Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hate Springs Eternal
New York Times ^ | February 11, 2008 | Paul Krugman

Posted on 02/11/2008 3:01:57 PM PST by reaganaut1

In 1956 Adlai Stevenson, running against Dwight Eisenhower, tried to make the political style of his opponent’s vice president, a man by the name of Richard Nixon, an issue. The nation, he warned, was in danger of becoming “a land of slander and scare; the land of sly innuendo, the poison pen, the anonymous phone call and hustling, pushing, shoving; the land of smash and grab and anything to win. This is Nixonland.”

The quote comes from “Nixonland,” [] by Rick Perlstein []. As Mr. Perlstein shows, Stevenson warned in vain: during those years America did indeed become the land of slander and scare, of the politics of hatred.

And it still is. In fact, these days even the Democratic Party seems to be turning into Nixonland.

...

What’s particularly saddening is the way many Obama supporters seem happy with the application of “Clinton rules” — the term a number of observers use for the way pundits and some news organizations treat any action or statement by the Clintons, no matter how innocuous, as proof of evil intent.

The prime example of Clinton rules in the 1990s was the way the press covered Whitewater. A small, failed land deal became the basis of a multiyear, multimillion-dollar investigation, which never found any evidence of wrongdoing on the Clintons’ part, yet the “scandal” became a symbol of the Clinton administration’s alleged corruption.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; krugman; nixon; obama
People are just being so mean to the Clintons.
1 posted on 02/11/2008 3:01:59 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

If any knows about eternally spring hate, it is absolutely unquestionably Paul Krugman. He and his cadre of toadies at the NYT editorial section are professional attackdogs and do nothing each week but hate Republicans and all things non-liberal.

They invented the politics of personal destruction. So if they suddenly find it distateful they might want to offer a ceasefire starting with their own columns. And that ceasefire needs to include the dyke Dowd and that queen Frank Rich and whomever writes the main editorials for the NYT.


2 posted on 02/11/2008 3:06:59 PM PST by bpjam (My party has fallen and it can't get up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The nation, he warned, was in danger of becoming “a land of slander and scare; the land of sly innuendo, the poison pen, the anonymous phone call and hustling, pushing, shoving; the land of smash and grab and anything to win. This is Nixonland.”

Wow. Sounds like Adlai Stevenson slandering Nixon.

It is funny to hear the Clinton Party, the War Room party, complaining about hardball politics.

3 posted on 02/11/2008 3:07:32 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Whitewater was not a small failed land deal. It was 300 elderly couples being bilked out of their life savings, and it led to convictions for a sitting governor, Jim Guy Tucker, among others.


4 posted on 02/11/2008 3:07:39 PM PST by Garden Island (US out of Iraq!.....And into Iran, Syria, and Pakistan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
In fact, these days even the Democratic Party seems to be turning into Nixonland.

EVEN the Democrat Party? Seems to me the Democrats became masters of the politics of personal destruction when Reagan was running for office, and it hasn't stopped since.

5 posted on 02/11/2008 3:08:25 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Why should anyone be interested in what former ENRON advisor Paul Krugman, of the Kooky Skool of Krugonomics has to say? Krugman's credibility is on the minus size of 'zero'.
6 posted on 02/11/2008 3:11:56 PM PST by mkjessup (Any SOB who calls John F'in Kerry "his dear friend" will NEVER get my vote, no way, no how.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Good gosh,where is the barf alert on this one!!


7 posted on 02/11/2008 3:12:16 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
“People are just being so mean to the Clintons.”

They are the “real victims” after all.

8 posted on 02/11/2008 3:16:44 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

9 posted on 02/11/2008 3:18:40 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

My two cents:

Tailgunner Joe McCarthy was right. Richard Nixon was on his side. They were both right. The commies and socialists vowed revenge on them both, Senator McCarthy died and they succeeded against President Nixon. They print and regurgitate their fellow travelers lies and accusations as the truth and two generations of Americans have soaked up this tripe unopposed by the mainstream media. This is just more of the same.


10 posted on 02/11/2008 3:25:57 PM PST by tupac (The Crux of the Biscuit - is the Apostrophe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
LOL.

They were "madly for Adlai."
11 posted on 02/11/2008 3:26:41 PM PST by horse_doc (Visualize a world where a tactical nuke went off at Max Yasgur's farm in 1969.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
LOL.

They were "madly for Adlai."
12 posted on 02/11/2008 3:27:00 PM PST by horse_doc (Visualize a world where a tactical nuke went off at Max Yasgur's farm in 1969.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Richard Nixon was a militant anti-Communist while serving on the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

That was a capital offense.

Now what of his lesser sins?

The famous "Checkers speech" defended against one accusation. He had been accused of getting a "Rich Men's Trust Fund" that enabled him to live in a style far beyond his salary as a Senator.

During the speech he questioned if the accusers (the Democrats and MSM friends) would announce their sources of funding. Oh! the shame of such invective! Shame, Senator Nixon. Shame!

Folks, those were the days when Eisenhower's chief White House aide Sherman Adams received a $200 vicuna coat from a businessman and had to resign.

Mean while Senate Democrat LBJ was stealing TV and radio licenses and his chief aide Bobby Baker was dancing with the Mob. Alger Hiss was hailed a hero and honored after years of serving Uncle Joe's workers' paradise -- while first-hand witnesses like Whittaker Chambers joined Nixon as charged with a capital offense: exposing Communists.

Go figure. (We have -- and history proves we were right.)

13 posted on 02/11/2008 3:44:17 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Gee, it’s not like he’s in the tank for Clinton Inc!Krugman's trying to find a away to fit the old Republicans are all Nixon template,all conservatives want to spy in your bed room ,force blacks into shoeshine stands and make 12 year old kids work in mines and sweatshops!You people better vote democrat and Clinton or they'll make us all go to the mega church and pray to Reagan !This is the media that McCain thinks should be the ones to give us our facts about the elections because non media people skew the facts to fit their agenda!
14 posted on 02/11/2008 3:44:50 PM PST by bonehead4freedom (I haven't left the Republicans ,they have left me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I don't think there is a more dishonest, partisan columnist in the nation today than Paul Krugman. Whitewater was a significant real estate swindle, and close buddies of the Clinton's were implicated and convicted. If a similar scenario had existed around GWB, Krugman would cite it as proof positive of his guilt by association.

As for the alleged personality cult surrounding Bush, it never existed, even among Republicans. Did anyone on FR ever wax eloquent about how Bush had given us "hope" and "redemption," that he "transcends politics" and provides a cure for what ails the human soul? And haven't we been hearing from the MSM for eight years how utterly UNinspiring and inarticulate he is?
15 posted on 02/11/2008 7:56:48 PM PST by Steve_Seattle (|"Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

It is typically Krugmanlike to turn things upside down and blame Obama - and even Nixon! - for the dirt that’s flying around in Democratic cricles today. Almost all of the sleaze is coming from the Hillary campaign; even most Democrats can see that, but not the liar Krugman. The man is disgusting.


16 posted on 02/11/2008 8:01:48 PM PST by Steve_Seattle (|"Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson