Posted on 01/31/2008 2:49:42 PM PST by Leisler
Mitt, on the other hand, had an "epiphany" on abortion while his administration is researching stem cell research, after 12 years of outspoken support of abortion rights. He headed a private equity firm specializing in corporate turnarounds, which usually starts with massive plant and store closings and finding cheaper labor abroad, which is not wrong per se but he goes around the country talking about creating blue collar jobs in America and about the evils of illegal immigration. That's just phoniness
Bills_Brown_Bag comments
He pretty much ticked off the party with his dismal record of anti-coattail riding. How many lawmakers did the Romney revolution produce? One? The GOP lost seats under Mittens and he could have cared less. It's payback time
BG notices Mitt's political pump and dump skills
Nonetheless, Mitt Romney doesn't create relationships the way politicians have to, which is why, even though he was a good governor in the overall, many don't have good feelings about him. In Massachusetts people would rather get screwed by somebody they like than be governed well by somebody they don't like. That's why this place is losing population and is the laughingstock of the rest of the country. However, Mitt still has to learn that you can't just treat a place like a business. You can't buy and sell it, you have to make a relationship with it and keep that relationship.
“He pretty much ticked off the party with his dismal record of anti-coattail riding. How many lawmakers did the Romney revolution produce? One?”
That’s a load of hoakus. Romney spent hours upon hours of his own time recruiting new Repubilcan candidates in 2004 and spent millions of his own money campaigning for these politicians in 2004.
I dare ask how many other politicians running have done the same? The obvious answer is zero, of course.
And the results? The usual as of late with Massachusetts: a massive victory for Democrats. I suppose Romney should have repeated the effort in 2006 in a year when it was obvious that the tide was high for Democrats and low for Republicans. Just tossed his money and his time away into nothingness...
I’m afraid Mass doesn’t take the state’s well-being all that seriously until the disaster siren is blaring loudly across the bay...
“The Massachusetts Republican Party died last Tuesday.
The cause of death: failed leadership.
The party is survived by a few leftover legislators
and a handful of county officials and grassroots activists
who have been ignored for years.
Services will be public and a mass exodus of taxpayers will follow.
In lieu of flowers, send messages to New Hampshire Republican voters
warning them about a certain presidential candidate named Romney.”
- Boston Herald, 11/12/2006
“Romney arrived on the scene with great promise,
but is leaving the Republican Party here in shambles.
Not only are the Republicans yielding the governor’s office
for the first time in 16 years, but registered Republicans
have fallen by 31,000 since Romney took office,
and their legislative presence is at historic lows.
But it worked out fine for him:
He is now chasing the prize he really covets, the presidency.”"
- Boston Globe 11/8/2006
This statement pretty much summs it up for Mass.,
“In Massachusetts people would rather get screwed by somebody they like than be governed well by somebody they don’t like.”
So the snubbing, in the context, means that Mitt was a good governor and didn’t screw the constituancy......But vote for McCain and a stronger drive towards a free and sovreign Aztlan!
Time for Massachusetts to do to Scumney what he did to the MA GOP. Bury it.
Propaganda machine at it’s best. You took it hook, line, and sinker!
See my previous post.
I watched it happen. Romney did bust his hump. Regressive Massachusetts voters clung to their Democrats...again.
NOT a propaganda machine because it is ALL the newspapers
in Romney’s home state.
Seems you got snookered.
“And as you allude to, two short years later, it was buttkis to State Republicans for Mitt. Pump and dump.”
A bit like you were just putting all your money in stocks this time of year in 2001, right?
*rolls eyes*
After Mitt was elected by the state GOP, he couldn’t dump them fast enough.
Mitt is a political Dr. Kavorkian .
Nor did team-Romney's Fake LEO and Fake badges.
Romney destroyed the state's economy putting it at the
bottom of all states in economic job gain.
Bishop Romney failed -- except to his revisionists.
I am not from Mass so i could really care less for any of what is being said about him in the Lib rags they call newspapers of which only two were quoted. I figured in a state so populace they would have more than two newspapers.
What I do know is that McCain is in bed with every major Lib in D.C. and that is someplace Mitt is not from. As far as I can tell Mitt hasn’t supported a degradation of our constitutional rights via McCain-Feingold not to mention the “security” via lanes of McAmnesty.
We’ll save the Huckster for another debate.
It was only a matter of time before the real reason came out for his dislike....his religion. Good post though. \s
Anyways, Mitt was just here to get his resume buffed, ticket punched, and racially, Mayor of Detroit was out.
only two? They are the only two major newspapers.
a medic would examine what is before her/his eyes.
We dislike Joe Isuzu Romney because he’s a sleazy liberal liar and a destructive farce that helps the Democrat cause wherever he goes.
Sensor failure in isle 4.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.