Posted on 11/25/2007 6:25:27 PM PST by CellPhoneSurfer
November 22, 2007 Snarls, smears and innuendo as attack dogs get ready for the fray Hillary Clinton and her aide, Huma Abedin Tim Reid in Columbia, South Carolina
The anonymous e-mails and letters began dropping into inboxes and through front doors this summer.
One claimed that Hillary Clinton was having a lesbian affair with Huma Abedin, her beautiful aide. Another online mass-mailing cautioned of the “dark secrets” of Mitt Romney’s Mormonism. A blogger claiming to support John McCain said that Rudy Giuliani's wife supported the killing of “innocent puppies”. Flyers appeared on cars accusing Barack Obama of being a Muslim extremist. An anonymous website said that Fred Thompson was a corrupt playboy.
Welcome to South Carolina, the foulest swamp of electoral dirty tricks in America. This state’s primary race has already become the sleaziest leg of the 2008 presidential campaign.
Here, political operatives know only one way to win: take your opponent’s head off. The Palmetto State’s primary follows hard on the heels of Iowa and New Hampshire and is the candidates’ first foray into the Deep South. For Republicans, in particular, it is crucial: since South Carolina gained its first-in-the-South status in 1980, no Republican has received the party nomination without winning the state.
“South Carolina is a do-or-die state again,” said Rod Shealy, a veteran Republican consultant, over a meal of fried pork and beans in his favourite diner, the Lizard’s Thicket. “The attacks are already coming on a daily basis. And with the anonymity of the internet, we’re going to see new lows in dirty politics that would have been unimaginable recently.”
Mr Shealy knows a thing or two about dirty politics. In 1990, when running his sister’s campaign for lieutenant governor, he paid an unemployed black fisherman facing felony charges to run for Congress to increase white voter turnout. He was convicted of breaking campaign laws.
Mr Shealy is among a small band of political consultants who wield enormous influence in South Carolina. They are bitter rivals and all learnt their trade from Lee Atwater, a South Carolina native and the first President Bush’s notorious and venal attack dog. Dirty politics ran in his blood. He once explained that the way to win a campaign lay in “strippin’ the bark off an opponent”.
The most grizzled political veterans until recently believed that the apogee of their state’s slash-and-burn mentality was reached in 2000, when John McCain’s presidential ambitions were emasculated by operatives working for Mr Bush.
After losing badly to Mr McCain in New Hampshire, the Bush team knew – as one operative says – that they had to “chop him up” in South Carolina. Flyers appeared saying that Mr McCain had fathered an illegitimate child with a black woman (he and his wife have an adopted Bangladeshi girl). A whispering campaign was started claiming that his five years as a Vietnamese prisoner of war had made him mentally unstable. His wife was a drug addict, people were told in anonymous telephone calls. Mr Bush and his former chief strategist, Karl Rove – another Atwater protégé – always denied any involvement. But Mr McCain’s campaign never recovered.
The brutality of South Carolina’s Republican primaries has until now involved the state’s hatchet men putting the party’s establishment candidate – Mr Bush in 2000 – back on track after upsets in Iowa or New Hampshire. What is different this year is that at least four Republican candidates – Mr McCain, Mr Romney, Mr Giuliani and Mr Thompson – are all heading to South Carolina with a realistic chance of winning the state. That means that the traditional two-man showdown will be replaced by a multi-candidate massacre among a group of men ripe for attack.
“The question this year is not whether the race will be dirtier than 2000,” said Will Folks, the former spokesman for Mark Sanford, the Republican Governor of the state. “The question is, when will it cross that threshold?”
The man who masterminded the destruction of Mr McCain in 2000 is Warren Tompkins, known by some operatives in South Carolina as the “God of Hell”. He has been hired this year by Mr Romney. He has already had to answer questions about his tactics.
The anonymous anti-Fred Thompson website PhoneyFred.org was traced to his consulting company.
He claimed that it was the act of an errant employee acting independently. Mr McCain has hired Richard Quinn, another of the state’s top consultants. Mr Folks says that the Tompkins and Quinn camps are using two websites, The Shot and The Palmetto Scoop respectively, which masquerade as objective blogs but in reality peddle daily dirt on opponents.
“ A picture of Mr Giuliani wearing drag at an event when he was New York’s mayor has appeared frequently. The day after scurrilous anonymous phone calls were made to New Hampshire voters about Mr Romney’s Mormonism this week, The Palmetto Scoop claimed that it was a ruse by the Romney campaign “to drum up sympathy for the candidate.” Mr Romney will need all of Mr Tompkins’s hardknuckle guile in a state where many social conservatives view Mormonism as a cult. The night before a Republican debate in May several conservative activists received an anonymous, eight-page letter entitled Mormons in Contemporary American Society: A Politically Dangerous Religion?
Nobody is sure who is behind the attacks on Mrs Clinton and Mr Obama, but the claims of lesbianism and Islamic extremism have found fertile ground on right-wing websites. Mr Obama, a Christian, was forced to deny the rumours at a campaign event on November 9.
Lee Bandy, who has written about South Carolina politics for 40 years, says of the Republican campaign: “The race is so close this year there is no telling what these guys will do to win. And a guy like Rudy Giuliani is a prime target.”
Let the games begin
“The man who masterminded the destruction of Mr McCain in 2000 is Warren Tompkins, known by some operatives in South Carolina as the “God of Hell”. He has been hired this year by Mr Romney. He has already had to answer questions about his tactics.”
Here we go, now the muck raking begins.
I doubt that there will not be a single SC voter that will not have seen Rooty’s err..”flamboyant” appearance in the dress.
Smearing is on all sides. It’s amazing what someone can make out of a candidate wearing an outrageous outfit like that as a joke or on a TV show.
Indeed, the folks in SC will look at the photos and make their own decisions.
The anonymous anti-Fred Thompson website PhoneyFred.org was traced to his consulting company.
Well, Well....
If it's not on drudge I don't believe it!?!
Stock up on microwave popcorn !!
You are very naive... Rudy has a history with homosexuals. It’s not just the dress.
Gee, you dont think romney didnt flash in there and pay this warren tompkins whatever it took not to be on the recieving end of these smears. I wish Thompson would have got to him first,but then, maybe he has.
BTW, do you wear a dress when you try to impress your friends?
Looks like an inoculation to me... Old news or not true... Clinton 101.
“Gee, you dont think romney didnt flash in there and pay this warren tompkins whatever it took not to be on the recieving end of these smears. I wish Thompson would have got to him first,but then, maybe he has.”
I have the impression that there is a sort of Hatchet Man cottage industry in SC, Tompkins is only the guy mentioned, there are other Tompkins there in play.
If everyone knows about Rudy’s dress, then you had better believe that every Republican voter will be treated to a Crash course in Mormon theology and history.
McCain has already been through this, so the garbage won’t be on his lawn as much as the other candidates lawns, but even still...
Choir Boys need not apply for the Republican Nomination.
Sherry Shealy Martschink, the sister of the Shealy mentioned above brings back old memories. In 1976 she was a 26 year old YR and YAF leader who had been advanced politiocally by Reagan backers. But Strom Thurmond supported Gerry Ford for president, and Shealy seconded Ford’s nomination, but her speech attacked Reagan for his extremism. She is still running for office, but apparently her treacherous nature has precvented her success.
The Hillary = Lesbo rumor is no doubt floated by Hillary’s campaign itself so as to later refute it and make her look like both a hero and victim at the same time.
It’s a transparent ploy because the rumor comes entirely from anonymous sources via liberal publications/reporters...instead of from verifiable facts and conservatives on the ground.
Isn’t that something? Sheesh.
Somebody ought to try to get video. That is all that would be
believed, unless Hillary can leave semen on her dress.
Oh, those nasty republicans. Who cares if Hillary is shampooing carpet on a new rug. It is the innuendo mouthed by some peckerwood redneck who “learnt” his trade from Lee Atwater, and has the audacity to conduct an interview at his favorite restaurant, the Lizards Thicket. Bet they have frog legs, too.
Interesting how the article looked at both (R) and (D) candidate smears, but still managed to blame (R)’s for all of them!
I believe that someday we will learn that this woman really works for mooselimb extremists.
She almost looks OK in that picture. There are others that are, shall we say, less flattering. What interests me more is where she gets the money for designer clothes - a different dress every day, according to friends. Her clothes cost way more than her salary.
If she is I must admit that Mrs. Clinton (as opposed to her husband) has very exquisite taste. If she is not why in the hell does she keep a political liability (Muslim of middle east and Indian extraction) as one of her very closet advisers and handlers?
Huma Abedin....Cartoon version of “whom I been beddin?”
Sometimes you can hear a nightingale sing in Gorky park.
I love democracy...I really do. How did it come to this?
Sounds like a gynecological test and an Italian suppository - what kind of kinky sex is that?
Surprised a little that this is going mainstream so early.
Which is worse? Hillary the Lesbian, or Hillary’s closest “friend” a Muslim born in MI and raised in Saudi Arabia whose parents are prominent Islamists in Saudi Arabia today. Huma’s mother wears the hijab and veil.
Huma is 29 years old and has a salary of $28K per year. Yet she managed to buy a condo for almost a million bucks, and is a shop-a-holic with tastes for $5,000 handbags, and $600 shoes.
Hillary gets screwed, so to speak, either way.
Old news, or not true. Clinton 101.
Clinton 102. Diversion from what Huma Abedin might really be. Hillary’s Arab controller.
These are Clinton news plants in one of their patented defusion techniques.
It’s a transparent ploy because the rumor comes entirely from anonymous sources via liberal publications/reporters...instead of from verifiable facts and conservatives on the ground.
Well, it's hard for me to not relay some information I have on the situation. To keep someone from getting in hot water, this will be necessarily vague: I have a friend who was assigned security detail at the White House during the Clinton Occupation. During his nightly rounds in a part of the White House that no one was supposed to be in, he saw Hillary sneaking out of a locked, dark room with another woman (not Huma, and, this woman has been talked about from other sources so this would not be a new rumor).
Hillary has to be careful if her campaign is trying to play a political game with this type of rumor. All it will take is one of Hillary's ex affairs to go public. With Hillary's private demeanor being acerbic, did they all leave on good terms?
I’m not naive (I am a Thompson supporter, by the way, but will vote for the final GOP nominee in order to beat Hillary). I know Rudy has homosexual friends.
And RE the other post - Being female, I do wear a dress occasionally to impress friends. I have also dressed up as (male) Dr. Who 2 for a sci fi convention, which means about as much as Rudy dressing up for a joke or on TV. If you have proof of his “cross-dressing” on an average day, let’s see it.
I’m quite aware of Milton Bearle’s antics or schtick, and there have been other people as well like Mel Gibson in “What Woman Want”.
The difference is Rudy is trying to be the President of the US, he is pro gay rights (to marry) and he also stayed with his gay friends after he broke up with his 2nd wife.
A NYT columnist who interviewed Rudy at the time mentioned something about kissing when Rudy left the apartment in the morning, no whether that was “Almost kissing” or whatever, that will be hashed out in SC to be sure.
.."I'm just here for the table scraps"
Not possible! No one could live through an affair with Smellary.
‘The most grizzled political veterans until recently believed that the apogee of their state’s slash-and-burn mentality was reached in 2000, when John McCain’s presidential ambitions were emasculated by operatives working for Mr Bush. ‘
I’ve seen this claim a million times on the internet, but I’ve never once seen anything close to ‘proof’ they were ‘operatives working for Mr Bush’.
Never once.
Why the “Hillary..” note in the title? This is a Republican hit-piece, nothing more.
IOW, Republicans = Bad.
Propaganda, pure and simple.
I think she's is right fugly.
“Egypt just jailed a woman for claiming to be a Christian, but wasn’t, because her father briefly converted to Islam when she was 2 years old. Why isn’t Barrack who has a Muslim father, also a Muslim in the eyes of Islamic nations?”
According to Islam, all children of Muslim fathers are automatically Muslim. And, once born a Muslim, you cannot convert. Therefore, in the eyes of Muslims, Obama is a Muslim.
And his “Christianity” gives me some concern as well. He goes to some anti-white church doesn’t he?
I don’t know if this is pointed out yet, but I believe Britain’s libel laws are more “plaintiff friendly” than similar laws in the US. In fact, I remember Brit Hume reporting that Bill Clinton’s biography had to be edited for publication in Britain because of concerns that Ken Starr could sue more easily under the British libel laws.
What all this should mean is that a British publication would need even more faith in the truth of the story than an American publication before the paper’s legal department let them print it.
Or, is the paper just reporting that others are accusing Hillary of having a lesbian affair?
Strangely (or perhaps not so strangely), it is far easier to find a picture of Rudy in a dress than one of Hillary in one on any internet search I have done.
Exactly, cvq3842, search for anti Rooty stuff and you get thousands of hits, pictures in dresses, youtube videos of anti 2nd amendment stuff etc.
Try searching for the same stuff about Hillary and you will come up blank...nothing...I know she has made statements contrary to the 2nd amendment, specifically once she became a Senator, and during the so called “Million mom March” and they are not available for linkage or even viewing.
The employees of Google donated 95%+ to democrat candidates in 2004, and it is my opinion that Anti Rudy stuff is being given search preferences and easier access then the Hillary stuff.
The “fix” is in on Google.
what's her name?-it was reported/gossiped years ago
Nice!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.