Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Vows To Send NASA Back to Moon
orlandosentinel.com ^ | Jan 18, 2008 | Robert Block

Posted on 01/19/2008 9:20:07 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares

Former N.Y. Mayor Rudy Giuliani on Friday pledged his unwavering support to return America to the moon and send astronauts to Mars, promising that if he were elected president space would be a pillar of his administration.

"A strong NASA and a revitalized space program will be a priority for a Giuliani Administration from day one," he told a group of about 35 space industry and local officials gathered at space policy round table organized by the Economic Development Commission of Florida’s Space Coast. He then drove home his promise with a vow to close the gap between the retirement of the space shuttle and the development of the next generation of manned rockets.

“Florida will continue to be the center of America’s space program … and our emerging space industry,” he said.

It was exactly the message that the group had been hoping for. The EDC and industry lobbyists, worried about the retirement of the space shuttle in 2010, have been trying for months to get presidential candidates from both parties to articulate support for NASA and manned space exploration. The EDC recently sent out invitations to all candidates in the hope of drumming up support for the space program. The issue could turn out to be crucial to wining the state, they argue.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.orlandosentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; fl2008; giuliani; mars; moon; moonbase; nasa; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-116 next last
Rudy is not exactly on my short list. But I am convinced that the nations that lead on the frontiers, dictate the course of human history.

I hope ALL the candidates will support NASA and vision for space exploration as strongly as this.

1 posted on 01/19/2008 9:20:11 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
I hope ALL the candidates will support NASA and vision for space exploration as strongly as this.

I do too, but more importantly I hope the next president appoints a NASA administrator that would consider for a second that they could be wrong. Rather than giving us the shaft (in more ways than one).

DIRECTly to the Moon and Mars.

2 posted on 01/19/2008 9:22:27 PM PST by AntiKev ("No damage. The world's still turning isn't it?" - Stereo Goes Stellar - Blow Me A Holloway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Just go away already Rudy!


3 posted on 01/19/2008 9:23:54 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Many of us would like to see Giuliani sent to the moon, McCain, too!


4 posted on 01/19/2008 9:24:50 PM PST by claudiustg (You know it. I know it. I'm optiMITTstic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Simply sounds like pandering to me, but who knows.


5 posted on 01/19/2008 9:25:14 PM PST by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

Yup, he’s promising the moon, the stars will be after his next defeat.


6 posted on 01/19/2008 9:25:56 PM PST by flying Elvis ("In...War, the errors which proceed from a spirit of benevolence are the worst" Clausewitz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

The Moon??? That’s so 70’s...BORING!
Been there, done that, nothing there.

I think Fred ought to come out tomorrow and call for sending a man to Mars.
That would really be exciting!


7 posted on 01/19/2008 9:33:50 PM PST by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

What other pandering can he come up with? Didn’t he recently come up with some sort of pandering when it comes to a form of Federal home insurance that would benefit Floridians disproportionately? Geeez, he might as well just stay down there.


8 posted on 01/19/2008 9:34:33 PM PST by stockstrader (We need a conservative who will UNITE the Party, not a liberal who will DEMORALIZE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

I say we send a WOMAN to the Moon.

And I have the perfect one - Hillary!


9 posted on 01/19/2008 9:35:50 PM PST by WOSG (Proamnesty-antiBushtaxcuts-proCO2caps-CFR-RINO John McCain delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

ALL of NASA or just some astronauts?


10 posted on 01/19/2008 9:38:21 PM PST by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

“Simply sounds like pandering to me, but who knows.”

Probably. It is not like he ever mentioned it before.

But I am a strong space advocate, and happy to see it elevated to some kind of visiblity this election.

Hilda-bama would cancel for sure lunar missions, and have NASA endlessly study global warming.


11 posted on 01/19/2008 9:40:54 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Rudy? Rudy who?


12 posted on 01/19/2008 9:42:34 PM PST by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
Many of us would like to see Giuliani sent to the moon, McCain, too!

LOL

A BIG 10-4 on that!

13 posted on 01/19/2008 9:43:31 PM PST by B Knotts (If McCain wins, we lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: flying Elvis

Nobody gives a darn about going back to the moon!! Give me a damned break. The last time we went,we paid all the money and the silly sob got up there and claimed it for “mankind”. BS — It was THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA moon.Close nasa down and send me my rebate!!!


14 posted on 01/19/2008 9:46:14 PM PST by Donnaplume
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AntiKev

.

In 2005 President BUSH first announced that Americans would be landing on the Planet Mars in 2025.

A new Democrat Congress has been quietly undercutting NASA’s Mars funding, so NASA has had to recently announce that Americans will be landing on the Planet Mars on 2035 instead.

Russia has just gleefully announced that it will be landing Rusians on the Planet Mars in 2025, America’s original target.

Vote next time around like your very future depends on it.

‘Cause it does.

.


15 posted on 01/19/2008 9:47:19 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Rudy is saying anything to get the Florida vote. He’s running ads promising to lower insurance rates too.


16 posted on 01/19/2008 9:47:34 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

I hope that as we are taxed for all of this science, we have a definite and measurable goal as we blithely go back to space.

Other than pandering to the aerospace industry, what would be Guiliani’s top three goals for a a return to the moon?

I’ll bet he hasn’t worked that out.


17 posted on 01/19/2008 9:48:15 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Okay. Fine. Lets go to the Moon, go to Mars, but all the money is in Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs) and in the Asteroid Belt. Why?

Plantinum Group Metals (PGMs, or PeGgyMays). One average sized asteroid contains enough PeGgyMays to equal the World’s Annual Gross Product!!!

The mining and processing can be done in space - a vacuum with zero gravity and unlimited solar power - saving Earth from the pollution of mining waste products.

Going into space is ridiculous unless it becomes lucrative. There are many high tech applications for PeGgyMaes but a drastic shortage here on Easth as the metals are formed hearer the Earth’s core.


18 posted on 01/19/2008 9:50:29 PM PST by SatinDoll (Fredhead and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donnaplume

“Close nasa down and send me my rebate!!!”

The nations that lead on the frontier, dictate the course of human history.

Perhaps you would rather the western world NOT lead?

And if you want a rebate, I think you should look at entitlements first....

http://www.federalbudget.com/chart.gif


19 posted on 01/19/2008 9:51:04 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

We have enough moon rocks from the last few trips.


20 posted on 01/19/2008 9:51:45 PM PST by ajay_kumar (United we win, divided democrats win. How difficult is that to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente
The Moon??? That’s so 70’s...BORING!
Been there, done that, nothing there.


Within a decade or two, the Chinese will be there. To stay - on a permanently manned base. So will the Russians, the Indians, and a bunch of other nations. So will we - even if there were nothing there, we wouldn't let the Chinese and the others claim that nothing for themselves.

I think Fred ought to come out tomorrow and call for sending a man to Mars.

I hope all the candidates will be serious about funding a manned expedition to Mars, but Mars is a long ways away and the Moon is right here, with conceivable military potential and a much shallower gravity well than Earth to launch Mars missions.
21 posted on 01/19/2008 9:52:04 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

It’s not about rocks.

The nations that lead on the frontier, dictate the course of human history.


22 posted on 01/19/2008 9:52:42 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Oh yeah. THATS what we need to spend money on.


23 posted on 01/19/2008 9:54:16 PM PST by annelizly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annelizly

I am no Rudy fan by any stretch. Been fighting hard for Thompson.

And yeah Rudy is pandering.

BUT..

Again.......The nations that lead on the frontier, dictate the course of human history.

“You have to keep pushing the frontier not just because it’s there, but because that’s how we find things that end up changing humanity,” -Paul Hill, Mission Control


24 posted on 01/19/2008 9:56:22 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Nations that take care of their people first, need not lead the world. My platitude sounds better than your platitude.


25 posted on 01/19/2008 9:57:32 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Nations that take care of their people first, need not lead the world. My platitude sounds better than your platitude.


26 posted on 01/19/2008 9:57:39 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Doesn’t NASA have a timetable that is forecast way past the next decade? Bush already pimped the Mars missions. Must get those subcontracting machine shops working again!
27 posted on 01/19/2008 9:57:45 PM PST by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

The Moon? What the heck does that have to do with 9/11?


28 posted on 01/19/2008 9:57:59 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

“Nations that take care of their people first, need not lead the world. My platitude sounds better than your platitude.”

Then America will descend into global irrelevancy. Like many european nations.

No thanks.


29 posted on 01/19/2008 9:59:50 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

“Within a decade or two, the Chinese will be there. To stay - on a permanently manned base. So will the Russians, the Indians, and a bunch of other nations. So will we - even if there were nothing there, we wouldn’t let the Chinese and the others claim that nothing for themselves.”

THe “high ground” critically matters.

And it advance our nation in many ways when we reach far.

I wish more freepers understood that.

I am often surprised that many do not.


30 posted on 01/19/2008 10:03:23 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
...the Moon is right here, with conceivable military potential and a much shallower gravity well than Earth to launch Mars missions.


Well, I hadn't thought about that. OK, it's the Moon then!
31 posted on 01/19/2008 10:04:21 PM PST by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
Nations that take care of their people first, need not lead the world. My platitude sounds better than your platitude.

By Nations I assume you mean governments, correct?

If so, you could not be more wrong.

That would appear at first blush to be socialism my friend, and we just spent a century proving how wrong that type of sentiment really is!
32 posted on 01/19/2008 10:04:55 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Good grief, what a pandering loser.


33 posted on 01/19/2008 10:05:04 PM PST by Antoninus ("Make all the promises you have to." --Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

We will descend into global irrelevancy if we do not go to the moon? Really?

Do you mean going to the moon will save us from the amoral abyss into which we are falling? You can’t be serious! It is more likely to give us bread and circuses to keep us from rioting for another day.

We are already descending into irrelevancy, and going to the moon will not change any aspect of that.

In fact, overextending the tax burden on the US taxpayers is more likely to send us into irrelevancy than any benefit we would get from going back to the moon again.

How exactly will it make us more relevant?

All this effort is intended to do it to provide cover for the various black projects that the government is involved in, most of which have no meaningful public scrutiny...

But of course, this is just my opinion.


34 posted on 01/19/2008 10:11:15 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Not if we send Rudy back to NY first.


35 posted on 01/19/2008 10:12:17 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

You are missing my pint on purpose, I believe. My point is that without a definite defined goal in mind, this is a massive waste of effort for a few to have an emotional high to put a few lines in our textbooks.

It has nothing to do with political beliefs. It has everything to do with a cost benefit approach to spending taxpayers’ money, using budgets taht are not fully visible to public scrutiny.


36 posted on 01/19/2008 10:14:46 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Rooty & algore, go up on our next unmanned rocket.


37 posted on 01/19/2008 10:17:14 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Again,

the nations that lead on the frontier, dictate the course of human history.

Astronaut Story Musgrave.....

“We have been a frontier culture. We were born out of exploration, we were born out of adventure. We were born out of the plains and the mountains. We’ve been a very physical kind of culture. And so, if you look at adventure, if you look at exploration, if you look at immersion in nature, a physical culture, and all those things, you can see directly how space flight relates to the way America has been born and how it evolved.”


38 posted on 01/19/2008 10:20:06 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

ron paul is probably vowing to send NASA to the moon for the first time.

hahahahahahahahaha

seriously though, send NASCAR to the moon


39 posted on 01/19/2008 10:28:14 PM PST by Disciplinemisanthropy (...and that, people, is what grinds my gears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Do you write for Star Trek? Sounds like a paraphrase of the opening which refers to seeking out new worlds, to go where no man has gone before.

These are all fine sentiments, but I have yet to hear anything that makes me think there is a good reason to do so now. Even the early explorers had financial backers who expected some very specific things as a result of their effort. Even if it was a risk, there was a clear goal in mind.

What budget do you seek for this nebulous warm fuzzy feeling about being a race of explorers? Would one trillion dollars over twenty years make us trailblazers again?

Most people in our society have never been explorers, and in fact most of those going west to settle it, were malcontents and unsuccessful in their lives, and they sought new opportunities. Where are the opportunities for a guy like me on the moon?

Unless you work for NASA, I can see none.

However, if you can give me an idea to pursue, that has some merit, then I might support it.

Again, if you removed the entries really going to the black budget for new weapons technology, what would it really cost?

40 posted on 01/19/2008 10:37:48 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

I guess he has the Ralph Kramdon vote locked.


41 posted on 01/19/2008 10:40:52 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
Giant Pander Alert!

Photobucket

42 posted on 01/19/2008 10:42:05 PM PST by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
It has everything to do with a cost benefit approach to spending taxpayers’ money, using budgets taht are not fully visible to public scrutiny.

Too bad all the worse-than-useless "social" programs can't be held to the same standard.

NASA does have its own problems, like any organization, but it's worse because it's a government bureaucracy.

43 posted on 01/19/2008 10:43:54 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

I’d like to see every program in every department of government have to justifuy their continued existence every year (or all right, every two years). They would have to show that clearly definable goals hare being met, and if not, the program is not reauthorized.

It would give an incentive to the bureaucratic minions to do some actual good, rather than writing reports demanding more money.


44 posted on 01/19/2008 10:48:11 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
Ah, but with social programs, they justify their existence and growth by not fixing problems. In fact the bigger the perceived problem, the more money they get to create more social problems.

It's the union equivalent of "Don't Kill the Job".

Not that I think social problems can be eliminated, but at the very least, they shouldn't encourage poverty, dependency, and anti-social behavior.

At least the big science endeavors have a goals.

45 posted on 01/19/2008 11:01:23 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

” I am convinced that the nations that lead on the frontiers, dictate the course of human history.
I hope ALL the candidates will support NASA and vision for space exploration as strongly as this.”

Oh, I agree with your sentiment. But I disagree that NASA is the way to get it done. Open it to competition. Privatize. That’s the way to innovation. I’m having a hard time thinking of many successful NASA projects in the last few years, and those that HAVE been successful aren’t anywhere near on the scale of shooting for the moon. It’s a mess.


46 posted on 01/19/2008 11:25:35 PM PST by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

I have a better idea: Privatize space flight, take a tiny fraction of the taxpayer money that would be saved, to build a wall from Tijuana to the Gulf Coast, and give the rest back to the taxpayers to invest, say, in the new companies that will be doing a better job of building rockets than the government can do.


47 posted on 01/19/2008 11:28:44 PM PST by Hunton Peck (A fool and his money are soon parted, preferably before he can give it to some liberal candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COgamer

We may never live in an age without human presence in space.
The space station passes over our heads everyday.
NASA has indeed accomplished much, even after Apollo.
not all of it sexy. But learning how to construct in orbit is important we learn by doing, and by making mistakes too.

But think of the twin Mars rovers and orbiters, Hubble, Galileo at Jupiter, Cassini at Saturn now. Asteroid and comet fly bys. Probes to study the sun. NASA does so much that the public isnt very aware of.

Private industry will play its part, I was a supportor of the X-prize.

But as a nation, it is all together appropriate we do these things as well.

There is a military benefit too obviouly.
Shuttle did fly secret to this day defense missions.


48 posted on 01/19/2008 11:33:26 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Many of us would like to see Giuliani sent to the moon, McCain, too!

HA! ....while your at it send $hrillary, too! POW! "straight to the moon!" (George Cramden-Jackie Gleeson :)

$he always wanted to be the first *itch on the moon.

49 posted on 01/19/2008 11:40:08 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, FRed, Run. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

“Many of us would like to see Giuliani sent to the moon, McCain, too!”

Yes, Rudy and McCain are the very worst!!

Southern Baptist leader, Dr. Richard Land, said that if Rudy gets the nomination, the Dem candidate will win, because religious conservatives won’t vote for Rudy.


50 posted on 01/19/2008 11:54:09 PM PST by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson