Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

C of E child abuse was ignored for decades
The Telegraph ^ | 21/10/2007 | Jonathan Wynne-Jones

Posted on 10/21/2007 1:21:12 AM PDT by managusta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: american colleen

“The reality is that child abuse/pedophilia is a sickness in one’s soul - married or not.”

absolutely. religious doctrine has nothing to do with it.


21 posted on 10/21/2007 7:19:33 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tiki

“Your problem is that you missed most of the conversation. Anyone who was there knew what the statement meant. It didn’t ignore anything.”

True, I’m commenting on this thread. I would have a similar reaction to anyone blaming Catholic doctrine for the problem. Still, why say it, except to get some sick pleasure out of a horrible situation.

Nobody in their right mind blamed rank-and-file Catholics, or Catholic doctrine for the molesters.


22 posted on 10/21/2007 7:25:09 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
If I might add something: Post #2 about priests and marriage shows me how shallow and facile our thinking has been about the church abuse.

Pedaphiles lurk amongst the married as well as the single. Now what? No simple generalizations will do here. Allowing priests to wed does not eliminate the problem.

How dismissive! See! It's a Catholic problem! Protestants marry! And Pride goeth before the Fall.

The Pointing finger needs to come in our direction. Ours, and anyone's who turned a blind eye, or looked away or pretended not to notice. People KNEW. The kids knew. And nothing happened.

So, society has done an about-face. Let the shrieking begin! But tell me: What have we learned?

23 posted on 10/21/2007 7:26:02 AM PDT by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tiki

“Your problem is that you missed most of the conversation. Anyone who was there knew what the statement meant. It didn’t ignore anything.”

Oh, and I hope the bureaucracy of the CoE pays the same price for enabling this to continue as the Catholic church bureaucracy did.

In the US, I’m sure they will.

The solution is to exclude gays from the priesthood and any other position of power or leadership in the church. The Catholic church may actually succeed in this. The ECUSA has glorified and institutionalized gays in the organization, but really, they’re barely Christian (being charitable here) as it is.

That’s why the Catholic church will survive and the ECUSA will not.


24 posted on 10/21/2007 7:31:53 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: doberville

“The Pointing finger needs to come in our direction. Ours, and anyone’s who turned a blind eye, or looked away or pretended not to notice. People KNEW. The kids knew. And nothing happened. “

Absolutely.


25 posted on 10/21/2007 7:35:12 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
You’re a sick pup.

That's beside the point.

My post was intended as sarcasm directed towards those who invariable attribute the homosexual predations of Catholic priests to the practice of celibacy in the Latin Rite. They pop up whenever there is a news article about some priest getting caught.

No offense at all was intended towards Anglicans, just towards ignorant liberal Catholics and other misinformed posters. Other informed Catholics would have spotted the sarcasm right off the bat and understood the post, so I confess to the sin of posting somewhat of an inside joke. And to being a sick puppy, LOL!

26 posted on 10/21/2007 10:00:07 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler ("A person's a person no matter how small." -Dr. Seuss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
Nobody in their right mind blamed rank-and-file Catholics, or Catholic doctrine for the molesters.

The problem is--that in that case there were, and are, a lot of people who weren't in their right mind, because it was and is extremely common to assume that the doctrine of celibacy of the priesthood was greatly to blame, and should be changed.

Although I think that priests should be allowed to marry, obviously the problem is a more general one--that pedophiles are attracted to positions of authority over children.
27 posted on 10/21/2007 10:05:22 AM PDT by Mariebl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: managusta

bump for publicity


28 posted on 10/21/2007 10:10:39 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: managusta

bump for publicity


29 posted on 10/21/2007 10:10:49 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Sorry if you are so blinded that you can’t see the truth. One of the DBM’s memes is that the Catholic sex scandal wss a result of celibacy driving solid men away. It’s clear that the root of (both) scandals is a lack of discipline and the freeing of normal constraints in the 1960s.


30 posted on 10/21/2007 3:05:20 PM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tioga

Are you blaming the victims by saying that their parents should have been more mindful of where they were spending their time?


31 posted on 10/21/2007 3:07:05 PM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sobieski

No, I am saying alarm bells went off for me and I told them no. I described it as “vatic” insight. I count myself blessed to have avoided that particular experience for my sons. Your assumptions are incorrect. Some dear friends of mine were not so lucky, I would NEVER judge them.


32 posted on 10/21/2007 3:27:12 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sobieski

“Sorry if you are so blinded that you can’t see the truth. One of the DBM’s memes is that the Catholic sex scandal wss a result of celibacy driving solid men away.”

DBM? not sure what that means.

I never said that about priests, nor is it even a reasonable argument, regardless of who or how many made it. Why did you even give that comment the time of day?

I just thought it a very odd comment on this thread.

The point is institutional changes have been made in the Catholic church. There will be no more “easy pickings” for gays there.

The CoE embraces gays, like the ECUSA, so, I suppose, there is no presumption that little boys won’t be molested by their clergy, so I guess mothers will protect their little boys from their clergy and it won’t be easy there either.


33 posted on 10/21/2007 4:16:45 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Drive-by Media. The assault on celibacy is far from over in the larger culture.


34 posted on 10/21/2007 4:25:28 PM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sobieski

“The assault on celibacy is far from over in the larger culture.”

If it was easy it would be meaningless


35 posted on 10/21/2007 4:41:08 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Without knowing the poster who made that comment, I think it was directed at those who blame doctrine for the sinners who break the doctrine. No one in their right mind would take any pleasure in this.

It isn’t the creed, but the homosexuals seeking positions of power (in any guise) who have created this problem.


36 posted on 10/21/2007 4:49:03 PM PDT by YCTHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gorzaloon

“Let us praise God. Oh Lord, oooh you are so big. So absolutely huge. Gosh, we’re all really impressed down here I can tell you. Forgive us, O Lord, for this dreadful toadying and barefaced flattery. But you are so strong and, well, just so super. Fantastic. Amen.” (Michael Palin as the chaplain in The Meaning of Life)

This one?


37 posted on 10/21/2007 6:42:29 PM PDT by Chickensoup (If it is not permitted, it is prohibited. Only the government can permit....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
This one?

I think the one I saw was on an early program. They probably liked it and adopted it later for the movie. I seem to remember some line like, "Thou slayest me with Thy bigness"...

I could be wrong, though..it has been decades.

38 posted on 10/22/2007 3:24:36 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (Food imported from China = "Cesspool + Flavor-Straw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


39 posted on 10/22/2007 6:16:35 AM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar; Huber

Ping


40 posted on 10/22/2007 6:17:27 AM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson