP and especially about Reagan conservatism. I think McCain wants to remake the party in his image. And his image is anethema to me - www.reforminstitute.org.

Find a ‘position’ on that website that you can agree with as a conservative and then tell me what Reagan would have done.


40 posted on 02/14/2008 2:29:17 PM PST by bpjam (My party has fallen and it can't get up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
...Obama or the Evil Witch would do far more damage than Peanut Head did...

I'll assume you lived through the late 70's. What makes you think things could get worse than that? It was spectacularly bad.

41 posted on 02/14/2008 2:29:26 PM PST by Hazwaste (Vote! Vote for the conservative local, state, and national candidates of your choice, but VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: street_lawyer

well that’s one conservative vote in his corner.


Two.


42 posted on 02/14/2008 2:29:39 PM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Gerry Ford was a pretty decent guy. Johm mcCain is not. There’s no comparison.


43 posted on 02/14/2008 2:29:48 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Probably the best person to make a judgment on that would be GWB.


44 posted on 02/14/2008 2:30:06 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Yeah, yeah, I’ll vote for him...and he’ll lose. That’s a certainty right now. Democrats are outvoting Republicans in primaries by almost 2:1.

I think we need to shift our focus to certain House and Senate races. We need to limit the new Dem President’s influence and get some good conservatives elected to Congress.


45 posted on 02/14/2008 2:30:27 PM PST by Choose Ye This Day (Capitalism without failure is like religion without sin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Reagan backed Nixon and Ford. McCain resembles Nixon in a lot of ways. The difference between then and now is that Ronald Reagan came, he showed the way, he proved his ideas are right, and now, the old guard wants to go back to the old, country club, liberal Republicans. I don't want to go back to the old party. I want to stay true to conservatism, because NOW WE KNOW BETTER.

Ronald Reagan fought for decades to get us there, and he put his ideas into practice and proved they work. It's a different world than in 1972 or 1976, and to say that we have to accept the notion that conservatives go back to being the crazy uncles in the back of the room while the Bushes and Rockefellers make the real decisions is simply unacceptable.

The goal is to convince the American people that Conservatism is the way to go. If the GOP won't accept conservatism, then we need to take our 20 or 30 percent of the electorate, run conservative candidates, and work to get that number to 50 percent. After all, what is the point of winning elections if it is just to implement policies with which we disagree?

46 posted on 02/14/2008 2:30:34 PM PST by Defiant (The new GOP: A slightly slower road to socialist authoritarianism. Hoorah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Okeedokee!


47 posted on 02/14/2008 2:30:43 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FloridianBushFan

Why have a military on foreign soil if we have no borders at home? Why risk their lives for nothing?


48 posted on 02/14/2008 2:31:22 PM PST by donna (Separated at birth: Hugo Rafael Chavez and Barack Hussein Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

That’s where Reagans followers may have done more for the country than Reagan’s personal decency would allow. We go forward by polarizing, not by bi-partanship. It would have been a huge tragedy, and perhaps a global disaster, had Reagan not taken the White House. In this election cycle, John McCAin is just the sort of fascist to preside over a vast abridgement of Constitutional rights. There may be a few nice, meek, falsely-decent Republican who go along with him, but real Americans have got to oppose this thug tooth and nail.


49 posted on 02/14/2008 2:31:57 PM PST by farmer18th (Conservatives who vote McCain are like abused dogs who keep licking their master's hand...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Technocrat
Forget it - the Huck, Fred, and Hunter people on this site are so far around the bend that they can see the loonies on DU from the back. And it ain’t pretty.

So it has started....

The moderates in the party cannot convince the conservative with logic, so lacking any ammunition, we are now being classified as the "fringe" element.

Good luck with that approach in convincing anyone to join with you to destroy the GOP.

Your boy McAmnesty will grant Amnesty to 20-40 million Illegal Alien invadors who promptly turn around and become Democrat voters by a margin of at least 60/40.

The GOP will be toast, no more winning Presidential elections, no more majorities in the house or senate.

Once McAmnesty does this, the numbers are against you.

But hey, go ahead and pull the lever for the guy who is going to kill any chance you might have at having a say in US politics.
50 posted on 02/14/2008 2:32:01 PM PST by SoConPubbie (McAmnesty is the End Times for the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson