Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Southern Politics 101 : Why Fred is after Huck and not McCain (Vanity)
Self ^ | Jan 11, 2008 | Self

Posted on 01/11/2008 6:16:46 AM PST by commish

First, let me get the obligatory “sorry for the vanity post” out of the way, although truthfully I am not sorry, this is something that I need to get off my chest and needs to be discussed.

The purpose of this post is to address those who are upset at Fred Thompson’s performance in last nights debate because he
1. Did not attack John McCain
2. Was mean to poor old Mike Huckabee.

It is time for a lesson in Southern Politics 101 :

As has been said ad nauseum on here already, Fred Thompson has always planned on employing a “Southern Strategy” to win the nomination. This is not to start a discussion of the merits of Fred, or Rudy G., allowing McCain, Romney and Huckabee to basically have free reign in Iowa, NH and Michigan, but as a background for the points I want to make.

Fred’s strategy has always been to start in SC, and use that to sweep the southern states – namely SC, Ala, Ga, Tenn, NC, Miss, LA, Tex. By winning those he would build a good number of delegates and have a solid shot at the nomination. That was his plan.

The monkey-wrench in that plan has become Mike Huckabee.

John McCain is not Fred’s main rival in the states Fred is targeting. That is why Fred is not attacking him like he is Huckabee. Yes, I know that Fred and John are close personal friends, but trust me there are no friends in politics. If Fred needed to hurt John he would.

The simple fact is John is a non-factor in the South, as long as there is no one else to split votes with Fred. McCain’s 25% in the polls in SC is his HIGH POINT. He will NEVER get over 30% in any southern state. He is maxed out. In the South, McCain is like the fart in church, there will be a lot of noise and a lot of disgusted faces.

So, Fred needs to get rid of the competition for the other 60%. Rudy? Not a factor anywhere but New Yawk south, otherwise known as Florida. Mitt? Massachusetts pretty boy – need I say more? 10-20% MAX.

That leaves one person – Huckabee. Huck is the only obstacle to a Fred sweep in the south, ergo HUCK MUST GO. Fred started the destruction of Huckabee last night.

Which leads to point two: Mean old Fred Thompson picking on Huckabee. Three words about that – BOO-FRICKIN-HOO!

This is not nicey nice Iowa, or touchy feely New Hampshire. This is the SOUTH! Home of BBQ, NASCAR, Sweet tea, and NEGATIVE CAMPAIGNING! Attack ads and negative campaigns are not shunned in the south, they are an ART FORM.

Thompson was campaigning to the people of South Carolina and the entire south last night, and trust me – they lapped that blistering attack on Huckabee up like a blue tick hound on a bowl water on an August day in Bama.

Anyway, enough ranting on my part. Hopefully this opens the eyes of some of the crowd upset at Fred for not doing this or that, or for being “mean”.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: fredthompson; huckabee; mccain; primary; sc2008; southernvote; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last
Just my 2 cents. I know a lot of people feel Fred needs to worry about more than the Southern States, but this is his strategy and I am just attempting to explain why he is doing what he is doing.
1 posted on 01/11/2008 6:16:51 AM PST by commish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: commish

The fact is that Fred is in 4th place in SC, as of the most recent Rassmussen. I said yesterday before the debate that Fred needed to attack Huckabee, but also McCain AND Romney. He needs to do just what he did to Huck to the others ahead of him. They lead him in delegates too. It was a good start, and got him some good publicity, but he does need to go after the others.


2 posted on 01/11/2008 6:19:30 AM PST by Huck (Ok, I'll sneak in a few posts here and there and try to stay out of trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commish

Nice analysis.


3 posted on 01/11/2008 6:19:45 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Fred’s attack on Huckabee was written by the same guy who wrote Mc Cain’s NH acceptance speech. Fred has thrown in with Mc Cain and will formally endorse him after SC.


4 posted on 01/11/2008 6:24:03 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: commish

I hear you but usually in politics the lead candidate is the one who gets attacked to drive his vote down.

McCain looks like the leader in SC and is deserving of attack.

Fred did show some strength last night but he need to keep it going in other directions.

Huckabee was hit on “nanny state” anti-smoking at the end of Fred’s statement.

I liked that.

We need more defense of personal freedom in this campaign that’s under attack from the anti-obesity, multicultural and anti-smoking crowds.


5 posted on 01/11/2008 6:25:35 AM PST by Nextrush (NO WAY MCCAIN but I remain uncommitted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commish
like a blue tick hound on a bowl water on an August day in Bama

Dan Rather, is that you? /kidding

6 posted on 01/11/2008 6:26:13 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commish

Fred won the debate and I think he will win South Carolina too.

Pretty soon we will be saying, “Good-bye, Huckabee.”

Just like last night’s debate basically said, “Good-bye, Romney.”


7 posted on 01/11/2008 6:28:15 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commish

I think you are dead on accurate with this ‘vanity post’ for what its worth.

The simple fact is McCain can’t win the major GOP primaries that don’t allow ‘cross over votes’.

What worries me is that some might think the votes he gets in NH or Michigan via ‘cross overs’ will still ‘be there’ come November.

They won’t be.


8 posted on 01/11/2008 6:28:25 AM PST by Badeye (No thanks, Huck, I'm not whitewashing the fence for you this election cycle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
I hear you but usually in politics the lead candidate is the one who gets attacked to drive his vote down.

I would agree 99% of the time, but the dynamics of SC are different. McCain may be in the lead, but it is because the other votes are split. McCain will not go any higher in SC.

By taking out Huckabee, Fred is hoping to eat into Huck's numbers and secure the undecideds.

I personally think it will work to an extent, but Fred will need to get some of Romney and Rudy's numbers too.

I also think some of McCain's support in the most recent polls is media driven and it will also filter off as people see there is an alternative.

Not saying Fred's strategy is 100% correct, but as a southerner I understand what he is doing.

9 posted on 01/11/2008 6:31:38 AM PST by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: commish

The SC Primary is just one week away. If you look where Fred is poling, he has a huge mountain to climb in a very short time. Rumor is he is just trying to help his buddy Mc Cain.


10 posted on 01/11/2008 6:34:38 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Huck

I agree 100% with you. If he is going to have a chance at the nomination he has to go after all of them. He needs to make the ideological differences clear with all the candidates.


11 posted on 01/11/2008 6:34:54 AM PST by Reagan79 (Ralph Stanley & The Clinch Mountain Boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: commish
IMO, this analysis is "spot on".

Contribution number 3 on its way to Fred's red truck.


12 posted on 01/11/2008 6:36:09 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Source??


13 posted on 01/11/2008 6:37:53 AM PST by RockinRight (Huck(abee, not the Freeper Huck) Sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Problem is SC allows crossover voting too. Thus McCain will surge out of Michigan to win SC. JMO. All these early states with crossover voting, together with the media who tells us daily who is dead, needs to quit, etc, are choosing our Repub nominee.


14 posted on 01/11/2008 6:39:16 AM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Sources and links, please?


15 posted on 01/11/2008 6:39:23 AM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

That’s why I called it a rumor. A couple of pundits speculating.


16 posted on 01/11/2008 6:39:29 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: commish

Nice analysis, except it falls apart in one key area.

McCain is a threat to Thompson in the South by the simple fact that he is leading SC. The last time I checked, SC is part of the South.

It’s inexplicable why he would go after Huckabee and not McCain when McCain is now the front runner and leading not just polls in MI but also SC. I take that back, it is easily explained by the fact that Thomson and McCain are good friends. Remember they worked on CFR together.


17 posted on 01/11/2008 6:40:18 AM PST by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hattie

‘Problem is SC allows crossover voting too’

I didn’t know that, thank you.

He lost SC last time around (McCain).


18 posted on 01/11/2008 6:40:29 AM PST by Badeye (No thanks, Huck, I'm not whitewashing the fence for you this election cycle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: commish

“John is a non-factor in the South”

Really?!? He’s leading SC. That’s in the South ain’t it?


19 posted on 01/11/2008 6:41:27 AM PST by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan79; Huck
I agree 100% with you. If he is going to have a chance at the nomination he has to go after all of them. He needs to make the ideological differences clear with all the candidates.

I really don't disagree with you on that, but I do understand why Fred is concentrating on Huckabee right now.

Fred alluded to this during his interview on Hannity's radio show. Hannity asked him about Super Tuesday and Fred's response was basically, "This week we are in South Carolina, so we are concentrating on South Carolina. We are taking it one state at a time, and will concentrate on Florida and states beyond that when it is time too."

I am not entirely sure how Fred plans to pull off "one state at a time" on Super Tuesday (23 states), but that is his strategy right or wrong.

But, on point, he is concentrating on SC, and in SC his target is and needs to be Huckabee. On Super Tuesday I do agree though he needs to broaden the target area and draw distinctions between himself and everyone (including his friend John).

20 posted on 01/11/2008 6:42:02 AM PST by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson