Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution Debate Led to Ouster, Official Says
Associated Press ^ | November 30, 2007 | The Associated Press

Posted on 12/01/2007 12:39:07 PM PST by Alter Kaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-400 next last
To: reasonisfaith
Marxists do not follow the Christian principle of absolute good or evil. I would say morality is a groundwork concept, thus illustrating a very important difference between Marxist and Creationist thinking.

If you put a sampling of all Christians sects into the mix, you will likely find quite divergent views of the "truth." A Catholic man can drink but have one wife. A traditional Mormon can have many wives but can't drink. Something here is not "Absolute." Now you might say Marxists are a murderous lot. They spent a lot of time killing their enemies. So did European Christians. The killing may be more to about keeping a despot in power rather than about ideology.

21 posted on 12/01/2007 2:42:02 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
Can you sum up intelligent design in no more than several sentences?

It is all laid out in the Wedge Strategy.

Governing Goals

Five Year Goals

Twenty Year Goals

One of the most pertinent sentences:

Design theory promises to reverse the stifling dominance of the materialist worldview, and to replace it with a science consonant with Christian and theistic convictions.

ID is a political movement, centered around an old idea, designed to promote a particular religious viewpoint.
22 posted on 12/01/2007 2:43:11 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

This is ad hominem. “Christians act ridiculously, therefore ID is incorrect.” The first is, sadly, true. But you are not providing a third world view that is absolutely verifiable. Please, let us examine your alternative. Is there something other than:

Time+space+nothing
Not really held by anyone

Time+space+something impersonal
(energy, mass, motion, etc.) Marxism

Time+space+personal something
Christianity

Fill us in on another alternative that has the scientific support of verifiable evidence.


23 posted on 12/01/2007 2:53:15 PM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88

“Apologies (rather than apologetics) may be in order. Do the postings of the scientists you refer to establish without question Common Descent as the origin of all life?”

Absolutely and unequivocally not.

The “origin of all life” is completely outside scientific studies of the mechanisms for speciation (that’s all evolution is).


24 posted on 12/01/2007 2:59:13 PM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stevem
To me, intellegent design is a theory, pure and simple.

A theory? ID might be called a hypothesis but certainly not a theory. A theory is well-established, having survived repeated testing via the scientific method.

The reason so many take umbrage to ID is that its proponents put forth no testable hypotheses, yet offer all sorts of conclusions.

I have no objection to teaching ID in philosophy class, but to date it has yet to rise to the level of science. (BTW, it is fine with me to discuss why it does not meet the standards of the scientific method in biology class.)

25 posted on 12/01/2007 2:59:22 PM PST by freespirited (I'm voting for the GOP nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.

Hmmm. Apparently the big evolutionary players, like TalkOrigins and Nova, don’t agree with you. They believe Common Descent is absolutely the realm of science and anyone questioning their right to this claim are “religionists” trying to jam out-dated dogma down the public’s throat.

Check out your compatriots.

http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-evolution.html


26 posted on 12/01/2007 3:07:16 PM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88

Common descent is science. Abiogenesis (studying how life might have originated) is also science. They are not the same field of science, however.

Steak is food.
Pizza is food.
They are not the same food.

OK?


27 posted on 12/01/2007 3:14:52 PM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Sorry. “Hypothesis” works for me.


28 posted on 12/01/2007 3:19:30 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

I was thinking of more generalized morality. Christians understand God makes the rules, meaning they’re fixed and absolute (whether men interpret rules correctly is a separate question). Marxists think man makes them, so for Marxists the rules are arbitrarily changed according to whoever is in power.


29 posted on 12/01/2007 3:26:55 PM PST by reasonisfaith (A liberal will never stand up like a man and admit his true beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
"Then why is every prominent ID proponent affiliated with them?"

I'm not. Ergo your premise is flawed (and since your entire argument depends upon your premise, that must mean that your argument is likewise flawed).

30 posted on 12/01/2007 3:49:01 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
"ID might be called a hypothesis but certainly not a theory. A theory is well-established, having survived repeated testing via the scientific method. The reason so many take umbrage to ID is that its proponents put forth no testable hypotheses, yet offer all sorts of conclusions."

Where to start?! First of all, just because *you* haven't researched something doesn't mean that something doesn't exist or isn't a certain way.

In this case, ID is the *only* theory that explains the origin of transgenic lab animals such as pigs that are genetically designed to grow human growth hormones.

Second, as far as "testable hypotheses" go, ID is testable and falsifiable (no bias means no ID) whereas it is Evolutionary Theory that has no published, peer-reviewed falsification criteria.

So enjoy eating your crow. You've earned it.

31 posted on 12/01/2007 3:53:52 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88
Time+space+something impersonal
(energy, mass, motion, etc.) Marxism

Time+space+personal something
Christianity

Fill us in on another alternative that has the scientific
support of verifiable evidence.

How about
Time+space (mass, energy, motion, etc.)
Logical speculation and experiment lead to Science

32 posted on 12/01/2007 4:01:25 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I'm not.

I said PROMINENT ID proponents.

Have you published any books on the subject? Do you have an academic appointment somewhere?

Name a single ID advocate to which the above applies who's not affiliated with the Disco Institute.

And no, Ann Coulter doesn't count. She's an ID advocate, but pretty much everything she wrote about it in her latest book came straight from Dembski, who's a Disco fellow.

33 posted on 12/01/2007 4:03:15 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: keats5; LoneRangerMassachusetts
It's equally wrong to try to link the "clockwork universe" design constraints to either Creationism, or Evolution, or Exogenisis, or Intelligent Design, or whatever.

It has not been demonstrated that the Universe runs on a precise, mechanical, set of tools and devices. On the other hand, there's a tremendous amount of evidence that it has randomness, free-will, forces we don't know about, and so forth ~ maybe even three different types of "time" dimensions.

34 posted on 12/01/2007 4:07:58 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Southack
scientific Intelligent Design

When scientists say there is a 20% chance of finding an extraterrestrial civilization in the next 20 years, they are not acting as scientists.

35 posted on 12/01/2007 4:11:08 PM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
They are "prominent" only in your mind ~ that's because you read their stuff entirely too much.

Best you focus on the creation of a double-helix molecular/crystalline form in water under 53 atmospheres pressure. That's where the neat stuff is just squeezing out all over the place ~ no accidents at all ~ or even "special creation".

36 posted on 12/01/2007 4:11:13 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.

Just had a steak pizza last night. Threw away the crust though ~ too much gluten in it. Otherwise it was excellent.


37 posted on 12/01/2007 4:13:53 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
It has not been demonstrated

Everything has been demonstrated to somebody or other some time or other.

38 posted on 12/01/2007 4:14:57 PM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Assume that I meant "successfully demonstrated". Does that clarify the issue?
39 posted on 12/01/2007 4:16:32 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Successfully demonstrated meaning that the monsters have burrowed beneath our cities and are waiting, breathing?


40 posted on 12/01/2007 4:22:15 PM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-400 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson