Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sweden's Saab says Swiss mulling Gripen fighters
Reuters ^ | Fri Jan 18, 2008 | Simon Johnson

Posted on 01/20/2008 8:48:48 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Sweden's Saab says Swiss mulling Gripen fighters

Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:25am EST

STOCKHOLM, Jan 18 (Reuters) - Swedish aerospace firm Saab (SAABb.ST: Quote, Profile, Research) said on Friday that Switzerland was mulling buying its state-of-art Gripen fighter in a deal potentially worth billions of Swedish crowns.

Saab said that Switzerland had requested it to tender for a contract to replace its fleet of F-5 fighters around the year 2013. Saab is one of four candidates.

The Swedish firm will submit its offer in the middle of 2008 with a decision due in 2009.

"There is massive interest in Gripen right now, which confirms our strong position on the world market," Ake Svensson, Saab's chief executive said in a statement.

In addition to Switzerland, Norway has asked Saab to submit a bid for up to 48 Gripen fighters. There, Saab is competing with the American JSF fighter for the contract.

Norway will decide on which plane to buy in spring 2009 with deliveries to begin in 2015.

Denmark and India are also looking at buying Gripen fighters. (Reporting by Simon Johnson; Editing by Paul Bolding)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; armsbuildup; gripen; saab; sweden; switzerland
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
1 posted on 01/20/2008 8:48:50 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Saab said that Switzerland had requested it to tender for a contract to replace its fleet of F-5 fighters around the year 2013.

Long time to keep a fighter. What did the F-5s replace - P-51s?

2 posted on 01/20/2008 8:59:50 PM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

size-wise— is this bigger than a F16 or same/smaller?


3 posted on 01/20/2008 8:59:51 PM PST by ASOC (The Captain doesn't choose the storm....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan
What did the F-5s replace - P-51s?

Probably F-86s.

4 posted on 01/20/2008 9:06:35 PM PST by SIDENET (Hubba Hubba...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

And Switzerland believes it needs jets because????

It’s not like they’re ever going to use them for anything. They’d get better bang for their bucks if they went with weather proofed paper mache hanger models.


5 posted on 01/20/2008 9:10:19 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

It’s lighter as far as weight goes-other dimensions like wingspan are probably similar.


6 posted on 01/20/2008 9:18:25 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Sweden’s Saab says Swiss mulling Gripen fighters”

That’s easy for you to say: to me, it’s a mouthful.


7 posted on 01/20/2008 9:26:31 PM PST by Nick Thimmesch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan
What did the F-5s replace - P-51s?

Probably ME-109s. An FW-190 accidentally landed there, early in WWII.

Hermann Goering was anxious to get it back, and Churchill's RAF wanted it.

While CH was trying to figure out how to maximize its profit, the aircraft mysteriously went up in flames one night.

And surprise, surprise, surprise, the Luftwaffe gave Switzerland half a dozen ME-109s shortly there after.

Any way, FWIW, I was in Geneva in the early 1990s, and there was graffiti opposing the purchase of F-18s at the time.

I guess they didn't buy the F-18s.

8 posted on 01/20/2008 9:31:31 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET; Last Dakotan
The F-5s replaced the last of Switzerland's DeHavilland Venoms and some of the Hawker Hunters.
9 posted on 01/20/2008 9:31:34 PM PST by atomic conspiracy (Rousing the blog-rabble since 9-11-01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nick Thimmesch

the swiss hate being called swedes and other way around so they should think twice about this.


10 posted on 01/20/2008 9:32:40 PM PST by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

They purchased 30 odd F-18s & are currently upgrading them for new sensors & weapons.


11 posted on 01/20/2008 9:33:50 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Are the batteries included, too?


12 posted on 01/20/2008 9:56:27 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What I wanna know is ... is this for the Swiss Air Force, or is this a prominent Bank CEO’s new private jet?


13 posted on 01/20/2008 9:58:36 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Really is a versatile aircraft.


14 posted on 01/20/2008 10:04:12 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Cheap, versitle, STOL capabilities. Good choice for the Swiss. I’d prefer them to buy the F-16 block 60, but I understand why the watchmaking bankers chose the Grippen.


15 posted on 01/20/2008 11:33:38 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Have the Swedes EVER successfully sold any previous generations of their fighters abroad?

I know they tried with the Viggen at least, but without success.


16 posted on 01/20/2008 11:55:37 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"Swedish aerospace firm Saab said on Friday that Switzerland was mulling buying its state-of-art Gripen fighter in a deal potentially worth billions of Swedish crowns."

I wonder where the money *really* coming from?

17 posted on 01/21/2008 12:56:14 AM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy
And Switzerland believes it needs jets because????

The Swiss have an Air Force that includes "hangers" built into mountainsides with several blast-proof doors to protect the aircraft. The Nazis didn't invade* in WWII because the Swiss had (and still have) hardened defenses covering every mountain pass, huge Army Reserves, and the finest in small arms and other militaria.

*Operation Christmas Tree didn't happen.

Most Swiss speak several languages, but in-migration (wait-staff, maid service) is changing the country for the worst-to-come.

18 posted on 01/21/2008 1:41:12 AM PST by Does so (...against all enemies, DOMESTIC and foreign...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Does so
"The Nazis didn't invade* in WWII because the Swiss had (and still have) hardened defenses covering every mountain pass, huge Army Reserves, and the finest in small arms and other [sic] militaria."

Basically, you're right. However, Hitler didn't invade the Swiss because he needed a foreign currency exchange.

19 posted on 01/21/2008 2:08:57 AM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

The Draken had won a few sales & the Gripen has done rather well given the competition it gets.


20 posted on 01/21/2008 3:28:14 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
Your guess would be wrong.


21 posted on 01/21/2008 4:12:58 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
I was in Geneva in the early 1990s, and there was graffiti opposing the purchase of F-18s at the time. I guess they didn't buy the F-18s.

It has been my life experience that the people who write graffiti aren't the ones who make or influence any decisions.

22 posted on 01/21/2008 10:16:07 AM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; Calvin Locke
At http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_Air_Force Wikipedia says 33 F-18s are in the Swiss AF and 54 remaining F-5 Tiger IIs.
23 posted on 01/21/2008 10:27:19 AM PST by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The Saab Grippen would have at least nominal engine commonality with the Swiss F/A-18Cs.


24 posted on 01/21/2008 11:02:58 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Does so

The myth of Swiss defense in WW2. The Swiss were the Nazis butt boys in every way measurable. Even allowing for war materials to be transported from Germany and southern France through Swiss territory to Italy.

Heck, we even bombed rail yards in Switzerland a time or few.

The Swiss were only neutral in name, not in deed. They didn’t get invaded by the Germans because there was no need, not because of fear of Swiss defense.

Now, update yourself to today...

Name a nation that the Swiss could defend themselves from that might actually want to invade them. The Swiss managed to do the usual european parasite backstabber games well enough to stay out from under the Sovs. Not because of their own strength, but because we decided not to let the Sovs have the Swiss.

Other than the usual modern european vanity, there’s zero reason for any european nation to spend a penny on defense.

They, all of them, lack the spine to use them. They, all of them, are too feeble, intellectually inbred and worthless to even be able to differentiate between friend and foe.

The Swiss. The degenerate scumbags that refused to honor their agreement to transfer 100 M113 APCs to the Iraqi Police forces because they “couldn’t be seen to be assisting the US in their illegal war of aggression against the peaceful peoples of Iraq.”

Screw the Swiss. They can take their neutrality, wrap it up in something sharp and jagged and shove it up in themselves until they bleed out.


25 posted on 01/21/2008 8:31:04 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy
"...Screw the Swiss. They can take their neutrality..."

The Swiss gave the Allies breaks: there are probably dozens of our aircraft whose bacon was saved by landing in Switzerland.

While you're at it, how about railing against WWII Irish neutrality?

Churchill was declined the use of an excellent Irish harbor to extend Allied escort protections against Nazi U-boat "wolf packs" and was willing to transfer all of Northern Ireland in exchange!

At least Switzerland can't claim being complicit in the massive tonnage—and Allied Merchant Marine deaths—in the very worst years fighting Nazism.

26 posted on 01/22/2008 1:36:03 AM PST by Does so (...against all enemies, DOMESTIC and foreign...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Does so

You’re right about the Irish.

My main issue with the Swiss, most of the EU and everyone else playing this game is that the civilization that they are members of is under attack, and they’re not even content with sitting on their tails. They’ve got to play obstructionist and passive aggressive back stabbing scumbags.

Weak pieces of quisling viche. As well as being snarky bags of quivering snivel.

Instead of dumping cash into aircraft they’ll never, ever, under any possible situation, have a real use for, why not put together a deployable, expeditionary capable regiment and get their worthless cowardly selves in the fight for their own survival.


27 posted on 01/22/2008 12:09:50 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Would flying jets around Switzerland be a sound idea with all those mountains? They will probably lose most of them right away, not so much by hitting mountains but by getting lost behind them and up in the formerly glaciated regions.


28 posted on 01/22/2008 12:12:47 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

They had ME-109’s in the 40’s.


29 posted on 01/22/2008 12:14:05 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Does so

Interesting. I am surprised that Churchill did not give teh Irish the same offer that Salazar got regarding the use of Lajes field.


30 posted on 03/11/2008 12:30:18 PM PDT by MSF BU (++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson