Skip to comments.
Anti-Jewish Attacks in US, Columnist Suggests Jews be Christians--Thank You, Ann Coulter
Arutz Sheva ^
| 10-14-07
Posted on 10/14/2007 7:45:16 AM PDT by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261-271 last
To: Idaho Whacko
The former head of Planned Parenthood made a big deal of her Jewishness when she promoted a Christmas card that said "Choice on Earth"--drawing an inference that Mary should have gotten an abortion.
But the most frustrating of the prominent Jews is Alan Dershowitz. He comes out with all these pro-Israel essays and then does all he can to get Hillary elected. Does anyone think Hillary will lift a finger to help Israel?
To: toddlintown
ok ann yapping her face in NYC also a sign of jewish weakness in NYC. That’s true too. Jews in New York are like WASPS in NYC in 1907.
262
posted on
10/15/2007 8:53:33 PM PDT
by
ckilmer
To: Idaho Whacko
(The percentage) of self-identified Jews (who) actually are agnostic or atheist...probably reaches 50%, but that is just a guess. As long as you're guessing, why not say 90%? It makes your argument so much stronger. But Ann was not talking to the atheist Jews; she was talking to the observant Jews. An atheist Jew is not a good candidate for conversion to Christianity or any other religion. But a devout Jew loves his religion, and for Ann Coulter to state that his faith is inferior is needlessly unkind--not to mention dumb.
263
posted on
10/15/2007 11:05:54 PM PDT
by
giotto
To: giotto
How do you know she was talking about observant Jews? Are you a mind reader? Or it is convenient to say because it suits you?
You sound like a typical Jewish Lawyer.
To: AmericanVictory
“All through this show, Klein displayed an astonishing total ignorance of the size and influence of the Jihadi movement, ...” -—American Victory
He has an obvious ignorance of the history of fundamental Christianity in America, too, and its influence on the course of our nation through the generations. He has probably never read anything on the Great Awakening, the Second Great Awakening, the Chicago and St. Louis revival periods, etc. --- JL
“All that seems to be relevant, according to such individuals, is that Christians should be intimidated into not exercising their right of free speech to try and convert others by speaking out to them of Jesus as the Son of the Living God who reaches out to them through love.” ---American Victory
And so, speaking in love, we should not be intimidated, but evangelize with all the more zeal. At present the efforts of the Body of Christ can in no way compare to those of the fundamentalist evangelistic and missionary movements between 1890 and 1940. ---JL
To: SJackson
You might want to read the New Testament more carefully. She is stating its essential message in contemporary language. We are saved by Faith, not be the Law. If we attempt to perfect ourselves by adherence to the law we fall farther from it because of our nature. Christ came to give us the capability of being saved even though we cannot be perfect.
266
posted on
10/16/2007 9:58:41 AM PDT
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
To: AmericanVictory
You might want to read the New Testament more carefully. She is stating its essential message in contemporary language. We are saved by Faith, not be the Law. If we attempt to perfect ourselves by adherence to the law we fall farther from it because of our nature. Christ came to give us the capability of being saved even though we cannot be perfect. That's fine, but she's tying her beliefs, which is irrelevant, to the Republican Party, as an image of a perfect America. That's not fine, it provides both an avenue of legitimate criticism to the extent Ann is linked to the GOP, imo not at all, and a defense for the left when attacked over groups like moveon.
267
posted on
10/16/2007 10:39:36 AM PDT
by
SJackson
(every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
To: Idaho Whacko
How do you know she was talking about observant Jews? I don't. I deduced from the facts I've already mentioned: Jewish atheists are poor candidates for conversion, and in fact they're not even Jews in the religious sense. So to talk about perfecting them by converting to Christianity is absurd for both reasons. Therefore she must have been talking about observant Jews.
You sound like a typical Jewish Lawyer.
No, I'm only an artist, but I'll take that as a compliment.
268
posted on
10/16/2007 3:46:03 PM PDT
by
giotto
To: giotto
Oh, a Jewish Artist, not nearly as liberal as a Jewish Lawyer...
To: Idaho Whacko
270
posted on
10/16/2007 8:04:35 PM PDT
by
giotto
To: SJackson
She is not saying that there could be a perfect America.
271
posted on
10/16/2007 9:10:41 PM PDT
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261-271 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson