Posted on 11/11/2007 11:57:59 PM PST by HAL9000
I hope it was IMMEDIATELY (as in an interrogation-ending fatal event) after a particularly painful round of questioning.
It may be unChristian, but I hope he died in serious pain.
Giovanna thinks Bin Laden is dead.
The more debatable question is whether Midhat Mursi is dead. He was their biochem fellow. Thought to have been killed at a dinner meeting Ayman was expected to attend. But recently the Washington Post reported matter-of-factly (and with no fanfare) that the reports of his death were greatly exaggerated.
So while I’m not going to debate the evidence that Bin Laden is alive, I do agree that war is deception. Usually, one of the greatest sources of deception is self-deception.
Well, you and the rest of the American Liberal/Socialist Empire would certainly know all about self-deception.
And, just FYI, the only people with whom the Washington Post has any credibility are liberals. So the next time you want to make reference to that rag, remember that that they, along with the New York Times and the LA Times, are the official Gospels of the Liberal Alternate Universe.
Talk about self-deception. The Washington Post???? You're kidding, right?
Yes, the wide consensus of the liberal, anti-Amherican moonbats. And where, perchance, do you place your banner, Pooksie?
You are wasting your time asking this “person” to give aid to the enemy. It is obvious whose side he/she is really on.
Let Ted Kennedy take him out at night for a coupla rounds of drinks and then a dip IN the drink. He’ll be drown and the Democrats will never mention it again.
Are these guys named Memon, both associated with anthrax, related? Is the guy from the 2005 story a son or nephew?
“During a raid on Jamil’s hideout in Swat, Mr Wazir said, police found a computer hard disc that contained information about poisonous chemical agent anthrax and on making dirty bombs.”
http://www.dawn.com/2005/01/18/top3.htm
18 January 2005 Tuesday 07 Zilhaj 1425
Man involved in failed attack on Musharraf held in Swat
By Ismail Khan
Whoops!
The war has been “screwed” by the Chomsky-types who spout that we went into Iraq to broaden the American “empire”, language that has assured an unfriendly welcome.
So we’ve had to tie a hand behind our backs and make assurances that we aren’t going to run things or even establish things, just monitor and guide and pull out sometime.
Still wondering when we will leave Germany, Japan, Korea, Bosnia...
We didn’t capture Adolph Hitler either. And there were prominent Nazis who elluded capture as well. It didn’t mean that the war never ended.
It is only immaterial to you because you live in freedom - something which you obviously take for granted.
intemperate comments by busy surfing Freepers on the subject only encourage them to remain so.
BS. If anything, it encourages them to get their facts straight before they shoot off about things, like, sayin, whether or not we are winning or losing a war.
And while I wouldnt ever let my daughter marry a Freeper, I know you all to be patriotic.
Wow. So you're going to tell your daughter who she must marry? How very progressive of you.
Yes, but I’ll be da**ed if I’m going to sit here and let him say we’re losing the war without commenting that he’s full of it.
Surf must have been up for waterboarding.
CPR training by interrogators optional.
Leni
Do you really think the death or capture of Bin Laden means anything more than vengeance for us?
Don’t get me wrong. I believe in payback. That is why I liked the concept of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, drawing his final pathetic breaths looking up at a US Special Forces solder who is standing with his foot on what remained of the hand Zarqawi used to behead poor Nicholas Berg.
But do you really think for one single solitary moment that what happens in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan has anything to do with whether Bin Laden is dead or alive?
For the record, no way Bin Laden should be taken alive if they find him, IF he is actually still alive (which I am not convinced of)
If he IS alive and is captured, he should shot in situ, and his body anonymously buried under a ton of rubble. The Islamofacists who worship him as a God can go on believing for years that Bin Laden is out there looking over them and scheming, waiting for the right moment to strike again. Hopefully, they will get bitter when it doesn’t happen, and when they draw their final breaths, hopefully in the same circumstances Zarqawi did, it will dawn on them that what they have been doing all these years is not some kind of fight of justice, but a simple bloodthirsty pagan worship of death.
The simple truth is that it makes no difference to liberals and those appeasers who follow their liberal “religion”, because that is surely what it is.
They said we couldn’t claim victory because we hadn’t captured or killed Saddam and his boys. We did.
They said we couldn’t claim victory because we hadn’t captured or killed Zarqawi. We did.
They said we couldn’t claim victory because Fallujah was not subdued. The US Marines subdued it.
They said we couldn’t claim victory because Anbar Province was unruly. They are having unification parades with police and soldiers.
They said we couldn’t claim victory because the “surge” would never work. It is working.
The bottom line is: To liberalism and its adherents, there is nobody that the US can kill or capture, no country that can be liberated that justifies in the eyes of liberals the desire to defend ourselves. To them, all war of any kind is unjustified. They will have to forgive the rest of us for not meekly offering up our necks for their knives.
BUMP!
GOOD!
You have that much control over your daughter? Pray tell us how.
Wow. They found out you can dig up a dead cow.
You don't "develop anthrax strains" by digging up dead cows.
Developing a strain implies that they were growing anthrax in a lab and then killing the bacteria with diluted antibiotics. If any anthrax bacteria survived, they'd try to grow more it. The idea is to develop a strain of anthrax that can't be killed by antibiotics. In other words, they were trying to create a more effective "weapon."
The Ames strain used in the 2001 anthrax attacks could be killed by just about any antibiotic. That's why no one died in Senator Daschle's office after the anthrax letter was opened there. All 5 people who died as a result of the 2001 attacks died because they weren't diagnosed and treated until it was too late for antibiotics to do any good.
Okay. Bin Laden is dead and we are winning. Fine. Whatever.
And I was just kidding about not letting my daughter marry a freeper.
Can we at least agree that Al Qaeda is responsible for the anthrax?
Thanks.
You reproduced? Good Gosh, who else knows about this?
(only kidding!)
Seriously, I don't see why it is germane to this discussion that Al Qaeda is responsible for Anthrax. By the way, I have no opinion on that. I don't regard it as a critical issue at this time. If it is important to acknowlege that there are islamofascist sympathizers and outright terrorists in the continental US who would like to do us harm, I have no problem agreeing with that.
I thought the issue you brought up is that mistreatment of captive terrorists causes terrorism. It reminds me of Ann Coulter's opinion that we don't want to piss off people who hate us and wish for our destruction, because that would make them hate us and wish for our destruction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.