Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

While one N.D. ethanol plant is closed, others are going ahead
Bismark Tribune ^ | Oct 22, 2007 - 04:00:47 CDT

Posted on 10/23/2007 10:20:11 AM PDT by drc43

FARGO (AP) - Work continues on three ethanol plants in North Dakota, despite a downturn in prices and the temporary shutdown of another plant.

Tharaldson Ethanol near Casselton and U.S. BioEnergy near Hankinson are to begin operations next year, to refine 100 million gallons of fuel a year from corn.

(Excerpt) Read more at bismarcktribune.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: ethanolenergy
One plant closes as others are being built? All is not well in the land of ethanol?
1 posted on 10/23/2007 10:20:14 AM PDT by drc43
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drc43

In my youth I worked construction on three large sunflower processing plants in ND. One was up and running for a year or two, the other two never were in production.


2 posted on 10/23/2007 10:21:49 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drc43

It must be easier to borrow money to build a plant than it is to borrow money to run a plant.


3 posted on 10/23/2007 10:24:27 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drc43

Ethanol Madness has subsided somewhat due to reality............


4 posted on 10/23/2007 10:26:11 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I think THIS will have much more impact on our oil dependency, IF it ever goes into production
5 posted on 10/23/2007 10:32:36 AM PDT by drc43 (Defeat is within our grasp... Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
100 million gallons goal means that they immediately get 54 million dollars from the federal government, and should they fail to reach their goal, their subsidy for the following year is reduced by the amount of the shortfall.

So you spend 25 million, you open a plant, you get paid 54 million, you produce maybe 20 million gallons of ethanol, your subsidy gets paid (20 million times .54 cents a gallon), you don’t have to pay back any money for the ethanol you didn’t produce, since your goal is still 100 million gallons, and you close up shop so you can register your next biofuel energy company and build the next plant.

Oh, wait, your budget to build the plant was 75 million, the state gave you 25 million to build it, the county forgave your taxes for two years, etc.

It’s a never ending scam, brought to you by your tax dollars.

6 posted on 10/23/2007 10:37:02 AM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: drc43

Don’t worry, in a couple of years from now the ethanol industry will seek a bailout from the government as a result of all the economic fallout to our economy.


7 posted on 10/23/2007 10:38:08 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drc43

more pollution than Gas. much more expensive to produce. Ethanol is a lose, lose situation.

Drill ANWR and strip mine the tar sands of Utah first.


8 posted on 10/23/2007 10:40:19 AM PDT by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Ethanol Madness”

That’s an awfully long pipeline, from North Dakota to Sen. Kennedy’s office.

;^)


9 posted on 10/23/2007 10:45:15 AM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

You forgot to mention that 1gal pure ETOH has less energy density
than the corresponding 1gal gasoline wrt/ release upon combustion.

MV


10 posted on 10/23/2007 10:46:12 AM PDT by madvlad ((Born in the south, raised around the globe and STILL republican))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: drc43
The companies building the plants are gambling on the cost of gasoline increasing in the future which will drive the market price of ethanol back up.

Considering that our consumption of gasoline keeps increasing, our refinery capacity is not increasing at the same rate, and our refineries are running at close to their maximum capacity, that seems like a pretty good bet.

The real questions are how soon will the price rise enough to make their business profitable, did they jump in too soon, and will some new technology make their plant obsolete before they start making a profit.

11 posted on 10/23/2007 10:48:17 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drc43
"A trip like this will give you an estimated 50 equivalent miles per gallon using gasoline. Driving range between fill-ups could be as much as an outstanding 640 miles."

It's already available (now only on the used market)- B4 VW Jetta with a Turbo-Dieseland a manual transmission. 50 mpg x 14.5 gallon tank --> 725 miles.

12 posted on 10/23/2007 10:57:48 AM PDT by Paladin2 (We don't fix the problem, we fix the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Who needs a pipeline? He’ll just drive.........


13 posted on 10/23/2007 11:09:46 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
What intriques me is that for commutes under 40 miles Round trip, NO gas is used. EVER. I know, it transfers this to the power grid.

But that can be dealt with via a wide variety of mechanisms, NONE of which involve OPEC.

I do not understand why THIS is not encouraged more, instead of the ethanol fiasco.

14 posted on 10/23/2007 11:10:28 AM PDT by drc43 (Defeat is within our grasp... Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: drc43

We don’t need stupid ethanol plants. We need more nuclear and coal plants.


15 posted on 10/23/2007 11:28:13 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drc43

I hope they all close down. This ethanol boom risks starving people in the third world from high food prices.


16 posted on 10/23/2007 11:30:11 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drc43
" ...to refine 100 million gallons of fuel a year from corn"

HURRAY! One third of a gallon per year for every man, woman and child in America!!! I can't wait to get mine!

17 posted on 10/23/2007 11:38:50 AM PDT by Mr.FixIt (Ethanol: Growing in four months what the U.S.A. burns in one day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.FixIt

That is just fron a couple plants, and the
ethanol plants in total will do over 7 billion
gal this year and much more next. Don’t believe the
crap being thrown at the ethanol industry.
And at present corn prices there is no gov
subsidy. Local tax breaks are given no matter
what type of factory or plant it is.Ed


18 posted on 10/23/2007 12:16:15 PM PDT by hubel458
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Balony- Milk in stores is up, and local farmers are
getting less now than few years ago. Corn growers in
Mexico complained we were dumping corn, putting them out of business, as there was too much. Cotton growers
in Africa the same complaint, of too much, to cheap putting them out of business. Here our corn growers
upped acreage 15%, cotton acreage replaced a lot of
that and there is still cotton surplus. Here in my
county, central Michigan, there is 40,000 acres
of weeds that could be used for producing fuel.
Just one county. One of 50 here that could crow
extra. Any high prices of food is just a scam
by middlemen who use erronious perceptions to
stick it to you. Ed.


19 posted on 10/23/2007 12:31:10 PM PDT by hubel458
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: drc43

Most people don’t care that the US imports tons of Islamic Oil. Avoiding same takes a greater investment than to do otherwise along with a strong desire to reduce use of imported oil.


20 posted on 10/23/2007 1:55:37 PM PDT by Paladin2 (We don't fix the problem, we fix the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: drc43

Ethanol is dead. there is a huge glut because they are making it faster than they can blend it.

Plus, BP is now going to butanol, as is ADM. They will wait till the plants go under and then buy them for a song to make butanol.


21 posted on 10/23/2007 1:58:22 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Fight the illegal Mexican colonizers & imperialist conquistadors! Long live the resistance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drc43

Maybe you could pedal a stationary bike all evening to charge a battery to allow you to drive (likely well under 40 mi/day) to work and avoid hooking up to the grid. Better yet, open a exercise gym and use the energy of others riding stationary bikes and treadmills to charge your battery.


22 posted on 10/23/2007 2:08:07 PM PDT by Paladin2 (We don't fix the problem, we fix the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

Not true- Some refiners refuse to use it and out
west the refiners add only MBPT which pollutes the
water and is a carcinogin. It is made in Canada
and they sure don’t have no trouble getting it
to Cal, Nev, Ore,etc. Who could be using ethanol from our
country.Butanol isn’t any better than ethanol
and ethanol setups won’t do butanol as easy.You don’t
even have to use the E-85, just blend 10% etahnol
in all gasoline.Even though it has little less BTUs
than gas it makes the other 90% burn cleaner thus
delivering more energy.That’s what these additives are for to get cleaner burn and less air polution.
There are 4 dumbfuck brands here not using
it and two that do, and we found better milage in our
older, larger vehicles using only ethanol 10%
blends.Ed


23 posted on 10/23/2007 2:35:24 PM PDT by hubel458
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hubel458

MTBE is pretty much phased out in favor of less polluting ethanol for it’s oxygenate properties.

Understand that there are issues with ethanol. It can’t be pipelined because of it’s affinity with water, and it has a high enough vapor pressure that it can’t be blended with gas without first pulling out the hexane, pentane, and other of the more vaporous substances in gasoline. It also has only 84K BTU per gallon v. 120K BTU for gasoline.

That is why oil companies are trying to go with butanol. It can be pipelined, blended with gasoline at any ratio without vapor issues, and it’s BTU per gallon is 104K. Even if it’s slightly more expensive to produce, what it saves refiners a bundle on the transport and blending, while still having oxygenate properties and delivering more BTU’s.

The only modification you’d need to an existing ethanol plant is that the butanol has to be constantly removed as the Clostridium bacteria can’t handle it in concentrations. The fermentation process is the same.

The move to butanol from ethanol has already begun. I think you will see alot of acquisitions by the big boys of failed plants.


24 posted on 10/23/2007 3:19:24 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Fight the illegal Mexican colonizers & imperialist conquistadors! Long live the resistance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: drc43

The problem is that there are so many ethanol plants, the price for the DDG cattle feed has hit rock bottom. So if you are in a place where you need to ship it, you can’t make any money.


25 posted on 10/24/2007 3:57:23 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drc43

We have barley enough power to keep the grid up. If there are a large amount of electric cars out there, the grid would fail.


26 posted on 10/24/2007 3:59:37 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hubel458; Tolerance Sucks Rocks
TSR, I think you have it a bit backwards.

There have been a lot of articles lately about the CHEAP price of US grain driving out the third world farmer, and thereby leading to starvation when the supply chain gets messed up. There was even a guy on NPR saying that the third world should unite and put huge tariffs on American grain to protect their own markets.

Yes, corn is up. It is now over what the price was per bushel in the 1970’s (and not much more). What other commodity is the same price range (not adjusted for inflation) for that time period?

Ethanol isn’t driving up the cost of steak and milk. If anything, it should have a slight downward price pressure (all that spent grain for feed is making cattle feed very cheap right now). But that isn’t the picture being painted by the MSM.

27 posted on 10/24/2007 4:04:47 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson