Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gore's Inconvenient 9/11 Truth
American Thinker ^ | October 18, 2007 | Denis Keohane

Posted on 10/19/2007 9:32:19 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 10/19/2007 9:32:23 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

fate

2 posted on 10/19/2007 9:38:02 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

LOL!


3 posted on 10/19/2007 9:41:54 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

To sum up, Gore is an egotistical moron.


4 posted on 10/19/2007 9:42:22 PM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“He must be able to critically sift through mountains of data, distinguish between reliable and unreliable climate models, and astutely analyze volumes of esoteric scientific reports and studies to determine with something like crystal clarity what will most assuredly happen in the future.”

I think we ought to look for examples Albert Arnold’s judgement and professed concern for the very survival of the planet, not to mention it’s inhabitants.

Beside Vice President Gore’s ‘ice tea memory’ and temple fundraising/outreach, how about something that has a direct bearing on our present face-off with Iran, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Russia and Turkmenistan and China. It doesn’t get as much coverage of Britney Spears or The Girls Next Door, but our Nobel Peace winning Albert Arnold was a real good negotiator, especially when it’s negotiated in ‘secret’, even if it violated HIS OWN LAW:-)

October 23, 2000

Gore Alleged to Have Violated Law He Authored
Senate to Probe Vice President’s
Secret Deals on Russian Arms to Iran
On Wednesday, October 25, the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations will begin hearings to probe recent press reports that Vice President Al Gore and then Russian Prime Minister Victor Chernomyrdin made a secret agreement five years ago in which the Vice President promised that the Clinton Administration would not enforce a U.S. law requiring sanctions for Russian weapons sales to Iran. That agreement has all the hallmarks of a secret treaty, although it was never submitted to the Senate. At the minimum, the secret deal constitutes an international agreement which should have been submitted pursuant to the Case-Zablocki Act (1 U.S.C. 112b), which requires the Secretary of State to transmit to Congress the text of all international agreements, other than treaties, within 60 days after such agreements enter into force.
To date, the Clinton-Gore Administration has refused Congressional requests to submit documents related to the deal; yet portions of one important document, a 12-page agreement signed by Gore and Chernomyrdin in which the Vice President commits the United States to “avoid any penalties to Russia that might otherwise arise under domestic law,” appeared in the October 17, 2000, edition of the Washington Times. The final paragraph of this document reads, “This aide memoire, as well as the attached annexes, will remain strictly confidential.”
New York Times Breaks Story
The secret Gore-Chernomyrdin agreement, and the Clinton-Gore Administration’s promise not to implement U.S. laws requiring sanctions for Russian weapons proliferation to Iran, was first reported in the New York Times on October 13, 2000:
“The 1995 agreement allowed Moscow to fulfill existing sales contracts for specified weaponry, including a diesel submarine, torpedoes, anti-ship mines and hundreds of tanks and armored personnel carriers. But no other weapons were to be sold to Iran, and all shipments were to have been completed by last December 31.
“In exchange for the Russian promises, the United States pledged not to seek penalties against Russia under a 1992 law that requires sanctions against countries that sell advanced weaponry to countries the State Department classifies as state sponsors of terrorism. Iran is on that list.”
The law referenced above is the 1992 Iran-Iraq Non-Proliferation Act (P.L. 102-484), sponsored by then Senator Al Gore, along with Senator John McCain. This law requires the President to impose sanctions on countries that sell advanced weaponry or assist in nuclear weapons programs in countries sponsoring terrorism. Russian cooperation with Iran’s nuclear program was a major concern behind enactment of that legislation.
Transfer of Equipment Meets Threshold for Sanctions
Pursuant to the 1995 agreement, the Clinton-Gore Administration would appear to have acquiesced in the transfer to Iran of sophisticated Russian weaponry. Specifically, Iran has taken delivery of advanced combat aircraft and T-72 main battle tanks. Further, Russia has allegedly transferred a variety of surface-to-air missiles, including shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles which are akin to Stingers. Most significantly, Russia has supplied three KILO-class diesel submarines to Iran, together with advanced “wake-homing” torpedoes and anti-ship mines. The White House has tried to downplay the impact of the Vice President’s deal with Victor Chernomyrdin by arguing that the weaponry transferred was “antiquated.”
However, according to most naval experts, KILO-class submarines are anything but antiquated. The submarines sold to Iran are difficult to detect and track in the shallow waters of the Persian Gulf because they generate very little noise when operating on battery power. In event of a crisis, Iran’s KILO-class submarines would pose a threat to U.S. forces, allied vessels, and merchant traffic. Because Iran is also acquiring surface-to-air missiles and anti-ship cruise missiles from Russia and China, U.S. anti-submarine warfare assets would find their ability to operate against the KILO-class submarines heavily circumscribed during the initial phases of a crisis. Thus, Russia has provided Iran with a significant military capability which poses a direct threat to U.S. ships in the region. As such, these transfers meet the threshold for sanctions under the so-called Gore-McCain Act.
Even Secretary of State Admits Sanctions Should Have Been Imposed
Recently, a spokesman for the Vice President defended Gore’s actions, claiming that “none of the weapons included in the agreement met the standard for triggering sanctions under the Gore-McCain law.” But Secretary of State Madeleine Albright clearly has a different opinion. In a secret letter uncovered by the Washington Times, and sent last January to Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov, the Secretary of State admitted, “Without the aide memoire, Russia’s conventional arms sales to Iran would have been subject to sanctions based on various provisions of our laws” [10/18/00]. Secretary Albright’s comments seem to indicate a clear commitment was given by the Vice President to ignore domestic sanctions laws.
Secret Agreement May Also Involve Nuclear Cooperation with Iran
Vice President Gore’s meetings with Chernomyrdin also may have involved Russia’s nuclear transactions with Iran. Classified documents obtained recently by the Washington Times contained a December 9, 1995, letter written by Mr. Chernomydrin to Vice President Gore with details on Russia’s deal with Iran to build a nuclear reactor. The Russian prime minister downplays the likelihood that Russian assistance to Iran’s nuclear program would assist Tehran’s radical anti-American regime — a sponsor of terrorism designated by the U.S. State Department — to achieve a nuclear weapons capability, and insists such information be kept from Congress:
“ ‘The information that we are passing on to you is not to be conveyed to third parties, including the U.S. Congress,’ Mr. Chernomyrdin said. ‘Open information concerning our cooperation with Iran is obviously a different matter, and we do not object to the constructive use of such information. I am counting on your understanding.’ “ [Washington Times, 10/17/00]
The secret arrangements between Mr. Gore and Mr. Chernomyrdin mostly took place in the context of a channel of communication known as the Gore-Chernomyrdin Commission, which began in 1993 and was conducted in twice-yearly meetings until Mr. Chernomyrdin was removed by former Russian president Boris Yeltsin in 1998. This channel appears to have served as a conduit for information and pledges regarding Russia’s proliferation behavior that were never disclosed to Congress despite a variety of U.S. laws.
Agreements Contradict Gore’s Stand on Proliferation
The secret agreements between Gore and Chernomyrdin contradict Clinton’s and Gore’s concerns that, “We need an administration that will produce action, not just promises, to stop the spread of dangerous missiles in the Middle East. We need a strong international effort and tough sanctions to keep weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of tyrants like those in Iran, Iraq, Libya and Syria” [Putting People First: How We Can All Change America, 1992, p. 125].
http://www.senate.gov/~rpc/releases/1999/df102300.htm


5 posted on 10/19/2007 9:52:48 PM PDT by dgallo51 (DEMAND IMMEDIATE, OPEN INVESTIGATIONS OF U.S. COMPLICITY IN RWANDAN GENOCIDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan
Al Gore, we are to believe, has the technical acumen to analyze complex data, assess risks, and identify the right countermeasures.

Of course he can do all of this, he invented the internet after all. /sarc

6 posted on 10/19/2007 9:55:04 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Furthermore:

-toward the end of their administration, Gore and Clinton pressed the issue and spend billions to wire schools for the internet despite the real computer experts saying, : “Excuse me but wireless network technology is here and soon will be widely used and so hard wiring is not necessary” - “ Hello? Hello? Listen to us! You need not spend that kind of money on wiring schools! Hello? Leading experts in the field here- Listen to me”

Promptly ignored…
And the same pattern follows with global warming


7 posted on 10/19/2007 10:02:46 PM PDT by DanielRedfoot ("Contrarianism" is Creativity for the Untalented)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Nobel laureate Al Gore, we are to believe, has the technical acumen to analyze complex data, assess risks, and identify the right countermeasures...and so on...

The author is making a ridiculous argument. That is, (egoist) Al Gore, like Yasar Arafat, won the Nobel Peace Prize - not in Physics, Chemistry, Medicine, or Economics.

In short, what the author should have done is argue how Gore's topic of "global warming" is not a current major issue in terms of Global Peace and thus irrelevant in the context of winning a Nobel Peace Prize.

8 posted on 10/19/2007 10:36:02 PM PDT by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

About the only truth in Gore’s movie is that there IS weather on the earth. Other than that, it’s just propaganda.


9 posted on 10/19/2007 10:38:44 PM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

The empty magazine well on that M16 clearly demonstrates Mr Gore’s credibility.


10 posted on 10/19/2007 10:39:57 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf

AGW™ ping


11 posted on 10/20/2007 5:15:48 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

Ping me if you find one I've missed.


hmmm...
12 posted on 10/20/2007 5:41:49 AM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic
In short, what the author should have done is argue how Gore's topic of "global warming" is not a current major issue in terms of Global Peace and thus irrelevant in the context of winning a Nobel Peace Prize.

I can do that, easily.

Gore's premise that climate change will increase the strains on international relations is incorrect.

Warming of the earth results in longer growing seasons, additional food yields, hence less pressure on populations stricken with famine and hunger.

Additonal food yields will produce more possibilities for alternative fuels such as ethanol from various sources, reducing our dependence on oil.....again reducing the international stresses that lead to war.

Therefore, global warming is good for peace and stopping it will promte war.

13 posted on 10/20/2007 5:55:58 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

“To sum up, Gore is an egotistical moron.”

Do they give an award for that?


14 posted on 10/20/2007 5:57:14 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dgallo51
Recently, a spokesman for the Vice President defended Gore’s actions, claiming that “none of the weapons included in the agreement met the standard for triggering sanctions under the Gore-McCain law.” But Secretary of State Madeleine Albright clearly has a different opinion. In a secret letter uncovered by the Washington Times, and sent last January to Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov, the Secretary of State admitted, “Without the aide memoire, Russia’s conventional arms sales to Iran would have been subject to sanctions based on various provisions of our laws” [10/18/00]. Secretary Albright’s comments seem to indicate a clear commitment was given by the Vice President to ignore domestic sanctions laws.

Why, what was in it for him? Russia donating to his Presidential campaign? There has got to be something in it for him to override sanctions with his name on it. And why didn't McCain start shouting from the rooftops, since he was running for Pres too??

15 posted on 10/20/2007 6:23:28 AM PDT by thirst4truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

Al Gore is NOT the problem. It’s his followers that are.


16 posted on 10/20/2007 6:51:43 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Life was better when cigarette companies could advertise and lawyers could not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
Al Gore is NOT the problem. It’s his followers that are.

Precisely...

Billy Clinton is another example. Had people not voted for him once, let alone twice, despite the evidence of his immoral character and ruthless gangster type control of things, he would have eventually shriveled away into nothing.

The voters released the monster and provided the cover for it's growth.

17 posted on 10/20/2007 8:22:49 AM PDT by SteamShovel (Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thirst4truth

“Why, what was in it for him? Russia donating to his Presidential campaign? There has got to be something in it for him to override sanctions with his name on it. And why didn’t McCain start shouting from the rooftops, since he was running for Pres too??”

Why indeed? Why are you the only one asking those questions? Not unimportant questions, given the current climate, but how about that Britney?


18 posted on 10/20/2007 10:10:51 AM PDT by dgallo51 (DEMAND IMMEDIATE, OPEN INVESTIGATIONS OF U.S. COMPLICITY IN RWANDAN GENOCIDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
Al Gore is NOT the problem. It’s his followers that are.

Gore has no followers, he is a follower. He follows the dictates of international Communism and works in concert with others with the same goal, socialism morphing into full blown Communism.

Global warming is the vehicle to control business activity. National Health Care is the vehicle for controlling individuals. Trial lawyers control our freedom by limiting the things people and companies are willing to do. Add to that the labor unions who help the others fund the Democrat Party and the media working as their propaganda arm and they have a pretty neat set up.

That is why it is important that all Americans become as diligent as freepers in this fight for our country.

19 posted on 10/20/2007 10:19:19 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“Gore has now been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, which has been given twice this decade as a sort of consolation prize to incompetent Democrats mired in grand delusions of their own greatness.”
Outstanding conclusion...you only left out the substantial research offered by searching “density of wood” and “Gore” in any (non-communist) search engine!


20 posted on 10/20/2007 10:32:18 AM PDT by CRBDeuce (an armed society is a polite society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson