Fred Thompson Wants 'No Amnesty'

The Washington Post ^ | November 14, 2007 | Ed O'Keefe

[Petronski]

I’m not bound to expose your lies on your little ‘efficacy thread.’ I’m going to point them out where you put them.

Intrade doesn’t say what you claim it says. You’re misrepresenting the meaning of the numbers. That’s your lie.

[Petronski]

“you can think of the price as the percentage.”

It’s a price, not a percentage.

I’m not bound to expose your lies on your little ‘efficacy thread.’ I’m going to point them out where you put them.

Intrade doesn’t say what you claim it says. You’re misrepresenting the meaning of the numbers. That’s your lie.

[Kevmo]

Asked & answered.

Thanks for bumping the thread.

[Petronski]

I’m happy to call attention to your lies, here, where you’ve posted them.

Intrade doesn’t say what you claim it says. You’re misrepresenting the meaning of the numbers. That’s your lie.

[Kevmo]

Asked & answered.

Thanks for bumping the thread.

[Petronski]

I’m happy to call attention to your lies, here, where you’ve posted them.

Intrade doesn’t say what you claim it says. You’re misrepresenting the meaning of the numbers. That’s your lie.

[Kevmo]

Asked & answered.

Thanks for bumping the thread.

[RockinRight]

OK. Buy a bunch of Fred futures.

Thank me when he wins and you’re rich. Split your profits with me 50/50.

[Petronski]

I’m happy to keep your lies bumped. Exposes your deception.

[Kevmo]

I think Hunter is a better bargain. He currently polls at 4% and if Intrade started to track that you would get 40X return on your investment.

Fred, on the other hand, is the only candidate I know of who has lost ~30 points on Intrade. Probably not as good of a bet.

[Kevmo]

Asked & answered.

Thanks for bumping the thread.

[Petronski]

Intrade says what it says. People can see for themselves.

It says what it says, not what you claim. Happily, people can see through your lies.

[Kevmo]

We can let them decide for themselves. Caveat subscriptor.

[Petronski]

Be careful of the liar. He posts as Kevmo.

[Kevmo]

Oh, look. Someone else posting Intrade data. You might want to ping them. It’s 2 for the price of 1 day for stalkers.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1925892/posts?page=37#25

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Thanks for posting the video link.

[Petronski]

I think Hunter is a better bargain. He currently polls at 4% . . .

Uh, no he doesn't. It's not a poll, it's a futures contract.

[Charles Martel]

Asked & answered yesterday.

[Kevmo]

You misread this post. And I would leave it to the readers to decide whether your accusations were a result of some other misreading.

From my original post:
Here’s a recent poll showing Hunter at 4%.

http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/28889/republicans_2008_giuliani_28_thompson_19

That means Hunter polls at 4%. Hunter’s futures at Intrade, if they were at 4% would not be the kind of bargain I was talking about because you couldn’t get 40X return by tracking to the poll data.

Thanks for bumping the thread.

[Kevmo]

You tell me, did Petronski misread post #70 or not?

If he/she misread that post, isn’t it a distinct possibility that he/she misread the other posts that gets their panties in a wad?