Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Commemorating Alger Hiss Day
FamilySecurityMatters ^ | 10/24/07 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 10/24/2007 6:28:27 AM PDT by captjanaway

On every October 24th since he’s been President, George W. Bush has issued a proclamation recognizing “United Nations Day.” Typically, Bush calls upon the people of the United States “to observe this day with appropriate programs and activities.” The appropriate thing to do would be to acknowledge the basic truth that communist spy and State Department official Alger Hiss laid the groundwork for the U.N. and became its first acting secretary-general, causing it to be dubbed “the house that Hiss built.” Hiss also advised President Franklin Roosevelt at the Yalta conference, which defined post-World War II Europe and betrayed Eastern European nations to Soviet control.

As you can imagine, this is a sensitive subject for the State Department. On the 60th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations, 2005, the State Department published a report, “The United States and the Founding of the United Nations, August 1941 - October 1945,” about how it was established, carefully omitting any mention of Hiss’s pivotal role. “That was just a brief summary paper on the organization itself as I recall,” said State Department historian Marc J. Susser. He claimed that the document was a “bare-bones history” and “brief outline” of the world body. Susser said he didn’t write it but “went over it.” He explained, “Somebody in the office did it.”

(Excerpt) Read more at familysecuritymatters.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: algerhiss; unitednations

1 posted on 10/24/2007 6:28:28 AM PDT by captjanaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: captjanaway
“The United States and the Founding of the United Nations, August 1941 - October 1945,”

Note the dates. When I was in school, I read somewhere an encyclopedia entry which claimed brazenly that WWII was fought between the Axis and the "United Nations". That was in the days when the UN had enough prestige that somebody thought they could get away with rewriting history around it. Haven't seen that kind of thing in years. Figures that this comes from the State Department.

After all, Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

2 posted on 10/24/2007 6:34:59 AM PDT by thulldud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

Hiss, Serpent, Satan...............


3 posted on 10/24/2007 6:36:45 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway
We need greater acknowledgement for Al Hiss Day. Yell about
it from the housetops so that all may appreciate this traitor
and his betrayal of Eastern Europe.
4 posted on 10/24/2007 6:36:51 AM PDT by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thulldud

August 1941? Prior to Pearl Harbor (12-07-41)?..........


5 posted on 10/24/2007 6:38:21 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway
"It would be nice if President Bush, on the occasion of this year’s “United Nations Day,” would repudiate the organization, recognize its communist roots, and announce plans to withdraw the U.S. in protest over its corruption, incompetence and failures in world affairs. If this is not possible, then rather than saying things about the world body that are flatly untrue, perhaps he could decide to say nothing. Silence would be a small step forward."

BTTT

6 posted on 10/24/2007 6:38:50 AM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway
"Typically, Bush calls upon the people of the United States “to observe this day with appropriate programs and activities."

I heartily agree.


7 posted on 10/24/2007 6:42:27 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
August 1941?

That was the Atlantic Conference.

8 posted on 10/24/2007 6:43:04 AM PDT by thulldud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thulldud

And has always been allied with Eurasia.


9 posted on 10/24/2007 6:43:21 AM PDT by wastedyears (A cosmic castaway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

Does anybody else wonder why we still support the UN?
It tries to undermine the Constitution of the USA and would love to cripple our Constitutional Republic.
In over 60 years No major politician has ever tried to get the USA out of the UN.

16 out of 17 of the AMERICANS that were involved in creating the U . N. were later identified, in sworn testimony, as secret communist agents.

The first Secretary General was the AMERICAN Alger Hiss. Alger Hiss served time in prison pursuant to his involvement in a Communist spy ring.

Many of the other AMERICANS that were involved in creating the U . N. fled the country, to avoid prosecution.

The ONE AMERICAN, that was involved in creating the U . N. ; and was NOT later identified, in sworn testimony, as a secret communist agent, was Dean Acheson. Dean Acheson’s law firm was the legal representative of the Soviet Union, in U. S. courts.

If the AMERICANS that were involved in creating the U . N. were Communists, what do you think we got from the rest of the world?


10 posted on 10/24/2007 6:43:30 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thulldud

As a second one, I was in high school after the millennium, and learned about Alger Hiss. I don’t remember what exactly we learned, but I do remember the name.

And that the Allies were fighting with the Axis Powers.


11 posted on 10/24/2007 6:45:49 AM PDT by wastedyears (A cosmic castaway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Weird, eh? I thought the United Nations was founded in 1945 to replace the League of Nations. I KNOW it did not exist prior to our entry into WWI.


12 posted on 10/24/2007 6:46:28 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

Oh, Cake, where’d you get that picture from?


13 posted on 10/24/2007 6:46:32 AM PDT by wastedyears (A cosmic castaway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

Satan has been busy these last few decades............


14 posted on 10/24/2007 6:48:29 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
The UN did not replace the League of Nations as the League of Nations was never ratified or implemented.
15 posted on 10/24/2007 6:54:56 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
I would recommend reading Witness by Whittaker Chambers. It will give you a usable understanding of Alger Hiss, not to mention a view into the soul of the Left. (Yeah, like who wants THAT?)
16 posted on 10/24/2007 6:56:46 AM PDT by thulldud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

If I had a UN flag, I could celebrate by dowsing it in my “Water.”


17 posted on 10/24/2007 6:57:31 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
Google image searched "UN flag burning, and got a hit on this UN Flag Burning Day thread, October 2003. (I love FR)
18 posted on 10/24/2007 7:00:14 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thulldud
When I was in school, I read somewhere an encyclopedia entry which claimed brazenly that WWII was fought between the Axis and the "United Nations".

That was the term the Allies used to refer to themselves. I don't know when during the war it came into common usage, but I'm pretty sure it was well-established before FDR died. Truman refers to the "united nations" in almost all of his wartime speeches.

In WWII, "united nations" was just a phrase -- like "coalition of the willing." Shortly after the war, they formed the basis of the United Nations, a body with a charter and deliberative bodies and so on. To this day, the five permanent members of the Security Council are still the ones that won WWII: The USA, Britain, Russia, China, and France.

19 posted on 10/24/2007 7:02:16 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
The UN did not replace the League of Nations as the League of Nations was never ratified or implemented.

... by the United States. You know there are other countries out there, right?

20 posted on 10/24/2007 7:04:50 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

Flag burning, in its symbolic speech, is the equivalent of an inarticulate scream. No matter which flag. Let it out if it makes you feel better, but it’s not an argument.


21 posted on 10/24/2007 7:08:13 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
In WWII, "united nations" was just a phrase -- like "coalition of the willing."

But in 1965, it had quite a different meaning. Especially when capitalized.

22 posted on 10/24/2007 7:10:03 AM PDT by thulldud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

“The appropriate thing to do would be to acknowledge the basic truth that communist spy and State Department official Alger Hiss laid the groundwork for the U.N...”

I never knew that until I read Anne Coulter’s book on McCarthy and the left wing in America.


23 posted on 10/24/2007 7:10:16 AM PDT by ZULU (We)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: ReignOfError
The UN did not replace the League of Nations as the League of Nations was never ratified or implemented.

“... by the United States. You know there are other countries out there, right?”

http://worldatwar.net/timeline/other/league18-46.html

Some members of the League which was implemented to stop wars were the ones who started wars to dominate their fellow members.

America was wise not to join and was very stupid to start and join the UN.

25 posted on 10/24/2007 7:15:50 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

Oh, it existed, formed to prevent another war. The US just didn’t join it, though President Woodrow Wilson dreamed up the idea. Also, the League of Nations coun’t impliment it’s own threats of multilateral military action if other sanctions didn’t work and was thus doomed to fail.


26 posted on 10/24/2007 7:16:03 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

Who said I’m arguing? I’m simply returning a compliment on this very special day.


27 posted on 10/24/2007 7:22:54 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
28 posted on 10/24/2007 7:23:44 AM PDT by dynachrome (Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

Bump!


29 posted on 10/24/2007 7:25:51 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thulldud
>>>In WWII, "united nations" was just a phrase -- like "coalition of the willing."

But in 1965, it had quite a different meaning. Especially when capitalized.

True. I was careful to capitalize the formal organization and not the earlier marriage of necessity. But the Axis and the Allies are traditionally capitalized, so I don't think there's necessarily anything sinister in that usage.

I watch a fair number of old movies, and for several years after the war, folks usually referred to the UNO -- United Nations Organization. I assume that was to distinguish it from the wartime united nations.

In your 1965 encyclopedia (or the encyclopedia you read in 1965, probably published years before, if your school library was like mine), for clarity's sake it probably should have said something like "...united nations, a group of countries that formed the basis for the modern UN."

30 posted on 10/24/2007 7:26:09 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Some members of the League which was implemented to stop wars were the ones who started wars to dominate their fellow members.

The League of Nations was feckless at best, no doubt.

In high school, I took a year of history via independent study. My thesis one quarter was: Could WWII have been avoided if the US had joined the League of Nations? My answer: No. Not even close. First, because the Versailles treaty was a textbook example of how to win the war and lose the peace. Second, because the LoN had no teeth; and third and most importantly, after WWI, most members of the League turned profoundly isolationist, as did the US. Europe tried to appease Hitler, and the US wanted no part of any of it.

31 posted on 10/24/2007 7:38:32 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Satan has been busy these last few decades............

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

32 posted on 10/24/2007 7:42:17 AM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway
I heard Alger Hiss give a lecture at Ohio University in the mid-70's, when I was a student there. Of course, this was just after Watergate when Nixon-bashing was at its peak.

Hiss avoided talking about his specific case and instead spoke in generalities about current foreign policy. When asked by a questioner about his case, Hiss went on about how the evidence they got on him was acquired illegally, blah, blah, blah.

He never came out and said "I was framed!", instead, he used lawyerly evasions to defend himself.

I walked away from that lecture convinced that Hiss was guilty of spying as accused.

33 posted on 10/24/2007 7:43:30 AM PDT by IndyTiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
Thank you very much, one of the outlaws in my family was the Ambassador to England before and during WWI.

I have 4 volumes of his life and letters and wanted to see any early ideas on the League even though he passed away long before it was started.

Without dragging them out I searched the inter net for him and found this website that have a selection of his life and letters.

http://net.lib.byu.edu/~rdh7/wwi/memoir/Page/Pagenotes.htm

I was so glad to find this, now I can seal them up to be safer.
And the website is so much faster to search and copy information.

34 posted on 10/24/2007 7:50:24 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo; thulldud
I'm embarrased to admit that I haven't read Witness. I've read plenty about Soviet spyrings and American communist activity in the postwar years, but never that book for some reason.

I've just logged into Amazon and have remedied that (I also purchased The Venona Secrets). Thanks.

35 posted on 10/24/2007 7:50:45 AM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

Except for Secretary of State Acheson, every US signer of the UN charter was a Communist.


36 posted on 10/24/2007 8:01:05 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

I took a piss this morning. Does that qualify?


37 posted on 10/24/2007 10:27:15 AM PDT by packrat35 (Politicians would be less worthless if they were edible, or useable for packing wheel bearings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packrat35
I took a dump this morning and in the process, I thought about the U.N. So I dedicated a "dump" in contempt to the U.N.

I took a piss this morning. Does that qualify?
38 posted on 10/24/2007 10:57:16 AM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: sandyeggo; VR-21

I read it aloud to my wife years ago. Chambers is on my short list of favorite writers, selected for their mastery of English and their clarity of thought.


40 posted on 10/25/2007 9:06:45 AM PDT by thulldud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: thulldud; sandyeggo
I look forward to it. I've been aware of the book for decades, but just never made the time.


42 posted on 10/25/2007 1:03:14 PM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson