Posted on 12/22/2007 9:01:45 PM PST by JRochelle
Oh well we must see what , Checkers , a Romney supporter , has to say about it .
What does being a “newbie” have anything to do with anything?
Debate my points. Disagree. Agree. Do whatever.
The “newbie” business is childish, though, you have to admit.
Who’s bashing, Mitt is very good looking....
“You sound angry.”
Amused, perhaps. I rarely anger.
Um..
Ok...
I totally agree , but certain Romney supporters were coming after me about my “tenure” as well. Will they come after you ?
“I find it so enlightening that more are more so called real conservatives are clinging to the liberal rags in order to take down Mitt.
Politics certainly do make strange bedfellows.
He must be scaring you guys something fierce.”
yep
You are spot on. I figured this out months ago. Mitt is the one they feared and have played up Huckabee in Iowa and McCain in New Hampshire in order to derail him.
The political hacks around here post their articles to try to gain a margin for their candidate, mindless of playing the liberal game.
As a staunch Romney supporter, I was doing some research on him tonight and didn't even known that he had been the top graduate at Harvard, in his class....about blew me away.
He doesn’t get angry.
That sounds robotic.
Electing lying liberals is very frightening, yes.
Romney is just your candidate’s worst nightmare! That is obviously why you post detractive statements about him. Think anyone can’t see through that?
The points you are trying to make have been thoroughly shredded on here time and time again . You are wasting your time , as most of the people around here are on to Mitt’s pandering , flip-flopping, addictions ....
Pravda, by definition.
“They oppose Romney because he would keep Guantanamo, which they apparently oppose because they think the prisoners there should have acces to courts. And they seem to want Romney to ban waterboarding.
Those are two issues on which I agree with Romney, and I believe most conservatives do as well, so I don’t know why a conservative would listen to this editorial board, which opposes candidates who won’t “ban waterboarding”.”
Closing gitmo and not interrogating terrorists is a recipe for getting people killed.
“The problem with Romney on immigration is that you can’t believe a word that comes out of his mouth.”
The guy who vetoed tuition breaks for illegals, fought to keep English-only in the classroom, fought against illegals getting driver’s licenses, and instituted programs to allow state police to coordinate with ICE officials...
Now, name the first action that Romney took while governor that was pro-illegal.
That’s the problem with your arguments: there wasn’t one.
Listen, you can shoot holes through Thompson’s record on immigration. I still trust the man, as I trust Romney. After Duncan leaves, those are the only two I trust.
How can you back McCain after McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Feingold, and the Gang of 14? And his opposition to Bush’s tax cuts? It makes no sense to me whatsoever that you attack Romney the way you do yet could still vote for McCain.
That's so true! I'm sure Fred Thompson, like any conservative, is disturbed at the prospect that the GOP might nominate a lying liberal like Slick Willard.
LOL
“LOL. Me too. Politics is about comparative choices. First things first. We have primaries. But if it came to Mitt getting the nod it would be an easy choice for me. I lean towards Fred now but we’ll see if he has what it takes. So far I have been unimpressed with Fred as a candidate. I hope he will take off. But perhaps he can’t make up his mind whether he wants to act in Hollywood or act in DC.”
yep
I'd wager it involved groundskeeping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.