Posted on 10/07/2007 11:53:36 PM PDT by jdm
We have a plane that is the successor to the U-2 that does this, and it flies too high and too fast to shoot down or catch.==
Russia too has missiles which goes the sinusoide path on hypersomic speeds in the stratosphere. Anyway the new russian airaircraft missiles catch them. Simple if AA missile goes 1 km/sec no airplane may get away of it. But even 20 years old S-200 could do it. That is why United States did never send no aircraft over Soviet Union.
Modern Russian S-400 missiles can go 3-5 km/sec in stratosphere. So you see.
Accualy new american ABM missiles may do same speed like S-400. SO no wonder that no airplane can get away.
The technology that our governments have available is way beyond most people’s comprehension, ==
But what if dish connected with targeting computer by optical wire or coaxial cable as it is in the russian AA eqiupment. How you would tamper in it?
Computers do what you tell them to do, if you know how to tell them. Believe me. I have spent most of my career making computers do exactly what I am asked to make them do.==
I work in IT too. And I know that if you do not know the command structure then you can’t do nothing. Simply the military computer won’t understand you. But in those military OS even command structure is the secret. And it is changed time to time. The all internal trafik is encrypted so as the data on the hard memory. You can do nothing.
If possible, it is no doubt classified. I remember hearing rumors around 20 years ago about how Russian spys could read a Magnetic Disk drive from outside a building. I think it had something to do with RF frequencies and/or noise bleeding around. Don't know how you could write on a magnetic disk drive remotely. But man the problems that could cause. Yikes.
I remember hearing rumors around 20 years ago about how Russian spys could read a Magnetic Disk drive from outside a building. ==
Fairy tales for sure:). One friend once worked into the so called “post box”. It is the jargon nick for secret research intitute. He told that they had there the metallic net inserted into glass of thier windows! It is for shielding any radio band. Not mention those windows were tri-packed and had special rough covering to refuse the laser reflection. To read the data from thier disks one can if he was been doing the reading sitting before display in thier display room. From outside it was impossible ever. Not mentioning thier computers were not connected to no network. And thier displays has no writing devices in it.
Correct. Just like viruses that tell you “critical system error” when you don’t really have any such thing. They are made to appear “real”, but are only BS to trick you into purchasing software that just invades your system even further.
Smoke and mirrors.
If you beam a radar wave at me, when it bounces back, your equipment provides a profile of the returning waveform and the profile’s deformation is seen by the operator and interpreted.
What if I absorb the wave so it does not return? Or I return it with deformations that do not give a large enough or recognizable profile???
We aren’t ‘jamming’ their signals, we are just changing what they think they see.
“think it had something to do with RF frequencies and/or noise bleeding around.”
Very perceptive. That is why DOD computer rooms have shielding.
Rus, Dwolfe
As I’m reading this it would appear that the raid used a combination of tactics.
The Datastream that is mentioned may well have been a sidelobe injection to misdirect the analog systems.
the analog systems are more prone to getting hit by this.
doing the similar trick to a digital system entails literally getting inside of the other guys controll systems.
The reason the Syrians and Iraninans are pissed is it appears, key appears, that the raid was pulled with some combination of bunnies out of an unspecified hat.
The Russians tend to build reliable battlefield stuff but and here is the real drag they are hitting again,
against NATO std, western stuff the stuff doesn’t get the job done.
r
We aren’t ‘jamming’ their signals, we are just changing what they think they see.==
If you arenot completely radio black (nonreflecting) then together with your fake signal the radar will get its own genuine reflected signal. It will be difficult but the radar computer may solve the problem to find the real signal. Radar will think that your fake signal is just a electromagnetic noise.
Secondly the passive radio home device of the AA missile may home on any kind of the radio signal ever. SO if your e-ware transmitter on the airplane will just emit the fake signals for radar it will be enough for the homing device to take the direction for missile. And anyways your e-airplane will not avoid the missile. It is sitting duck:).
And yet,
the IDF and American support snuck in totally undetected and bombed the heck out of the base in Syria.
the IDF and American support snuck in totally undetected and bombed the heck out of the base in Syria.==
That is why I think that Syrians were shy to shoot down the american e-war airplane. This won’t work in the real war.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.