Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmaker wants to punish Berkeley
MediaNews via CoCoTimes ^ | 2/7/8 | Steve Geissinger

Posted on 02/07/2008 6:32:52 PM PST by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The council also voted to explore enforcing a city anti-discrimination law, focusing on the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

Since they voted to send a letter to the commandant of the Marines telling them they are unwelcome, aren't they discriminating??? Ahhhh, the hypocracy of the democrat/liberal mind, it has no limits.

21 posted on 02/07/2008 8:16:38 PM PST by theymakemesick (The war on drugs benefits government agencies, politicians and drug dealers, they don't want to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Lani Hancock, the old red, is still in office?

Just proves that old reds never die, they just smell that way.

Someone get ahold of the old newsletter “BCA” (I think it stood for Berkeley Community Association” and put them on-line somewhere or send them to www.frontpagemagazine.com, “www.discoverthenetwork.com”.

They detail what the reds did in Berkeley in the 1970’s, while TOCSIN detailed the California reds in the 60s.


22 posted on 02/07/2008 8:18:48 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Madmax, the Grinning Reaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Wil H

If I remember right, the San Andreas Fault is on the west side of the Bay. The Hayward Fault goes right under Berkeley. And when I lived in Fremont in 1995, the papers said the Hayward Fault was way past due for a major quake.


23 posted on 02/07/2008 8:18:52 PM PST by JeffChrz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The legislator said the city's resolution also applauds residents and organizations "that may volunteer to impede, passively or actively, by nonviolent means, the work or any military recruiting office located in the City of Berkeley." He added this "nonviolent means" has resulted in people chaining themselves to one another in order to physically obstruct people from entering the Marine recruiting office.

From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
[wais.access.gpo.gov]
[Laws in effect as of January 3, 2005]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between January 3, 2005 and July 7, 2006]
[CITE: 18USC2388]

TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

PART I--CRIMES

CHAPTER 115--TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES


Sec. 2388. Activities affecting armed forces during war

(a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies; or

Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so--

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(b) If two or more persons conspire to violate subsection (a) of this section and one or more such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be punished as provided in said subsection (a).

(c) Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe or suspect, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under this section, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(d) This section shall apply within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, and on the high seas, as well as within the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 811; Pub. L. 103-322, title XXXIII, Sec. 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)


Historical and Revision Notes


Based on sections 33, 34, 35, 37 of title 50, U.S.C., 1940 ed., War and National Defense (June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title I, Secs. 3, 4, 5, 8, 40 Stat. 219; Mar. 3, 1921, ch. 136, 41 Stat. 1359; Mar. 28, 1940, ch. 72, Sec. 2, 54 Stat. 79).

Sections 33, 34, 35, and 37 of title 50, U.S.C., 1940 ed., War and National Defense, were consolidated. Sections 34, 35, and 37 of title 50, U.S.C., 1940 ed., War and National Defense, are also incorporated in sections 791, 792, and 794 of this title, to which they relate.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

Amendments


1994--Pub. L. 103-322 substituted ``fined under this title'' for ``fined not more than $10,000'' in last par. of subsec. (a) and in subsec. (c).

Repeals


Section 7 of act June 30, 1953, ch. 175, 67 Stat. 134, repealed Joint Res. July 3, 1952, ch. 570, Sec. 1(a)(29), 66 Stat. 333; Joint Res. Mar. 31, 1953, ch. 13, Sec. 1, 67 Stat. 18, which had provided that this section should continue in force until six months after the termination of the National emergency proclaimed by 1950 Proc. No. 2914 which is set out as a note preceding section 1 of Appendix to Title 50, War and National Defense.

Repeal of Extensions of War-time Provisions


Section 6 of Joint Res. July 3, 1952, repealed Joint Res. Apr. 14, 1952, ch. 204, 66 Stat. 54, as amended by Joint Res. May 28, 1952, ch. 339, 66 Stat. 96. Intermediate extensions by Joint Res. June 14, 1952, ch. 437, 66 Stat. 137, and Joint Res. June 30, 1952, ch. 526, 66 Stat. 296, which continued provisions until July 3, 1952, expired by their own terms.

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=browse_usc&docid=Cite:+18USC2388
24 posted on 02/07/2008 8:19:38 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL

Nope! The City has NOT backed down. Two councilcritters are introducing a new resolution to make the original resolution a little more moderate, but that won’t be until the 12th. Mayor Bates is making noise about the wording being a little excessive, but that’s only because of the intense scrutiny from angry Americans.


25 posted on 02/07/2008 9:34:48 PM PST by SmithL (My tagline dropped out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JeffChrz
If I remember right, the San Andreas Fault is on the west side of the Bay

I think you are correct - to a fault !..LOL

26 posted on 02/07/2008 10:02:08 PM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Chickens. Liberal chickens.


27 posted on 02/07/2008 10:06:51 PM PST by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson