Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HilLIARy resigns from U.S. senate to run for president
BrainyHistory ^ | June 11 1996 | brainyhistory

Posted on 10/04/2007 10:10:00 AM PDT by Mr. K

June 11, 1996 in History

Event: Bob Dole, Sen-R-KS, resigns from U.S. senate to run for president


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: piginapantsuit
Oh wait... that was Bob Dole...

And if I remember correctly he was hounded by democraps to do it...

1 posted on 10/04/2007 10:10:03 AM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Oh great, then Eliot Spitoon can appoint himself to the Senate......


2 posted on 10/04/2007 10:11:51 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
LBJ had the law changed in Texas only for him so he ran both for Texas Senator and Vice President on the same ballot!
3 posted on 10/04/2007 10:13:24 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

where are the democraps clamoring for her to resign like they did Dole?


4 posted on 10/04/2007 10:14:21 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
LBJ had the law changed in Texas only for him so he ran both for Texas Senator and Vice President on the same ballot!

Lloyd Bentson did the same thing in 1988 and Joe Lieberman did the same thing in 2000 (though in Connecticut).

5 posted on 10/04/2007 10:15:18 AM PDT by VRWCmember (Fred Thompson 2008! Taking America Back for Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Accuracy is important. Dole was hounded to resign as minority leader. He surprised everyone by resigning from the senate in total.


6 posted on 10/04/2007 10:15:44 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

And what about the NY voters that she assured she would serve her full term? That is the question I would like to hear asked.


7 posted on 10/04/2007 10:16:07 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Heh heh! More likely we'll see this headline:

Hillary wins Presidency - Decides to Keep Senate Seat Also
"Too much good I can still do for the little people by holding both offices."

;)

8 posted on 10/04/2007 10:18:58 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Joe Liberman did not resign from the Senate, and he was running for the dRAT VP slot behind Gore.


9 posted on 10/04/2007 10:20:03 AM PDT by IrishMike (Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

He’d much rather wait for Hitlery to appoint him AG.


10 posted on 10/04/2007 10:20:14 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (If You Support America - Thank a Soldier; If You Support Al-Qaeda - Thank a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doodad
And what about the NY voters that she assured she would serve her full term? That is the question I would like to hear her asked.

One of the reasons why she got 600,00+ fewer votes this last time around...

And here are three other questions for her:

1) Would she reauthorize the EO banning assassination?

2) Would she put the Gorelick wall back in place?

3) Would she try to repeal the Patriot Act?

11 posted on 10/04/2007 10:22:57 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Hillary wins Presidency - Decides to Keep Senate Seat Also "Too much good I can still do for the little people by holding both offices."

Hillary appoints herself to SCOTUS, thus completing a rare trifecta...

12 posted on 10/04/2007 10:25:08 AM PDT by rfp1234 (Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

He could appoint himself Senator and then wait for the AG nod...Resume enhancements, don’tcha know.......


13 posted on 10/04/2007 10:25:54 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Senator Joe Lieberman ran for BOTH the Senate and as Gore’s VP in the same election.


14 posted on 10/04/2007 10:28:25 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Bob ‘Its My Turn, Damnit!’ Dole is the primary reason Bill Clinton got a second term.

And his decision gave us the worlds only living spine donor, Trent Lott, as SML during the impeachment mess, which Lott refused to address responsibly.


15 posted on 10/04/2007 10:30:17 AM PDT by Badeye (So much for the faux tri athlete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doodad

Actually she was slick with that one. She said that in 2000 she would serve her full term, which she did to 2006. In 2006 she did not make that same claim.


16 posted on 10/04/2007 10:32:37 AM PDT by bird4four4 (Behead those who suggest Islam is violent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I once made a run for the County Line. I had my entire hometown behind me...;-)


17 posted on 10/04/2007 10:32:49 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
One of the reasons why she got 600,00+ fewer votes this last time around...

Why you keep pimping this meaningless factoid is beyond me. The point is that Hillary got a MUCH HIGHER PERCENTAGE of the vote in 2006 than 2000. That's what counts.

You're painting this misleading picture that Hillary has gotten weaker - not stronger - since 2000, when all evidence points to the contrary.

18 posted on 10/04/2007 10:35:46 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Kerry set the standard for that.

Democrats don’t resign from ANYTHING, anymore.

Laws and rules that apply to the rest of us Sheeple, simply do not apply to National Democrats anymore, they have risen above them...


19 posted on 10/04/2007 10:40:22 AM PDT by tcrlaf (You can lead a Liberal to LOGIC, but you can't make it THINK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Why you keep pimping this meaningless factoid is beyond me. The point is that Hillary got a MUCH HIGHER PERCENTAGE of the vote in 2006 than 2000. That's what counts.

She wanted a record turnout to boost her run for prez. She didn't get it.

You're painting this misleading picture that Hillary has gotten weaker - not stronger - since 2000, when all evidence points to the contrary.

She has gotten weaker. And I'll ping you with this post after Election Day :)

20 posted on 10/04/2007 10:40:34 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bird4four4

I remember her making the same claim in 2006 (I thought). I seem to remember speculation and even derision that she would pull that.


21 posted on 10/04/2007 10:44:33 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

She won’t resign the Senate seat.

If her presidential aspirations are foiled, she will unseat Reid and become Senate Majority leader.


22 posted on 10/04/2007 10:47:30 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I once made a run for the County Line. I had my entire hometown behind me...;-)

LOL!

23 posted on 10/04/2007 10:47:54 AM PDT by American Quilter (Keep this great conservative web site going--donate to FreeRepublic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Hillary

2000 > Wins with 55% of the vote

Hillary

2006 > Wins with 67% of the vote

Don’t final percentages count more than number of votes themselves?

In the earlier scenario she scored just over HALF THE VOTE; in the latter (more recent, mind you) scenario she scored MORE THAN 2/3 OF THE VOTE.

How is she getting weaker?

The trend is not in our favour. If you believe the trend is in our favor, how do you figure?

That 600,000 or 700,000 less figure from 2000 is a hollow statistic, IMHO.

And how can we predict turnout in ‘08? IMO, it’s pointless to compare her turnout in ‘06/’00 to ‘08 since two turnouts were for Senator and the other (future one) will be for POTUS.


24 posted on 10/04/2007 10:51:33 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jdm

I live in NYS. I’m just telling you what I see :)


25 posted on 10/04/2007 10:55:20 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51

Majority leader


26 posted on 10/04/2007 11:05:18 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I live in NYS. I’m just telling you what I see :)

I also live in NYS, and I'm not sure what you see or where you see it. Regarding Hillary's lower vote total in 2006, the TOTAL votes cast in that election were nearly 2.3 million fewer than in 2000. A lot of people--both Democrats and Republicans--stayed home because they knew Hillary and Spitzer were both going to win in runaways.

And the latest poll from Quinnipiac (insert obligatory "any poll that doesn't say what I want it to say is a Democrat plot" rant here) has Hillary beating Giuliani in New York by 52-41 percent. So either a whole bunch of upstate New Yorkers are in favor of Hillary, or the folks in New York City who supposedly love Rudy for saving them from crime and for his heroic leadership after 911 don't really like him all that much.
27 posted on 10/04/2007 11:12:13 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy
If the GOP nominates a RINO, Hillie might stand a chance.

Let's hope the GOP doesn't nominate a RINO.

28 posted on 10/04/2007 11:14:01 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy; jdm

Limbaugh’s talking about this very subject right now :)


29 posted on 10/04/2007 11:17:14 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"HilLIARy resigns from U.S. senate to run for president "

Ratzzzz... I thought ya were series. :)

30 posted on 10/04/2007 11:19:04 AM PDT by ~Kim4VRWC's~ (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

No Spitzer will appoint Bill to the Senate.


31 posted on 10/04/2007 11:24:14 AM PDT by SgtSki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SgtSki

That’s an idea I hadn’t considered. But, would he? Appointing himself would be very tempting..............


32 posted on 10/04/2007 11:28:51 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Is he agreeing with you or me? :) I can’t listen right now, unfortunately.


33 posted on 10/04/2007 11:31:45 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

If only his major constiuency, the deceased, had been accomplished enough submit write in ballots, LBJ would not have HAD to modify the law.

But alas it was all they could do to “show up” at the polls in alphabetical order.


34 posted on 10/04/2007 11:40:39 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rod1
I did not vote in that election because I was not 21 even though I had finished 3 years Regular Army and 2 years of college!
35 posted on 10/04/2007 11:52:53 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rod1

If you can find the book “A Texan Looks At Lyndon, A stuy in Illegitimate power” by J. Evetts Haley, please read it.

Copyright 1964 by J. Evetts Haley.


36 posted on 10/04/2007 12:20:06 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

"We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society.”

"It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, for the few, and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity."

"We can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."

"We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own turf in order to create this common ground."

"I certainly think the free market has failed."

"I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector [oil] in the entire economy, that they are being watched."

"What I want to do is take those profits and apply them to alternative energy."

Karl Marx or Frederick Engels said none of these things; Hillary Clinton said them all.

See here for more gems from Hillary:

http://www.nohillaryclinton.com/info/movies/quotes/index.htm

37 posted on 10/04/2007 1:12:06 PM PDT by rllngrk33 (The RATs and Media are the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rllngrk33

very very nice set of quotes!

there is one i have been trying to find for a while where se said “this capitalist system of ours has failed”

She also said something about killing old people once becuase they cost so much money in health care...


38 posted on 10/05/2007 12:14:46 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
She also said something about killing old people once becuase they cost so much money in health care...

If you can find a source and the exact quote, I'll add it to my list.

39 posted on 10/06/2007 8:28:12 PM PDT by rllngrk33 (The RATs and Media are the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

And Lloyd Bentsen used the same law in 1988.


40 posted on 10/06/2007 8:31:05 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson