Posted on 01/26/2008 8:25:31 PM PST by HD1200
The media said Obama took the majority of the youth vote under 30. In other words he owns the indoctrinated. This is a group that will tell you George Bush brought down the WTC but can't tell you who Ramsey Yousef is. This is a group that will swear we went to war with Iraq because Cheney wanted the oil but can't tell you why Cheney called for the end to hostilities after liberating Kuwait. This is a group that can't tell you what ANY of the specifics are of Obama's proposals. I suppose we can give them a pass for that because I don't think anybody including Obama himself knows the answer to that question.
(Excerpt) Read more at captainsquartersblog.com ...
Funny, that's he same thing they said after Iowa.
This election and it's coverage is turning out to be the biggest farce I've ever seen in my life. After Iowa, it was OBAMA who brought the race card to the table with his MKL "mountaintop" spiel. It was OBAMA who reference the lunch counters in Selma. Yet it was the Clintons who were blamed. The irony is astounding. The dems have two world class liars competitng for the slanted coverage of the media. All over the TV tonight they have been tripping over themselves about how OBAMA has "formed a coalition".
A coalition of who? Unity where?
More than 80% of theblack vote went to Obama. 75% of the white vote didn't.
Where is the "unity" in those numers? I see nothing in them but division.I have to laugh watching OBAMA's speeches. The black 'preacher' voice being underlined by hs JFK style puncuations with his right hand. There certainly is alot of sizzle being sold in the Democrat party these days. However the size of the steak get's smaller and smaller while the price has reached a level none of us can afford.
When will someone have the guts to stand up to this charade? Who will be the one who can expose the truth about the direction Obama will take this country in race relations. With every racially nuanced speech Obama is allowed to make unchallenged, we step back further in time, ripping open old wounds on the way. Yet anyone who would dare challenged the voice of this "oppressed" orator is accused of race baiting.
No one see's this? Are we really that blind?
How many black leaders must be elected in this country just because the majority of the black community supports them on that basis alone? How many times will a percentage of the white community fall in line out of sense of misguided guilt and a desire to offer political reparations? When will the message of the politicians TRULY be race neutral and targeted to benefit ALL Americans? Certainly not anytime soon as long as we continue to placate the real racists among us.
The media said Obama took the majority of the youth vote under 30. In other words he owns the indoctrinated. This is a group that will tell you George Bush brought down the WTC but can't tell you who Ramsey Yousef is. This is a group that will swear we went to war with Iraq because Cheney wanted the oil but can't tell you why Cheney called for the end to hostilities after liberating Kuwait. This is a group that can't tell you what ANY of the specifics are of Obama's proposals. I suppose we can give them a pass for that because I don't think anybody including Obama himself knows the answer to that question.
Reagan has often been accused of being an ideologue, and he was. However he also had a sound strategy to accomplish his ideological goals. Obama on the other hand is the most vacant ideologue I think I've ever seen. Obama is void of anything but subtle racial rhetoric. He is nothing but the the delivery boy for the "Guilt of the Month Club", coached by manipulative media mentors.
Bill Clinton had my vote for being the biggest liar this country has ever seen. Obama is now threatening that title. However, I will give Bill Clinton credit for a recent comment he made pertaining to Obama.
"This is the biggest fairytale I've ever seen. Give. Me. A. Break"
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016767.php?disqus_reply=104078#dsq-message
There is a bright side her for Hillary. She knew the black vote was going to go to Obama. Look at all that walkin’ around money she saved.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1960184/posts
Good post . . . thanks for sharing it.
A coalition of those who hate Billary?
Conversation with an Obama Voter:
Me... Why are you voting for Obama?
Idiot... Because he wants CHANGE.
Me... What kind of “change”?
Idiot... CHANGE -— you know CHANGE!
Me... Specifically, what is he looking to do?
Idiot... Didn’t you hear me - he wants CHANGE.
Me... Yeah, got that. But, what does it MEAN!!!!!!????!?!?!?!
Idiot... You’re just racist.
Me... Oh.. nevermind.
Just thinkin’
If you have to be 35 to run for President, maybe you should have to be 35 to vote for President.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Obama is young,
vibrant,
healthy
well educated,
intelligent,
handsome,
appealing to the women,
and the men like him,
he is happily married,
with a lovely family,
looks good on TV
is articulate
good speaker
enthusiastic
Edwards (another young man) had a good showing in SC
if he is Obamas running mate we will get beaten
The GOP have nothing to put up against Obama
All except Huck are old enough to be Obamas father...
All have negatives co npared to Obama
Romney... as much a social liberal but too much older, belongs to an organization with a long history of discrimination against blacks and others...
Huck, some contrast in the social issues, but no contest...
McClain......yes well
Gulianni...too much personal baggage...
Paul...The age difference..and though he is a sweet man...he would have excited crowds...
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
If only we had a REAL conservative....
someone conservatives could get behind...
I thought Duncan or FRed...
FRed is ancient compared to Obama...but the rallies would be full of energy and fun...
Looks like it will probably be Obama in Nov...
Unless we can come up with a miracle, the conservatives will stay away in droves...
|
Whooooppppppps
Paul...The age difference..and though he is a sweet man...he would NOT excite crowds...
Where's the big story here? The same holds true for the people who voted for the Clintons.
He may have the under 30 vote, but they don’t vote as reliably as the over 50 crowd.
Obama offers significant change over Clinton:
Obama: same old socialist wine in a new bottle.
Clinton: same old socialist wine in an old bottle.
Vote Obama, vote Change.
Um, why do so many voters seem to be idiots?
Obama’s South Carolina victory is much ado about nothing. Bill Clinton may have been race-baiting, but the numbers show his predication was accurate: the black voters carried Obama to victory in SC. He may not fare as well in other states.
I’ll admit, it’s been fun watching Obama knock Hillary down a few pegs. But I’d rather she win the nomination because I believe she’s beatable, whereas he has the type of charisma that could rally people and bring in mindless voters looking for a celebrity in the White House.
Oops. predication should read prediction
And own property, be able to pass a basic literacy test (in English), and actually not be reliant on a welfare check.
It’s about “emotions” and “feelings”.
I guess I’m not sensitive enough.
Thank heavens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.