Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Campaign Brings on Key Religious Conservative (Thompson staffer leaves, joins Romney)
CBN News ^ | 31 October 2007 | David Brody

Posted on 10/31/2007 4:28:58 PM PDT by Spiff

Romney Campaign Brings on Key Religious Conservative

October 31, 2007
David Brody
CBN News Senior Correspondent

Mitt Romney's campaign tells The Brody File that Bill Wichterman, who used to do conservative and religious outreach for Fred Thompson's campaign, has joined Team Romney. This is a nice "get." He'll be a part of the Faith and Values steering committee.

Bill Wichterman left the Thompson campaign because Thompson DOES NOT support the federal marriage amendment. At least the version that is on the table now. Mitt Romney does support it. Wichterman liked that fit. Who can blame him?

This is a guy who has been big on the federal marriage amendment for years. When Bill Frist was trying to push the amendment through the Senate, it was Wichterman who was leading the charge by getting social conservative groups organized and mobilized. Expect him to be a big boost for the Romney campaign when it comes to the marriage issue. His depth of knowledge here is masterful.

It's not just the marriage issue. By nabbing Wichterman, it's a sign to inside and outside the beltway social conservative groups that Romney is serious in courting them. Wichterman is very well respected by these groups and he has close contacts at places like Focus on the Family, Family Research Council, etc. When he was on the Hill, he was very active in the Senate's "Value Action Team" meetings where dozens of groups would meet once a week to go over social policy and plot strategy.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; christianvote; elections; fma; fred; marriage; marriageamendment; mittromney; romney; thompson; valuesvoters; wichterman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last
There was rumor of this earlier. It was said that this might be a key indicator of an impending Romney endorsement by James Dobson.
1 posted on 10/31/2007 4:29:00 PM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: asparagus; Austin1; bcbuster; bethtopaz; BlueAngel; Bluestateredman; borntoraisehogs; Bosco; ...

• Send FReep Mail to Unmarked Package to get [ON] or [OFF] the Mitt Romney Ping List


2 posted on 10/31/2007 4:29:51 PM PDT by Spiff (<------ Mitt Romney Supporter (Don't tase me, bro!) Go Mitt! www.mittromney.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Let the power vaccume begin...Romney is about to put the gas pedal down, and truck right thru these other candidates.

Romney is legit!


3 posted on 10/31/2007 4:32:25 PM PDT by Samba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Samba

I’ll vote for Fred McCain or Rudy Brownback or any warm body should Hillary be the Dem’s pick. This is not the election to sit out.


4 posted on 10/31/2007 4:38:57 PM PDT by The Iceman Cometh (Democrats In Control! (Where's my friggin' free stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

I agree....I’ll will be voting for whoever is against Hillary, I just hope its Mitt. I think he would smoke her in the primary debates.


5 posted on 10/31/2007 4:47:10 PM PDT by Samba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Samba
>>>>I think he would smoke her in the primary debates.

I knew Mitt had many liberal ideas. When did he become a Democrat?

6 posted on 10/31/2007 4:50:21 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

So how did ol Mitt respond to Freds smackdown today on his lousy immigration record?


7 posted on 10/31/2007 4:51:02 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
It's been suggested that this development presages Dobson's endorsement of Romney.

It makes sense. Only Romney supports the agenda of the religious right in all important respects. Better yet, his personal and family life exemplify Christian ideals even if he is not seen by evangelicals to be Christian per se.

8 posted on 10/31/2007 4:52:11 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
What's Fred's immigration record?

* * * crickets * * *

Yeah. Fred doesn't want to talk about that.

9 posted on 10/31/2007 4:53:49 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mylife
So how did ol Mitt respond to Freds smackdown today on his lousy immigration record?

The Romney campaign responded to Thompson's jab thusly:

“Fred Thompson is as wrong as he is late to this campaign and the debate over tougher immigration enforcement.

“Governor Romney has been at the forefront on this issue, advocating tougher standards of enforcement of existing immigration laws while also initiating the call the cut off federal funding to sanctuary cities that ignore our immigration laws. Governor Romney also took action in his state by working out an agreement with the federal government to authorize state police to enforce federal immigration laws.

“Governor Romney strongly opposed the McCain-Kennedy legislation and was a vocal critic of the blanket amnesty it provided to lawbreakers with the Z-visa provision.”


10 posted on 10/31/2007 4:55:55 PM PDT by Spiff (<------ Mitt Romney Supporter (Don't tase me, bro!) Go Mitt! www.mittromney.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Spiff

Looks like these two are gonna cross swords again over this issue


12 posted on 10/31/2007 4:59:00 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
There was rumor of this earlier. It was said that this might be a key indicator of an impending Romney endorsement by James Dobson.

Interesting rumor. It does make some sense. Since Dobson is absolutely opposed to Rudi and, let's say, not happy with Fred, then before he jumps to a third-party he almost has to endorse some GOP candidate that he does accept. Otherwise, people will question his judgment, whether he gave the GOP field a fair chance and so on.

So Dobson does almost have to endorse someone.

I'm still thinking that Dobson will go for Huckabee and try to jumpstart his campaign with an Iowa win. But Iowa might not cooperate so well. It's very important for these organizations to endorse the winner and help them to become the winner. That is their entire value politically. So Huckabee is too much a long shot for Dobson to risk his influence by endorsing him, I think.

At this level of politics, these organizations need to pick a winner, especially one that needs their help, then help make them the winner so that they can be seen in a kingmaker role. Then if their guy wins office, he owes them, other politicians fear them, etc.
13 posted on 10/31/2007 5:00:35 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Bump.

Another lost opportunity for Fred.

Ah, but Fred doesn't need them. He's doing it HIS way.

14 posted on 10/31/2007 5:02:58 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
His looks are going to work with the ladies. For me, its his strong family values. Our country needs a strong role model, and If you cant admit that his moral compass is tighter than the rest, then I question your judgment.

The man is legit, admit it.

15 posted on 10/31/2007 5:07:53 PM PDT by Samba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

I’d like to know more about Fred’s position. I know I’m opposed to a federal marriage amendment. Big Gubmint is supposed to be for libs.


16 posted on 10/31/2007 5:12:05 PM PDT by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

“I’m still thinking that Dobson will go for Huckabee”

If Romney wins the primaries, as I hope he does, then the best move he could make would be to choose Huckabee as his running mate, in my opinion.


17 posted on 10/31/2007 5:13:32 PM PDT by tabsternager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Samba
I'm not looking for a father - Reality is you will find no better man that GWB. In terms of the man's integrity. Hell Mitt has jumped all over the place on issues. GWB stands for what he stands for.....whether you like him or not (and that includes his base).

Fact is we need a strong leader, with backbone to continue the WOT.

I would like the next POTUS to have a WH that was much more effective and engaged in the PR aspect.

18 posted on 10/31/2007 5:16:42 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
"Since Dobson is absolutely opposed to Rudi and, let's say, not happy with Fred, then before he jumps to a third-party he almost has to endorse some GOP candidate that he does accept."

This is why I'm not completely comfortable with Clergymen being in the endorsing business. Getting too involved with the world has a way sucking one in farther than they intended to get.

19 posted on 10/31/2007 5:21:39 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Found it.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/08/cwa_spokesman_thompson_stance.php

I agree with Fred on this one. It’s no business of the feds to define marriage. The excuse used by supporters of an amendment is that one state could be forced to recognize gay marriages from another state, but Fred’s preferred amendment takes care of that, while properly leaving it to the states to govern themselves on the issue.


20 posted on 10/31/2007 5:22:43 PM PDT by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
I agree...I love GWB. The man is rock solid. I cant tell yet if Mitt has nuts like GWB when it comes to the WOT, but I'm sure he will be a better communicator.
21 posted on 10/31/2007 5:26:15 PM PDT by Samba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mylife

He’s still putting sav on that hurt.

LLS


22 posted on 10/31/2007 5:39:07 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Samba; DevSix

If you guys want to discuss other men’s private parts, this isn’t the right forum. Have you tried LarryCraigMeetups.com?


23 posted on 10/31/2007 5:51:01 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

rofl.


24 posted on 10/31/2007 5:55:30 PM PDT by darkangel82 (And the band played on....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
This is why I'm not completely comfortable with Clergymen being in the endorsing business. Getting too involved with the world has a way sucking one in farther than they intended to get.

Agreed. The televangelist/psychobabblers have done way too much of it. They also like to talk about politics and psychology more than they do about scripture and Christian doctrine.

They are too worldly, like the old Roman prelates were.
25 posted on 10/31/2007 5:55:47 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

Dobson isn’t a “clergyman.”


26 posted on 10/31/2007 6:00:30 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (With "Republicans" like this, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I know I’m opposed to a federal marriage amendment. Big Gubmint is supposed to be for libs.

A marriage amendment is a good way to get the BIG GOBBMINT out of the marriage issue, The courts are part of the big gobmint. Without the amendment we will have all the state gobmints fighting over the issue, and one state fighting another.
27 posted on 10/31/2007 6:04:24 PM PDT by broncobilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: joebuck; George W. Bush

“Since Dobson is absolutely opposed to Rudi and, let’s say, not happy with Fred, then before he jumps to a third-party he almost has to endorse some GOP candidate that he does accept.”


“The online evangelist said Dobson’s Focus on the Family, for example, is part of the World Congress of Families – an organization which the foundation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the official name of the Mormon church, is a major funder of. Keller also claims Dobson and other leaders remain silent on Romney because they don’t want to upset the large number of Mormons who buy their books.”

http://www.christianpost.com/article/20071016/29718_Why_Some_Evangelicals_Won’t_Vote_for_Romney.htm


28 posted on 10/31/2007 6:37:05 PM PDT by ansel12 (Proud father of a 10th Mountain veteran. Proud son of a WWII vet. Proud brother of vets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Mitt is racking up the evangelical endorsements.


29 posted on 10/31/2007 6:47:33 PM PDT by Mitt Romney (Mitt Romney For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broncobilly
Without the amendment we will have all the state gobmints fighting over the issue, and one state fighting another.

Actually, the amendment fred supports is the right one. It says no state has to recognize the marriage laws of another state. That solves the problem, while leaving the definition of marriage to the states. It's not the feds business.

30 posted on 10/31/2007 6:51:31 PM PDT by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...

Reagan21 Introduced Today
Human Events | 10/31/2007 | Human Events
Posted on 10/31/2007 4:25:20 PM PDT by mdittmar
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1919226/posts


31 posted on 10/31/2007 7:00:01 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, October 22, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitt Romney
Mitt is racking up the evangelical endorsements.

Nice of you to stop by, Mitt. Great campaign you're running.

32 posted on 10/31/2007 7:05:26 PM PDT by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Mitt didn’t say that, his campaign did.

Mitt was waiting for his lawyers to tell him what to say.


33 posted on 10/31/2007 7:28:23 PM PDT by papasmurf (sudo apt - get install FRed Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
This is why I'm not completely comfortable with Clergymen being in the endorsing business

Dr. Dobson is not an ordained clergyman, he's a child psychologist by profession who founded a nationally recognized advocacy organization called Focus on the Family (FOF) to support Christian values in American society.

One of the ways FOF supports Christian values is through informing members and a nationwide radio audience of pending or proposed legislation that involves moral and/or social engineering issues. FOF is a non-profit tax exempt org and can't endorse any candidate for public office. As I understand it, Dr. Dobson as a private citizen can endorse candidates in his role as a private citizen but not in his role as the leader of FOF, and not by any means that could be associated with FOF's radio and literature outreach.

Whether or not I correctly understand his legal standing regarding endorsing a candidate as a private citizen, one thing I do know for sure is that he is not a clergyman.

34 posted on 10/31/2007 8:02:44 PM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
Fred did make a detailed comment on immigration. It was here on Fr, I believe you can find it.

He is against amnesty, he thinks the borders should be closed. You can read his statement, probably on his web page.

I have not decided who I will support, So many say it’s so late to start a campaign, I am 84, to me it is still too early.

Many will be sick and tired of this two year campaign. when it is over, and others will get so vicious we may have some real disturbances among the natives. Our Congress began the 2008 campaign the day after they were sworn in. The senators that are running for President have spent much more time on the campaign trail that tending to their job, If they were employed by a private business they would be fired.

35 posted on 10/31/2007 8:41:49 PM PDT by frannie (Fear not tomorrow, God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

ROFL!


36 posted on 10/31/2007 8:44:55 PM PDT by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Fred doesn’t have any great record on immigration.


37 posted on 10/31/2007 9:31:19 PM PDT by TheLion (How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Why would he endosrse someone who is not a winner? I like Huckabee, but it seems to me he doesn’t have the organization and money to make a strong bid at the candidacy.


38 posted on 10/31/2007 9:34:58 PM PDT by TheLion (How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Another good day for Mitt!


39 posted on 10/31/2007 9:38:05 PM PDT by TheLion (How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mitt Romney

HOLY CRAP ARE YOU REALLY MITT ROMNEY? If you are, welcome to Free Republic, sir.


40 posted on 10/31/2007 9:40:14 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Samba

I saw Mitt and his wife the other day being interviewed by Hannity. I was very impressed, they have been in love since they were 15 years old. What a love story, Mitt said that she is his starter wife AND his trophy wife. I thought it was very endearing, especially in this day and age when so many don’t want to settle down until they have gotten tired of playing the field. What an example they would be to the younger generations. And here Mitt is, such a good looking man and he is so faithful to his wife. What a testimony about how people should live their lives!


41 posted on 10/31/2007 9:46:16 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tabsternager
If Romney wins the primaries, as I hope he does, then the best move he could make would be to choose Huckabee as his running mate, in my opinion.

I think Hunter would be a better choice for Romney.

Mitt does not need support on values and Huckabee's positions on some other key issues, like immigration, would not help the ticket. If Romney wins the primaries, he's overcome the anti-Mormon opposition. In the General between Hillary & Mitt, religion will not be an issue for enough voters to make a difference. And bringing Arkansas along does not help much, either.

Hunter brings a depth of experience in legislative and defense areas. I'd much rather have Hunter as VP & President of the Senate than Huckabee. (Even better would be Hunter/Romney but that's not likely to happen.)

42 posted on 10/31/2007 9:47:28 PM PDT by esarlls3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mitt Romney
Mitt is racking up the evangelical endorsements.

He sure is. And for good reason.

43 posted on 10/31/2007 9:48:51 PM PDT by Spiff (<------ Click here for Go Mitt! www.mittromney.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

And thus the slow implosion of Fred continues....


44 posted on 10/31/2007 9:49:00 PM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

I think it is really terrible to jump all over Mitt for seeing the light. Then you mention our President, true, he is a man with integrity, but he wasn’t always like that, he used to be a guy who liked to party, does that mean that we cannot accept the fact that George Bush is a changed man, does it mean that he has “jumped all over the place” because he woke up and saw the light? I think I see a problem with your reasoning.


45 posted on 10/31/2007 9:50:05 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Huck

No matter, it is wrong to anyway encourage same sex marriage, it will be the downfall of our civilization, I think it is safe to say it would be ok to make it a Federal matter in the case of something of this magnitude. According to that logic, we should have never made slavery unconstitional. Many died in the Civil War, proving that this was not a good rational for certain issues, that in fact, the Federal Government does have jurisdiction in certain, very important issues. I would say that same sex marriage, with all of it’s demoralizing results on the future health of our country is a valid matter for the Federal Government, I am fine with amendment making it illegal. The issue threatens to destroy our country, and if it takes hold, could be the future justification for future devasting terrorist attacks. I think this is a very serious matter, and I have no problem with the Federal Government sticking their nose in this matter.


46 posted on 10/31/2007 9:55:18 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mitt Romney

And people need to remember that it is still very early, the polls might not be as important as people think they are. Time will tell who will emerge as the front runners.


47 posted on 10/31/2007 9:56:48 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Samba

You’re right. Yes he’s good looking but his intelligence and family values are extremely impressive. Now more than ever, young people need a ROLE MODEL. Mitt’s the real thing.


48 posted on 10/31/2007 10:01:47 PM PDT by SHEENA26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

“I saw Mitt and his wife the other day being interviewed by Hannity. I was very impressed, they have been in love since they were 15 years old.

They’re both an inspiration and so very down to earth.


49 posted on 10/31/2007 10:07:21 PM PDT by SHEENA26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Samba
I think he (Romney) would smoke her in the primary debates.

Hillary is so shrill, so smarmy, so two-faced and beligerent -- that Romney would look like a magnificent orator when compared alongside.

Romney is quick-witted -- but not vindictive.

He is the perfect anti-Hillary candidate -- not to mention the fact he holds good solid common sense conservative views on most all issues.

GO ROMNEY!!

50 posted on 11/01/2007 4:33:36 AM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson