Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US cuts greenhouse-gas emissions in 2006 (fell by 1.5 percent, the first decline since 2001)
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 11/28/07 | Veronica Smith

Posted on 11/28/2007 3:59:54 PM PST by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The United States reduced greenhouse gas emissions in 2006 after four years of increases, the government said Wednesday ahead of a key United Nations meeting next week on climate change.

The Department of Energy (DoE) said greenhouse gas emissions in the world's biggest polluter fell by 1.5 percent in 2006, the first decline since 2001.

Measured against US economic growth of 2.9 percent last year, the department said greenhouse gas intensity fell by 4.2 percent, the largest yearly decline since 1990, its base year.

President George W. Bush welcomed the DoE report as confirmation of his administration's controversial policy of opposing strict international limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

"This puts us well ahead of the goal I set in 2002 to reduce greenhouse gas intensity by 18 percent by 2012," Bush said.

"Our guiding principle is clear: we must lead the world to produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions, and we must do it in a way that does not undermine economic growth or prevent nations from delivering greater prosperity for their people."

The revived US headway in the battle against global warming came as the Bush administration prepares for the UN meeting on climate change that opens Monday in Bali, Indonesia.

International delegations will be meeting through December 14 on the island resort to discuss an agenda for future talks on an agreement that would eventually replace the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, which expires in 2012.

The Bush administration argues for voluntary measures, new technologies and increased efforts to persuade fast-developing countries like China and India to do their share of regulating greenhouse gases.

According to the DoE's report, the US pumped 7.076 billion tonnes of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere last year.

The 2006 decline was only the third reduction in annual emissions since 1990, the department said. Since then, emissions of the heat-trapping gases have increased at an average annual pace of 0.9 percent.

Emissions of carbon dioxide from energy consumption and industrial processes fell by 1.8 percent in 2006, after rising at an average pace of 1.2 percent per year from 1990 to 2005.

"Favorable weather patterns, where both heating and cooling degree-days were lower in 2006 than 2005, and higher energy prices, were the primary causes of lower total energy consumption," the DoE said.

The second-largest emissions decliner were man-made gases with high global warming potentials, or "high-GWP gases," which fell by 2.2 percent.

Methane emissions dropped by 0.4 percent, while nitrous oxide emissions rose by 2.9 percent.

The DoE explained the reduction in carbon dioxide emissions was due to a 0.5 percent decline in overall energy demand and a decrease in the carbon intensity of electricity generation, driven by increased use of natural gas and greater reliance on on non-fossil fuel energy sources.

The Sierra Club, an environmental group critical of the Bush administration's climate policy, pointed to the role of weather in the improved performance.

"It would not be a good idea to put your bets on the weather as a way of reducing emissions," Josh Dorner, a Sierra Club spokesman, told AFP.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bush; climatechange; decline; doe; emissions; globalwarming; greenhousegas; term2; usa

1 posted on 11/28/2007 3:59:59 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Wind turbines near high tension power lines in California. The United States reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 1.5 percent in 2006 in the fight against global warming, the first decline since 2001.(AFP/File/Lee Celano )


2 posted on 11/28/2007 4:01:25 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

A snowy owl is seen at Shirotori zoo in Higashikagawa, southwestern Japan May 11, 2007. More than a quarter of all U.S. bird species are vulnerable to extinction, according to a comprehensive list compiled by two conservation groups released on Wednesday. Global warming may be partially to blame. (Yuriko Nakao/Reuters)


3 posted on 11/28/2007 4:02:02 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“US cuts greenhouse-gas emissions in 2006
(fell by 1.5 percent, the first decline since 2001)”

And we didn’t need to fly to Bali to get it done.
Imagine that!

Not Enough Parking for Private Jets Going to UN Climate Conference [seriously]
Newsbusters ^ | Nov 23 2007 | Noel Sheppard
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1929778/posts


4 posted on 11/28/2007 4:06:27 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf; Defendingliberty

~~ AGW™ ping~~


5 posted on 11/28/2007 4:06:35 PM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
And NASA now certifies that 1934 was the hottest year on record, and most of the hottest years on record were before 1950. Before the greenhouse gas "crisis".

Algore, where is thy sting?

*crickets*

6 posted on 11/28/2007 4:06:38 PM PST by Sender (You are the weapon. What you hold in your hand is just a tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Shouldn’t this read:

Wind turbines at 20% capacity in California.


7 posted on 11/28/2007 4:13:08 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VOA; TrebleRebel

“US cuts greenhouse-gas emissions in 2006”

Due to pollution laws and regulations, and modernizations, that have nothing to do with GHGs.

But ironic anyway.


8 posted on 11/28/2007 4:13:55 PM PST by Shermy ("A rising tide lifts all boats" ...but lowers those on the other side of the ocean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So If Florida and Kansas had not nixed the plans for the latest generation of coal power plants they would have been in the lead for clean power.


9 posted on 11/28/2007 4:14:23 PM PST by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So how did all of the sanctimonious Kyoto signators do? You’d think an AFP article would mention something like that, wouldn’t you?


10 posted on 11/28/2007 4:15:55 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Due to pollution laws and regulations, and modernizations, that have nothing to do with GHGs.
But ironic anyway.

Yep--and if energy prices continue to stay high or go even higher--I wouldn't be surprised if the # continues to drop as people look for better efficiency.

11 posted on 11/28/2007 4:18:00 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

Would love to read the article, but I need to dump my used motor oil in the stream out back.


12 posted on 11/28/2007 4:20:55 PM PST by appalachian_dweller (Live each day as if it's your last.....it might be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

Another upcoming scam is “CO2 sequestration”. Because any new coal plants in a lot of areas of the US, to be built, will have to cut pollution, one option thought up was sequestration underground. They’ll claim carbon credits for something they already have to do.


13 posted on 11/28/2007 4:24:25 PM PST by Shermy ("A rising tide lifts all boats" ...but lowers those on the other side of the ocean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“The Sierra Club, an environmental group critical of the Bush administration’s climate policy, pointed to the role of weather in the improved performance.”

DUE TO WEATHER!
THE SIERRA CLUB SAID IT WAS DUE TO WEATHER! DO THEY MEAN THAT THE CO2 DROP IS DO TO WEATHER (Climate Conditions)!
ARE THEY SAYING SINCE GLOBAL COOLING HAS TAKEN PLACE IN 1998 THAT CO2 HAS FINALY DECREASE?
AL WILL BE FURIOUS!
WE ALL KNOW THAT CO2 DRIVES THE CLIMATE.


14 posted on 11/28/2007 4:33:24 PM PST by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

That’s progress. Then again, India and China wiped out that decrease probably by a factor of ten or so.

Are we still all gonna die in 10 years?/s/


15 posted on 11/28/2007 4:38:27 PM PST by exit82 (I believe Juanita--Hillary enabled Juanita's rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson