Posted on 01/24/2008 6:44:17 PM PST by jimluke01
Yet Another Study Confirms Gay Life Expectancy 20 Years Shorter
“under even the most liberal assumptions, gay and bisexual men in this urban centre [Vancouver, BC] are now experiencing a life expectancy similar to that experienced by all men in Canada in the year 1871.”
This is a PDF that I found.
My health insurer sends me a form to fill out once a year, one of the questions always asked is, “am I a smoker”. I understand their reasoning for that.
They do not and I assume they cannot ask if I’m homosexual, a life style choice every bit as dangerous as smoking and I believe from the stats I read, much more so.
I recently bought some life insurance policies for my grand children. Same question about smoking, even for a 9 year old, though my other grand children are older and was a more legitimate question when asked of them. No questions about the highly risky behavior of homosexuality.
It is stunning that smoking has been made the health crime of the century but no one DARES speak of what the homosexual lifestyle does to a persons mind and body. It’s sad that depravity is protected as a “right”. Talk about “designer sickness”.....you’re on the cutting edge of “freedom” if you support gay rights and a gay lifestyle is suicide.
bookmark
NARTH (I think it stands for The National Association for Reorientation Therapy for Homosexuals)is an incredible resource for info. on this subject.
Semen is DESIGNED for the female body. When it enters another male, for whom it is not designed, it is DISORIENTED, wreaking havoc, and attaching itself to the lining of the bowels where it mutates,etc.
There is a specially-privileged disease. It is given benefits that no other disease has.
I am sick of the low-life politicians who bow down before a very powerful lobby and give it whatever it demands.
That being said, I do hold the medical community responsible for caving to LW pressure groups and not instituting the same proven disease control techniques that have worked for typhoid fever, polio, leprosy, and other deadly communicable diseases when these practices could have saved tens of millions of lives.
Just curious — what should they DO when they “wake up?”
“Semen is DESIGNED for the female body. When it enters another male, for whom it is not designed, it is DISORIENTED, wreaking havoc, and attaching itself to the lining of the bowels where it mutates,etc.”
Huh? What does it mutate into? What havoc does the semen wreak? How does one identify disoriented semen?
For starters, stop teaching schoolchildren that this vile lifestyle is "normal", but is dangerous, filthy, and wrong.
There is an article at NARTH’s website about this. I should have said that the sperm become disoriented. Sorry.
“There is an article at NARTH’s website about this.”
Could you link the article? I’m curious. I’ve never heard of disoriented sperm, or of sperm doing damage to to people.
“For starters, stop teaching schoolchildren that this vile lifestyle is normal.”
Gotcha. That would be liberal schoolteachers. What about the rest of us?
Here is a link from a different source.
http://www.glma.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.viewPage&pageID=690
Here is a link re: hyper-aids.
http://www.narth.com/docs/strain.html
Here is one about another disease, expected to enter the heterosexual population eventually.
http://www.narth.com/docs/cdceurope.html
Thanks for the many links, fetal (and for following up by FreepMail). I’ve been away for the weekend.
I was not debating that anal sex can be dangerous (as can vaginal sex) when one of the parties has a sexually transmittable disorder. That’s pretty clear. I was particularly curious about the “disoriented sperm” claim — I hadn’t heard it before.
The article you linked from NARTH gave a rationale, and cited a 1977 study. I did a quick lit search on the topic. It seems that this claim is echoed only in a handful of religiously oriented sites (usually using the same “two-in-one-flesh” wording, so I think they’re probably loosely copied from one another, and all citing the same 1977 study). I can’t access the study (the journal is only online from 1998 forward), and I can’t find any mention of the same explanation for anal cancer anywhere else in the scientific literature or from any credible independent source (one that doesn’t use the same religious language).
We really don’t know what causes anal cancer, although exposure to HPV (which isn’t necessarily prevented with condoms) seems to be a strong marker for it, and smoking increases the risk. There’s a good summary on the matter from the American Cancer Society here:
It doesn’t have anything to say about disoriented sperm. I am starting to think that this may be a bit of an overblown hypothesis derived from that early study. Do you have any other leads on it?
No, sorry, I do not have any further info. I will also look further, although I doubt much will be revealed publicly if it suggests that nature responds negatively to homosexual activity. I would encourage you to contact NARTH directly-particularly Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, who has dedicated his life to helping homosexuals (who come to him for help)become chaste and/or reoriented. I have read some of his information, but would suggest you get the info. directly from the professionals who work in this field.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.